ライフサイエンスコーパス: difference

1 zumab) and -15% to 15% with a 95% CI for ORR difference.

2 and BDII in etiology, partly due to genetic differences.

3 BC in young women, including ethnic specific differences.

4 t hoc analysis for statistically significant differences.

5 ', 'allergy' and 'pollen' - showing cultural differences.

6 d on adsorption entropy rather than enthalpy differences.

7 genetic, environmental and neuropathological differences.

8 analysis were used to determine significant differences.

9 h 211 (78.1%) of 270 in the meropenem group (difference -0.7% [95% CI -7.9 to 6.4]).

10 oup vs 0 in the placebo group; between-group difference, 0 [95% CI, -10.0 to 0]; P = .61).

11 the duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference, 0.01 d [95% CI, -2.67 to 2.69 d]; low-qualit

12 .4 in the levothyroxine group; between-group difference, 0.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.0 to 2

13 and 3.8+/-18.4, respectively; between-group difference, 0.4; 95% CI, -2.1 to 2.9).

14 (boys, 1.21 [1.5] vs girls, 0.71 [1.0]; mean difference, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.27-0.74]; effect size, 0.38)

15 d was 36% lower than in the pre-vGMS period (difference, -0.28 [CI, -0.35 to -0.22]).

16 (boys, 23.9 [3.9] vs girls, 24.9 [3.5]; mean difference, -0.92 [95% CI, -1.61 to -0.23]; effect size,

17 r disease recurrence, or died (absolute risk difference -1.4%, 95% CI -7.0 to 4.3; hazard ratio 0.96,

18 ] to 6 [death]; minimum clinically important difference, 1 point), assessed at 90 days by postal ques

19 significantly more improvement in pain (mean difference, 1.6 units [95% CI, 0.9 to 2.3 units]) and ph

20 : boys, 11.1 [7.7] vs girls, 9.4 [8.1]; mean difference, 1.63 [95% CI, 0.21-3.05]; effect size, 0.21)

21 mprovements were sustained at 9 months (mean differences, 1.1 units [CI, 0.4 to 1.8 units] and 7.0 un

22 mplant reconstruction had decreased fatigue (difference, -1.4; P = .035), whereas patients who underw

23 s 10.9 days in the intensive group (absolute difference, -1.5 days; 95% CI, -3.1 to -0.3; P = .04).

24 in the IN and RE groups, respectively (mean difference: -1.06 kg; 95% CI: -2.75, 0.63 kg; P = 0.22).

25 day 3 compared with 97 (50.0%) of 194 (mean difference 10.0, 95% CI 0.2-19.8, p=0.046) in the monoth

26 ine to 80% (943 of 1184 patients) at 1 year (difference 12%), whereas in the control group it increas

27 31.7 (27.1) days in the control group (mean difference, 17.9; 95% CI, 3.71-32.01; P = .02).

28 mean peripapillary RNFL thickness (mean [SE] difference, -17.06 [3.14] mum; 95% CI, -23.29 to -10.82;

29 ; P = .002), nerve branch density (mean [SE] difference, -17.94 [5.45] branches/mm2; 95% CI, -28.77 t

30 onstruction had increased pain interference (difference, 2.0; P = .006).

31 han clinically diagnosed cases (mean decline difference 2231 pg/dl, 95% CI: 897-3566, p = 0.0013).

32 ine to 67% (732 of 1092 patients) at 1 year (difference 3%).

33 boys, 15.1 [9.8] vs girls, 11.8 [9.2]; mean difference, 3.31 [95% CI, 1.60-5.02]; effect size, 0.35)

34 10; P = .001), nerve fiber length (mean [SE] difference, -3.03 [0.89] mm/mm2; 95% CI, -4.81 to -1.25;

35 Corneal nerve fiber density (mean [SE] difference, -6.78 [2.14] fibers/mm2; 95% CI, -11.04 to -

36 , -121 to +101; minimal clinically important difference, 7 letters), analyzed by treatment assignment

37 e use decreased from 14.5% to 4.9% (adjusted difference, -7.7%; 95% CI, -13.1% to -2.4%).

38 9 to 2.3 units]) and physical function (mean difference, 9.3 units [CI, 5.9 to 12.7 units]) than the

39 s assessed for 46 texture features, and mean difference, 95% limits of agreement, within-subject coef

40 en in subgroup analyses, with no significant difference according to the indication for anticoagulati

41 lay APA, S. pombe showed greater 3' UTR size differences among APA isoforms than did S. cerevisiae PA

42 oxon signed rank test was used to assess for differences among treatment groups for the mouse studies

43 cervical) in all women in England in view of differences and changes in vaccination and screening upt

44 Second, differences are seen in the base stacking of pairs in di

45 ed group (HR 0.83, 0.74-0.92), with absolute differences at 5 years of 8.1% (3.4 to 12.8) and at 10 y

46 HPLC-MS and 4861 genes exhibited significant differences at transcript levels by microarray analysis

47 eline CC, showed a statistically significant difference between both groups (log rank, p 0.036).

48 (reference was the taller sibling): >/=10 cm difference between brothers hazard ratios=0.69 (95% conf

49 In a voxel-based lesion analysis, the difference between erectile dysfunction scores before an

50 approach emphasizes the commonly overlooked difference between how net and gross carbon fluxes affec

51 There was no survival difference between PB-type cancers and PDAC (33.3 vs 31.

52 llowed for the determination of the enthalpy difference between physically adsorbed pentene in ZSM-5

53 enrichment at the boundary, but decrease the difference between the coexisting phases by ordering the

54 tion color measurements showed a significant difference between the control dough and the dough conta

55 like adhesion is the configurational entropy difference between the freestanding and adhered states o

56 toperative 30-day morbidity did not show any difference between the groups (FFT: 35% vs LFT: 29%, P =

57 3.2 (3.0) in HC (p=0.38), with a significant difference between the groups (p<0.001).

58 who received intensive therapy, there was no difference between the proportion of responding clones i

59 theory (DFT) is used to calculate the energy difference between the putative product-determining isom

60 ificant (0.2 [SD 1.1] vs 0.1 [1.1], p=0.010) difference between the two groups in change from baselin

61 The cost difference between the two groups was $648 ($87,476 in t

62 Surprisingly, there was very little difference between the two proteomes under standard grow

63 s when air humidity decreases (i.e. when the difference between the vapor pressures of leaf and atmos

64 incinerator fly ashes revealed a significant difference between their EPFR contents.

65 As(V) was determined as the difference between total As and As(III).

66 electrons) associated with the reflectivity difference between two different substrates can be track

67 Conclusion The only difference between using the single- or double-needle pr

68 call for caution in interpreting qualitative differences between associations among different dyad ty

69 ascorbic acid were analyzed, not statistical differences between both crops were found.

70 expression using RNA sequencing and assessed differences between conditions by linear modeling of the

71 There were no significant differences between groups in patients' growth parameter

72 nservation, there are significant structural differences between microtubules assembled in vitro from

73 two strategies: one that concerns observing differences between nonhuman species (G), the second tha

74 Differences between PCI and CABG were assessed using lon

75 To identify potential fine differences between rHBeAg and HBeAg, we used these Fabs

76 Risk factor differences between the cohorts were measured using the

77 ar explanation for the observable phenotypic differences between the mouse and human skin and broadly

78 m mass spectrometry analysis revealed marked differences between the proteins packaged within the two

79 We interpret the geochemical and temporal differences between the SE and NW lava fields to be cons

80 role of the human Y chromosome in phenotypic differences between the sexes in health and disease.

81 of the PrP(Sc) conformers has revealed major differences between the two diseases, which preferential

82 We find evidence of significant differences between the two groups in the composition of

83 rg and Ebola virus VP35 proteins may explain differences between them in polymerase function and immu

84 ensive characterization has not revealed any differences between these reticulocytes and in vitro-cul

85 understanding of sex-specific cardiovascular differences both at baseline and in disease is required

86 and characteristics, which accounts for sex differences, but there is also evidence to support under

87 Differences by antibiotic class should be further explor

88 lection in rural environments and that these differences can drive adaptation and shape population st

89 Birds do not appear to possess a time-difference clock sense [2].

90 ow performing with relatively small survival differences compared with expected.

91 This difference could not be accounted for by differences in

92 This difference defines their distinct roles in the regulatio

93 of the cation shows a one order of magnitude difference depending whether it is inferred at the nanom

94 determine whether statistically significant differences existed.

95 Differences from related projects include a much broader

96 ctors of intelligence exist among individual differences (g) in performance in several species, and a

97 ed by proteomic two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry, an

98 Structural brain differences have been associated with BD, but results fr

99 Traditionally, sex differences have been attributed to the differential eff

100 Differences have been observed in the microbiota of chil

101 sion heuristic and what underlies individual differences have hitherto remained unanswered.

102 howed significant racial/ethnic and regional differences, high exposure burden to multiple allergens

103 Overall, these differences highlight that changes in infant formula com

104 These differences illuminate yield-reporting deficiencies and

105 in vivo) infected ex vivo with MAV-1 had no difference in activities of secreted MMP2 and MMP9 from

106 The absolute difference in ADCs (right branch - left branch) was sign

107 The difference in aromaticity between the rings contributes

108 does not consistently favor the proposed sex difference in attractiveness preferences, nor the fitnes

109 There was no significant between-group difference in change in patient-reported overall health

110 fore age 7 years had a larger direct effect (difference in cognitive function z score) on child cogni

111 A recent Cochrane review found no difference in complications, including urinary tract inf

112 We speculate that the striking difference in compulsive-like locomotor behavior is also

113 We used the difference in delta(15) N between 20 ant conspecifics in

114 adjusted rates 10% vs 6%; P = 0.018), and no difference in discharge destination (P = 0.11).

115 anari than Koshihikari resulted in the small difference in evapotranspiration.

116 Our results suggest an age-specific difference in human postvaccination responses.

117 The significant difference in k0 is due to a tunneling effect caused by

118 more signs of congestion, but no significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction.

119 jury severity and demographic variables, the difference in LOS for Medicaid vs non-Medicaid recipient

120 In addition, there was no difference in mean visual outcome of the first versus se

121 o benefit on the primary outcome (HVLT-R-DR; difference in means -0.43 [95% CI -1.73 to 0.87]).

122 In a prespecified secondary analysis, no difference in mortality was found (odds ratio, 1.16; 95%

123 to discriminate monomolecular odorants whose difference in odor cannot be quantified.

124 We aimed to estimate the difference in opioid relapse-free survival between XR-NT

125 ent with WBRT than with SRS and there was no difference in overall survival between the treatment gro

126 No statistically significant difference in overall survival was observed between the

127 ement with HPLC results, with an average <9% difference in predictions between the two analytical app

128 Results No difference in procedure duration was seen overall (P = .

129 (75.3%) vs 25 of 260 (9.6%; P < .001), for a difference in proportions of 65.7% (95% CI, 59.3%-72.1%)

130 (74.0%) vs 21 of 254 (8.3%; P < .001), for a difference in proportions of 65.7% (95% CI, 59.4%-72.1%)

131 21 patients (4.0%) in the dalteparin group (difference in risk, 2.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1 t

132 imple explanation of the clinically reported difference in surgical outcomes.

133 In our simulations, the difference in surrounding tissue excitability also offer

134 erone rise in the boys nor a gender-specific difference in testosterone levels, which suggests that u

135 guideline found no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of second-generation antidepr

136 There was no significant difference in the levels of inhibition of UVB-induced im

137 Overall difference in the mean transformed NPSC score for the TL

138 incidence and depth of impoverishment as the difference in the poverty head count and poverty gap wit

139 There was no difference in the primary endpoint of day 1 dyspnea redu

140 nts undergoing PCI, there was no significant difference in the rate of target-vessel failure between

141 Results There was no significant difference in the size or shape of ablations created by

142 in of the abnormal composition change is the difference in the thermodynamic properties of ternary Fe

143 ctive antiretroviral therapy (HAART) had any difference in their IOP compared with patients without H

144 identified 764 genes with at least a 2-fold difference in TL1A-mediated expression between IFNG-secr

145 id not result in a statistically significant difference in tumor burden or survival distributions com

146 (from 58.9% to 69.2%; P<0.001), there was no difference in unadjusted rate of successful cardioversio

147 We found no difference in uptake of screening between the active cho

148 pared to controls, there were no significant differences in allele frequencies between affecteds and

149 There were no differences in allergic disease between LEAP groups.

150 AMY2 show copy number variations that affect differences in amylase amount and activity, and AMY1 cop

151 lla, Sweetheart and Staccato), with distinct differences in anthocyanins and vitamin C contents, on h

152 ation and epigenetic marks interact to shape differences in behavior.

153 maturation in old age as well as individual differences in behavioral performance.

154 ggesting mechanisms selecting for consistent differences in behaviour and social plasticity.

155 ual selection is likely to favour individual differences in behaviour, social plasticity (i.e., indiv

156 were many similarities but, crucially, some differences in biomarker levels (IL-1beta and sRANKL) an

157 remains prevailing in explaining black-white differences in birth outcomes, the individual contributi

158 infant stem cell metabolism correspond with differences in body composition in early life, a known c

159 rgy use against metered data, accounting for differences in building materials and appliances.

160 taking gemfibrozil did not show significant differences in CAL and PD compared with untreated patien

161 We found no differences in clinical outcomes between MGUS patients a

162 e of ASD might partially be explained by sex differences in clinical symptoms, etiological models sug

163 These differences may extend to differences in cognition among individuals.

164 Moreover, dissociating innate differences in cognitive function from cannabis-induced

165 analysis to identify patterns of individual differences in compulsive "addiction-like" aggressive be

166 No differences in cortisol levels were found.

167 g-protease as a major determinant of subtype differences in disease progression among HIV-1 subtypes;

168 Together, these data suggest that differences in DNA methylation may partly explain the en

169 n versus cell elongation is suggested, as no differences in DNA methylation were observed between 24-

170 , treatment efficacy is generally modest and differences in efficacy between antidepressant therapies

171 of opioid agonist treatment associated with differences in efficacy compared with opioid taper or ps

172 methadone vs buprenorphine) associated with differences in efficacy for treating prescription opioid

173 These data demonstrate chemoarchitectural differences in ERbeta neurons of the mouse PVN that are

174 interactions through pollinator responses to differences in floral attractants, and that the effects

175 e on Mg isotope fractionation is thus due to differences in fungal cell mass fluxes.

176 eral afferent neurons, but found no striking differences in gene expression between male and female m

177 optical screening images revealed unexpected differences in growth characteristics among strains of B

178 There were also significant differences in growth of EFW between countries.

179 oteomic analysis of the liver reveals global differences in hepatic proteins when comparing diets ric

180 This analysis revealed profound differences in heterozygote frequencies among population

181 We describe here important differences in how the Rb and p107 C-terminal domains (C

182 ansplant consortium demonstrates significant differences in IC among centers, the importance of bilia

183 Prior studies have examined differences in individual cytokine levels in patients wi

184 Our findings suggest that programmed differences in infant stem cell metabolism correspond wi

185 altered conformation upon RNAP binding or to differences in intrinsic properties between the proteins

186 rease in breakdown rates is uncertain, given differences in litter quality and microbial and detritiv

187 The observed differences in low-temperature adaptation between B. per

188 METHODS AND We examined cross-sectional differences in MD by age and menopausal status in over 1

189 RNAseq and qPCR confirmed significant differences in mean expression for 10 genes previously i

190 is demonstrated by statistically significant differences in mean scores between ICUs, between types o

191 espite a high number of concussions in RIRP, differences in mental health, social or work functioning

192 In the RD analysis, we found no significant differences in MI risk between patients who started PPIs

193 miR122 was able to quantitatively detect the differences in miR122 levels in Huh7 and HEK293T cells d

194 We report differences in morphology and diet of the termite-eating

195 We examined differences in mortality when ICU patients were admitted

196 ation is essential to establish sex-specific differences in muscle metabolism and body weight develop

197 No differences in OS or second neoplasias were observed in

198 bjective of the current study is to evaluate differences in outcome by applying five periodontitis ca

199 patient populations across providers so that differences in outcomes are truly attributable to differ

200 general internist, there were no significant differences in overall 30-day mortality rates among pati

201 ) and statistical adjustment can be made for differences in patient populations across providers so t

202 d effects (%) were estimated on the basis of differences in percent effect changes in conditional log

203 how subtle differences in spike timing drive differences in perception or behavior, leaving it unclea

204 70) for 1860 generations, showed significant differences in photosynthesis and growth from a populati

205 tive method without BSSVS, and highlight the differences in phylogenies created by each.

206 Differences in placental longitudinal R1 (1/T1) and tran

207 No significant differences in postoperative anterior chamber reaction (

208 of intestinal inflammation and there were no differences in previously published metabolic markers of

209 We observed no significant group differences in pseudoreference VT or SUV, excepting whol

210 Differences in PtdIns3K and Rho-GTPase activity were att

211 to assess mortality by occupation in the UK, differences in rates between England and Wales and Scotl

212 cus on understanding the determinants of sex differences in rehospitalization risk among conditions.

213 vel, by RNA-FISH, and is not attributable to differences in repressive histone H3K9me3 or H3K27me3 le

214 his difference could not be accounted for by differences in running speed, as the firing rates of PER

215 As a result of the differences in spectral data, the incorrect structural a

216 senting within-category and between-category differences in speech and nonspeech contexts.

217 However, it is unknown whether or how subtle differences in spike timing drive differences in percept

218 We identified significant group differences in striatal dopamine transporter binding (al

219 ct effectiveness estimates have varied, with differences in study design, location, follow-up duratio

220 In this study, we tested for differences in subcortical grey matter volume (n = 1157)

221 Additionally, our results suggest possible differences in the aetiology of depression between women

222 to distinct molecular subgroups that reflect differences in the age of onset, gender predominance and

223 rences in outcomes are truly attributable to differences in the care provided.

224 Regional differences in the cellular distribution of aromatase (e

225 To date, differences in the clinical outcomes between the 2 cohor

226 Significant differences in the community structure were determined a

227 most common brain malformations to identify differences in the effect of virtual corpus callosotomie

228 This study uncovered differences in the fatty acid selectivity profiles of ce

229 e cancer but also likely contributing to sex differences in the health and diseases of man.

230 but we lack a basic understanding of how sex differences in the human cerebellum are distributed and

231 This analysis revealed major differences in the immune checkpoint expression patterns

232 We found no differences in the mean change at 1 year in the Hypothyr

233 severe group (p = 0.008); (3) no significant differences in the mean rod-mediated responses.

234 These differences in the response of periodontal tissues to or

235 mportance of individual neural and autonomic differences in the response to nature exposure.

236 These sex differences in the role of these prostanoids in the PVAT

237 Segregated H is used as a means to emphasize differences in the selected grain boundary structures wh

238 We attribute differences in the self-association properties of Loqs,

239 itory cortex that is sensitive to individual differences in the timing of initial response to sound o

240 These results highlight differences in the transfer of favorable gene clusters c

241 ned mutations in the capsid protein revealed differences in their cytoplasmic and nuclear accumulatio

242 ther, after controlling for medical factors, differences in time to acceptance for transplant were ex

243 Whether sex differences in treatment decisions reflect patient prefe

244 n white stroke survivors without substantial differences in unmet need.

245 Anopheles mosquito species, these phenotypic differences include vectorial capacity, as it is only fe

246 ealthy individuals than between species; the difference increased for more distantly related species.

247 Differences increased in eyes with a thinner RNFL thickn

248 > mIgepsilon, and that these BCR expression differences influence respective developmental fitness.

249 antly differ, and it is unclear whether this difference is due to an altered conformation upon RNAP b

250 To test whether this difference is related to visual capacity and frontal pla

251 However, differences may be related to a modifying effect of age,

252 These differences may extend to differences in cognition among

253 Such differences may have clinical significance, as therapeut

254 Such differences may ultimately contribute to their unique be

255 increased performance in the orienting (mean difference [MD] = 14.63) and executive (MD = 21.00) atte

256 These differences need validation, and their impacts on dispar

257 LPrs1898671 homozygotes, with no significant difference observed between wildtype and heterozygous pa

258 the IOL Master 500 and Pentacam AXL, a mean difference of 0.026 mm and COR of 0.055 (P = .75) was fo

259 s suggested previously, the observed phasing difference of deep delta(18)Oc likely reflects early war

260 depressive symptoms, and executive function (differences of 0.6-0.7 SD; P=1.2x10(-3)-2.4x10(-4)).

261 Differences of opinion regarding whether there may, or m

262 ersus second NAION events (standardized mean differences of visual acuity 0.008, P = 0.890; and visua

263 Power analysis predicts that a 1-point difference on this 5-step scale would be detectable with

264 g interruptions, a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001).

265 The range of the difference (percent) in impacts between including and ex

266 Many of the differences persist through subculture.

267 s and scatter fractions did not reveal large differences regardless of the mu-map used.

268 alization strategy to reduce method-specific differences related to the length of genic regions.

269 s for each age group to capture the temporal differences seen in the immune responses of these mice.

270 predicting poor outcome or standardized mean difference (SMD) of thyroid hormone levels with 95% conf

271 The conformational differences stem from the orientations of the apical dom

272 Regional sex differences suggest that extrinsic factors, such as wate

273 ose thought to carry out model-free temporal difference (TD) learning.

274 nderstanding of the phenotypic and genotypic differences that exist between patients and their tumour

275 the full and P-VLBW cohorts may reflect true differences, the association of a reduced risk of ROP am

276 rain region not normally associated with sex differences, this work sheds light on ways that genes, e

277 A difference threshold of 0.47 degrees C or greater betwee

278 , with estimates ranging from no significant difference to nearly 2 degrees C warmer than present-day

279 dure, revealing the importance of procedural differences to the demonstration of the drug effect.

280 The described differences underline the complementarity of NISs and RC

281 The least-squares mean difference versus placebo with respect to the absolute c

282 haliana and its dependence on vapor pressure difference (VPD) and on water feed to the leaf.

283 f clinically significant prostate cancer, no difference was found in the diagnostic performance of th

284 A significant difference was observed between the impaired and nonimpa

285 No significant difference was seen between the placebo patch vs the 100

286 r to -1.26 g/L per year), but no significant difference was seen in the rate in early-start patients

287 formation occurs on the metal domains, these differences were correlated with the altering concentrat

288 No differences were detected in estrogen receptor, progeste

289 Differences were evaluated using paired 2-tailed t tests

290 No significant differences were found in the moral distress total score

291 women than for men of the same race, and the differences were greatest in younger age groups (for exa

292 to control group eyes (12/31, 38.7%), though differences were marginally significant (P = .065).

293 Examination (MMSE; p=0.004) at 1 year; these differences were not present after 2 years.

294 k African vs 14.8% for white British), these differences were not significant after adjusting for age

295 No significant performance differences were revealed among the three sites, while s

296 No statistically significant between-group differences were seen for any secondary outcome at 4 wee

297 Potentially important differences were seen in: testing repertoire [10/44 (23%

298 d with higher adult BMI in both genders, and differences were typically larger at older ages and simi

299 rator, a multivariate model showed increased differences with decreasing RNFL thickness (P < .001), d

300 he second that concerns observing individual differences within a nonhuman species (g).