ライフサイエンスコーパス: directive

1 thin the political Marine Strategy Framework Directive).

2 rectives (compared with 8% in the absence of directives).

3 Subcommittee formed by the U.S. President's directive.

4 e., those from the large combustion plant EU directive.

5 y free from substances regulated in the RoHS Directive.

6 aBDE, DecaBDE, DecaBB) regulated in the RoHS Directive.

7 ed a surrogate decision maker and an advance directive.

8 an inducement to seek the informed patient's directive.

9 Few completed a research advance directive.

10 Only 15 (14%) had an advance directive.

11 titioner and 1088 (38%) completed an advance directive.

12 orting lake status in the EU Water Framework Directive.

13 withdraw was supported by a patient advance directive.

14 60% for the European Union Renewable Energy Directive.

15 romise the clinical effectiveness of advance directives.

16 ers to the clinical effectiveness of advance directives.

17 7.6% of those subjects, in turn, had advance directives.

18 indings support the continued use of advance directives.

19 ors, research proxies, and advanced research directives.

20 influenced participants to complete advance directives.

21 sed questions regarding the value of advance directives.

22 33 (16.2%) expressed preferences in advance directives.

23 patients and families when formulating care directives.

24 hich thereby inherit different developmental directives.

25 nee physicians as per the European Work Time Directives.

26 facilitate completion of psychiatric advance directives.

27 s plan for future needs and complete advance directives.

28 236 (27%) were identified as having advance directives.

29 er ICU charges than patients without advance directives.

30 ntly among patients with and without advance directives.

31 th these often complicated and ever-changing directives.

32 ledge about the perioperative use of advance directives.

33 Few critically ill seniors have advance directives.

34 to 11% of the patients who died with advance directives.

35 al programs seem more promising than advance directives.

36 ent, and 43% of patients had written advance directives.

37 presence and absence of advanced healthcare directives.

38 ut also as a surrogate for broader treatment directives.

39 sions in the presence of advanced healthcare directives.

40 umentation within the 28 advanced healthcare directives.

41 ement in the presence of advanced healthcare directives.

42 le treatment, yet few presented with advance directives.

43 n presence or absence of advanced healthcare directives.

44 han half of patients had advanced healthcare directives.

45 e presence or absence of advanced healthcare directives 1 month apart to allow memory washout.

46 established for benzo[a]pyrene in food by EU directives (1-10mugkg(-1)).

47 37%) as collaborative, and 12 of 98 (12%) as directive; 1 of 98 (1%) could not be placed into a categ

48 n discussions 2.7 (0.9), and lack of advance directives 2.9 (1.0); clinician factors, which included

49 n those patients who use hospice and advance directives, (2) the different time frames of assessing t

50 ion and validation of a method, according to Directive 2002/657/EC and the Analytical Quality Assuran

51 An EU Food Supplements Directive (2002) requires that supplements should be saf

52 ues regarding ballistic hazards - e.g. 3 mT (directive 2004/40/EC, EN 60601-2-33), and 30 mT (BMAS 20

53 aration of micronutrient content (Commission Directive 2006/125/EC).

54 f such products as recommended by Commission Directive 2006/125/EC.

55 ies Policy and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (2008/56/EC).

56 With the recent transposition of Directive 2010/53/EU into the transplant regulation of E

57 We then analyze the impact of Directive 2010/53/EU which was adopted to support the im

58 At the dose proposed by the European Union Directive 2010/69/EU for the carnosic and carnosol compo

59 ctrometry was developed in regard to Council Directive 333/2007EC and ISO/IEC 17025 (2005).

60 I, 1.10 to 1.44), and if they had an advance directive (65% v 50%; OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.54 to 2.65).

61 ant differences in documentation of advanced directives (9.6% for TBC vs 9.9% for TPM; OR, 0.97 [95%

62 The tobacco industry lobbied against Directive 98/43/EC at the level of EC member state gover

63 Through Council Directive 98/43/EC, the European Community (EC) sought t

64 sed the impact of the European Union's Birds Directive, a conservation policy enacted in 1979, and re

65 ex, divorced marital status, lack of advance directives, a recent decline in functional status, and n

66 The Texas Advance Directives Act (TADA) provides legal immunity for physic

67 sting that discussing and completing advance directives (AD) can promote more acceptance and less acr

68 atients with heart failure (HF) have advance directives (AD) in place before the end of life is immin

69 h cancer do not discuss prognosis or advance directives (ADs), which may lead to inappropriate and/or

70 programs as foci for education about advance directives (ADs).

71 ents were more likely to complete an advance directive after a physician discussion (odds ratio [OR],

72 litigation to prevent implementation of the directive after its passage.

73 nalizing peptide ligands that could serve as directive agents for specific drug delivery in hematolog

74 Presence of advanced healthcare directives also did not reduce the prominent variance am

75 Advance directives, although important, are just one piece of in

76 There is a high prevalence of advance directives among American dialysis patients, and such di

77 data could aid discussions regarding advance directives among surgical patients.

78 The mothers' feeding practices (directive and nondirective control), the children's food

79 es: Identify medical decision-maker, advance directive and resuscitation preference, distribute famil

80 of certain conservation measures through the directive and the response of bird populations.

81 We studied the availability of advance directives and appropriate surrogates to guide decisions

82 hompson's 'laws of growth' provide intrinsic directives and constraints for the generation of individ

83 elping patients complete psychiatric advance directives and ensuring that the documents contain usefu

84 fectiveness of legislation promoting advance directives and legalizing physician-assisted suicide dep

85 tate laws and regulations concerning advance directives and medical licensure, and literature concern

86 nt differences between living wills, advance directives and other forms of healthcare proxies.

87 on between preferences documented in advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making.

88 ritten information about psychiatric advance directives and referral to resources in the public menta

89 driven by international advocacy and policy directives and supported by unprecedented donor funding

90 onsent, though both general advance research directives and surrogate consent are acceptable; (viii)

91 Patients assigned to UC received no exercise directives and were monitored by monthly telephone conta

92 ble medical options, 15 (19%) had an advance directive, and 28 (25%) had a palliative care consultati

93 -authored proposals in place of the original directive, and if necessary to use litigation to prevent

94 such instrument, the European Union's Birds Directive, and we identify positive associations between

95 patient-physician discussions about advance directives, and (4) discussions about life support, in a

96 xample, 35 states did not allow oral advance directives, and 48 states required witness signatures, a

97 improving readability, allowing oral advance directives, and eliminating witness or notary requiremen

98 nt-physician relationship, distress, advance directives, and end-of-life care preferences.

99 esolution of disagreements, honoring advance directives, and ensuring the provision of palliative car

100 rty percent of American patients had advance directives, and such directives were used in decision ma

101 of German and Japanese patients had advance directives, and such directives were used in decision ma

102 deral level, congressional oversight, policy directives, and targeted funding have helped focus natio

103 d mechanical ventilation, to prepare advance directives, and to participate in a plan to manage their

104 e EU through the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (annual mean total phosphorus concentrations o

105 ually well from the same direction, making a directive antenna prone to receive echoes and reflection

106 High directive antennas are fundamental elements for microwav

107 ant step forward in developing a new type of directive antennas.

108 recently In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Directive-approved Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/TaqMan96 real-t

109 ies on cost savings from hospice and advance directives are not definitive.

110 Advance directives are recorded by medical personnel more often

111 all future treatment decisions; oral advance directives are unenforceable; (5) if a physician prescri

112 ameworks, for example, the EU Drinking Water Directive, are met by DGT sampling.

113 Living wills, a type of advance directive, are promoted as a way for patients to documen

114 In light of directives around the world to eliminate toxic materials

115 r work suggests many surgeons regard advance directives as antithetical to the goals of surgical ther

116 Psychiatrists rated the advance directives as highly consistent with standards of commun

117 ected problems arise often to defeat advance directives, as the case in this paper illustrates.

118 Conversations about advance directives averaged 5.6 minutes; physicians spoke for tw

119 right sides of the body, suggesting that the directive axis is homologous with the bilaterian dorsal-

120 s perpendicular to the oral-aboral axis, the directive axis.

121 distributions demonstrate a highly radiated directive beam when the lens is applied to a conical hor

122 ) either sometimes or always discuss advance directives before surgery, with younger physicians less

123 igh potential demand for psychiatric advance directives but low completion rates.

124 nning should emphasize not the completion of directives but the emotional preparation of patients and

125 phrologists appear willing to follow advance directives, but the low prevalence of such directives li

126 g a protracted lobbying campaign against the directive by a number of interested organisations includ

127 isting data suggest that hospice and advance directives can save between 25% and 40% of health care c

128 es the development of the EU Water Framework Directive central water quality elements from 1970 to 20

129 in 32% of treatment decisions in presence of directives (compared with 8% in the absence of directive

130 Rate of advance directive completion, assessed by inspection of complete

131 mpletion and implementation, but the advance directive concept itself may be fundamentally flawed.

132 o association was found between the mothers' directive control and the children's food intakes.

133 tatus was inversely associated with mothers' directive control, and mothers' nondirective control was

134 sis) critically ill patients without advance directives (control group).

135 life, the physician's role is to provide non-directive counselling regarding the short and long-term

136 otein turnover, and explores future research directives designed to protect skeletal muscle mass in p

137 w physicians introduced the topic of advance directives, discussed scenarios and treatments, provided

138 nfidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 12.9), advance directive discussions (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 8.3), ini

139 the goal of introducing patients to advance directives, discussions infrequently dealt with patients

140 When available, advance directives do not change care or reduce hospital resourc

141 01) as were first-time requests for advanced directive documentation (14.6% vs 0.0%; p < 0.001).

142 Advanced directive documentation was significantly greater prior

143 ed in this essay shows, even a valid advance directive does not guarantee that unwanted medical inter

144 rehabilitation to assess effects of advance directive education on completion of (1) living wills, (

145 hown that the methano-bridge exerts a strong directive effect which diminishes as the bridge moves fr

146 orination of the lactone was achieved by the directive effects of a diastereoselectively installed al

147 by methoxy and hydroxyl substituents, whose directive effects override methyl substitution effects.

148 avefronts into planar ones, and generating a directive emission.

149 models examined associations between advance directives, end-of-life Medicare expenditures, and treat

150 ion to introduction of EU Waste Incineration Directive (EU-WID) (subsequently transposed into IED) an

151 that best practice may be characterized as: directive, evidence-based, and quality-focused.

152 s in August each year, European Working Time Directives (EWTDs) for junior doctors' working hours and

153 e European Commission has recently published directives extending procedures that may be used for off

154 However, use of more directive feeding control was associated with lower weig

155 tated patient without a surrogate or advance directive for whom they considered limiting life support

156 tection limit required by the European Union directives for drinkable water and food samples (0.1 mug

157 They have also suggested new experimental directives for examining the specific ways in which spin

158 requirements of US-EPA, WHO, and EU Council Directives for measurements of the maximum allowed conce

159 may require additional signaling pathways as directives for movement through the extracellular space.

160 Despite growing evidence and directives for pressure injury prevention, implementatio

161 ntal and administrative controls, and policy directives for sun safety starting February 10, 2011.

162 ess attitudes and concerns regarding advance directives for their patients who have high-risk surgica

163 lf-guided intervention consisting of advance directive forms and written educational information vers

164 s among American dialysis patients, and such directives frequently play a role in decision making.

165 lly Engineered Mice (GEM) is the result of a directive from the National Cancer Institute Mouse Model

166 n (LT) in the United States persists despite directives from the federal government to reduce geograp

167 The presence of frailty or advance directives had little impact on limiting use of life-sus

168 vs. 11%, p =.046) and patients with advance directives had shorter ICU durations and lower ICU charg

169 The European Working Time Directive has decreased the clinical exposure of residen

170 The European Working Time Directive has led to concerns that trainees' hours of wo

171 U legislation, including the Water Framework Directive, has led to the application of increasingly st

172 Recent research and policy directives have emerged with a focus on sustainable mana

173 The presence of an advance directive, however, may have helped guide decisions earl

174 int out some strengths and weaknesses of the Directive in addressing living organ donation.

175 y or terminally ill patients have an advance directive in their medical record, and physicians are ac

176 cent advances in RNA research have posed new directives in biology and chemistry to uncover the compl

177 Policy directives in several nations are focusing on the develo

178 ndmark discoveries, but also by governmental directives, institutional policies, and public attitudes

179 The language in an advanced directive is often imprecise and may not provide clear g

180 Completion of an advance directive, its structure and content, and its short-term

181 Advance directive law may compromise the clinical effectiveness

182 Unintended negative consequences of advance directive legal restrictions may prevent all patients, a

183 These restrictions have rendered advance directives less clinically useful.

184 y would decline to operate on patients whose directives limit postoperative care.

185 e to operate on patients who have an advance directive limiting postoperative life-supporting therapy

186 ch to high-risk operations for patients with directives limiting postoperative care.

187 rectives preoperatively, and (2) how advance directives limiting postoperative life-supporting therap

188 e directives, but the low prevalence of such directives limits the frequency of their use.

189 It is unclear if advance directives (living wills) are associated with end-of-lif

190 onding to the survey thought that an advance directive made by the patient should have a decisive inf

191 ing + guiding + making a recommendation) and directive (making an independent treatment decision).

192 nce be provided in a formal research advance directive may be unnecessarily restrictive.

193 t leads to the completion of written advance directives may influence the usefulness of these documen

194 Achieving the promise of psychiatric advance directives may require system-level policies to embed fa

195 ptors (NgR1, NgR2, and NgR3) are growth cone directive molecules known for inhibiting axon regenerati

196 tives under the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD).

197 cal treatment may be terminated; (4) advance directives must comply with specific forms, are not tran

198 re planning, including completion of advance directives, occurs for all patients with serious illness

199 ion of advanced bladder cancer, is the prime directive of our current phase II Iressa/docetaxel trial

200 In 1946, a Directive of President Truman enjoined the National Rese

201 ature, appear to be resistant to the lineage directives of rhGM-CSF.

202 Because advance directives offer only limited benefit, advance care plan

203 MWI) is regulated through the European Union Directive on Industrial Emissions (IED), but there is on

204 ught to delay, and eventually defeat, the EC directive on tobacco advertising and sponsorship by seek

205 In 2010, the Directive on undesirable substances in animal feed enter

206 ed: patients with do not resuscitate advance directives on day 1 of ICU admission and a control group

207 Current European Commission Directives on foods for infants and young children place

208 ies are needed to assess the effect of these directives on subsequent care.

209 case is made for listing simplified Advance Directives on the Medicare card.

210 decision-making capacity to complete advance directives on the treatment preferences for life-sustain

211 determined the impact of advanced healthcare directives on treatment decisions by multiple physicians

212 incompetent patient who had left no advance directive or appointed healthcare proxy.

213 the facilitated session completed an advance directive or authorized a proxy decision maker, compared

214 research based on the presence of an advance directive or do-not-resuscitate order, as it would creat

215 formative or not) and assessed for guidance (directive or not), diagnosis (staging changed, new tumor

216 are research involving patients with advance directives or do-not-resuscitate status is both possible

217 ourse and encourage the execution of advance directives or healthcare proxies.

218 e (EOL) decisional authority through advance directives or surrogates.

219 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.99), not having an advance directive (OR, 1.35 [CI, 1.04 to 1.76]), estimating an e

220 ; 95% CI, 1.0-2.7), and authoring an advance directive (OR,1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-2.0) were not associated

221 with the medical team, the patient's advance directive, or each other lasting >7 days; death expected

222 they have do-not-resuscitate orders, advance directives, or are in need of end-of-life care.

223 The objective was to explore whether and how directive (overt) and nondirective (covert and food envi

224 lued the existence or creation of an advance directive preoperatively, but they did not discuss this

225 y surgeons do not routinely discuss advanced directives preoperatively and more than one half reporte

226 and: (1) how often surgeons discuss advance directives preoperatively, and (2) how advance directive

227 The implementation of advanced healthcare directives, prepared by almost half of the adult populat

228 ng symptom management and discussing advance directives, prognosis, and hospice care.

229 Advance directives promise patients a say in their future care b

230 40/EC, EN 60601-2-33), and 30 mT (BMAS 2009, directive proposal 2011).

231 In addition to directives provided by transcription factors and recepto

232 , randomised, controlled trial of brief, non-directive psychotherapy and routine general-practice car

233 Patients who had prepared advance directives received care that was strongly associated wi

234 and the presence of clearly defined advance directives regarding patient preferences for medical car

235 ls were for legal issues (proxy and advanced directives) related to end of life.

236 applied in patients with and without advance directives (respectively): mechanical ventilation, 44% v

237 quate in 14 and 21 of 28 advanced healthcare directives reviewed, respectively.

238 Therapists adhered to a non-directive Rogerian model of psychotherapy.

239 family and provided a recommendation; and 4) directive role (1 of 63), in which the physician assumed

240 ion is well established, plays an unexpected directive role in the megakaryocyte lineage.

241 ole, although a greater proportion assumed a directive role in this time-pressured scenario than has

242 The advance directive's 4 clinical scenarios found a preference for

243 , or both who cannot read or execute advance directives; same-sex or domestic partners who may be wit

244 ssigned to a facilitated psychiatric advance directive session or a control group that received writt

245 plans in 15% of all OCT sessions and 17% of directive sessions.

246 cal, and financial issues as well as advance directives should be addressed long before enteral feedi

247 s, they do indicate that hospice and advance directives should be encouraged because they certainly d

248 Advance directives simply presuppose more control over future ca

249 now have a decade of experience with advance directives since the Patient Self-Determination Act was

250 ilies at time of hospitalization and advance directives solicited.

251 dest (43%) for "does the advanced healthcare directive specify which treatments the patient would cho

252 Advance directives specifying limitations in end-of-life care we

253 Advance directives specifying limits in care were associated wit

254 Advance directive statements included refusal of cardiopulmonary

255 Two patients received CPR, despite advance directive statements refusing this treatment.

256 ware of whether or not patients have advance directive statements, as unauthorized CPR was administer

257 fected by the presence or absence of advance directive statements.

258 wo independent reviewers selected 51 advance directive statutes and 20 articles.

259 Nineteen (5%) patients had advance directives (study group).

260 o stop dialysis in the absence of an advance directive than German or Japanese nephrologists.

261 More patients with advance directives than those without had do-not-resuscitate ord

262 ily meeting who refuses to follow an advance directive that clearly declines advanced life-sustaining

263 rations of 1-2 mg/l) and the Water Framework Directive that will enforce "good ecological and chemica

264 he EU is considering implementing a Trapping Directive that would alter UK legislation, and a recent

265 Act encourages patients to fill out advance directives that state their desires.

266 ows that 90% of patients do not have advance directives, that patients and doctors are both remiss in

267 I probability was above the EU Bathing Water Directive threshold for excellent water quality (3%).

268 Under a quality-improvement directive to intensify infection-control measures, extre

269 nd not others, although none used an advance directive to refuse all treatment.

270 Most participants used the advance directive to refuse some medications and to express pref

271 They enable patients' advance directives to be valid wherever they are cared for (home

272 ipts of audiotaped discussions about advance directives to document how physicians introduced the top

273 asures at many levels, from legal and policy directives to social attitudes and values, women's work

274 be regulated in the European Water Framework Directive, TPs formed in biological processes or during

275 re currently regulated by the Drinking Water Directive using a maximum allowable concentration of 0.1

276 Initially proposed in 1989, the directive was adopted in 1998, and was annulled by the E

277 A new advertising directive was proposed in May, 2001.

278 The overall completion rate for advance directives was 26.7% (95% CI, 21.5% to 32.5%), with a hi

279 that showed an impact of advanced healthcare directives was ICU monitoring withheld in 32% of treatme

280 cks, Hispanics, and those without an advance directive were at increased risk.

281 Advance directives were associated with higher adjusted probabil

282 Directives were associated with lower adjusted probabili

283 Advance directives were designed to help patients establish the

284 Do not resuscitate directives were given for 71 patients (35.0%).

285 icity, marital status, religion, and advance directives were not associated with accuracy.

286 ent and were incapable of completing advance directives were significantly more likely to opt for lif

287 hundred thirty five patients who had advance directives were successfully matched to 135 patients who

288 se patients had advance directives, and such directives were used in decision making for 0.09% of pat

289 an patients had advance directives, and such directives were used in decision making for 3.2% of all

290 ieve the targets set by EU's Water Framework Directive (WFD) in Finnish coastal waters in the Gulf of

291 the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD), a project for the production of a fish

292 y metal ions of the European Water Framework Directive (WFD): Cd(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), Hg(II).

293 ests were based on the application of the EU directive, which enables comparison and harmonisation of

294 atus" requirements of the EU Water Framework Directive with a 15% reduced cost, due to responsive aer

295 ting of counseling and completing an advance directive with a social worker.

296 reoperatively, but they did not discuss this directive with their surgeon.

297 seful in light of recent funding institution directives with regard to data sharing and archiving and

298 of 75) actually preferred to discuss advance directives with their oncologist if AD discussion was ne

299 he industry sought to prevent passage of the directive within the EC legislature, to substitute indus

300 o lack surrogate decision makers and advance directives, yet little is known about how often this occ