コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ng while humans performed a difficult visual discrimination task.
2 provenance and destination) during a visual discrimination task.
3 n chickens trained to perform an orientation discrimination task.
4 ence speed of acquisition in a forced-choice discrimination task.
5 ons in rats performing an auditory frequency-discrimination task.
6 d from barrel cortex while a rat performed a discrimination task.
7 macaque monkeys performed a fine orientation discrimination task.
8 al observer deemed optimal to accomplish the discrimination task.
9 by prior expectation during a visual motion discrimination task.
10 decision-making component of a somatosensory discrimination task.
11 which were also activated in the non-speech discrimination task.
12 ct behavioral performance in the same visual discrimination task.
13 reas while rats performed an active aperture discrimination task.
14 d performance in a whisker-dependent texture discrimination task.
15 avian auditory cortical neurons after a song discrimination task.
16 iods of training of a high versus low reward-discrimination task.
17 nd midbrain of monkeys performing a temporal-discrimination task.
18 ively modulate sniff strength during an odor discrimination task.
19 had no impact on a well learned simple odor discrimination task.
20 n rhesus monkeys during a vestibular heading discrimination task.
21 ural images presented during a face/scramble discrimination task.
22 nnectivity before training on a novel visual discrimination task.
23 ns in a reaction time (RT) random-dot motion discrimination task.
24 formance on a two-interval, delayed response discrimination task.
25 ccuracy while listeners performed a go/no-go discrimination task.
26 FPs) in rats trained on a two-choice, visual discrimination task.
27 ues' choices in an amplitude modulation (AM) discrimination task.
28 ge on a nonnative speech and visual language discrimination task.
29 al judgments during a fine heading direction discrimination task.
30 and saccade response time on a visual motion discrimination task.
31 ences of tones while performing an intensity discrimination task.
32 ing accuracy and behavioral performance in a discrimination task.
33 ortices of monkeys performing a vibrotactile discrimination task.
34 tation-selective channels during a difficult discrimination task.
35 ential role for rate-codes in A1 for this AM discrimination task.
36 lind observers performing a global direction discrimination task.
37 mance of a model output neuron on a stimulus discrimination task.
38 both humans and monkeys performing a heading-discrimination task.
39 animals performed a two-alternative heading discrimination task.
40 types in the striatum, during a food-seeking discrimination task.
41 ity as monkeys performed a relative-distance discrimination task.
42 ng and aged monkeys were tested on an object discrimination task.
43 edictions based on sensitivity in the coarse discrimination task.
44 le monkeys performed a delayed somatosensory discrimination task.
45 alization) for an auditory temporal-interval discrimination task.
46 ortex in these aged rats by using an oddball discrimination task.
47 underlying dyslexia using a simple frequency-discrimination task.
48 miliarity discrimination task and a location discrimination task.
49 n two reaching tasks and one tactile texture discrimination task.
50 est period depended on the difficulty of the discrimination task.
51 identity) discrimination task and a category discrimination task.
52 rformed the best in the high-contrast motion discrimination task.
53 r while participants performed a famous name discrimination task.
54 of psychometric performance in the direction-discrimination task.
55 uditory sensory function by means of a pitch discrimination task.
56 2.9 mM) receptors during a simultaneous odor discrimination task.
57 textual CS in that appetitive Pavlovian drug discrimination task.
58 ontal cortex as monkeys performed a duration-discrimination task.
59 aque monkeys during performance of a sensory discrimination task.
60 egimen on a consonant-vowel phoneme-in-noise discrimination task.
61 hat underlie perceptual learning in a visual-discrimination task.
62 hree times across two days on an orientation discrimination task.
63 while participants performed the expression discrimination task.
64 tivation on mice performing a GO/NOGO visual discrimination task.
65 during performance of a memory-guided visual discrimination task.
66 neurons during performance of an associative discrimination task.
67 vity during the sensory-gathering epoch of a discrimination task.
68 nd after training on an audiovisual temporal discrimination task.
69 nd monkeys that performed a motion direction discrimination task.
70 hesus macaques performing a motion direction discrimination task.
71 to mask the use of these cues in a luminance discrimination task.
72 FC in rats performing a two-alternative odor discrimination task.
73 areas of two monkeys during a somatosensory discrimination task.
74 learning on a novel visual shape orientation discrimination task.
75 at drives decisions in an auditory frequency discrimination task.
76 nkeys improved their performance in an image discrimination task.
77 nipulation, while monkeys performed a visual discrimination task.
78 f macaque monkeys performing a facial gender-discrimination task.
79 nterference effect during a motion direction discrimination task.
80 C of mice performing a PFC-dependent sensory discrimination task.
81 L) of rats during learning in an odor-guided discrimination task.
82 during such an experiment, a classic tactile discrimination task.
83 single training of a peripheral orientation discrimination task.
84 formed a two-interval forced-choice contrast discrimination task.
85 neurons in area V4 while monkeys performed a discrimination task.
86 ral intraparietal area during a visuospatial discrimination task.
87 t on memory consolidation using a behavioral discrimination task.
88 while they performed an auditory spatial cue discrimination task.
89 PEG) of ferrets trained on a simple auditory discrimination task.
90 d on a high-contrast visual stimulus using a discrimination task.
91 sting brain before and after a somatosensory discrimination task.
92 correlates with decisions in an orientation-discrimination task.
93 nd perform either sound location or identity discrimination tasks.
94 ica) are known to learn the context to solve discrimination tasks.
95 n animals are engaged in sound detection and discrimination tasks.
96 necessary to perform these types of sensory discrimination tasks.
97 n switching between orientation and contrast discrimination tasks.
98 rats performing temporal and light-intensity discrimination tasks.
99 al activation in these areas during temporal discrimination tasks.
100 ction biases and lower visibility ratings in discrimination tasks.
101 red for difficult, but not simple, olfactory discrimination tasks.
102 pyramidal PFC neurons in circuits subserving discrimination tasks.
103 d cognitive demands of memory-guided sensory discrimination tasks.
104 an be surprisingly predictive of behavior in discrimination tasks.
105 ation and performance of visual and auditory discrimination tasks.
106 n cortical representations in widely studied discrimination tasks.
107 le performing stop, working memory, and time discrimination tasks.
108 ature (orientation and frequency) and visual discrimination tasks.
109 ut not face, discrimination accuracy in both discrimination tasks.
110 of sensory neurons and animals' judgments in discrimination tasks.
114 terion, and compare it to a more traditional discrimination task, allowing us to model this explicit
115 mediately after the sample phase of a social discrimination task and 24-h later were subjected to a 5
116 of the gestures: a visuo-spatial (identity) discrimination task and a category discrimination task.
117 or medial shell of the NAc on a familiarity discrimination task and a location discrimination task.
118 ion and subsequent reversal of an egocentric discrimination task and a visually cued task in the wate
119 ile still in utero) on a consonant and vowel discrimination task and at 6 and 10 mo of age on a nonna
121 P during a well-studied moving-dot direction-discrimination task and manipulated whether a saccade ta
122 and outer hair cells, in a two-choice visual discrimination task and studied the behavioral consequen
123 coding of oddball sounds in a human auditory discrimination task and suggest the existence of an adap
124 luences the lateralization of an odor memory/discrimination task and that hormone replacement therapy
125 xtensive training on an automated two-choice discrimination task and then maintained their memory per
126 when the monkeys performed the vibrotactile discrimination task and when they were not required to r
127 -5 Hz Vm oscillations when animals performed discrimination tasks and passively viewed drifting grati
128 ts: animals trained extensively in a heading discrimination task, and "naive" animals that performed
130 ged in a two-alternative forced-choice taste discrimination task, and assaying the responses of these
131 sal, while human subjects performed a motion-discrimination task, and decomposed task behavior into l
132 orded during a version of the cued direction discrimination task, and we found no change in MT respon
133 -) were trained on a variety of speech sound discrimination tasks, and auditory cortex responses were
135 redicted success rates on a difficult visual discrimination task, as well as the amount of task impro
136 dency in the temporal domain; and (2) a time discrimination task, assessing temporal resolution.
139 ization task that was absent during a motion discrimination task before categorization training.
141 erformance on a well learned, difficult odor discrimination task, but had no impact on a well learned
142 ly, we show that behavioral performance on a discrimination task can be predicted based on the amplit
143 of cats change as they learn an orientation-discrimination task, casting new light on the neuronal b
144 or colliculus in monkeys performing a motion discrimination task caused profound inattention for stim
145 we show that monkeys performing a direction discrimination task commit to a choice when the accumula
146 la after training on an inhibitory avoidance discrimination task, comprising two distinct training co
147 ts were trained in a serial feature negative discrimination task consisting of reinforced presentatio
148 ual performance on a visual motion direction-discrimination task corresponds to changes in how an unm
149 hat performance on a forced-choice olfactory discrimination task depends on relative spontaneous pref
150 eys (Cebus apella) were tested on a 2-choice discrimination task designed to examine their knowledge
152 macaques trained to perform a fine disparity discrimination task, disparity-selective neurons in V2 w
153 ns by considering the case of the concurrent discrimination task, drawing on findings from humans and
154 prague-Dawley rats were trained on an object-discrimination task during which they could freely explo
155 monstrate that animals can perform a tactile discrimination task equally well whether mechanical stim
156 Both marmosets also performed an orientation discrimination task, exhibiting a saturating psychometri
157 trained mice to perform an auditory Go/NoGo discrimination task followed by a reversal to compare le
158 performance on a two-alternative choice odor discrimination task following local, bilateral blockade
159 we measure perceptual deficits in a heading discrimination task following surgical ablation of the n
160 ithout musical training performed a duration discrimination task for a silent period in a rhythmic au
161 forming the same non-ideal unambiguous state discrimination task for coherent states with low mean ph
163 al hippocampal subfields during a perceptual discrimination task for scenes, faces, and objects.
165 We trained monkeys to perform a heading discrimination task from visual and vestibular cues, var
168 ger periods when they must perform difficult discrimination tasks, implying that the brain's ability
170 perceptual learning on an auditory frequency-discrimination task in human listeners when practice on
171 encephalography (MEG) and a tactile temporal discrimination task in humans, we find that oscillatory
174 lucose utilization during a multidimensional discrimination task in the caudate nucleus, hippocampus,
177 measured choice probabilities in a disparity discrimination task in V1, which had been at chance (0.4
178 s were trained on a discrete-trials temporal discrimination task in which a light (22 cd/m(2)) was pr
179 were trained in a compound feature negative discrimination task in which a tone was presented and im
180 d and five parrot species with a touchscreen discrimination task in which novel stimuli were occasion
181 FC lesions were trained in a multiple-choice discrimination task in which operant nosepoke responses
182 ns while they performed a cued somatosensory discrimination task in which the cue-target interval was
183 trained adult monkeys in a difficult object discrimination task in which their visual experience wit
184 ormed multiple trials of a rewarded odd-ball discrimination task in which we varied the potential rew
186 unteers were trained to a coarse orientation discrimination task, in either the morning or evening.
188 tested human participants in an orientation discrimination task, in which performance is contingent
189 ly-presented visual categorial oddball shape discrimination task; in Exp 2 (Auditory-Attend), listene
190 ined to perform a tactile-acoustic frequency discrimination task, including both unimodal and crossmo
192 sks than in those performing light-intensity discrimination tasks, indicating greater neuronal activa
193 Here we trained mice to perform a sensory discrimination task involving appetitive and aversive vi
194 an transfer learning of a coarse orientation discrimination task involving first-order, luminance-mod
195 ested human and monkey subjects in a heading discrimination task involving visual (optic flow) and ve
196 In three experiments, participants performed discrimination tasks involving faces, bodies, and object
197 /neurite complexes are essential for texture discrimination tasks involving glabrous skin but not whi
198 performed either an orientation or contrast discrimination task, involving one of two laterally pres
199 lts suggest that normal competence in a salt discrimination task is dependent on the taste receptor f
200 ifically, performance on a tactile-frequency-discrimination task is impaired when an auditory distrac
201 lexible sensory representation during active discrimination tasks is achieved in the PFC by a special
202 We examined whether performance of temporal discrimination tasks is associated with increased neuron
203 difference of detection tasks in contrast to discrimination tasks is that only the stimulus presence
204 30 aging human participants on a numerosity discrimination task known to engage the parietal cortex
205 procedural food acquisition task and visual discrimination task learned in a previous experiment.
206 icipants (20 ASC) performed a classic motion discrimination task, manually indicating the global dire
208 eural patterns during a Chinese lexical tone discrimination task matched those observed in Chinese/Fr
211 ming a reaction-time visual motion direction-discrimination task, neurons in a primary input structur
212 of rats trained on a vibrissal vibrotactile discrimination task, nor does it affect the whiskers' me
213 as recorded in rats performing a conditional discrimination task on a modified T-maze in which the id
215 mined the effects of training in a pure tone discrimination task on relations between behavioral perf
218 ay courses of training on a motion direction discrimination task, once while ingesting 5 mg of donepe
220 ers' performance on two global visual motion discriminations tasks, one requiring the combination of
221 eficits were observed in the tactile texture discrimination task or in an analgesic control monkey.
222 ned human listeners on an auditory frequency-discrimination task over multiple days and compared the
225 ants completed a facial emotion and identity discrimination task prior to and following tRNS to eithe
226 e response evoked by the high-contrast speed discrimination task, reflecting a functional dissociatio
228 n human participants performing two auditory discrimination tasks relying on distinct acoustic featur
230 ingly, we suggest that deficits on difficult discrimination tasks reported for patients with MTL lesi
234 , or vertex, participants performed a visual discrimination task requiring covert attention to either
236 cortex (vlPFC) of monkeys performing a shape discrimination task respond more strongly to occluded th
237 g rats in a particularly difficult olfactory-discrimination task results in acquisition of high skill
239 In a parallel human psychophysical pitch-discrimination task, reverberation impaired the ability
240 avioral responses during an intradimensional discrimination task showed similarity-dependent generali
241 and partial least-squares in three distinct discrimination tasks: skin cancers and precancers from b
242 t in the context of relatively simple visual discrimination tasks, spatial attention modulates percep
243 ucture contributes to common elements of the discrimination task such as the monitoring of sensory co
244 , to a greater extent compared to the visual discrimination task, supporting the idea of semantic-lev
245 bstantial initial training on an orientation discrimination task, switches to a new location or posit
246 groups of subjects were trained on a texture discrimination task (TDT) after baseline sleep, and were
247 s was combined with behavioral detection and discrimination tasks, thalamic recordings from awake ani
248 mbens was higher in rats performing temporal discrimination tasks than in those performing light-inte
249 ith Parkinson's disease (PD) on a concurrent discrimination task that can be learned implicitly by ne
250 in a reaction time version of the direction-discrimination task that matches neural measurements to
251 at individual variability in a simple visual discrimination task that reflects both processing speed
252 bees (Apis mellifera) responded to a visual discrimination task that varied in difficulty between tr
253 behaviors requiring fine frequency and level discrimination, tasks that CI users find especially chal
256 monkey behaviour in a fixed-duration motion discrimination task, the model integrates sensory eviden
259 these participants were able to perform the discrimination task; there was no correlation between aw
261 o set a decision criterion in an orientation-discrimination task under both static and dynamic condit
262 when participants shifted to a novel Vernier discrimination task under identical saccade conditions.
265 ntly in two difficult but similar perceptual discrimination tasks under DO and CO procedures, respect
267 ormance of human participants in an auditory discrimination task using a two-parameter computational
268 two macaque monkeys in a coarse orientation discrimination task using band-pass-filtered dynamic noi
269 ully trained on a black-and-white two-choice discrimination task using painted paddles and food reinf
272 ioral flexibility during a reversal learning discrimination task was reduced in alcohol-dependent mic
273 us of macaque monkeys performing a direction discrimination task, we can predict the monkey's choices
274 here, with a simple "face"/"car" perceptual discrimination task, we obtained late (decision-related)
275 In recordings from mice engaged in an odor discrimination task, we report that the firing rate of O
276 -time version of a visual/vestibular heading discrimination task, we show that behavior is clearly su
277 used three versions of a visually cued color discrimination task: we varied reward size, delay to rew
278 abilities in this monkey for the orientation discrimination task were significantly larger than those
279 Three conditions (one detection and two discrimination tasks) were used to manipulate task compl
280 with behavioral performance on 11 consonant-discrimination tasks when spike timing was preserved and
281 Human listeners performed a syllable pitch discrimination task where two syllables served as to-be-
282 on tomography (FDG-PET) and a novel semantic discrimination task which probed knowledge of social and
283 the prototypical two-alternative dot-motion discrimination task, which is known to strongly benefit
284 e ability to learn the concurrent configural discrimination task, which required the rats to learn th
285 rtles demonstrate long-term memory of visual discrimination tasks, which relates to apparent abilitie
286 e perceptual consequences of learning a fine discrimination task while adapting the neurons that carr
287 stimuli) the state of SCx during an emotion discrimination task while controlling for visual effects
288 Human subjects performed an orientation discrimination task while emphasizing either response sp
289 Observers performed a simple orientation-discrimination task while ignoring task-irrelevant orien
291 V4 while rhesus monkeys performed a contrast discrimination task whose difficulty changed in blocks o
292 Signal theoretic analysis of a global motion discrimination task with adaptive performance staircasin
293 ons during the performance of an associative discrimination task with auditory cues for appetitive ve
294 es in a two-alternative forced choice visual discrimination task with high- and low-contrast visual i
295 emotor cortex of monkeys performing a visual discrimination task with reaches as the behavioral repor
297 Human observers performed an orientation discrimination task, with either valid or invalid attent
298 ormed analogous variants of a DMTS frequency discrimination task, with the frequency information pres
299 jointly activated by duration and numerosity discrimination tasks, with a congruency effect in the ri
300 rgeted to S1 enhanced performance on sensory discrimination tasks without affecting task attention or
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。