ライフサイエンスコーパス: discharge diagnosis

1 ermine how often mesenteric adenitis was the discharge diagnosis.

2 records from 2000 to 2010 with HF as primary discharge diagnosis.

3 404.x3, and 428.xx recorded as the principal discharge diagnosis.

4 r polymerase chain reaction and received any discharge diagnosis.

5 al Modification code 427.31 as the principal discharge diagnosis.

6 art failure and those with another principal discharge diagnosis.

7 ased on the location of heart failure in the discharge diagnosis.

8 ith each other and with the final neurologic discharge diagnosis.

9 sonality disorder checklist and by DSM-III-R discharge diagnosis.

10 primary care-treatable diagnosis based on ED discharge diagnosis, a substantial proportion required i

11 s with a primary inflammatory skin condition discharge diagnosis and 647 patients with primary inflam

12 e fee-for-service beneficiaries by principal discharge diagnosis and classified hospitals as PCI- or

13 ve primary care-treatable diagnoses based on discharge diagnosis and our modification of the algorith

14 d Measures: Heart failure diagnosis based on discharge diagnosis and physician review of sampled medi

15 alizations with hepatitis A as the principal discharge diagnosis and rates of secondary discharge dia

16 iagnosis, and results were compared with the discharge diagnosis: AR, n=15; chronic rejection (CR), n

17 nts with longer AKI duration and those whose discharge diagnosis at index AKI hospitalization include

18 bjects with penicillin "allergy" to 2 unique discharge diagnosis category-matched, sex-matched, age-m

19 For each visit with a discharge diagnosis classified as primary care treatable

20 n International Classification of Diseases-9 discharge diagnosis code for HF (primary position) and s

21 lized between 1998 and 2008 with a principal discharge diagnosis code for HF.

22 Using inpatient discharge diagnosis codes (1993-2008), we determined tha

23 above baseline and in the Medicare cohort by discharge diagnosis codes and the use of dialysis.

24 Patients were identified using discharge diagnosis codes and then geocoded to their hom

25 An algorithm using primary discharge diagnosis codes for acute ischemic or hemorrha

26 fication of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) discharge diagnosis codes in adults hospitalized with se

27 iseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification discharge diagnosis codes into diagnoses and disease cat

28 Use of only hospital discharge diagnosis codes plus pharmacy dispensing data

29 sease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification discharge diagnosis codes were used to compare first-yea

30 ng clinic visit electrocardiograms, hospital discharge diagnosis codes, death certificates, and Medic

31 -specific hospitalization rates by principal discharge diagnosis codes, grouped into 283 disease cate

32 3.2-42.1) and 99.5% (95% CI: 98.8-100) using discharge diagnosis codes.

33 Information on hospital discharge diagnosis, emigration, and mortality was obtai

34 ith a first-ever subdural hematoma principal discharge diagnosis from 2000 to 2015 matched by age, se

35 (>/=18 years old) with PAH as the principal discharge diagnosis from January 1, 2001, through Decemb

36 itis (> or =15 years old) were identified by discharge diagnosis from the Swedish National Board of H

37 n, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code 428 discharge diagnosis groups: 428 primary, 428 nonprimary,

38 diagnosis in 1996 to the top-ranked primary discharge diagnosis in 2010.

39 rial fibrillation or flutter was the primary discharge diagnosis in only 38.4% of cases.

40 NTS: We identified 1658 patients with an MMD discharge diagnosis in the Swedish Hospital Discharge Re

41 is the leading diagnosis-related group (DRG) discharge diagnosis in the United States and accounts fo

42 Patients were identified through discharge diagnosis lists by using the International Cla

43 d as treated if there was documentation of a discharge diagnosis, medication prescribed for depressio

44 Incidence of CHF as ascertained by hospital discharge diagnosis (n = 208) and death certificates (n

45 In the inpatient setting, a primary discharge diagnosis of 691.8 had excellent PPV.

46 ecords of patients 30 to 74 years old with a discharge diagnosis of acute CHD (ICD-9 codes 410 or 411

47 of all patients (N = 23,268) with a primary discharge diagnosis of acute embolism and thrombosis of

48 atients aged 65 to 86 years with the primary discharge diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction who w

49 all adult (age, >or=15 yrs) patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute verapamil or diltiazem over

50 Iowa, Wisconsin) with the confirmed primary discharge diagnosis of AMI in 4 periods: 1992-1993 (n=10

51 alized in the United States with a principal discharge diagnosis of AMI were identified through the u

52 uary 1994 and February 1996 with a principal discharge diagnosis of AMI, and were eligible for reperf

53 Hospitalisations with a discharge diagnosis of an acute ischaemic stroke were in

54 inding that patients with HL with a hospital discharge diagnosis of an AI have a substantially higher

55 he Swedish Twin Registry, who had a hospital discharge diagnosis of AN, or who had a cause-of-death c

56 The primary outcome variable was a discharge diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia.

57 Overall we found persons with a hospital discharge diagnosis of CD to have a 5.35-fold (95% CI, 3

58 spitals between 2005 and 2011 with a primary discharge diagnosis of CD.

59 versity teaching hospital with a primary DRG discharge diagnosis of CHF.

60 To assess the impact of a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuromyopath

61 hed analysis of a large national database, a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy a

62 Compared to patients without a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy a

63 yneuropathy and/or myopathy, patients with a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy a

64 Of 3,567 ICU patients with a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy a

65 nts to 3,436 ICU patients who did not have a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy a

66 dy demonstrates the clinical importance of a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy a

67 reexisting neuromuscular abnormalities and a discharge diagnosis of critical illness polyneuropathy a

68 Patients were grouped as with or without a discharge diagnosis of dementia by ICD-9-CM criteria.

69 We identified all patients with a hospital discharge diagnosis of diabetes between 1985 and 1990 us

70 agreement between drug treatment data and a discharge diagnosis of diabetes, considered whether agre

71 e 120 days before admission, and 16.3% had a discharge diagnosis of diabetes.

72 ersity of Pennsylvania (Penn) with a primary discharge diagnosis of heart failure (n=657) and (2) pat

73 e compared between patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of heart failure and those with anot

74 udied patients hospitalized with a principal discharge diagnosis of heart failure between January 200

75 admissions at a single center with a primary discharge diagnosis of heart failure were reviewed (N =

76 Consecutive hospitalizations with a discharge diagnosis of heart failure were reviewed.

77 ospitalizations of patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of heart failure, acute myocardial i

78 AHF-type if they met the following criteria: discharge diagnosis of heart failure, systolic blood pre

79 f these hospitalizations, 6549 (13.9%) had a discharge diagnosis of heart failure.

80 lized between 2011 and 2013 with a principle discharge diagnosis of heart failure.

81 ged after hospitalization with the principal discharge diagnosis of heart failure.

82 of age who were hospitalized with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF between April 1998 and March 1

83 om Kaiser Permanente Colorado with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF between January 1, 2001, and D

84 eneficiaries hospitalized with the principal discharge diagnosis of HF in acute-care nongovernmental

85 spital claim with a principal (first-listed) discharge diagnosis of HF using the International Classi

86 ospital stays (n = 1,686,089) with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF were identified from National

87 2 patients from 271 hospitals with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF, initiation of angiotensin-con

88 s used to identify patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of inferior vena cava thrombosis (In

89 al influenza diagnosis, was defined as (1) a discharge diagnosis of influenza, (2) a prescription of

90 21 to 64 years hospitalized with a principal discharge diagnosis of ischemic heart disease before (No

91 CT use for adult inpatients with a principal discharge diagnosis of major depression, recurrent.

92 erized hospital discharge data set who had a discharge diagnosis of meningococcal disease.

93 ns of a separate group of 18 patients with a discharge diagnosis of mesenteric adenitis were reviewed

94 an admission diagnosis of appendicitis had a discharge diagnosis of mesenteric adenitis.

95 2046 patients (1312 white; 734 black) with a discharge diagnosis of MM and MGUS, respectively.

96 our patients with an inpatient or outpatient discharge diagnosis of MMD developed cancer during postd

97 children 18 years of age and younger with a discharge diagnosis of pancreatitis identified 135 patie

98 italization for both a primary and secondary discharge diagnosis of psychoses (ICD-9 codes 290.x-299.

99 ons in 7178 children (age 0-22 years) with a discharge diagnosis of SCD and either ACS or pneumonia.

100 Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification discharge diagnosis of stroke admitted through the emerg

101 e patients admitted in 1995 with a principal discharge diagnosis of unstable angina or chest pain.

102 d from all infants <2 years old and having a discharge diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia or ventri

103 The primary discharge diagnosis often failed to reflect the reason f

104 efined as the first occurrence of 1 hospital discharge diagnosis or 2 outpatient diagnoses for ascite

105 ardiogram at ARIC follow-up visits, hospital discharge diagnosis, or death certificates through 2011.

106 Controls were matched to cases on primary discharge diagnosis related group (DRG), age, sex, acuit

107 ng cancer, 58 hospitalized with at least one discharge diagnosis that coded to benign neoplasia (Inte

108 s with a primary inflammatory skin condition discharge diagnosis were 61.0% female and had a mean (SD