ライフサイエンスコーパス: direct comparison

1 a conventional ISE configuration, allowing a direct comparison.

2 ope images, the gold standard, were used for direct comparison.

3 t experiments and setups, thus hindering any direct comparison.

4 scent proteins under the same conditions for direct comparison.

5 udies (18916 patients) were included with 15 direct comparisons.

6 an for CT or MRI (pooled difference based on direct comparisons, 0.11 to 0.22), and MRI was associate

7 To permit direct comparison across methods, all results were norma

8 han among those who came as adults; however, direct comparisons across Hispanic groups are lacking.

9 d to be higher than those of medication, but direct comparisons, albeit usually based on few trials,

10 ion to skin wetness, which provides easy and direct comparison among different fabrics.

11 across multiple genomes, thus facilitating a direct comparison among them.

12 Direct comparisons among all the multi-domain NRs studie

13 different 2D chromatograms, permitting their direct comparison and (ii) to automatically identify and

14 mass spectrometry (MS), promises avenues for direct comparison and correlation of metabolite data obt

15 of reference product or standard active for direct comparison and has a potential to be used for adu

16 ialized than those of green plants, although direct comparisons are lacking.

17 al differences between the studies mean that direct comparisons are not straightforward.

18 esults with the wet mount method or culture, direct comparisons assessed with kappa scores, and laten

19 Direct comparison between AFM data obtained on glass and

20 Direct comparison between anisotropy decays calculated f

21 in Africa has limited our ability to make a direct comparison between archaic and modern human genom

22 pressant-like effects of ECT and performed a direct comparison between BDNF manipulations in the VTA

23 We make direct comparison between cellulose nanomaterials and ca

24 We sought to draw a direct comparison between ERAD and CytoQC by studying th

25 A direct comparison between exchanges occurring at short a

26 Direct comparison between factors revealed that the temp

27 No direct comparison between FST and SCM is available.

28 Different denominators meant that direct comparison between groups was difficult, but the

29 As a result, a direct comparison between hemodynamic values should only

30 This modeling framework allows a direct comparison between in vitro bioluminescence exper

31 Direct comparison between matched pre-treatment and rela

32 A direct comparison between parallel activated sludge and

33 nal AD phenotype using RNA-seq and the first direct comparison between platforms in this disease.

34 This study provides a direct comparison between quantification methods through

35 ing interstadial onsets as tie-points allows direct comparison between radiocarbon dates and Greenlan

36 rogress of their laws, as well as facilitate direct comparison between states for research and educat

37 cal connectome fingerprint that allows for a direct comparison between structural connectomes.

38 We need additional randomised trials with direct comparison between targets based on unified scori

39 We included randomised studies with direct comparison between targets.

40 We report a direct comparison between the activity of ZnCu and ZnO/C

41 principle of the dual-microring system by a direct comparison between the calculated and measured va

42 We make a direct comparison between the devices made with the macr

43 Direct comparison between the nanowire region and the pl

44 re than 40 FPs to enable straightforward and direct comparison between them.

45 In a direct comparison between these next generation organoty

46 of using PEG-DET for protein delivery and a direct comparison between two cationic block copolymers

47 erenced experimental design that allowed for direct comparisons between analogous masked and unmasked

48 es has been slow, in part due to the lack of direct comparisons between existing 2-dimensional and 3-

49 crystal engineering efforts and facilitates direct comparisons between experimental and computationa

50 Direct comparisons between GHG emissions and LCOE and be

51 Logistic challenges make direct comparisons between laboratory- and field-based i

52 ccount for observational processes, allowing direct comparisons between metapopulations.

53 ways discovered with genomic sequencing, but direct comparisons between models and "omics" data are l

54 However, direct comparisons between molecular catalysts and enzym

55 ly to track a visual target, thus precluding direct comparisons between neural activity and behavior.

56 rity and somatic differentiation, permitting direct comparisons between organisms with different life

57 te the popularity of each of these measures, direct comparisons between the two have been limited, an

58 jection sites within S1 were matched so that direct comparisons between these two groups could be mad

59 Bayesian NMAs were performed to combine direct comparisons between treatments with that of indir

60 However, direct comparisons between VH-IVUS and OCT are lacking a

61 In this study we describe their direct comparison by using TCRs that could be formatted

62 ce few studies evaluated nonporous implants, direct comparisons cannot be made definitively between i

63 flaw is less relevant as a source of bias in direct comparisons conducted within studies.

64 or vice versa, to facilitate meta-analysis, direct comparison, data integration and visualization.

65 two Vpu functions in parallel assays, making direct comparisons difficult.

66 In direct comparisons, efficacy of the CD38 bispecific prov

67 Direct comparisons from 41 randomized controlled trials

68 ses versus 19 423 controls, in addition to a direct comparison GWAS of 7129 SCZ cases versus 9252 BP

69 extremity is increasing, but no large-scale direct comparison has been reported between conventional

70 To our knowledge, a direct comparison has not been performed before.

71 Our direct comparison highlights the mechanistic differences

72 Direct comparison in five samples with a total of 1378 i

73 igands bind to fibrillar Abeta in the brain, direct comparisons in the same individuals have not been

74 ts have not been analyzed in a comprehensive direct comparison including a wide range of different im

75 r, based on limited observations and with no direct comparisons, it is not clear whether these observ

76 Network meta-analysis was used to pool direct (comparison of second-generation DES to BMS) and

77 In this study, we report on the direct comparison of 3 novel GRPR-targeted radiolabeled

78 o rationalize the trends observed, including direct comparison of 3-cyano-, 3-nitro-, and 3-phenyl-su

79 inter-individual variability, we performed a direct comparison of [(11)C]PK11195 and [(18)F]DPA-714 b

80 We report the results of the direct comparison of a freely expanding turbulent Bose-E

81 The pH(abs) scale enables for the first time direct comparison of acidities of any LC mobile phases,

82 ed unified pH (pH(abs)) scale, which enables direct comparison of acidities of solutions made in diff

83 is presented or it may be in addition to the direct comparison of allocated groups.

84 emission signals (lambdamax=425 nm) allowed direct comparison of amperometric and luminescence perfo

85 A direct comparison of anabolic activity using BONCAT and

86 To enable direct comparison of ancestry background in different st

87 Direct comparison of antifouling performance of differen

88 A direct comparison of Apaf-1 in the apoptosome and as a m

89 Finally, this study is the first direct comparison of atomistic simulations to the contin

90 rly or late training, we performed the first direct comparison of bidirectional synaptic plasticity i

91 The presented study gives a direct comparison of binding properties of catalytic Pd

92 A direct comparison of bulk and surface spectral functions

93 e UiO-67 template, we were able to perform a direct comparison of catalytic activity with that of the

94 h and parallel sets visualization and allows direct comparison of clinical outcomes via survival anal

95 d donor progenitor cell product collected, a direct comparison of concurrent PBSC versus BM donation

96 In addition, CDF facilitates the direct comparison of data obtained independently from di

97 A direct comparison of DeltaCt values shows a larger abund

98 However, reports describing a direct comparison of different NAATs have been limited.

99 This makes direct comparison of different study-results difficult a

100 Direct comparison of dominant/cryptic epitope-specific C

101 This direct comparison of dynamic human and machine internal

102 This is the first study demonstrating a direct comparison of EET and EDP on vascular inflammator

103 We describe here a direct comparison of electrochemical and spectrochemical

104 Direct comparison of endogenous memory CD8 T cell respon

105 nfluence of sample heterogeneity, permitting direct comparison of ensemble and single-molecule diffus

106 This is the first direct comparison of enzymes and molecular complexes, en

107 l substituents of varying electronic demand, direct comparison of experimental and computational subs

108 A direct comparison of experimental m/z values provided no

109 accurate assessment of cannabis exposure and direct comparison of findings across studies.

110 er the same stimulation conditions allowed a direct comparison of firing rates and gamma-band synchro

111 Only through direct comparison of ganR- and ganciclovir-sensitive (ga

112 Direct comparison of gene expression by ALK(+) TCL cells

113 Here, a direct comparison of genome-wide occupancy of beta-caten

114 Here we show a direct comparison of gold and lead hohlraums in efficien

115 Here we report a direct comparison of high harmonic generation in the sol

116 We performed a direct comparison of high- and low-specific-activity (18

117 The multimodal approach allows direct comparison of how viscoelastic properties track t

118 Direct comparison of ICOS(-/-) Tregs to ICOS(+/+) Tregs

119 ode are united into a single system enabling direct comparison of IE values across ionization modes.

120 a-Fe2O3) as a model oxide, we show through a direct comparison of in situ synchrotron X-ray scatterin

121 Direct comparison of in vitro DNA binding affinity of th

122 This work is the first example of direct comparison of in vitro selected and natural aptam

123 ance imaging study is the first to allow the direct comparison of interaction-based and prior-based l

124 Direct comparison of isolates from potato chip samples f

125 A direct comparison of L-edge XAS and Kalpha RIXS spectra

126 Direct comparison of LG-SRM (5 h gradient) and conventio

127 ter mixing of labeled and unlabeled samples, direct comparison of light and heavy peaks allowed for t

128 Here we present a direct comparison of longitudinal data from both studies

129 The direct comparison of loop interaction and G-quartet stac

130 This Tric-LUC reporter allowed a direct comparison of luciferase activity with locomotor

131 Exploratory analyses of direct comparison of lutein/zeaxanthin vs beta carotene

132 with bilateral large drusen at baseline, the direct comparison of lutein/zeaxanthin vs beta carotene

133 ps from tomato and cultivated potato allowed direct comparison of marker orders between species.

134 We recommend direct comparison of means between groups with the use o

135 he level of bioinorganic chemistry, enabling direct comparison of metallozeolite active sites to func

136 The aim of the study was a direct comparison of microvascular obstruction (MVO) det

137 e genomic context of the FXN locus and allow direct comparison of normal and expanded FXN loci with r

138 ors using site-specific integration to allow direct comparison of normal and expanded FXN loci.

139 ion of adapted 5-5A recombinants allowed for direct comparison of NS3 protease and NS5A inhibitors ag

140 , and topography steps and present the first direct comparison of numerical and experimental data.

141 No direct comparison of octreotide and (68)Ga-DOTATATE imag

142 Direct comparison of our human and leishmanial ribosome

143 A direct comparison of outcomes between moderate mixed aor

144 Direct comparison of paralogous gene pairs all duplicate

145 Peer-reviewed studies with direct comparison of patient and control groups, and ava

146 This allowed direct comparison of present transcriptomic data with th

147 bypasses preerythrocytic stages, enabling a direct comparison of protection against either life cycl

148 In direct comparison of pure rPH with pure iPH, severe cere

149 Direct comparison of riverine and reservoir reaches, whe

150 n in ESI-MS signal responses, which yields a direct comparison of samples with different binding stre

151 This allows direct comparison of samples without using a reference g

152 ay using arrays of microrings, which allowed direct comparison of sensitivity and specificity.

153 e role of solvent dynamics, and it permits a direct comparison of simulation results with infrared sp

154 Direct comparison of simulations with published experime

155 y of the L-asparaginase domain and provide a direct comparison of sites critical for the conformation

156 Here, a direct comparison of sphingolipid profiles in Arabidopsi

157 A direct comparison of strongly and moderately coupled res

158 The authors present direct comparison of structural brain circuitry in child

159 This direct comparison of structure-function relationship ind

160 elles in HEK 293T cells, providing the first direct comparison of subcellular pools of the metal with

161 olysis of pretreated switchgrass allowed for direct comparison of sugar yields and lignin removal bet

162 Direct comparison of survival estimates between national

163 Direct comparison of TCR signaling on a single cell basi

164 ated to DeltaFM than to DeltaFFM; however, a direct comparison of the 2 indexes with respect to chang

165 This observational study did not allow for direct comparison of the 2 regimens.

166 Here we show for the first time a direct comparison of the abilities of Sec-containing mTR

167 Direct comparison of the Adar1 (-/-) and Adar1 (E861A/E8

168 is study, we bridge this gap by presenting a direct comparison of the aggregation kinetics of the ALS

169 The direct comparison of the anticancer activity of all natu

170 We identify 18,210 structural variants by direct comparison of the assembly with the human referen

171 This approach allowed direct comparison of the binding constants of prothrombi

172 As the most desirable validation is a direct comparison of the calculated values with the valu

173 We furthermore provide a direct comparison of the capabilities of LDA with those

174 ere, we present, to our knowledge, the first direct comparison of the carboxysome function from alpha

175 n the same substrate, thereby allowing for a direct comparison of the chain bonding motifs and their

176 However, a direct comparison of the charge transport properties ind

177 Direct comparison of the chloro, bromo, and iodopyrazole

178 To facilitate direct comparison of the cleavage rates, key experiments

179 the tumor tropism of MSCs, there remains no direct comparison of the efficacy and specificity of AMS

180 In this first direct comparison of the efficacy of dorz/brim/tim and b

181 Direct comparison of the etch pit image and the ODF plot

182 single photon) action regime, thus enabling direct comparison of the experimental vibrational patter

183 of safe and efficacious subunit vaccines, a direct comparison of the immunogenic properties and prot

184 the influence of electrical potential and a direct comparison of the influence of surface structure

185 tion of bulk-sensitive NEXAFS data enables a direct comparison of the information provided by GIWAXS

186 This study has allowed a direct comparison of the key characteristics of carbon-b

187 A direct comparison of the latter structures clearly illus

188 dentified in individual analyses, allowing a direct comparison of the MHCII peptidome in different ty

189 A direct comparison of the modeled anisotropy decays to ti

190 On the basis of direct comparison of the mutations linked to either cold

191 Likewise, direct comparison of the native CD3delta segment in oxid

192 different stages during the two processes a direct comparison of the performance and changes in mole

193 uring a study of MRSA nasal carriage allowed direct comparison of the qPCR and ddPCR assays to the Ce

194 esulting high-purity nanocrystals enable the direct comparison of the reactivity of the {111} and {10

195 A direct comparison of the removal capacity of the HSBS an

196 Here, we report the first direct comparison of the respective contributions of the

197 The direct comparison of the responses to TcdA and TcdB in c

198 imulated under the same conditions to enable direct comparison of the results and discrimination of t

199 In a direct comparison of the same FNA also tested by an RNA-

200 concentrations of analytes, it can provide a direct comparison of the signals arising from the analyt

201 A direct comparison of the two instrumental techniques was

202 Direct comparison of the uptake rate of LPC-DHA and NEFA

203 To allow direct comparison of these 2 radioactive labels for the

204 Direct comparison of these datasets revealed that althou

205 same experimental conditions; consequently a direct comparison of these two techniques has not been p

206 A direct comparison of this technology with fluorescence-a

207 tive to two standard regimens and provided a direct comparison of those two regimens.

208 Here we present direct comparison of three leading platforms displaying

209 The direct comparison of three Orbitrap mass spectrometers,

210 The present study provides direct comparison of tissue-specific MAOA expression and

211 This study provides a direct comparison of transcriptional programs between pu

212 Direct comparison of tropisetron to the current AD thera

213 The direct comparison of uptake of tritiated compounds demon

214 ect shared risk loci and second, that future direct comparisons of BP and SCZ are likely to identify

215 Use of standardized panels enables direct comparisons of data from different trials and stu

216 Direct comparisons of erosion during pulsed heat loading

217 here were no significant differences between direct comparisons of fructose vs glucose sessions follo

218 ildhood immunization programs worldwide, but direct comparisons of impacts against invasive pneumococ

219 Only direct comparisons of macular versus RNFL parameters (i.

220 rhythms on immune system structure, enabled direct comparisons of murine and human blood cell phenot

221 Direct comparisons of PD-1 expression and function betwe

222 s in GingerALE software were used to perform direct comparisons of pediatric and adult fMRI findings.

223 Nevertheless, direct comparisons of plant-microbe diversity at the com

224 Direct comparisons of psychosis features between 22q11DS

225 This simulation pipeline allows direct comparisons of simulated and observed data in a c

226 ion in young and older adults, but as yet no direct comparisons of TDCS effects exist between the two

227 We provide free software to allow direct comparisons of the 3 + 3 design with other model-

228 Direct comparisons of the perfusion estimates for normal

229 T) for the treatment of peanut allergy (PA), direct comparisons of these approaches are limited.

230 Direct comparisons of these novel treatments, however, a

231 d neck lesions and was inferior to PET/CT on direct comparison (P = 0.015).

232 In direct comparison, Pentobra demonstrated bactericidal ac

233 This direct comparison provides evidence that LFABP and IFABP

234 ured and 19 of these investigations provided direct comparisons relating passive sampler uptake and o

235 Direct comparisons revealed PD+ GM reductions predominan

236 Direct comparisons show that reaction centers are more s

237 Direct comparisons showed that use of metformin (risk ra

238 In this work, we perform a direct comparison that corrects for these experimental l

239 In this direct comparison, the core/contralateral ratio (3.35+/-

240 In direct comparisons, the APRI was associated with a sligh

241 with inflammatory and physiologic tissues in direct comparison to (18)F-FDG.

242 vestigated the potential of such a design by direct comparison to a traditional PET scanner.

243 XRIL allowed a direct comparison to be made between the near-band emiss

244 Additional prospective clinical trials with direct comparison to culture and PCR are warranted.

245 of the recently circulating EBOV-C05/C07 in direct comparison to EBOV-K with 6 animals per group, an

246 alistic supersaturations to enable the first direct comparison to experimental nucleation rates for t

247 m in-situ incubated pyrrhotite, allowing for direct comparison to microbial communities of iron-sulfi

248 thin the production segment of the EPA GHGI, direct comparison to our results is complicated.

249 /-) mice were studied up to 1 year of age in direct comparison to parental strain FVB.Mdr2(-/-).

250 rapeutic efficacy in 3D tumor models and the direct comparison to results from 2D models.

251 second laser for single-particle studies via direct comparison to the excimer laser (193 nm wavelengt

252 RNAz and EvoFold in genome-wide screens; in direct comparison to the most recent RNAz screen on D. m

253 s (e.g., diffusivity) could then be used for direct comparison to the results obtained by future stud

254 aborines to model cavities in T4 lysozyme in direct comparison to their carbonaceous counterparts.

255 ties of the ion atmosphere, and thus provide direct comparison to theoretical results.

256 e differential diagnosis of dementia, though direct comparisons to clearly establish superiority of o

257 icularly valuable on a laboratory scale, and direct comparisons to other methods are provided.

258 Through direct comparisons to previously published data as well

259 This corpus provides the first direct comparison, to our knowledge, between different p

260 Data were pooled across studies for direct comparisons using random-effects models.

261 Direct comparisons were made between treatments using ra

262 We performed meta-analyses of direct comparisons when outcomes and follow-up periods w

263 Well-designed direct comparisons, which are scarce, need public fundin

264 a quantitative marker of tumor perfusion by direct comparison with (15)O-water perfusion imaging.

265 Direct comparison with 7.5 mL of blood revealed a signif

266 This work is placed in context by showing a direct comparison with a Ni catalyst for >40 examples sp

267 lack of computational approaches that allow direct comparison with AFM experiments.

268 nd reactivity behavior were characterized in direct comparison with all-carbon anthracene.

269 In direct comparison with another long-acting insulin, insu

270 In direct comparison with behavioural and those with dysexe

271 The method has been validated by direct comparison with conventional bulk rheology method

272 For a direct comparison with conventional metal electrodes, si

273 the different experimental data, allowing a direct comparison with corresponding parameters found in

274 Direct comparison with experiment shows that passive ela

275 rious mechanisms of voltage sensing, enables direct comparison with experiments, and supports mechani

276 broblasts, which allows us to make the first direct comparison with germline mutation rates in these

277 Through direct comparison with hydrophobic analogues, a signific

278 Finally, we make a direct comparison with iron-based dioxygenases and expla

279 ics of iC3b at a peptide resolution level in direct comparison with its parent protein C3b.

280 contribution from other sources which makes direct comparison with model source contribution challen

281 temporal (<50 picoseconds) scales provides a direct comparison with multimillion-atom molecular dynam

282 uires nucleotide sequence as input, based on direct comparison with NLPB calculations for available c

283 Direct comparison with oligonucleotide hybridization exp

284 nger treatment duration, larger samples, and direct comparison with other medications.

285 Although direct comparison with previous estimates is not ideal o

286 ed hESCs differentiate into bona fide CTB by direct comparison with primary human placental tissues a

287 It is demonstrated through direct comparison with reference compounds that the pres

288 omplex gpASNase1 crystal structures allows a direct comparison with the bacterial enzymes and serves

289 ergent-solubilized PglB from C. lari allowed direct comparison with the distances based on the previo

290 oes not rely on curve fitting and provides a direct comparison with the performance of normally sight

291 Through direct comparison with the results of cryo-electron micr

292 hen evaluate our approach in two ways: (1) a direct comparison with the state of the art using benchm

293 ng zinc in the same crystal form that allows direct comparison with the zinc-free structure.

294 clic voltammetry, and UV-vis spectroscopy in direct comparison with three other known BN naphthalene

295 Receptor (IR) with Insulin bound that allows direct comparison with unliganded IR and suggests a mech

296 eristics of the polymorphic TPC2 variants in direct comparison with WT.

297 alysis using a fixed-effect model to combine direct comparisons with indirect evidence.

298 ness and functional diversity, which enables direct comparisons with more traditional material chemis

299 This isoelectronic perturbation allows for direct comparisons with the wild-type enzyme.

300 For direct comparisons within and among populations, clinica