ライフサイエンスコーパス: discrimination learning

1 ctory bulb (OB) slows, but does not prevent, discrimination learning.

2 ptical self-stimulation, and directs sensory discrimination learning.

3 shown no evidence that CeA lesions affect FN discrimination learning.

4 subcortical structures during threat/safety discrimination learning.

5 ively with fear ratings during threat/safety discrimination learning.

6 t toward a key role of V1 at early stages in discrimination learning.

7 ehavior and an impairment in contextual fear discrimination learning.

8 d D2 receptors have opposing effects on odor discrimination learning.

9 receptors have opposing effects in aversive discrimination learning.

10 t species differences in the rate of initial discrimination learning.

11 rns of cue-elicited neuronal activity during discrimination learning.

12 during direct comparison of delay and trace discrimination learning.

13 en PKA and PKC during acquisition of spatial discrimination learning.

14 mice on black-white and horizontal-vertical discrimination learning.

15 ocampal lesions, do not affect simple visual discrimination learning.

16 tance, and a persistent impairment on visual discrimination learning.

17 c blockade slowed, but did not prevent, odor discrimination learning.

18 red on pattern discrimination and concurrent discrimination learning.

19 performing various tests of conditional and discrimination learning.

20 (3) the extent of generalization of interval discrimination learning.

21 terms of response inhibition and conditional discrimination learning.

22 id (B/W) mice were tested in shock-motivated discrimination learning, 1-way avoidance conditioning, a

23 amygdaloid complex were tested on concurrent discrimination learning (24-hr intertrial interval [ITI]

24 ce show a severe impairment of somatosensory-discrimination learning ability in a behavioral task tha

25 , produced a persistent impairment on visual discrimination learning and a florid, but transient, Klu

26 havioral sensitivity to reinforcement during discrimination learning and D(2)-like receptor availabil

27 a set-shift task in which reward depended on discrimination learning and extradimensional set-shiftin

28 e was modified to an arena, and simultaneous discrimination learning and reversal learning were demon

29 nd ABL fired selectively to cues during odor discrimination learning and reversal training.

30 in awake, behaving rats during go/no-go odor discrimination learning and reversal.

31 cept permanence (OCP), computerized tests of discrimination learning, and infant social behavior.

32 ples include motor-sequence learning; visual-discrimination learning; and perceptual learning of a sy

33 During discrimination learning, animals receiving TCVs had impr

34 an, spatial working memory, planning, visual discrimination learning/attentional set-shifting and dec

35 hippocampectomy in infancy spares concurrent discrimination learning but not recognition memory.

36 Experiment 1 assessed trace conditional discrimination learning by using a light conditional sti

37 Trial-dependent, latent and discrimination learning can be assessed using modificati

38 um and I. Daum that reports that conditional discrimination learning depends on awareness.

39 Critically, this depth-discrimination learning did not generalize to the traine

40 sly to produce a severe impairment in visual discrimination learning for auditory secondary reinforce

41 sterior fusiform gyrus were recruited during discrimination learning for faces, but not scenes and do

42 mic MK-801 have no effect on T-maze position discrimination learning, impairment of SDA by MK-801 lik

43 ioral and neural correlates of threat/safety discrimination learning in adolescents and adults using

44 agonist improved learning ability on visual discrimination learning in all monkeys but this improvem

45 y of this paradigm to generate threat/safety discrimination learning in both adolescents and adults.

46 ERalpha and ERbeta agonists disrupted discrimination learning in both sexes.

47 dorsal hippocampus rapidly improved general discrimination learning in female mice.

48 The data suggest that discrimination learning in naive subjects requires NMDA

49 , at this dose, did not impair simple visual discrimination learning in normal monkeys.

50 assertions is found in feature negative (FN) discrimination learning, in which a "target" stimulus is

51 We here investigate how olfactory discrimination learning is regulated by cholinergic modu

52 Intriguingly, during active odor discrimination learning, mitral but not tufted cells exh

53 damage involving the HC and PrC compromised discrimination learning of scenes and faces but left dot

54 experienced odours and differentially delay discrimination learning of unrecognized and novel odour

55 TD were found to have deficits in the visual discrimination learning paradigm specific to the reversa

56 Here we developed a discrimination learning paradigm that assesses the abili

57 modeling reinforcement-related behavior in a discrimination learning paradigm.

58 ow normal changes in response latency during discrimination learning, particularly on trials involvin

59 er, were unimpaired in acquisition of object discrimination learning problems and responded like cont

60 A discrimination learning procedure was used to expose rat

61 ith the self-administration chambers using a discrimination learning procedure.

62 ive stimulus effects by examining if ethanol discrimination learning produces changes in brain region

63 Using drug discrimination learning, rats were trained to discrimina

64 superficial layers of the SC during pattern discrimination learning reverses the precedence for glob

65 eward and specific digging substrate--during discrimination learning sessions.

66 s were first trained to acquire an olfactory discrimination learning set (ODLS) on 40 olfactory-uniqu

67 n reversal learning set (DRLS) and olfactory discrimination learning set (ODLS) tasks, a delayed matc

68 gnocellularis (nBM) were tested on olfactory discrimination learning set (ODLS), olfactory discrimina

69 consistent findings regarding the concurrent discrimination learning task by demonstrating that perfo

70 For 30 years, the concurrent discrimination learning task has figured prominently in

71 the amygdala impair performance on a visual discrimination learning task in which an auditory second

72 ve of impaired performance on the concurrent discrimination learning task than was the amount of dama

73 Here, using a validated discrimination learning task that distinguishes goal-dir

74 d were tested on a simple, two-choice object discrimination learning task that has been shown to be s

75 Using a new concurrent spatial discrimination learning task, they found that fornix tra

76 relative to 3 normal controls on concurrent discrimination learning tasks with only 10 problems with

77 mporal specificity in somatosensory interval discrimination learning that generalizes across skin loc

78 y exacerbated age-related deficits in object discrimination learning; the magnitude of this effect wa

79 We propose that V1 plays a key role early in discrimination learning to enhance behaviorally relevant

80 ations to a high criterion and on concurrent discrimination learning, to a single high criterion acro

81 y in piriform cortical function during odour discrimination learning until mastery, suggesting that e

82 Discrimination learning was facilitated by making the CS

83 Go/no-go discrimination learning was not affected by L-NAME.

84 Simple discrimination learning was not affected, whereas acquis

85 To answer this question, pattern discrimination learning was studied in three intact cats

86 Modest impairments in discrimination learning were measured in lower expressor

87 However, significant differences in discrimination learning were observed during the reversa

88 es revealed a key role for the HC and PrC in discrimination learning, which is consistent with repres

89 On conditional discrimination learning, which is particularly sensitive

90 sculus) were tested on a task of simple odor discrimination learning with 3 repeated reversals.

91 hown only to impair new postoperative object discrimination learning with large stimulus set sizes (>

92 that emerges during specific stages of odour discrimination learning, with a transient bias toward th