ライフサイエンスコーパス: deviation

1 y level (where sigma represents the standard deviation).

2 cts was set as 45 mum (mean minus 2 standard deviations).

3 than 4.5% reproducibility relative standard deviation.

4 Light state with significant conformational deviation.

5 he primary sensors, leading to an IL-23/TH17 deviation.

6 ce of concha bullosa and direction of septal deviation.

7 he ocular fundi, which produced an A-pattern deviation.

8 ng regulatory T and B lymphocytes and immune deviation.

9 lineage integrity by preventing TFH-lineage deviation.

10 wing a sub-25 Hz linewidth and a 32 Hz Allan deviation.

11 y and precision showed <9% relative standard deviation.

12 n universality at the level of four standard deviations.

13 wer precision manifesting in higher standard deviations.

14 ated to standard automated perimetry pattern deviations.

15 ognitive score of -0.3 (-0.5, -0.1) standard deviations.

16 men; mean age, 56.1 years +/- 17.7 [standard deviation]).

17 than for control subjects (mean +/- standard deviation, 0.09 mL/mL +/- 0.03 vs 0.11 mL/mL +/- 0.03, r

18 x angle, mean diffusivity (mean +/- standard deviation, [0.89 +/- 0.09] x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec vs [0.9 +/

19 he mean comorbidity count was 2.38 (standard deviation 1.22).

20 tion with protein kinase A (root mean square deviation = 1.8 A), indicating common ancestry.

21 sk of CHD (pooled relative risk per standard deviation, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.18), wh

22 eproducibility was observed (pooled standard deviation, 1.7%-9.4%).

23 A composite index (standard deviation 10, minimally clinically significant differenc

24 participants (mean age, 64.2 years; standard deviation, 10.9) were followed for a mean of 6.5 years (

25 5529 patients (mean age, 57 years [standard deviation, +/- 10.9 years]; women, n = 2071; men, n = 34

26 age for the cohort was 62.4 years (standard deviation, 11.4 years).

27 ated (mean age, 55.0 years +/- 8.7 [standard deviation]; 14 men).

28 le and the mean age was 55.8 years (standard deviation, 15.6 years).

29 asy test was 3 minutes, 18 seconds (standard deviation = 16.88 seconds).

30 an time of recurrence of 3.7 years (standard deviation = 2.94 years, ranging from 1 to 12 years).

31 first year after diagnosis was 2.8 (standard deviation, 2.5) (median, 2.0; interquartile range, 1.0-4

32 ing a mean follow-up period of 5.1 (standard deviation, 2.7) years, 13% of men and 21% of women with

33 e followed for a mean of 6.5 years (standard deviation, 2.8).

34 ular pattern (PAMP), comprised 52% (standard deviation, 28%) of the HCV RNA in the livers of patients

35 sponders or nonresponders (mean +/- standard deviation, 3.23 dB +/- 1.41 vs -0.88 dB +/- 1.46 [P = .0

36 ), CVD, and cancer over a mean 8.9 (standard deviation, 3.5) years of follow-up, stratifying by basel

37 ents underwent a mean of 23.03 +/- (standard deviation) 4.20 GBCA administrations (mean accumulated d

38 provided accurate results (relative standard deviation; 4.03%).

39 and all-plexus retinal VD (mean +/- standard deviation: 47.2%+/-7.1% and 73.5%+/-6.6%) were lower tha

40 articipants was 67.4 years +/- 8.7 (standard deviation); 49.8% were women.

41 Women were aged 79.2 (standard deviation, 6.7) years, on average.

42 patients (51.8% women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 60.4 years +/- 8.2), core laboratory and site

43 examinations (63 men; mean age +/- standard deviation, 61.4 years +/- 11.8) performed for suspected

44 Twenty-three women (mean age +/- standard deviation, 61.7 years +/- 13.8) were recruited from a si

45 follow-up duration was 70.2 months (standard deviation, 61.8 months; median, 52 months; range, 6 mont

46 x patients (143 women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 63 years +/- 17) with newly diagnosed pulmona

47 and 2011 in 587 elderly (mean = 70 (standard deviation, 7) years of age) male participants in the Nor

48 e women had an average age of 66.6 (standard deviation, 7.6) years, were depression-free in 1996, and

49 They were also 0.5 standard deviations (95% CI: 0.2, 0.8) closer to adult height and

50 rides (odds ratio [OR] = 4.86 per 1 standard deviation, 95% confidence interval 3.48-6.78), other ver

51 8) and possibly triglycerides (0.19 standard deviations, 95% CI -0.1-0.48), but was unlikely related

52 I 1.06-2.35), LDL-cholesterol (0.21 standard deviations, 95% CI 0.01-0.4), total cholesterol (0.21 st

53 0.01-0.4), total cholesterol (0.21 standard deviations, 95% CI 0.03-0.38) and possibly triglycerides

54 ing depth threshold of two or three standard deviations above the mean, 96.9% or 96.7% of positions,

55 The relative standard deviations, accuracy, LOD, and LOQ show that the method

56 Three-month mean (+/- standard deviation) acuity: AT Lisa, binocular uncorrected distan

57 er optimum conditions, the relative standard deviation, adsorption capacity and limit of detection we

58 R imaging a mean 12.6 days +/- 5.6 (standard deviation) after CA.

59 Mean (+/- standard deviation) age at diagnosis was 40.9+/-16.9 years, and 6

60 ican Americans (94.9%) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 64.3 (9.9) years.

61 Results Mean (+/- standard deviation) age, and body mass index were 57.5 (+/- 10.1)

62 patient age was 14.7 years +/- 5.2 (standard deviation; age range, 0.7-20.5 years), and 55.2% (32 of

63 otal of 95 eyes (66 patients, mean [standard deviation] aged 49 [12.5] years, 31 [47%] of whom were h

64 as to assess if the presence of nasal septal deviation and concha bullosa is connected with the devel

65 The median angle of deviation and median stereoacuity were not significantly

66 contacts, sequence entropy, root mean square deviation and secondary structure and disorder predictio

67 ntial complications include induced vertical deviation and torsion.

68 The relative standard deviations and relative recovery of Pb (II) was 4.9% and

69 tively, were 0.317 mug/g +/- 0.060 (standard deviation) and 0.048 mug/g +/- 0.004 in the cortex, 0.41

70 entropy, fractal dimension mean and standard deviation, and second-order entropy, homogeneity, differ

71 of torsional and vertical components of the deviation, and therefore may be useful in cases of bilat

72 ing, 72 subjects (78 masses) due to protocol deviations, and 41 subjects (43 masses) due to high-risk

73 erns of inter-species interactions, multiple deviations are caused by pleiotropy and epistasis in met

74 ar models were tested with visual field mean deviation as a dependent variable and time (alone and wi

75 igher-order representations and signal their deviation as a prediction error.

76 Horizontal and vertical ocular deviations at 9 different gaze positions of each eye wer

77 ate-adjusted mean logMAR VA change (standard deviation) at 1 year among treatment groups (-0.048 [0.4

78 The mean number of injections (standard deviation) at 1 year was higher in the ranibizumab (6.4

79 The mean+/-standard deviation baseline age and eGFR of HF patients were 68+/

80 dered abnormal when values were two standard deviations below controls' mean uptake.

81 head circumference less than three standard deviations below the mean for age and sex and results in

82 Among 1239 infants (mean [standard deviation] BW = 864 [212] g; gestational age [GA] = 27 [

83 orhoods reduce the DSA-average MELD standard deviation by 29% and save about 65 lives annually.

84 These deviations can influence procedure reliability, efficien

85 % confidence interval, 0.8-4.1] per standard deviation change in cystatin C).

86 ed with an overall relative absolute average deviation close to 0.14% for the 15,298 data points exam

87 However, neither volume nor metabolite deviations consistently lateralized the epileptogenic hi

88 Nasal septal deviation, contrary to concha bullosa, has influence on

89 io in case mean, 1.0083 +/- 0.0373 [standard deviation]; DN-to-pons ratio in control mean, 1.0183 +/-

90 Average (+/- standard deviation) floors were 105 mum (+/- 15.9 mum) for MRW, 3

91 n curves (r(2)=0.995), and relative standard deviation for replicate injections lower than 5%.

92 iated with IHD (odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation for TSH 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9

93 8, and 144 h, the approximation led to large deviations for some of the patients, in particular unacc

94 the mean initial presenting VA (+/-standard deviation) for decade 1 eyes to be worse (2.05+/-1.29 lo

95 alpha oscillations constitute the strongest deviation from 1/f power-law scaling, the signature of L

96 ncluding a high value of gamma, along with a deviation from a Curie-Weiss law observed in the low-tem

97 strong electron-hole asymmetry and a strong deviation from a linear dispersion but remain topologica

98 than those of healthy individuals, based on deviation from a newly defined healthy plane (HP).

99 ivefold vertices, where there is the largest deviation from a planar hexagonal array.

100 cs, to identify subtle changes (band shifts, deviation from linear approximation, etc.) for common sa

101 able to approach the equilibrium state after deviation from metastability or can be frozen on returni

102 % in certain habitats, whilst also driving a deviation from natural phase proportions.

103 d in several vessels, implying a significant deviation from Poiseuille's law.

104 Deviation from the CentC consensus has little or no effe

105 ates A and B, may become evident toward zero deviation from the correlation line of the usual inverse

106 esulting in a sharp inner core boundary, but deviation from the eutectic composition exists in some l

107 tructure support open-shell intermediates, a deviation from traditional strong-field organometallic c

108 plex quantum theories, studying one of their deviations from complex quantum theory: the non-commutat

109 Under harsher SALE conditions, deviations from diffusion-limited behavior are found due

110 rast with observed "vital effects," that is, deviations from elemental and isotopic compositions at t

111 reviewed the medical literature on observed deviations from guidelines, clinical significance, and i

112 These results identify important deviations from idealizations of MT and LIP and motivate

113 nto account defect interactions and to allow deviations from local charge neutrality when considering

114 at monitor for tissue stress and malfunction-deviations from optimal homeostasis-and that molecules t

115 These interactions compensate for deviations from the consensus sequence, allowing CTCF to

116 luctuation-dependent coexistence may explain deviations from the expected negative diversity-ecosyste

117 on due to haemolysis when commonly practiced deviations from the guideline procedure were performed.

118 gellum exemplifies a system where even small deviations from the highly regulated flagellar assembly

119 ble and plausible explanations for sustained deviations from the long-term delta(13)C mean.

120 The deviations from the median behavior are multiplicative a

121 MI z score, measuring the number of standard deviations from the median BMI for age and sex), cardiom

122 Deviations from the range cause impulsiveness and aggres

123 iability, but no significant differences, in deviations from the summary estimate between paired grou

124 ase DRI values on chronic disease endpoints; deviations from the traditional framework were often req

125 Although many deviations from the universal code exist, particularly i

126 However, recent studies have identified deviations from this pattern.

127 d storage of deuodenoscopes did not identify deviations from US Food and Drug Administration or manuf

128 Considerable deviations from Vegard's law are observed, due to the di

129 ile blue light-based phase shifts show large deviations from what is observed in wild-type cells.

130 line description of bacterial growth in 3-d, deviations from which can be used to identify phenotypic

131 odynamically significant PDA (mean [standard deviation] gestational age 25.7 [1.2] weeks and birth we

132 mean number of stages for MMS was 2 standard deviations greater than the mean number for all physicia

133 laucoma (GON and abnormal visual field, mean deviation >-6 decibels [dB]), glaucoma suspects (GON and

134 of AD per genetically predicted one standard deviation higher isoleucine levels was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.0

135 One standard deviation higher weight change gave an RR of 1.20 (95% C

136 To reduce these deviations, i.e. image distortions, we use spiral scanni

137 Ba2Cu3O y Furthermore, the absence of marked deviation in [Formula: see text] at the onset of long-ra

138 Deviation in calculated FDM concentrations from true val

139 tigen-specific regulatory T cells; or immune deviation in favor of TH1 responses.

140 Results Mean ADCs +/- standard deviation in patients with MM for the normal, focal, and

141 There was no substantive deviation in postnatal growth trajectory or adult body m

142 ure deficit (VPD, +0.66 kPa), annual percent deviation in precipitation (-38%), and 2011 difference b

143 iated with a decrease of 5%-8% of a standard deviation in self-reported mental health.

144 eld of the membrane, estimating the standard deviation in these fluctuations as approximately 10MV/cm

145 The standard deviation in W, sigma w , varies widely over the globe w

146 Deviations in colonization patterns have been associated

147 The fluorescent cell tracking revealed large deviations in the behavior of individual cells.

148 ominant isotype may help explain the extreme deviations in the IgLkappa/IgLlambda ratios among mammal

149 T12-L4 vertebrae was 146 HU +/- 29 (standard deviation) in case patients and 173 HU +/- 42 in control

150 ing was 83 beats per minute +/- 21 (standard deviation) in the AF group and 63 beats per minute +/- 1

151 Mean age was 11.1 years +/- 4.7 [standard deviation] in boys with microlithiasis and 9.1 years +/-

152 For example, a 1-standard-deviation increase in "likes clicked" (clicking "like" o

153 ume (mean difference in z score per standard deviation increase in NT-proBNP level, -0.021; 95% confi

154 ume (mean difference in z score per standard deviation increase in NT-proBNP level, -0.037; 95% CI: -

155 A one-standard deviation increase in safety climate score was similarly

156 rs, and CRP and interleukin-6, each standard deviation increase in sCD14 was associated with increase

157 We found 1 standard deviation increase in the overall EQI (worse environment

158 mass index and AF (hazard ratio per standard deviation increase, 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI],

159 the measurements of horizontal and vertical deviation (intraclass correlation coefficient horizontal

160 ean intermediate precision relative standard deviation is 14% for biological samples, 6% for silica n

161 abiogenic calcite, and that the size of the deviation is determined by the degree of carbon utilizat

162 y (mean, median) and heterogeneity (standard deviation, kurtosis, skewness) MRI parameters] in HCC an

163 Image noise (pixel standard deviation), lesion contrast (after reconstruction), lesi

164 standard methods with in analytical standard deviation limits.

165 on, root-mean-square error, root-mean-square deviation, Lin concordance correlation, and diagnostic o

166 t of detection of 50 ng/L, relative standard deviation lower than 20% and overall recoveries (includi

167 glaucoma (standard automated perimetry mean deviation </=-8 dB) was used to estimate measurement flo

168 TAGs were quantified with relative standard deviation <17%.

169 thin the 64-97% range with relative standard deviations <20% for all HPH in all commodities.

170 Actual measurement and deviation map analysis were performed after acquiring di

171 iffuse or focal patterns on SD-OCT-generated deviation maps (probability map that compared patients w

172 on global indices, as indicated by the mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD), wer

173 res regression of a simulated patient's mean deviation (MD) data.

174 itudinal measurement variability of SAP mean deviation (MD) using linear regressions.

175 least squares linear regressions of SAP mean deviation (MD) values over time.

176 Predicted mean deviation (MD) was calculated with multilevel modeling o

177 rom month 6 to month 12 in visual field mean deviation (MD) with secondary measures being change in p

178 For each participant, we determined how mean deviation (MD) would change if the patient maintains his

179 Three global indices were extracted: mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and vi

180 h r values ranging from 0.31 (worse-eye mean deviation [MD]) to 0.42 (better-eye MD; P < 0.0001 for a

181 y progressing eyes (progression >/=1 dB mean deviation [MD]/year) and 486 non-rapidly progressing eye

182 culated a coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) for each regional model.

183 Mean, median, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum values were determined.

184 A standard deviation of <+/-1% over a 200 s period is achieved in t

185 or coordination number 6) with mean absolute deviation of 0.025 A, approximately the accuracy of the

186 Success rate at 6 months (total horizontal deviation of 10 prism diopters or less and evidence of b

187 detection of 0.05nM and a relative standard deviation of 4.9%.

188 ions, suggested an overall relative standard deviation of 6.3-11.0%.

189 e relationship between the mean and standard deviation of a set of measurements.

190 s, the lower-level face area ML computes the deviation of actual from predicted stimuli.

191 specifically, roughness (i.e., the standard deviation of cortical thickness) of the right inferior p

192 ions the K(+)-SCISEs had a very low standard deviation of E(0) of only 501.0 +/- 0.7 mV that is the b

193 e their gravitropic setpoint angle (i.e. the deviation of growth direction relative to vertical).

194 Mean and standard deviation of horizontal and vertical NBSL were 14.33 deg

195 ecovery was 82.24%, with a relative standard deviation of less than 5%.

196 inguishes 2 levels of processing: short-term deviation of local auditory regularities and global long

197 neity index (ratio between the mean standard deviation of luminal signal intensity and the mean lumin

198 ild feature vectors of homogeneity, standard deviation of pixel values, and mean of the pixel values

199 Compared with using the standard deviation of shear wave speed (SWSSD) alone, SWSSD combi

200 oducibility, calculated as relative standard deviation of sixty measurements across three days, range

201 also had the strongest correlation with mean deviation of the 4 central VF points (rho = -0.420; P <

202 n serum sample over one week and the maximum deviation of the average response from reference values

203 d as 1.96 multiplied by the root-mean-square deviation of the fractional paired differences in SUV an

204 The relative standard deviation of the individual calibration data points, mea

205 inear relation between the mean and standard-deviation of the intervals produced by monkeys in SCT is

206 it residual of noisy spectra to the standard deviation of the measured FRET efficiency.

207 Deviation of the nasal sector from the expected ISNT pat

208 Poissonian log-likelihood term based on the deviation of the reconstructed image from the measured d

209 iority margin was set at 20% of the standard deviation of the score in the placebo group.

210 10 IU per milliliter) were within 1 standard deviation of the target value for all but one sample, wh

211 peatability, calculated as relative standard deviation of twenty measurements within a day, and repro

212 have different values of w, higher standard deviation of w increases the critical fraction for wanin

213 , 2 most abundant ions) resulted in standard deviations of 0.2 per thousand (CHCl3) and 0.4 per thous

214 < 1.0% and isotopic pattern root-mean-square deviations of 0.5-1.5%) while demonstrating an increased

215 he range of 1041-1063 kg m(-3) with standard deviations of 0.6-1.1%.

216 The relative standard deviations of 2.9% and 5.8% (n=6) were obtained at 60mug

217 .32 ng muL(-1) and relative process standard deviations of 9.0-14%, respectively.

218 The largest standard deviations of age-standardised DALYs between the 20 age

219 w 13% from true values and relative standard deviations of below 11% from the mean values in a miRNA

220 Mean unsigned deviations of kappaBell vs. kappaSCT are 0.08, 0.04, 0.0

221 ained in both systems with relative standard deviations of retention times (RT; n = 6) typically betw

222 m errors were observed at a tl of 96 h, with deviations of the approximation from the time integral o

223 Tissue-specific deviations of the approximation from the time integral w

224 dditional peaks were observed which signaled deviations of the isothermal magnetisation behavior from

225 e show that this is not the case; pronounced deviations of the local order from that observed in the

226 Similarly, standard deviations of the pore-to-pore time distributions decrea

227 growth arrest and characteristic phenotypic deviations of tip swelling and apical invaginations.

228 hotophysical changes of the labels, leads to deviations of up to 4 A from the real interdye distances

229 multifold inaccuracies and relative standard deviations of up to 70% in crude cell lysate.

230 showing a mean difference (+/-1.96 standard deviation) of 0.03 +/- 0.44 log10 IU/ml.

231 verage, errors occurred a mean (+/- standard deviation) of 8.97 hours +/- 2.28 into the shift (median

232 lts The mean overall difference (+/-standard deviation) of PET with ATAC compared with PET with CTAC

233 e of six-sample matrices provided a standard deviation on the results, and this information could be

234 ll occur at a precise time, while minimizing deviations or noise about the mean?

235 unt in women (differences 0.03-0.06 standard deviations, P < 0.05 between individuals with and withou

236 Pattern deviation (PD) values of 11,449 reliable visual fields (

237 led across cohorts a moderate -0.26 standard deviations per decade (SD/decade) (95% confidence interv

238 patial associative learning (-0.140 standard deviations per risk factor, p < 0.0001) and remained sig

239 One of those had no vertical deviation postoperatively and 1 patient resulted in 2Del

240 acted: mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and visual field index (VFI).

241 the mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD), were analyzed with multivariable regres

242 greement (LOA; mean difference +/-2 standard deviation) ranged from -43.950 to 67.951 cm(2), LOA% (gi

243 Deviations relative to the standard CRF, i.e., gain func

244 ismatch Responses (MMRs) to equivalent pitch deviations representing within-category and between-cate

245 un precision (<8% and <10% relative standard deviation, respectively) and accuracy (<9% and <13% bias

246 Neither septal deviation (right sided: p=0.962; left-sided: p=0.731), n

247 ullosa and contralateral direction of septal deviation [right-sided (p=0.039), left-sided (p=0.003)].

248 al(2D) plot upon structural root-mean-square deviations(RMSD) from either Dark or Light state.

249 The relative standard deviation (RSD%) for intra-day (repeatability) and inter

250 pM, good reproducibility (Relative Standard deviation (RSD) =3.3%) and high selectivity over other m

251 CCS method performs with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 0.29% for all ion species across the

252 The relative standard deviation (RSD) was 0.1% for a 1microgL(-1) aluminum lev

253 , number (East: 44 +/- 20% relative standard deviation (RSD), N = 7; West: 37 +/- 30% RSD, N = 7), an

254 he precision, evaluated as relative standard deviation (RSD), was 2.47% (n=10) for a sample containin

255 as 2.86microgL(-1) and the relative standard deviation (RSD, n=8) was 1.8%.

256 y, expressed as percentage relative standard deviation (% RSD) was below 9% for all the amino acids a

257 The relative standard deviation (%RSD) for 6 replicate measurements of 1.0mugL

258 he precision, expressed as relative standard deviation (%, RSD) was below 11.3%.

259 The relative standard deviations (RSDs) for ASA, ROX and NIT determined from f

260 aseline daily step-count was 7,479 (standard deviation [s.d.] 2,671), and average time in MVPA bouts

261 loops, the average minimum root mean square deviation sampled is 0.93 A, compared with 1.34 A withou

262 ds ratio 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.64 per standard deviation score in body mass index [SDS-BMI]).

263 Each one standard deviation (SD) higher WHRadjBMI (1 SD approximately 0.08

264 A 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in VO2Max was associated with be

265 ecision for the 1-ml assay showed a standard deviation (SD) of 0.14 log10 copies/ml or less and a coe

266 ivariable regression in ALSPAC, a 1 standard deviation (SD, equivalent of 3.7 kg/m2) increase in mate

267 age of the patients was 60.7 years (standard deviation [SD] 13.2 years).

268 1 indicating performance that was 1 standard deviation [SD] above the hospital mean) and 30-day risk-

269 Mean age was 70.4 years (+/-9.6 standard deviation [SD]).

270 ists per 100,000 residents and 4.9 (standard deviation [SD], 2.8) networks covering a mean of 39.4% (

271 years of age (mean age, 9.4 years; standard deviation [SD], 4.56 years) with glaucoma and their pare

272 The average EVAN-G score was 84.3 (standard deviation, SD, 6.4) after VR, and 64.3 (SD, 11.7) after

273 d to moderate, and the average (+/- standard deviation) severity score was 2.61 +/- 1.01.

274 The standard deviations (sigma) of the pulse amplitude distributions

275 und between the blood flux index and VF mean deviation (Spearman rho = 0.44; P = .045) and RNFL thick

276 duction of about a third in the two-standard-deviation spread (-1.2 degrees Celsius) relative to the

277 strain 1 [delta1/2], 19.8% +/- 4.6 [standard deviation]; strain 2 [delta1], 39.5% +/- 9.3) by using d

278 y was assessed using within-subject standard deviation (SW), coefficient of variation (CV), and intra

279 th the pH sensors demonstrating the greatest deviation; the flexible hard gold platform achieved a se

280 /- 1 x 10(-13) m(2) s(-1), with the standard deviation thought to be related to the large range of po

281 e quantification of individual lesions large deviations to CTref can be observed independent of the M

282 score increased from 10.1 +/- 9.1 (standard deviation) to 13.3 +/- 11.9 after implementation of the

283 on (mean interval, 17 months +/- 4 [standard deviation]) to assess IPH change.

284 male; mean age, 67.1 years +/- 8.7 [standard deviation]) underwent FD and Ecc measurement, and 992 (5

285 The standard deviation universally increased with the uncalibrated si

286 de at a precision of <0.5% relative standard deviation using relatively broadband lasers to mitigate

287 The lower (<2%) relative standard deviation values obtained from the data suggested that t

288 eatured the lowest relative process standard deviation (Vx0%) of 7.2% compared to MS and AIF-MS with

289 The relative standard deviation was 4.5% for a tin solution of 0.50microgL(-1)

290 The relative standard deviation was 7.3% and the pre-concentration factor was

291 Blanks were low, relative standard deviation was below 8% for all soils and no statistical

292 The precision (relative standard deviation) was in the range of 1.3-4.5%.

293 red coronary attenuation values +/- standard deviation were comparable between the iodixanol 270 and

294 correlation coefficient, and pooled standard deviation were used to assess the reliability of OCT ang

295 Relative standard deviations were 3.67% and 2.89% for the five replicate m

296 Relative standard deviations were less than 20%.

297 In both tests, ocular deviations were measured on a 9-point target grid locate

298 n [63%]; mean age, 36 years +/- 12 [standard deviation]) were included.

299 on-the-fly feedback of the root mean square deviation with respect to the experimental structure did

300 nt experience (measured in units of standard deviations, with a value of 1 indicating performance tha