ライフサイエンスコーパス: diagnostic interview

1 om the Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

2 ealth Organization's Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

3 Mental Health Survey Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

4 ealth version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

5 ssessed with the WMH composite international diagnostic interview.

6 World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

7 ealth version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

8 ted by trained interviewers using a standard diagnostic interview.

9 sion of the Michigan Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

10 cificity=0.98) and an in-person confirmatory diagnostic interview.

11 re assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

12 ive sample using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

13 sion of the Michigan Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

14 wn Obsessive Compulsive Scale and the Autism Diagnostic Interview.

15 e or anxiety disorder as determined by brief diagnostic interview.

16 cts were administered a standard psychiatric diagnostic interview.

17 he short form of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

18 assessment using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

19 fied versions of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

20 re assessed through self-report items from a diagnostic interview.

21 with the use of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

22 Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

23 vised version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

24 ified version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

25 D section of the Comprehensive International Diagnostic Interview.

26 ified version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

27 riteria for adult ADHD in the semistructured diagnostic interview.

28 order, as assessed post hoc with a validated diagnostic interview.

29 ystematic clinical interview or a structured diagnostic interview.

30 sorders with the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

31 World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

32 visits and 147 (10.5%) completed a telephone diagnostic interview.

33 Age Psychiatric Assessment, a comprehensive diagnostic interview.

34 al reappraisal interviews), fully structured diagnostic interview.

35 Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

36 l disorders with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

37 ealth version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

38 Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

39 lly structured, lay-administered psychiatric diagnostic interview.

40 urvey version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

41 disorders using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.

42 parental loss and maltreatment and completed diagnostic interviews.

43 icipants were blindly assessed by structured diagnostic interviews.

44 me psychiatric histories were evaluated with diagnostic interviews.

45 ge origin, it is essential to use translated diagnostic interviews.

46 vere traumas, who participated in structured diagnostic interviews.

47 x admission using a series of semistructured diagnostic interviews.

48 ely assessed by blind raters with structured diagnostic interviews.

49 e, and opposite-sex pairs through structured diagnostic interviews.

50 e, and opposite-sex pairs through structured diagnostic interviews.

51 se disorders were assessed in person through diagnostic interviews.

52 onal Perfectionism Scale and participated in diagnostic interviews.

53 e been conducted with new questionnaires and diagnostic interviews.

54 inical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) conducted diagnostic interviews.

55 ple of US civilians who completed structured diagnostic interviews.

56 which diagnoses are based on semistructured diagnostic interviews.

57 ecificity and predictive value compared with diagnostic interviews.

58 wed in person with the use of semistructured diagnostic interviews.

59 were completed during or after the clinical diagnostic interviews.

60 enrolled,of which over 86% were seen for two diagnostic interviews.

61 9, 21, and 24-26 years) by use of structured diagnostic interviews.

62 ng symptoms were assessed by self-report and diagnostic interviews.

63 for axis I DSM-IV conditions with structured diagnostic interviews.

64 By diagnostic interview, 0.4% of children with cancer met c

65 At subsequent diagnostic interview, 18% fulfilled International Classi

66 ys: (1) cases diagnosed using a standardized diagnostic interview, (2) the subset using treatment, an

67 d varied by the use of questionnaires versus diagnostic interview (33.6% and 19.3%, respectively) and

68 cluding the administration of semistructured diagnostic interviews; 346 patients had current major de

69 sments including the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, a brief self-rated disability ques

70 ures The AI-SUPERPFP Composite International Diagnostic Interview, a culturally adapted version of th

71 ealth Organization's Composite International Diagnostic Interview, a fully structured lay-administere

72 giving patients the Composite International Diagnostic Interview about their opioid use, we assessed

73 sing on three traits derived from the Autism Diagnostic Interview: "age at first word," "age at first

74 the long form of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview and a questionnaire on psychotropic

75 ion analyses were conducted using the Autism Diagnostic Interview and Autism Diagnostic Observation S

76 (N=332) were evaluated with a semistructured diagnostic interview and completed paper-and-pencil ques

77 nvolved in writing, updating, or modifying a diagnostic interview and its supporting materials: 1) wr

78 Following a diagnostic interview and pretreatment assessment, partic

79 Patients first underwent a diagnostic interview and pretreatment evaluation, follow

80 All participants underwent a diagnostic interview and psychiatric ratings, a comprehe

81 0) was found between Composite International Diagnostic Interview and Schedule for Affective Disorder

82 and personality traits were assessed through diagnostic interview and self-report questionnaire, resp

83 dministration of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Modified PTSD Symptom Scale

84 th SLE completed the Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Systemic Lupus Activity Que

85 Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview and validated with blinded clinical

86 Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview and validated with blinded clinical

87 h bipolar I or II disorder, using structured diagnostic interviews and clinician-administered and sel

88 Structured diagnostic interviews and magnetic resonance imaging sca

89 Diagnostic interviews and measures of selected risk fact

90 were systematically assessed with structured diagnostic interviews and neuropsychological batteries f

91 They were assessed for psychopathology with diagnostic interviews and psychodiagnostic testing.

92 violence and substance use and mental health diagnostic interviews and reviewed medical records at ba

93 both before and after the interventions with diagnostic interviews and semistructured measures design

94 or ADHD according to clinical and structured diagnostic interviews and standardized questionnaires we

95 sed every 6 months for 2.5 years, undergoing diagnostic interviews and venipuncture for measurement o

96 ostic estimates were based on semistructured diagnostic interviews and/or structured family history i

97 , namely, antisocial behavior (assessed by a diagnostic interview) and antisocial character traits (a

98 established with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview) and at least moderate depressive s

99 Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview, and included a broad range of fear

100 iversity of Michigan Composite International Diagnostic Interview, and participant's drug use were as

101 d on retrospective reports, lay-administered diagnostic interviews, and only 1 survey.

102 gies (self-report questionnaires, structured diagnostic interviews, and tape-recording of sessions) w

103 aseline, all patients completed a structured diagnostic interview as well as measures of anxiety symp

104 erger Syndrome (and High-Functioning Autism) Diagnostic Interview (ASDI)), and social cognition (Ekma

105 A fully structured, lay-administered diagnostic interview assessed a wide range of DSM-IV dis

106 ed psychopathology, assessed by standardized diagnostic interview at 20-year follow-up.

107 chiatric disorder was assessed by structured diagnostic interview at a mean age of 38.3 years.

108 tients were assessed by using semistructured diagnostic interviews at baseline and in four follow-up

109 ealth Organization's Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Auto 2.1.

110 Cross-sectional diagnostic interview, behavioral, and neuroimaging data

111 aire results, conducted a telephone research diagnostic interview by means of the bipolar module of t

112 101) were assessed for PTSD using structured diagnostic interviews by both child and parent reports,

113 stablished using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and compared to the prevalen

114 h Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and work impairment with the

115 The AI-SUPERPFP Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), a culturally adapted versio

116 ssion, the shortform Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and a revised version of th

117 World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), which measures problem use

118 Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI).

119 f detailed information from a semistructured diagnostic interview, clinicians rarely diagnose the dis

120 re randomly assigned to two clinicians for a diagnostic interview; clinicians were blind to any previ

121 Patients completed a structured diagnostic interview (Composite International Diagnostic

122 Cross-sectional structured diagnostic interviews conducted between April 1, 1992, a

123 s derived from six subsequent semistructured diagnostic interviews conducted by professionals.

124 ional records were obtained and standardized diagnostic interviews conducted with the parents of case

125 World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview criteria for 12-month major depress

126 in primary care patients Across all studies, diagnostic interviews determined that 257 of 2785 patien

127 onalized as a DSM-IV/Composite International Diagnostic Interview disorder with a score of 50 or less

128 As with adult DSM-IV/Composite International Diagnostic Interview disorders are due largely to compon

129 fetime prevalence of Composite International Diagnostic Interview disorders was 61.0% (95% confidence

130 with 12-month DSM-IV/Composite International Diagnostic Interview disorders, they constituted 63.5% o

131 3 evaluation visits that included structured diagnostic interviews during 2 weeks, followed 1 week la

132 all available information, including direct diagnostic interviews, family history reports and medica

133 lity disorders was assessed with the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) and borderl

134 tients meeting criteria for both the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines and DSM-III-R for b

135 er had to meet criteria for both the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines and DSM-III-R.

136 E-EPA in 30 female subjects meeting Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines and DSM-IV criteria

137 I disorders in 290 patients who met Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines criteria and DSM-II

138 ts met DSM-III-R criteria as well as Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines criteria for border

139 npatients who met both DSM-III-R and Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines criteria for border

140 y using the cognitive section of the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines.

141 PTSD symptoms were measured with the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA)

142 A structured diagnostic interview for current DSM-IV disorders was th

143 indly administered a semistructured research diagnostic interview for DSM-5 adult ADHD.

144 e personality disorder module of the Revised Diagnostic Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders

145 ality Disorder Examination, a semistructured diagnostic interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders

146 ality Disorder Examination, a semistructured diagnostic interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders

147 ality Disorder Examination, a semistructured diagnostic interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders

148 The Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders an

149 l Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders; the Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders, a

150 Disorders and its follow-along version (the Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders-Fo

151 All the subjects were assessed with the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies and assigned di

152 Participants underwent assessment using the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies at the French s

153 The Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies was used to det

154 etime Version or one of four versions of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies.

155 d to the child's diagnostic status using the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies.

156 nistered the Mandarin Chinese version of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies.

157 Participants were interviewed with the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies.

158 tion, were elicited using the semistructured Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies.

159 ed computer-assisted Composite International Diagnostic Interview for mental disorders adapted for ca

160 the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disord

161 They were given structured diagnostic interviews for axis I and axis II disorders.

162 Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview in face-to-face interviews.

163 More research using structured diagnostic interviews is needed to examine the prevalenc

164 ment; n = 5302 were screened, n = 4263 given diagnostic interview, n = 393 were known to have PTSD wi

165 es (n = 14,707 were screened, n = 5374 given diagnostic interview, n = 814 had PTSD) and 8 were condu

166 Structured diagnostic interviews, obstetric hospital records, and m

167 with 12-month DSM-IV/Composite International Diagnostic Interview PTSD and did not differ between hig

168 re quantified based on items from the Autism Diagnostic Interview Revised.

169 203 pairs; mean age, 13.2 years), the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) (205 pairs; mean ag

170 n early childhood, as reported on the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (P<.04).

171 ioral characteristics measured by the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and Autism Diagnostic Obser

172 R in autism based on ratings from the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and Autism Diagnostic Obser

173 Structured diagnostic assessments (Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and Autism Diagnostic Obser

174 le 4 in phase 2 validated against the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and Diagnostic Interview fo

175 port, which was validated against the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised in a subset.

176 domains or domains of symptoms on the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised or the Autism Diagnostic Ob

177 e signals reached significance in the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised qualitative scan.

178 n and FA were examined in relation to Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised ratings of restricted and r

179 with age, intelligence quotient, and Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised social and repetitive behav

180 enotype-phenotype interactions on the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised was found with the 5-HTTLPR

181 The Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised was used to confirm diagnos

182 Diagnostic Observation Schedule, and Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised were performed for each boy

183 m Diagnostic Observation Schedule and Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised were used to confirm ASD, w

184 arent report measure of ASD symptoms (Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised) and clinical observation i

185 Of the 12 RRBs measured by the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised, seven were found to be sig

186 rs/stereotyped patterns domain in the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised--was used as a covariate in

187 ort, validated in a subgroup with the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised.

188 g to the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) and DSM-III and for

189 and mental disorders was assessed using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) at ages 11, 26, and

190 nt Area follow-up, 349 individuals who had a Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) interview were blind

191 ity of a National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) lifetime diagnosis o

192 The Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) was also used in 199

193 Pression and AnXiety schedule (DPAX) and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS)).

194 on and AX for anxiety) was compared with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS), both of which were

195 ffective psychoses were identified using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule and best-estimate consensu

196 , Taiwan, Korea, and New Zealand), using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule and DSM-III criteria and i

197 The Diagnostic Interview Schedule and the same survey proced

198 xico, were located and interviewed using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule between January 25, 1994,

199 ars to assess psychiatric symptoms using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (4th edition;

200 eened for probable mental disorders with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Predictive Sc

201 nical research interviewers administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 t

202 Using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children version 2.3,

203 At baseline, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3.

204 MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At baseline, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3.

205 At follow-ups, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version IV (c

206 At follow-up interviews, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version IV (C

207 The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children was used to m

208 ne mental health screening, modules from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children were administ

209 e Colorado Adolescent Rearing Inventory, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, and the Comp

210 rviewers administered the PTSD module of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, version IV (

211 disorders assessed with parent report on the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-IV.

212 Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children.

213 measured by age-appropriate versions of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children.

214 nd semistructured assessments, including the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-III-R disorders (a

215 The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-III-R provided lif

216 The National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-III-R was used.

217 Data were obtained by using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-IV and the Addicti

218 owed the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-IV and the World H

219 disorder was assessed using the Computerized Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-IV.

220 ,106 families, mothers were administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Major Depressive Disor

221 uded the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule to assess PTSD.

222 ed in a 1992 telephone administration of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule Version 3 Revised.

223 ered the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule Version III-R to assess co

224 IV (child and young adult versions) and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule Version IV (substance use

225 IV (Child and Young Adult versions) and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule Version IV (substance use

226 The National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule was used at baseline and a

227 e symptoms of suicidality as measured by the Diagnostic Interview Schedule were analyzed: thoughts ab

228 ion with a structured psychiatric interview (diagnostic interview schedule) and a questionnaire (Beck

229 Among adult cases defined via the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, 73.9% had received a diag

230 g (DSM-III-R criteria) was assessed with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, and sociodemographic and

231 The National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule, revised according to DSM-

232 sing the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule, the Life Chart Interview,

233 The NIMH-DIS (NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version III Revised) was

234 sing the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version III Revised, to d

235 They were interviewed using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version III, Revised to i

236 respondent, using a modified version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version IV, and the World

237 Using a modified version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, we ascertained past and p

238 n of the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule, which was administered by

239 he National Institute of Mental Health Quick Diagnostic Interview Schedule-III, Revised, computer ver

240 the feasibility of translation of the Quick Diagnostic Interview Schedule-III, Revised, into America

241 ing the National Institutes of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule-III-R.

242 r hospitalization were established using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

243 uterized National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

244 rs, Third Edition, and was measured with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

245 y both before and after the bombing with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

246 psychiatric disorders were assessed with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

247 asis of screening questions derived from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

248 t of major depression were obtained from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

249 d by the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

250 rough use of the Conflict Tactics Scales and Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

251 r depressive disorder was measured using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

252 other axis I diagnoses were assessed by the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

253 y of attempted suicide were assessed via the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

254 The Diagnostic Interview Schedule/Disaster Supplement was us

255 There were 71 new cases of Diagnostic interview Schedule/DSM-IV major depression an

256 re obtained by structured interview with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule; the mean age of the offsp

257 n which both members completed the pertinent diagnostic interview sections were included.

258 Concordance of Composite International Diagnostic Interview SED diagnoses with blinded Schedule

259 y on Drug Abuse: the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short-Form (CIDI-SF) scale, the K10

260 ession module of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Short Form.

261 iagnosis trauma and psychiatric history, and diagnostic interviewing should consider concurrent condi

262 calculated using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Substance Abuse Module as the crite

263 iagnostic interview (Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Substance Abuse Module), yielding D

264 or Children, and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Substance Abuse Module.

265 The respondents completed a structured diagnostic interview that retrospectively dated age at o

266 pression in Dementia, a structured, anchored diagnostic interview that was developed to reliably diag

267 2 mo, and 24 mo by using the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Interview, the Multidimensional Body-Self Rel

268 Using a semistructured diagnostic interview, they assessed rates of symptoms of

269 ified version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview; they also assessed retrospectively

270 ousehold survey that used a lay-administered diagnostic interview to assess a wide range of DSM-IV di

271 iversity of Michigan Composite International Diagnostic Interview to assign DSM-III-R diagnoses.

272 Patients completed 1) a diagnostic interview to determine the presence of a curr

273 ndependent evaluators using a semistructured diagnostic interview to determine the presence of anxiet

274 e of comorbidities and that used a validated diagnostic interview to establish the diagnoses of bipol

275 ntal Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) and a diagnostic interview to identify cases of CRF.

276 Psychiatric diagnostic interviews to be used in epidemiologic studie

277 higan version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, to assess DSM-IV diagnoses and hel

278 Diagnostic interviews using DSM-5 criteria were conducte

279 Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview, version 2.1.

280 es assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, version 3.0 psychosis screen.

281 Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview, version 3.0, a fully structured, l

282 e PTSD module of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, version 3.0; onset of PTSD; and wa

283 nts included the Comprehensive International Diagnostic Interview-Version 2.1 module for DSM-IV socia

284 etime version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview was administered by telephone.

285 A telephone diagnostic interview was administered to eligible twins

286 The Composite International Diagnostic Interview was used to assess 12-month DSM-IV

287 Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview was used to assess DSM-IV anxiety d

288 ealth Organization's Composite International Diagnostic Interview was used to assess nicotine depende

289 Trauma/PTSD status (based on structured diagnostic interviews) was defined as no trauma at eithe

290 terview, a fully structured lay-administered diagnostic interview, was used to assess DSM-IV lifetime

291 Diagnostic interviews were administered 3 months after d

292 Semistructured diagnostic interviews were administered by clinically ex

293 Six waves of direct diagnostic interviews were administered to a sample of y

294 Structured diagnostic interviews were administered to assess for po

295 Structured diagnostic interviews were given to 117 consecutive inpa

296 Structured diagnostic interviews were reliably performed with a ser

297 Structured diagnostic interviews were used to assess respondents' l

298 Age-appropriate structured diagnostic interviews were used to assign DSM-III-R diag

299 hese epidemiological studies used structured diagnostic interviews with similar diagnostic criteria a

300 Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI), a fully structured inte