ライフサイエンスコーパス: diagnostic workup

1 sorders starting from the time of the cancer diagnostic workup.

2 actions can be confirmed as allergic after a diagnostic workup.

3 y suggestive of GPA and should prompt a full diagnostic workup.

4 fication of patients who do not need further diagnostic workup.

5 cases remains unknown even after a complete diagnostic workup.

6 orporation of paraclinical investigations in diagnostic workup.

7 as been integrated into the standard patient diagnostic workup.

8 diagnosis was confirmed in 124 (54.9%) after diagnostic workup; 118 of the 124 fulfilled WAO/EAACI cr

9 ations were affected for appropriate further diagnostic workup: an alerting history (eg, breast sympt

10 with acute ischemic stroke require immediate diagnostic workup and IAT in case of intracranial arteri

11 y should have a strong impact on the current diagnostic workup and management of unexplained, or refr

12 ry to mammography, additional algorithms for diagnostic workup and screening high-risk subgroups of w

13 management of uveitis, including appropriate diagnostic workup and scrupulous attention to preoperati

14 timodality approach is increasingly used for diagnostic workup and supported by recent guidelines.

15 Diagnostic workup and therapeutic intervention can be ch

16 on (MR) remains a challenging problem in the diagnostic workup and treatment of patients with heart f

17 is report details the clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, and initial therapy of 2 of these pat

18 important as imaging plays a key role in the diagnostic workup, and prompt diagnosis is necessary to

19 fessionals to ensure the recognition, proper diagnostic workup, and reporting of measles.

20 Data on subsequent diagnostic workup are sparse.

21 e immunoglobulin titers and accurate allergy diagnostic workups are strongly recommended in these pat

22 the right questions and performing a limited diagnostic workup as suggested here, this algorithm may

23 ergency care setting (ECS), after subsequent diagnostic workup at our Allergy Center (AC).

24 We also found that sputa submitted for CF diagnostic workup can be divided into a limited number o

25 outpatient colonoscopy for CRC screening or diagnostic workup (controls, n = 49).

26 stent bodily complaints for which a thorough diagnostic workup does not reveal adequate explanatory s

27 CMR is a valuable component of the diagnostic workup for ARVC when performed with a dedicat

28 portion who underwent an appropriate initial diagnostic workup for asthma in the community.

29 rkers and fecal calprotectin are used in the diagnostic workup for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) i

30 ically intractable focal epilepsy undergoing diagnostic workup for localization of seizure foci.

31 n of the AIJCV could be an added tool in the diagnostic workup for PML and should be included in the

32 current guidelines pay little attention to a diagnostic workup for pulmonary embolism in these patien

33 n expression that is employed as part of the diagnostic workup for the majority of solid tissue malig

34 Further diagnostic workup for unsuspected extracolonic findings

35 All diagnostic workups generated because of extracolonic fin

36 y, a suggested novel algorithm for p53-based diagnostic workup in AML is presented, aiming at facilit

37 ate PET image quantification for an improved diagnostic workup in dementia patients.

38 d (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging could improve the diagnostic workup in patients with cardiac masses.

39 uspicion of EATL should lead to an extensive diagnostic workup in which magnetic resonance enteroclys

40 Diagnostic workup including brain biopsy was unrevealing

41 oad search profile in the ECS and subsequent diagnostic workup is important for identification and cl

42 ncreased risk of mental disorders during the diagnostic workup leading to a cancer diagnosis was unkn

43 In beer-allergic patients the diagnostic workup may point to the detection of some tol

44 Diagnostic workup must rapidly determine which, if any,

45 -home screening interview followed by a full diagnostic workup of a subsample of participants based o

46 the role of computed tomography (CT) in the diagnostic workup of abdominal stab wounds remains contr

47 hort study to assess the value of PSP in the diagnostic workup of acute appendicitis.

48 hort study to assess the value of PSP in the diagnostic workup of acute appendicitis.

49 Biomarkers for the differential diagnostic workup of AD are needed.

50 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers to the diagnostic workup of Alzheimer disease, it needs to be d

51 ances in the awareness, pathophysiology, and diagnostic workup of concussion, mTBI, and PTH, there is

52 ative to routine coronary angiography in the diagnostic workup of DCM.

53 actate levels are adequate biomarkers in the diagnostic workup of GLUT1 deficiency syndrome.

54 ols and using pathological biomarkers in the diagnostic workup of LMS.

55 the usage of an MC as additional tool in the diagnostic workup of nodal PTCL.

56 f computed tomography (CT) for the emergency diagnostic workup of patients with caustic injuries.

57 CT/MRI) with (18)F-FDG PET/CT upfront in the diagnostic workup of patients with oral, pharyngeal, or

58 d NSA-abs analysis should be included in the diagnostic workup of patients with rapidly progressive c

59 These hybrid systems are redefining the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected or known in

60 vanced MR imaging techniques for the routine diagnostic workup of patients with these tumors.

61 Adding fecal calprotectin to the diagnostic workup of pediatric patients with symptoms su

62 have demonstrated promising results for the diagnostic workup of prostate cancer.

63 at KCNQ2 screening should be included in the diagnostic workup of refractory neonatal seizures of unk

64 lidate routine inclusion of JAK2V617F in the diagnostic workup of SVT patients.

65 derwent stress MPI between 2006 and 2012 for diagnostic workup of syncope.

66 matic lumbar puncture at the time of initial diagnostic workup on treatment outcome in children with

67 ition, morphogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, prognosis, and treatment of these ano

68 s identified in the UCA survivor or when the diagnostic workup revealed a phenotype suggestive of a s

69 bellar dysfunction that might elude standard diagnostic workup strategies for ataxia.

70 All the patients underwent a diagnostic workup that included esophagogastroduodenosco

71 uated for patient and tumor characteristics, diagnostic workup, treatment, and outcome.

72 understanding the clinical characteristics, diagnostic workup, treatment, disease assessment, and pr

73 ve value of biopsy recommendation after full diagnostic workup was 19 of 84 for mammography (22.6%; 9

74 Tissue diagnosis during the diagnostic workup was achieved in 104 patients (68%), wh

75 Diagnostic workup was completed within 6 hours of initia