ライフサイエンスコーパス: discrepancy in

1 This study found significant discrepancies in 18.5% of patients who underwent autopsy

2 eement for Hvisu was moderate (kappa = 0.64, discrepancies in 27% of the cases).

3 primary and secondary outcomes, there was no discrepancy in 54.9% and 33.3%, complete omission in 7.8

4 Negative feedback systems respond to discrepancies in a manner that reduces deviations from s

5 The number of major discrepancies in a single shift ranged from one to four,

6 investigated the role of cortisol in gender discrepancy in a zebrafish model of HCC.

7 ed liposarcoma without impacting OS, whereas discrepancies in adjuvant systemic therapies did not imp

8 lled at each institution on the magnitude of discrepancy in adverse effect-reporting between patients

9 nary vein isolation alone cannot explain the discrepancy in AF incidence between heart transplant rec

10 Discrepancies in analyses between publications and other

11 racterization of the gene family and resolve discrepancies in annotation between gene family members.

12 Reasons for discrepancies in apnea detection among channels included

13 However, discrepancies in applying the model suggest that Cl(-)/H

14 the discovery of a large number of apparent discrepancies in assembly and annotation of these genome

15 We investigated this discrepancy in beta3-/- and wild-type (beta3+/+) mice us

16 We found significant discrepancies in both DeltaG and k(q), including A*/D pa

17 The authors find considerable discrepancies in both the estimated prevalence of asthma

18 We found discrepancies in both the reported coverage of the human

19 Here, we report a neural response discrepancy in brainstem encoding of these two sounds, o

20 We have investigated the source of this discrepancy in CA1 pyramidal neurons.

21 4 hours were independent predictors of count discrepancies in CABG surgery.

22 anisms have been proposed to account for the discrepancy in calculated and observed reduction potenti

23 e of EPCs in post-MI recovery and on the sex discrepancy in cardiac events.

24 Conclusion: Considerable discrepancies in cardiovascular screening guidelines sti

25 The cumulative 6-yr discrepancy in CCM days between HCRIS and MedPAR/HCIS (3

26 The discrepancy in CCM days between HCRIS and MedPAR/HCIS in

27 showed, for the first time, that despite the discrepancy in cell envelope concentrations of FepA and

28 using hydrodynamic stimulation, showing the discrepancy in cell response between direct compressive

29 ught possible explanations for this isolated discrepancy in CHD findings.

30 This discrepancy in choosing probes poses a challenge in inte

31 We suggest that some discrepancies in conclusion depend on the interpretation

32 detected a lower rate of clinicopathological discrepancy in critically ill patients than previously r

33 Given this discrepancy in crystallographic findings, we sought chem

34 ntial unifying framework for the unexplained discrepancies in current findings.

35 ogenetic bands sequence location reduces the discrepancies in cytogenetic assignment from 61 to 38.

36 Discrepancies in data abstraction were resolved by conse

37 nternational comparisons because of protocol discrepancies in data collation.

38 e microenvironments that may help to explain discrepancies in deep-sea biogeochemical budgets.

39 A significant discrepancy in deglycosylation activity was observed bet

40 servation and results also shed light on the discrepancy in demographic estimates among recent studie

41 ng outputs were explored to characterize the discrepancies in detail.

42 Most were discrepancies in detecting abnormalities rather than in

43 Furthermore, some discrepancies in detection of mixed infections were obse

44 Autopsy can still identify discrepancies in diagnosis even in patients who have und

45 omplement fixation test (CFT), with the main discrepancy in diagnosis resulting from the increased se

46 In order to understand phenotypic discrepancies in different chemokine knockout lines and

47 We reconcile the discrepancy in diversity loss from invaders by showing t

48 r identifying base pair mismatches and other discrepancies in DNA, has led to the proposal that selec

49 Possible reasons for this discrepancy in donation rates include increased rates of

50 designs that do not mirror clinical reality, discrepancies in dosing and the timing of therapeutic in

51 ns in pristine clouds, but they showed large discrepancies in dust-mixed clouds.

52 tionally productive open promoter complexes; discrepancies in earlier studies may be attributable to

53 Discrepancies in ECA and NCS results are largely due to

54 Thus, menstruation accounts for 30% of the discrepancy in elimination of PFOS between men and women

55 The discrepancy in energy intake (YAQ - TEE) was related to

56 Here we illustrate that the discrepancies in estimates are most likely due to differ

57 rences do not appear to explain the observed discrepancies in estimates of alpha.

58 as been described, but there are significant discrepancies in estimates of the frequency of IE63-posi

59 The discrepancy in evolutionary age of the wheat genomes est

60 We show how apparent discrepancies in experimental findings can be reconciled

61 ing so, vGNM is able to resolve the apparent discrepancy in experimental B-factors among structures o

62 ne ozonolysis with SO2 along with systematic discrepancies in experimentally derived reaction rates b

63 The discrepancy in extent of integrin dysfunction between mu

64 Although discrepancies in FcepsilonRII-mediated functions are bei

65 ges was conducted by 4 experts, who examined discrepancies in findings between image grades by traine

66 Objective: To characterize discrepancies in findings of ROP between digital retinal

67 This discrepancy in findings leaves it unclear if episodic me

68 ellite datasets are used to investigate this discrepancy in forest cover change estimates in China be

69 into the CNS of muMT mice was not impaired, discrepancies in frequencies of virus-specific CD8(+) T

70 In the corresponding NAC images, the discrepancies in frontoparietal portions of the neocorte

71 Thus, we sought to address the apparent discrepancy in Fur responsiveness to metals.

72 erences might be an important key to explain discrepancies in generation and expression of tprK varia

73 s becoming popular as a method for resolving discrepancies in genetic association studies.

74 e not yet available for GPR55 screening, and discrepancies in GPR55 mediated signaling pathways have

75 We find that this root-class-specific discrepancy in GSA response to low phosphorus is mirrore

76 Instead, this discrepancy in haemal spine morphology may be attributab

77 efs and attitudes may help to address racial discrepancies in health care outcomes.

78 e and DNA-bound protein, we propose that the discrepancy in heat capacity arises principally from the

79 In conclusion, a discrepancy in HLA class I expression in islets assessed

80 We attempt to disentangle the discrepancies in how physicists and biologists use the t

81 Reconciling these discrepancies in how we evaluate gene essentiality has a

82 Here we review recent advances and discrepancies in how Wnt/Lrp5 signaling regulates osteob

83 also be relevant for resolving mutation-rate discrepancies in human and to explain kataegis.

84 last-specific protein 1 (FSP-1) demonstrated discrepancies in immunophenotype and cytomorphologic fea

85 These findings indicate a discrepancy in incentive associated with the immediate v

86 Discrepancies in inclusion and exclusion criteria and VE

87 l multisensory systems are able to cope with discrepancies in information provided by individual sens

88 Discrepancies in interpretation between testing laborato

89 ence of social determinants of health to the discrepancy in IQs, which was 13%.

90 ee-map comparison, we noticed that the major discrepancies in land use changes among the three maps w

91 Here, we investigate this discrepancy in light of a recent, quantitative theory of

92 Discrepancies in linkage findings are not uncommon and a

93 The results resolve discrepancies in literature reports of CMC and pK(a) val

94 te the reasons for this marked racial/ethnic discrepancy in liver-related mortality.

95 Animal studies have shown that the discrepancies in metabolites between patients and contro

96 In addition, the discrepancy in methane source estimates is particularly

97 Data gaps and discrepancies in methodology and reporting have so far h

98 An apparent discrepancy in molecular weights, 135 vs. 200 kDa and 15

99 aled in the acute phase after MI substantial discrepancies in myocardial tissue texture between the 2

100 olysis may provide a possible reason for the discrepancy in neuroprotection, with forced exercise far

101 Discrepancies in nodule categorization were mainly cause

102 ree) factor, resolves functionally important discrepancies in noncanonical structure and refines low-

103 For both methods, this discrepancy in nuo was almost identical to the discrepan

104 NMR supported these observations, but slight discrepancies in observed and predicted NMR vicinal coup

105 ith O(3) and suggests that model/measurement discrepancies in OH and HO(2) would benefit from a close

106 ferrocene/ferrocenium, explaining the large discrepancy in open-circuit voltage potentials between t

107 It is necessary to resolve these apparent discrepancies in order to be able to assess the relative

108 The slight discrepancy in orientations in solution and crystal lies

109 putational approach allows us to investigate discrepancies in our understanding of the interaction of

110 sis as a platform to selectivity wherein the discrepancy in oxidation potentials between internal ver

111 possibility for the general in vitro-in vivo discrepancy in oxidative stress found in both mice and r

112 The enormous discrepancy in parasite loads observed in livers and spl

113 Concordance was assessed via discrepancies in perceived prognosis, statistics, and Mc

114 s, to give explanations as to why there is a discrepancy in pharmacogenomic studies, given recent con

115 of miniSOG and ascertain the reasons for the discrepancy in PhiDelta values.

116 that as a disease becomes more prevalent the discrepancy in power becomes more extreme.

117 e "needs improvement" zone and a >/=10-point discrepancy in pre-post scores was needed to describe a

118 riability in cell quality is a main cause of discrepancies in preclinical studies.

119 We demonstrate that this discrepancy in presentation is not related to immunodomi

120 the disease, and estrogens exacerbating, the discrepancy in prevalence between men and women is still

121 iologically, these findings not only explain discrepancies in previous in vivo vs. in vitro studies,

122 covery of the SRSF1 binding motif reconciled discrepancies in previous motif analyses.

123 These findings help to reconcile discrepancies in previous reports and suggest that the f

124 We suggest that the discrepancies in previous reports of Notch1IC transgenic

125 Because of discrepancies in previous reports regarding the role of

126 Our findings not only help to bridge the discrepancies in previous studies about synaptic vesicle

127 This work resolves discrepancies in previous studies of As(V)-ferrihydrite

128 solution conditions likely explain apparent discrepancies in previous studies of MutL assembly.

129 Although discrepancies in proliferative, self-renewal, and differ

130 Due to discrepancies in proprioceptive acuity, overlap in motor

131 ults provide a plausible explanation for the discrepancy in PS-dependence reported in the literature,

132 lobule and can be used to reconcile apparent discrepancies in published data relating to the C-helix.

133 This resolves discrepancies in published studies of Cry1A binding in Y

134 We addressed this apparent discrepancy in raft microdomain-associated BACE1 process

135 There were few discrepancies in randomization, blinding, and interventi

136 e site frequency spectrum and found that the discrepancy in rare variant abundance across demographic

137 The discrepancies in rates at high calcium-to-carbonate rati

138 The discrepancy in rates of electron transfer appears to be

139 As there may be discrepancies in referral practice and, therefore, inequ

140 tion function, making it difficult to detect discrepancies in regions where the probability density i

141 Many of the discrepancies in reimbursement for similar procedures pe

142 prolapse (MVP) is controversial, with marked discrepancies in reported complication rates.

143 a limited number of investigations and with discrepancies in reported findings that may result from

144 Discrepancies in reported HLA class II associations with

145 tic shock, and organ dysfunction, leading to discrepancies in reported incidence and observed mortali

146 There are significant discrepancies in reported sorption constants (log(KAs)),

147 Reasons for discrepancies in reporting major findings included error

148 a were analyzed after excluding studies with discrepancies in reporting of outcomes.

149 may result from variations in trial methods, discrepancies in reporting, and an overreliance on surro

150 atient optimism and confidence; however, the discrepancies in reports of consultation content, partic

151 for motor-sequence learning and explain the discrepancies in results across studies.

152 reduce interlaboratory variations and limit discrepancies in results between different laboratories.

153 The discrepancies in results can be attributed to the enhanc

154 We conclude that although discrepancies in results exist between assays, each assa

155 Age at first trauma could help explain discrepancies in results of past studies of trauma and A

156 Variability between kits may account for the discrepancy in results obtained and for the lack of cons

157 thms for pyrosequences ('denoising') reduced discrepancies in richness but also removed known morphos

158 The most common area of discrepancy in ROP classification is stage, although int

159 This discrepancy in rRNA and gene content based analyses of w

160 However, discrepancies in RRP estimates exist among methods desig

161 Despite this discrepancy in salt sensitivity, NMR and CD data indicat

162 Given the socioeconomically driven discrepancies in self-reported vision status, self-repor

163 merits detailed further study, as the large discrepancies in sex-specific hemodialysis prevalence by

164 transplantation is often challenging due to discrepancy in size between donor and recipient, poor mu

165 To resolve discrepancies in slide agglutination serotyping (SAST) r

166 This discrepancy in SOAT inhibition by BeauIII was investigat

167 We resolve this discrepancy in songbirds, showing that Nif silencing acu

168 Discrepancies in species identification between the refe

169 ous work elsewhere, there is no evidence for discrepancies in ss-sl calcifying depth habitat or seaso

170 As a by-product of our work, we explain the discrepancy in structures predicted for C99 congener hom

171 Discrepancies in study selection were resolved by discus

172 One possible explanation for this discrepancy in study findings could be the varying time

173 This phenotype may explain the discrepancy in survival between high and low CD97-expres

174 The discrepancy in survival of macrophages and that of mice

175 ying the causes of this underutilization and discrepancies in survivors of CA.

176 ect actual species differences or arise from discrepancies in techniques and measured signals (electr

177 There is a discrepancy in telomere length as measured by signal int

178 the complex modulus, although there is some discrepancy in terms of the wavevector dependence.

179 We highlight some discrepancies in the absolute thicknesses determined by

180 g is activated by both UVB and TNFalpha, but discrepancies in the activation of key upstream signalin

181 Our data indicate discrepancies in the alternating access model of cotrans

182 We hypothesize that the discrepancies in the apparent sulfonamide resistance bet

183 Furthermore, we suggest that previous discrepancies in the assignment of effects of inhibitors

184 There are still discrepancies in the association of enterovirus and myoc

185 RAP protocol eliminates most of the previous discrepancies in the binding estimates for the three dif

186 ition are disproportionately larger than the discrepancies in the biomass weight estimate.

187 ecently discovered that explains many of the discrepancies in the classic Th1/Th2 model, and has been

188 Despite minimal discrepancies in the coding region, there are striking t

189 rrent or lifetime prevalence, and those with discrepancies in the data that could not be resolved by

190 ected using administrative data, but ongoing discrepancies in the definition of severe sepsis produce

191 These findings help to explain existing discrepancies in the degree of dendritic spine plasticit

192 good agreement, but also reveals significant discrepancies in the description of guanine-sugar valenc

193 Somatic Mutations in Cancer) revealed marked discrepancies in the detection of missense mutations in

194 Additionally, we show that discrepancies in the developmental phenotypes caused by

195 vations, which appear to be mainly caused by discrepancies in the different experimental protocols ap

196 Reported discrepancies in the effects of tumor necrosis factor (T

197 sms exhibit such relationships could explain discrepancies in the epidemiological literature, where s

198 the field and this is further aggravated by discrepancies in the estimates of mtDNA mutant fractions

199 ities in earlier reports, and highlights the discrepancies in the estimation of trap densities from e

200 e-bound nucleosomal structures reveals other discrepancies in the expected chemical design, including

201 Previous work indicated discrepancies in the extent of U(VI) reduction by magnet

202 all sportive lemurs to validate phylogenetic discrepancies in the genus Lepilemur and to evaluate evo

203 ed from local interplanetary dust, and large discrepancies in the inferred brightness of the optical

204 d in these effects are discussed and certain discrepancies in the literature about some genetic effec

205 Zn(II) binding sites in Fur may resolve some discrepancies in the literature and have implications co

206 ere provide a reasonable explanation for the discrepancies in the literature between spectroscopists

207 ypic analyses of mutant strains that suggest discrepancies in the literature concerning GpsB might ha

208 s using whole cells or spheroplasts, and the discrepancies in the literature data were discussed.

209 tudies of visual learning reconciles earlier discrepancies in the literature on perceptual learning.

210 gnitive impairment and to resolving numerous discrepancies in the literature on the place cell contri

211 Our findings also suggest that the discrepancies in the literature regarding dopamine trans

212 ts thus give insight to help resolve current discrepancies in the literature regarding pilus stiffnes

213 We addressed discrepancies in the literature regarding the pharmacolo

214 tudy provides practical confirmation of past discrepancies in the literature regarding the variable e

215 We attribute discrepancies in the literature to a lack of reproducibl

216 Motivated by apparent discrepancies in the literature we sought to test the ax

217 ng cascades can not only account for several discrepancies in the literature, but also account for th

218 These findings can account for discrepancies in the literature-memories of our distant

219 regard to their potential to explain current discrepancies in the literature.

220 rtion of Type I fibers and FEV1 accounts for discrepancies in the literature.

221 gth, of the double helix and shows how known discrepancies in the measured twisting constants of long

222 pendent haloperoxidases to account for these discrepancies in the merochlorin and napyradiomycin clas

223 Genesis has resolved discrepancies in the noble gas data from solar wind impl

224 highlighting the versatility of PREs despite discrepancies in the number and location of DNA binding

225 Thus, reported discrepancies in the pharmacology of UCN-01 and the infl

226 ghlight potential opportunities to eliminate discrepancies in the PL intensity of different suspensio

227 is relatively high; however, there are wide discrepancies in the prevalence and causes of attrition

228 Recent studies have identified substantial discrepancies in the prevalence of mental disorders amon

229 d these differences mainly resulted from the discrepancies in the primary sequence of the relatively

230 Contextualizing mortality explained discrepancies in the prioritization of death among stake

231 This study serves to highlight the discrepancies in the public databases and the problems o

232 This reclassification clarifies previous discrepancies in the public databases as well as in the

233 nation for many of the wavelength-dependency discrepancies in the published literature.

234 While significant discrepancies in the quantitative prediction of activati

235 es for all four sites with activation energy discrepancies in the range 0-3 kBT.

236 postcataract endophthalmitis, there are wide discrepancies in the rate and potential causes of postop

237 based on these data that reconcile apparent discrepancies in the recent literature with regard to th

238 uately registered, and approximately 30% had discrepancies in the registered and published primary ou

239 We tested the hypothesis that discrepancies in the reported frequencies of HNE ANCAs i

240 However, there are wide discrepancies in the reported frequencies of so-called t

241 We discuss possible explanations for the discrepancies in the results from different laboratories

242 The resulting comparisons show significant discrepancies in the sequence as well as in the order an

243 We identify major discrepancies in the spatial patterns of winter Northern

244 Discrepancies in the spectroscopic data between syntheti

245 have drawn attention to possibly inadvertent discrepancies in the way men and women are treated for c

246 There are significant discrepancies in the willingness to participate in vario

247 Because of the discrepancy in the amount of label scrambling between ma

248 ly, more studies are needed to clear up this discrepancy in the ancestral rates, but I believe that t

249 nces consist of 22 nucleotides, there exists discrepancy in the characteristic lengths of the miRNA s

250 8 surgical cases involves an intraoperative discrepancy in the count.

251 0.5, respectively), reconciling the apparent discrepancy in the experimental data.

252 nterphase and mitotic cells and to address a discrepancy in the field (i.e., whether ER sheets persis

253 , they provide an explanation for a possible discrepancy in the form of tolerance observed in differe

254 ive correlation between the magnitude of the discrepancy in the frequency of reporting adverse effect

255 ined probe sets reveals approximately 30-50% discrepancy in the genes previously identified as differ

256 Size discrepancy in the graft and recipient ducts was noted i

257 ovide a "microbiological" bias and lead to a discrepancy in the growth of M. avium subsp. paratubercu

258 low-risk patients in both models, with more discrepancy in the high-risk patients when using the cus

259 lular pressure dynamics explain the apparent discrepancy in the interpretation of experimental result

260 xpression may be responsible for some of the discrepancy in the level of protection detected for the

261 Given this discrepancy in the literature and that the consequence o

262 These results explain the discrepancy in the literature by showing that novel asso

263 A discrepancy in the literature crystal structure has been

264 This work addresses the discrepancy in the literature regarding the effects of s

265 However, there is much discrepancy in the literature regarding the proposed ben

266 The discrepancy in the magnitude could suggest a prestin-con

267 n the PDLT group because of significant size discrepancy in the main bronchus (P < 0.05).

268 The substantial discrepancy in the male-to-female ratio between clinic-r

269 hed clinical data by using the percentage of discrepancy in the mean, time to 90% peak, peak value, a

270 screpancy in nuo was almost identical to the discrepancy in the measured ratio of DeltaV/DeltaP (tota

271 At present, there is still a large discrepancy in the measurement of the reactive uptake co

272 parameters may be accurately estimated, the discrepancy in the model renders it less predictive than

273 After correcting for the discrepancy in the number of involved joints, no differe

274 V-1 are identified which may account for the discrepancy in the rate of evolution of these two retrov

275 The marked discrepancy in the rates of sustained virologic response

276 f 25 meta-analyses showed more than a 2-fold discrepancy in the relative diagnostic odds ratio betwee

277 an island basalts would resolve the apparent discrepancy in the relative helium concentrations of oce

278 Cell sterilisation largely accounts for the discrepancy in the relative risks between these two popu

279 The discrepancy in the relaxation times increases with incre

280 This large discrepancy in the stimulation of the first electron tra

281 Discrepancy in the supply-demand relationship for critic

282 The discrepancies in this diphtheria diagnostics EQA alarmin

283 We discuss literature discrepancies in this regard.

284 e screened for eligibility, and any possible discrepancies in this screening were resolved.

285 alarial vaccine candidates, we explored this discrepancy in this study.

286 f self-rated health across surveys, striking discrepancies in time trends were observed.

287 ions to STDP, we must account for this large discrepancy in timescales.

288 This apparent discrepancy in topA requirements in different bacteria p

289 in current BPLM theory, including three-fold discrepancies in torsional persistence length at the hig

290 To decipher the discrepancy in transgene expression between MLV and HIV-

291 gical variables were examined in relation to discrepancy in univariable and multivariable models adju

292 Long et al. describe a "discrepancy" in using UniFrac to assess statistical sign

293 kidney transplantation is costly, with wide discrepancy in utilization and a limited evidence base,

294 n-melanoma skin cancer to further define sex discrepancies in UVB-induced inflammation.

295 Discrepancies in variability are largest at low latitude

296 Previous research provides evidence for discrepancies in various types of emotional self-report

297 Our findings show significant discrepancies in vessel length density in FGR placentas.

298 The discrepancies in volumes and risk-adjusted mortality wer

299 Among 194 true discrepancies in which findings were missed at CT(p), ca

300 d on immunological studies, but reveals some discrepancies in which paralog types have been lost or d