ライフサイエンスコーパス: digital subtraction angiography

1 nces of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

2 graphy, computed tomography angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.

3 after PTA was assessed by using conventional digital subtraction angiography.

4 in 11 swine, the authors performed baseline digital subtraction angiography.

5 al TOF MR angiography and two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography.

6 or results when compared with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.

7 Digital subtraction angiography 4 weeks after gene thera

8 resonance angiography, ultrasonography, and digital subtraction angiography all have a role in endol

9 The relative ability of MR digital subtraction angiography and TOF MR angiography t

10 s (APRs), and imaging including conventional digital subtraction angiography, computerized tomographi

11 acquisition with a motion-immune dual-energy digital subtraction angiography (DE DSA) system.

12 Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography did not identify any und

13 at MR angiography was compared with that at digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (n = 13) and compu

14 rate of detection of aneurysms at follow-up digital subtraction angiography (DSA) after initial DSA

15 Their results were compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference s

16 study if they had a CT angiography (CTA) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) diagnosis, an inte

17 anner is increasingly replacing conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for diagnosing or

18 Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has served as the

19 hic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) rather than digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in a pregnant woma

20 Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is considered the

21 iography are useful in the diagnostics while digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the best option

22 Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of cerebral vessel

23 ndard of cerebral vessel imaging remains the digital subtraction angiography (DSA) performed in three

24 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) revealed a dissect

25 The use of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) versus helical CT

26 readers evaluated 43 renal arteries on x-ray digital subtraction angiography (DSA), 3D-Gadolinium MR

27 Digital subtraction angiography (DSA), the reference sta

28 ripheral vascular disease after conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

29 e type identification compared with those at digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

30 nt 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

31 tion underwent conventional angiography (ie, digital subtraction angiography [DSA]) and contrast-enha

32 rols; 18 rats underwent catheterization with digital subtraction angiography guidance for intraportal

33 ere used with fluoroscopy, road mapping, and digital subtraction angiography in 19 patients.

34 s-chase three-dimensional magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography in the arterial system f

35 Two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography is superior to two-dimen

36 ed in an aortic bolus to provide contrast at digital subtraction angiography of the aorta and renal a

37 erwent right heart catheterization and-after digital subtraction angiography of the pulmonary arterie

38 Digital subtraction angiography remains the gold standar

39 Although intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography remains the historical g

40 After intervention, the digital subtraction angiography showed a good stent posi

41 nt arterial vasculature, will be shown using digital subtraction angiography, SPECT/CT, contrast-enha

42 one operator showing better performance with digital subtraction angiography than with CFA (P = .04).

43 At digital subtraction angiography, the mean percentage of

44 ded comparison of power Doppler imaging with digital subtraction angiography, the reference-standard

45 advocated as alternatives to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography to screen for aneurysms.

46 MR digital subtraction angiography was significantly superi

47 Twenty-three patients also underwent digital subtraction angiography, which was a reference s

48 liminary data support the combining of 2D MR digital subtraction angiography with 3D bolus chase MR a

49 Selective digital subtraction angiography with a flow directed cat

50 Digital subtraction angiography with a gadolinium chelat