ライフサイエンスコーパス: dermatology

1 lications for this technique in the field of dermatology.

2 tools can be applied to drug development in dermatology.

3 consultation for improving patient access to dermatology.

4 ould be considered as potential new drugs in dermatology.

5 n to age and treatments in a local clinic of dermatology.

6 diagnostic, and therapeutic interventions in dermatology.

7 bservational studies have important roles in dermatology.

8 sciplines: cell biology, mouse genetics, and dermatology.

9 ures were performed in the specialty area of dermatology.

10 asting impact of study in Europe on American dermatology.

11 estigators across multiple fields, including dermatology.

12 ed to achieve universal imaging standards in dermatology.

13 r this new and dynamic era of data intensive dermatology.

14 highlighting recent studies in the field of dermatology.

15 se series from a private practice (Hollywood Dermatology), 2 patients presented for dermatologic proc

16 agement published by the American Academy of Dermatology 2014 work group were compared with those cre

17 ics of each product (eg, American Academy of Dermatology [AAD] criteria, sun protection factor [SPF],

18 QI assessment tools.Journal of Investigative Dermatology accepted article preview online, 08 October

19 e PAR2-TSLP pathway.Journal of Investigative Dermatology accepted article preview online, 22 Septembe

20 applications in man.Journal of Investigative Dermatology accepted article preview online, 22 Septembe

21 d cancer resistance.Journal of Investigative Dermatology accepted article preview online, 30 Septembe

22 advanced cSCC carried out in 1 department of dermatology and 2 departments of medical oncology in Fra

23 ed by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology and Dermatology Times, respectively.

24 Tertiary allergy, dermatology and paediatric units in 10 European countrie

25 pendent, self-selected academic and military dermatology and plastic surgery physicians with extensiv

26 between 2006 and 2009 from the Department of Dermatology and Rheumatology at the Radboud University M

27 ated with MMS or WLE per standard of care in dermatology and surgery (general surgery, otolaryngology

28 arity with the Practice Gaps section of JAMA Dermatology, and 56% discuss these commentaries during r

29 rd of Dermatology, Society for Investigative Dermatology, and American Academy of Dermatology,point t

30 rral centers, as well as several pneumology, dermatology, and internal medicine departments.

31 ciety for Allergology, Society for Pediatric Dermatology, and World Allergy Organization.

32 were all outpatients from the department of dermatology at Bispebjerg Hospital.

33 ive study was conducted at the department of dermatology at Ghent University Hospital between Februar

34 ts with advanced cancer who were referred to dermatology at Yale-New Haven Hospital, a tertiary care

35 conducted in a tertiary referral center for dermatology between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 20

36 delphia, with Albert Kligman and then to the Dermatology Branch at the National Institutes of Health

37 re published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology, but many articles from the broader scientif

38 studies took the fields of cell biology and dermatology by storm in providing the first credible evi

39 eledermatology appeared to improve access to dermatology care among Medicaid enrollees and played an

40 Follow-up in a specialized transplant dermatology center and baseline total-body skin examinat

41 hart review of all PLC visits at an academic dermatology center from October 2010 to January 2012.

42 cal trial of 30 patients from the outpatient dermatology center of Tufts Medical Center, enrolled fro

43 d evaluated at an academic tertiary referral dermatology center.

44 trial in a single-center outpatient academic dermatology center.

45 study was performed in 2 academic outpatient dermatology centers and 1 private dermatology practice.

46 tudinal Assessment and Registry [PSOLAR]) at dermatology centers.

47 r of pigmented lesion clinic (PLC) visits at dermatology centers.

48 rapy, were enrolled from 122 investigational dermatology centres worldwide.

49 to prednisolone from 54 UK and seven German dermatology centres.

50 ital Oakland, Columbia University outpatient dermatology clinic (NY, USA) and a private practice outp

51 Hershey Dermatology Clinic and an online survey site.

52 015, in a tertiary referral center pediatric dermatology clinic and in 2 private consultant rooms of

53 among 40 patient-parent dyads at a pediatric dermatology clinic at the Children's Hospital of Philade

54 citrant HHD were evaluated in the outpatient dermatology clinic at the Cleveland Clinic.

55 -week period at a tertiary referral academic dermatology clinic at The Hospital for Sick Children in

56 ll participants were recruited from a single dermatology clinic between April and May 2014.

57 Of these, 420 patients were evaluated in the dermatology clinic for biopsy-proven NMSC of the head an

58 is seen at a tertiary care center outpatient dermatology clinic from June 2011 through October 2012.

59 edical records from an outpatient university dermatology clinic identified patients with an acne diag

60 en September 10, 2010, and May 6, 2016, in a dermatology clinic in an academic medical center.

61 months during 2013 and 2014 at an outpatient dermatology clinic in Chicago, Illinois, with a convenie

62 er cohort study, performed in the outpatient dermatology clinic of 2 academic hospitals, included 80

63 tive cohort study conducted at an outpatient dermatology clinic of a tertiary care hospital between F

64 Nine of 50 patients (18.0%) evaluated in dermatology clinic underwent biopsy to exclude skin canc

65 mical staining on formalin-fixed BCCs from a dermatology clinic were examined in masked fashion by a

66 Patients being referred to a dermatology clinic were randomly assigned, stratified by

67 se 3 acute myeloid leukemia presented to the dermatology clinic with a 5-day history of a nonpruritic

68 A man in his 30s presented to the dermatology clinic with complaints of recurrent redness,

69 In each dermatology clinic, 250 consecutive adult out-patients w

70 Out of 5000 patients who visited an office dermatology clinic, clinical records of patients with sp

71 Patients were from a private practice dermatology clinic, with assessed scars representing a r

72 ts who would have otherwise been referred to dermatology clinic.

73 mination was conducted at a university-based dermatology clinic.

74 University of California, Davis, outpatient dermatology clinic.

75 ingle, urban, safety-net hospital outpatient dermatology clinic.

76 ire compared with respondents in the medical dermatology clinic: race-adjusted OR, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.56

77 Dermatology clinical practice guideline authors received

78 e payments received by physicians who author dermatology clinical practice guidelines, compare disclo

79 ot been studied among physicians who develop dermatology clinical practice guidelines.

80 Patients were identified in an outpatient dermatology clinical setting over a 6-month period (10 m

81 in allergy, immunology, infectious diseases, dermatology, clinical pharmacology, and pharmacogenomics

82 It is therefore important for dermatology clinicians and researchers to understand the

83 Thirty dermatology clinicians saw a total of 2770 patients with

84 placebo-controlled trial with patients from dermatology clinics at 12 VA medical centers recruited f

85 uly 1, 2011, to June 30, 2012) in outpatient dermatology clinics at an academic medical center.

86 ion other than skin cancer (controls) at the dermatology clinics at the Kirklin Clinic of the Univers

87 from an academic pigmented lesion clinic and dermatology clinics of the affiliated Veteran Affairs me

88 via flyers displayed on college campuses, at dermatology clinics, and at student health facilities.

89 are numerous barriers to achieving cosmetic dermatology competency during residency.

90 bability, 0.0025; 95% CI, 0.00020-0.030 with dermatology consult vs 0.026; 95% CI, 0.0065-0.10 withou

91 Patients were randomized to dermatology consultation (n = 40) versus standard of car

92 and 20 patients were randomized to receive a dermatology consultation (treatment group).

93 Of the 20 patients in the dermatology consultation group, 2 (10%) were diagnosed a

94 Dermatology consultation in the primary care setting imp

95 Obtaining an outpatient dermatology consultation may be a cost-effective strateg

96 Analysis was performed on dermatology consultation patients to establish a predict

97 cal diagnosis for nonexcised lesions) of FTF dermatology consultation remains higher (67%-85% agreeme

98 The expansion of the role of dermatology consultation services may improve patient ca

99 ed for any indication, for whom an inpatient dermatology consultation was requested between September

100 Of those evaluated by dermatology consultation, pseudocellulitis was diagnosed

101 logy is reliable for the triage of inpatient dermatology consultations and has the potential to impro

102 The value of inpatient dermatology consultations has traditionally been demonst

103 nosis and management; however, the impact of dermatology consultations on metrics such as hospital le

104 Multivariable modeling also showed that dermatology consultations were associated with a reducti

105 Multivariable modeling showed that dermatology consultations were associated with a reducti

106 Dermatology consultations were associated with improveme

107 To determine the association of dermatology consultations with patient care in hospitali

108 nsultation processes were used to manage the dermatology consultations.

109 lectance confocal microscopy with a handheld dermatology-dedicated microscope can play a role in the

110 trial was conducted at a university hospital dermatology department according to the intention-to-tre

111 University hospital dermatology department affiliated with the French NF1 re

112 The patients had all been treated in the dermatology department at Hospital Universitari Germans

113 n transplant from 1990-2008 evaluated in the dermatology department for a subsequent biopsy-proven he

114 d using the medical records of patients from dermatology departments belonging to the French Study Gr

115 ve multicenter study was conducted including dermatology departments belonging to the French Study Gr

116 iocytoid Sweet syndrome was conducted in the dermatology departments of 5 university hospitals and a

117 patients with newly diagnosed BP in 8 French dermatology departments.

118 Frequency of cosmetic dermatology devices and injectables used for dermatology

119 gorically between educational practices: the dermatology elective (SMD = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.17-2.11) and

120 the extent to which the American Academy of Dermatology enforced their Administrative Regulations fo

121 edical professionals with varying degrees of dermatology experience, each of whom evaluated a minimum

122 biopsy-proven DN occurred through the latest dermatology follow-up.

123 associated with telaprevir were referred to dermatology for evaluation and treatment.

124 a European Network (GA(2) LEN), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), and the World Allergy Organizat

125 had a seismic impact on moving investigative dermatology from a medical backwater to a scientific dis

126 of all NIH grants awarded to departments of dermatology from fiscal year 2009 to 2014.

127 f payments received by physicians who author dermatology guidelines and the accuracy of disclosure st

128 Three American Academy of Dermatology guidelines published from 2013 to 2016 were

129 e Parameter and the 2014 American Academy of Dermatology guidelines to highlight the basic principles

130 he leaders of German-speaking departments of dermatology have had some training in the United States.

131 ., in this issue of Journal of Investigative Dermatology, have examined the role of immunocytokines L

132 Limited evidence exists for task shifting in dermatology; however, studies from psychiatry demonstrat

133 Following World War II, dermatology in German-speaking Europe faced enormous cha

134 oid Meeting, organized by the Departments of Dermatology in Lubeck and Marburg and the Institute of A

135 Medicare Advantage physician directories for dermatology in many areas substantially overestimate the

136 ucted at the Brazilian Center for Studies in Dermatology in Porto Alegre, Brazil.

137 The interactions between dermatology in the United States and German-speaking Eur

138 Dermatology in the United States particularly benefited

139 tors to the subsequent flowering of academic dermatology in the United States.

140 to lead to key discoveries in investigative dermatology, including but not limited to identifying si

141 s have shown promising results in radiology, dermatology, intensive care, diabetes, rheumatology and

142 engths and limitations that should guide the dermatology investigator's choice of assay.

143 trend in NIH funding for female and MD-only dermatology investigators.

144 Although microRNA research in psoriasis and dermatology is still relatively new, evidence is rapidly

145 , and LinkedIn members corresponding to each dermatology journal and each professional and patient-re

146 The use of social media by dermatology journals and professional and patient-center

147 We identified popular dermatology journals based on Facebook likes and Twitter

148 We obtained an archived list of 102 current dermatology journals from SCImago on the World Wide Web

149 On July 17, 2012, of the 102 dermatology journals ranked by SCImago, 12.7% were prese

150 The future of dermatology lies in integrative research, in which clini

151 Secondary measures included the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) scores and genera

152 They wrote Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) when they visited

153 measured quality of life with the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI).

154 Index for Atopic Dermatitis (QoLIAD) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) are recommended fo

155 d Severity Index (PASI) after 16 weeks, with Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) as a secondary end

156 ek dosing is ineffective, with reductions in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores compared wi

157 a Activity Score (UAS), has correlation with Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) which assesses Qua

158 Index (PASI), and secondary outcome was the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).

159 oL (AE-QoL; 56.2 [18.7] and 59.9 [19.2]) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; 14.6 [5.7] and 16.

160 9; 95% CI: 1.03-1.38), and a higher baseline dermatology life quality index (HR 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00-1.

161 e specific skin pain-related question on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (median, -1.00; range, -2

162 rms in skin-related quality of life by total Dermatology Life Quality Index (median, -4.00; range, -8

163 BQOL was found to be more sensitive than the Dermatology Life Quality Index (P = .02).

164 nt-Oriented Eczema Measure (P < 0.0001), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (P = 0.0285).

165 ve a moderate correlation with scores on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (R = 0.63) and the Genera

166 ith quality-of-life instruments, such as the Dermatology Life Quality Index (Spearman rank correlatio

167 amyloid A), and quality-of-life assessments (Dermatology Life Quality Index and 36-item short form he

168 Mean (SD) Dermatology Life Quality Index and Chronic Urticaria Qua

169 of interest was the HRQOL as measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index.

170 al Anxiety and Depression Scale, and (4) the Dermatology Life Quality Index.

171 s comparing IPNI and CPNI are limited in the dermatology literature.

172 We hypothesized that patients in the dermatology medical setting would prefer professional at

173 based study, performed at a national medical dermatology meeting in Itasca, Illinois, in 2012, includ

174 n this issue of the Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Meylan et al. present evidence from a prosp

175 The benefits of free samples in dermatology must be weighed against potential negative e

176 participants were practicing or training in dermatology (n = 144 [91.1%]).

177 ermatology organizations included dermRounds Dermatology Network (11 251 likes on Facebook and 2900 f

178 The mean payments for the subspecialties of dermatology, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and urolo

179 (NY, USA) and a private practice outpatient dermatology office in Newport Beach (CA, USA).

180 more than 60 clinical variables relating to dermatology, ophthalmology, and neurology have been meas

181 Use of high-dose lasers and light devices in dermatology, ophthalmology, oncology, and dentistry are

182 identified professional and patient-centered dermatology organization activity on social networks thr

183 al and each professional and patient-related dermatology organization.

184 Popular professional dermatology organizations included dermRounds Dermatolog

185 urnals and professional and patient-centered dermatology organizations remains largely unknown and, t

186 Patient-centered and professional dermatology organizations use social networking sites; h

187 K on the face were recruited in a university dermatology outpatient clinic from 2015 to 2016, and 32

188 This study was a case series performed at a dermatology outpatient clinic of 3 patients with severe

189 cally dispersed US private and institutional dermatology outpatient clinical practices focused on cos

190 Patients were from plastic surgery and dermatology outpatient clinics in the United States and

191 ge-matched male controls without acne from a dermatology outpatient department of a tertiary care ins

192 008 and September 2009 were recruited from a dermatology outpatient department.

193 bo-controlled randomized clinical trial at a dermatology outpatient practice of an urban academic med

194 or serving as biomarkers and therapeutics in dermatology over the next decade.

195 The most popular dermatology patient-centered organizations were the Skin

196 tional, anonymous survey by English-speaking dermatology patients (aged 18 years or older) at general

197 dents were medical, surgical, and wound care dermatology patients, respectively.

198 n the general population of immunosuppressed dermatology patients.

199 An expert panel in psoriasis, pediatric dermatology, pediatric rheumatology, pediatric gastroent

200 n pediatric dermatology, procedural/cosmetic dermatology, plastic surgery, scars, wound healing, acne

201 an international multidisciplinary team from dermatology, plastic surgery, surgical oncology, emergen

202 igative Dermatology, and American Academy of Dermatology,point to the lasting impact of study in Euro

203 The American Academy of Dermatology policies may benefit from stricter enforceme

204 , through December 31, 2000, in a university dermatology practice and its affiliated Department of Ve

205 cal record review carried out in a pediatric dermatology practice at an academic institution of patie

206 Women aged 18 to 45 years visiting a dermatology practice completed anonymous surveys assessi

207 and EVD images of skin tumors from a private dermatology practice from March 1 to September 30, 2013.

208 JAMA Dermatology Practice Gaps commentaries are intended to a

209 We performed a prospective dermatology practice-based study using questionnaires an

210 g consensus on standards for skin imaging in dermatology practice.

211 outpatient dermatology centers and 1 private dermatology practice.

212 g consensus on standards for skin imaging in dermatology practice.

213 er 80s (patient 2)-were treated in a private dermatology practice.

214 2, 2009, to December 31, 2012) from a single dermatology practice.

215 An online survey in academic dermatology practices among PDs of US dermatology reside

216 rol study performed in multicenter pediatric dermatology practices in the United States recruited 132

217 as conducted of patient-generated reviews of dermatology practices on 2 consumer review platforms.

218 A total of 518 reviews from 45 dermatology practices on Yelp and 4921 reviews from 45 d

219 elanoma patients from regional hospitals and dermatology practices.

220 A panel of national experts in pediatric dermatology, procedural/cosmetic dermatology, plastic su

221 ould not be required to perform any cosmetic dermatology procedures.

222 The dermatology profession needs to understand disease manag

223 y practices on Yelp and 4921 reviews from 45 dermatology providers on ZocDoc were collected from 3 ge

224 ted relying on consumer websites to identify dermatology providers.

225 ntified in the following categories: general dermatology reference (61 [26.6%]), self-surveillance/di

226 January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2013, at a dermatology referral center at a single institution.

227 n cancer training and screening by PCPs with dermatology referral patterns and rates of skin biopsies

228 n prescription acne treatment at the time of dermatology referral.

229 ntion revealed no significant differences in dermatology referrals overall and those for presumptive

230 tion of significantly fewer postintervention dermatology referrals that lacked specific diagnoses (25

231 Proportion of dermatology referrals, subsequent skin biopsies, and PCP

232 A total of 229 dermatology-related apps were identified in the followin

233 le data available regarding the diversity of dermatology research cohorts with respect to sex, race,

234 al of 1292 NIH-funded grants were awarded to dermatology research from fiscal year 2009 through 2014.

235 for maintaining their presence in NIH-funded dermatology research.

236 Surgical training in dermatology residencies has increased, and there is grow

237 an impact on physician clinical practice and dermatology residency curricula.

238 Gaps commentaries are discussed during most dermatology residency journal club activities.

239 re of 17 questions was sent via e-mail to US dermatology residency program directors (PDs) in Februar

240 om PDs were received from 53 of 114 (46%) US dermatology residency programs.

241 ademic dermatology practices among PDs of US dermatology residency programs.

242 address patient safety gaps occurring during dermatology residency.

243 dermatology devices and injectables used for dermatology resident hands-on cosmetic dermatology train

244 ns in the CSD among Texas dermatologists and dermatology residents and patient registrations among CS

245 of elliptical excisions performed by senior dermatology residents applying for procedural or Mohs su

246 Self-reported rates of dermatology residents committing errors, identifying loc

247 Many dermatology residents enter the workforce planning to pr

248 g in Itasca, Illinois, in 2012, included 142 dermatology residents from 44 residency programs in the

249 ions of the CSD and among dermatologists and dermatology residents in Texas from April 1, 2011, throu

250 Senior dermatology residents preparing for surgery fellowships

251 Of surveyed dermatology residents, 45.2% have failed to report needl

252 re either certified dermatologists or senior dermatology residents.

253 Wound care and medical dermatology respondents preferred professional attire co

254 failure or signs of recurrence at the 3-year dermatology review.

255 m the outpatient clinic at the Department of Dermatology, Roskilde Hospital, and 326 patients with HS

256 It is a joint initiative of the Dermatology Section of the European Academy of Allergy a

257 ence has been reviewed by a taskforce of the Dermatology section of the European Academy of Allergy a

258 ries study included patients referred to the Dermatology Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer C

259 this case series, 2 patients referred to the dermatology service of an academic tertiary care hospita

260 tor-blinded randomized clinical trial at the dermatology service of an urban university medical cente

261 arch 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017, at the Dermatology Service of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Canc

262 ts affiliated Department of Veterans Affairs dermatology service.

263 red from remote sites of primary care to the dermatology services of 2 VA medical facilities for ambu

264 ies expect dermatologists who offer cosmetic dermatology services to provide competent care.

265 quired to travel farther distances to access dermatology services.

266 tients who were identified in the outpatient dermatology setting were found to have MBAITs on clinica

267 ly 20 of 53 (38%) PDs believed that cosmetic dermatology should be a necessary aspect of residency tr

268 ermatological Association, American Board of Dermatology, Society for Investigative Dermatology, and

269 l clinic settings, though respondents in the dermatology surgery clinic were less likely to prefer pr

270 r professional attire, while patients in the dermatology surgical and wound care setting would prefer

271 t population presenting to the Department of Dermatology surgical unit at Wake Forest University Bapt

272 Compared with in-person dermatology, teledermatology served more patients younge

273 In dermatology, the development of objective, standardized

274 In the field of dermatology there is a need for high-quality evidence in

275 rapid increase in the use of microneedles in dermatology, there are few data about their safety.

276 the most commonly prescribed medications in dermatology, there are limited data on steroid-related s

277 l of the American Academy of Dermatology and Dermatology Times, respectively.

278 g, categorizing PD attitudes toward cosmetic dermatology training during residency and describing res

279 t 3 programs (94%) offered hands-on cosmetic dermatology training using botulinum toxin, and 47 of 53

280 d for dermatology resident hands-on cosmetic dermatology training, categorizing PD attitudes toward c

281 ost every program provides hands-on cosmetic dermatology training, there are barriers to training, in

282 d products, and PD attitudes toward cosmetic dermatology training.

283 e cyclosporine, who presented to a specialty dermatology transplant clinic with multiple, recurrent,

284 r of female investigators with NIH grants in dermatology trended down significantly compared with the

285 bserver-blinded clinical study at a tertiary dermatology university hospital clinic enrolled patients

286 of 55 patients treated at the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein,

287 ntified patients with an acne diagnosis at a dermatology visit in the past 3 months who were prescrib

288 nguages and were not present for a scheduled dermatology visit.

289 Rates of dermatology visits by patients affiliated with primary c

290 ted mentioning sunscreen at only 1.6% of all dermatology visits.

291 rom 73.5 to 3.0 days compared with in-person dermatology visits.

292 rcely used within the field of investigative dermatology, we aim to highlight CyTOF's utility and dem

293 All NIH-funded principal investigators in dermatology were categorized by their academic degree an

294 standards for camera-based digital images in dermatology were identified.

295 re who underwent review at the Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital.

296 tment at a university hospital department of dermatology with ustekinumab according to the dosing reg

297 tient clinical practices focused on cosmetic dermatology, with a total of 23 dermatologists.

298 an increasingly important outcome measure in dermatology, with disease-specific QOL instruments being

299 methodological framework to develop COSs in dermatology, with the ultimate goal of better decision m

300 ith HS were recruited from the Department of Dermatology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denm