ライフサイエンスコーパス: discussion

1 gth-of-evidence assessment was done by group discussion.

2 rence on cognitive control remain a topic of discussion.

3 be an important contribution to this policy discussion.

4 CHTC could change the focus of the pre-test discussion.

5 of the consensus group were included in the discussion.

6 Delphi process (online), and 4) a World Cafe discussion.

7 ther discordance was resolved with consensus discussion.

8 ts strictest sense, as will be argued in the Discussion.

9 cell imaging technologies, have revived this discussion.

10 ns using patient scenarios to illustrate our discussion.

11 P data from the SPRINT trial may inform this discussion.

12 ect to invite partners to participate in the discussion.

13 re then identified through multidisciplinary discussions.

14 nts on the approaches used in family consent discussions.

15 ogical information in multidisciplinary team discussions.

16 sive steps are needed to better promote such discussions.

17 to factor BRCA2 mutations into PCA screening discussions.

18 anisms are in part a matter of controversial discussions.

19 elopment and disease that arose during these discussions.

20 ater disposal or reuse, and to inform policy discussions.

21 This report summarizes those discussions.

22 lutionary considerations and even structural discussions.

23 ommittees and then modified after full-panel discussions.

24 recommended against CPM with no substantive discussion (14.5%; n = 37).

25 DISCUSSION: A common finding in environmental epigenetic

26 report of surgeon recommendations, level of discussion about CPM, satisfaction with surgical decisio

27 and 30.1% (n = 343) reported no substantial discussion about CPM.

28 Discussion about how the relationship between race/ethni

29 recommendation against CPM and the extent of discussion about it with 3 outcomes: patient satisfactio

30 8; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-9.12), less discussion about patients' sociodemographic circumstance

31 The effect of having less discussion about patients' sociodemographic circumstance

32 Here, a detailed discussion about the commonly adopted strategies to opti

33 A final discussion about the current "state-of-art" and future p

34 which is characterised by robust debate and discussion about the nation's future; national legislati

35 The review concludes with a discussion about the remaining challenges in the field a

36 uring operations are generating considerable discussion about their potential to contaminate aquifers

37 tions from an isolated surgical problem to a discussion about treatment alternatives and outcomes.

38 that engages patients with diabetes in group discussions about diabetes-related topics, has over a ra

39 cohort of 192 patients, facilitating family discussions about goals of treatment and organ donation

40 ing donation at imminent death and including discussions about organ donation in end-of-life planning

41 th risk factors in early adulthood to inform discussions about primary prevention.

42 breast cancer, and suggested approaches for discussions about surveillance mammography with older pa

43 owerful tools to elucidate the controversial discussions about the molecular or nanoscale nature of m

44 ytoplankton chytridiomycosis, resulting from discussions among an international team of chytrid resea

45 w of prior literature, ongoing research, and discussions among the authors, suggested considerations

46 Woodward, a discussion and analysis of Woodward's persona is given.

47 m-based catalysts to provide a more coherent discussion and because of the availability of detailed m

48 es emerged across workshop presentations and discussion and centered on 1) physiologic or development

49 h the urgency of trauma care limits explicit discussion and consideration of patient priorities, we f

50 fusive or superdiffusive has been a focus of discussion and controversy.

51 omote a nonpunitive culture that values open discussion and feedback on diagnostic performance." It m

52 Several of these claims warrant further discussion and highlight the critical importance of data

53 evel at which this cleft forms is a topic of discussion and interest, with the most likely levels of

54 SCS design, conduct, and findings, with his discussion and interpretation of their importance.

55 We conclude with a general discussion and recommendations for dealing with families

56 ir work in open forums that promote critical discussion and reproducibility.

57 ing patient outcomes has been the subject of discussion and research for years.

58 ze diverse HIV-1 isolates have reinvigorated discussion and testing of these products in humans, sinc

59 erience training DVD to encourage reflective discussion and the identification and application of gen

60 DISCUSSION AND The theoretical merits of the low-dose ca

61 ta mining in wide research areas, scientific discussion and the therapeutic discovery process.

62 On the basis of consensus discussions and a review of the literature, we do not su

63 h greater involvement of all stakeholders in discussions and decision-making in order to deepen under

64 relatives and residents were not involved in discussions and decision-making, which seemed to limit u

65 The discovery of alpha-Gal stimulated new discussions and investigations regarding the relevance o

66 ica Ebola epidemic has profoundly influenced discussions and practice concerning global health securi

67 ly benefitting from directed palliative care discussions and reduce the number of ICU transfers.

68 pelin's nosology have roots in these earlier discussions and would be enriched by a deeper appreciati

69 (e.g., lecture), multiple voice (e.g., pair discussion), and no voice (e.g., clicker question thinki

70 Email questionnaires, evidence review, panel discussion, and iterative voting was performed.

71 rtial regulatory frameworks, intense ethical discussions, and meaningful changes in social beliefs ac

72 They participate in medical team discussions, and provide information.

73 d potential hurdles of this approach through discussion; and reached consensus on recommendations reg

74 We propose reframing discussions around surveillance mammography in older bre

75 Through consensus discussions at 3 meetings over 12 months, a classificati

76 ment for cisgender adults requires a nuanced discussion based on baseline risk factors and age of adm

77 DISCUSSION: Based on our evaluation of the evidence, we

78 delines reviews the guideline and includes a discussion between 2 experts on how they would apply it

79 al benefit in decreasing IBTR after a shared discussion between the patient and her radiation oncolog

80 The definition was created through discussions between five expert members of the European

81 er to patients should inform more meaningful discussions between healthcare professionals and patient

82 ined from medical records and audio-recorded discussions between PCPs and patients.

83 ic meetings is currently a popular topic for discussion, but one that often lacks supportive data.

84 We follow up on this discussion by showing how structural priming drives real

85 y and management, and to raw material supply discussions by providing country-level information on th

86 DISCUSSION: Cognitive impairment in PD is complex, with

87 d explain why we need open and international discussions concerning a technology that could have glob

88 This analysis and discussion differs significantly from a viewpoint on CO2

89 DISCUSSION: DMF appeared generally safe and no carryover

90 Tea polyphenols have been a topic of discussion due to their health benefits.

91 Although a lively discussion ensued, there was general agreement that spec

92 DISCUSSION: Fate and bioaccumulation models describe how

93 The workshop presentations and panel discussions focused on current understanding and knowled

94 Discussion focuses on opportunities and challenges for m

95 As policy discussions for the expanded use of RTS,S/AS01 continue,

96 DISCUSSION: For every intervention the balance between p

97 essions, as well as via online "question and discussion" forums outside of contact session time.

98 via village health worker-led participatory discussion groups) and provision of health services (inc

99 ere discussed more than 2 decades ago, these discussions had little impact on epidemiologic practice.

100 Recent discussion has focused on questions related to the repea

101 Although the discussion has global relevance, we focus on low-resourc

102 To date, these discussions have been unable to reach a consensus regard

103 Collectively, the basic scientific discussions herein should provide a framework for unders

104 Our discussion highlights the importance of single-cell in s

105 n and historically contextualize our current discussion, I review in detail the proposal for etiologi

106 Discussion: Improving the engagement of the informal sec

107 es/developments are also included to put the discussion in a broader context.

108 Our intervention increased discussion in each broad policy area by 62.7% (relative

109 mentation has been the focus of considerable discussion in paleoanthropology.

110 icians with accurate information for patient discussions in the clinical setting.

111 suggest two ways in which Jussim's extensive discussion (in his 2012 book) could be enriched: first,

112 Discussion: In addition to ART, reducing immune activati

113 DISCUSSION: In this article, we propose a definition of

114 Themes of discussion include: communication with families, interpr

115 The discussion includes a comparison with cyclic adducts of

116 at the federal level, policy and management discussions initiated by the propagation of this rare ru

117 hnology, and (3) foster a broad and informed discussion involving all stakeholders including research

118 Discussion is given to the implications of a broader con

119 A detailed discussion is made on the technical barriers in the fabr

120 Conclusion Prognostic discussion is not intrinsically harmful to the patient-p

121 Finally, a discussion is offered on the additional effects generate

122 A further discussion is performed concerning why the re-emitted ra

123 A detailed discussion is presented on new developments in adsorbent

124 The discussion is then divided around the specific roles tha

125 Reported here are the specific discussion items and recommendations from this critical

126 RESULT AND DISCUSSION: JC pollen number was the most of all, more t

127 DISCUSSION: Key lessons range from the availability of s

128 ng a prospective ILD using multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) to validate diagnoses.

129 ne, side chains, and substituents), then the discussion moves on to polymer engineering (e.g., molecu

130 at we hope will spark the cross-disciplinary discussion necessary to produce a cognitively plausible

131 We conclude with a discussion of a still-debated question: do older adults

132 s of language associated with discourse in a discussion of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

133 nsure of Zika vaccine candidates including a discussion of clinical study designs, approaches to demo

134 After a discussion of commonly used strategies for the reconstit

135 We conclude with a discussion of current challenges and future opportunitie

136 Gram-positive pathogens and concludes with a discussion of current efforts to develop kinase inhibito

137 empirically determined physician preference, discussion of depression in a patient's note was found t

138 The discussion of each class of materials focuses on molecul

139 ation techniques is presented, followed by a discussion of elegant approaches and clever solutions th

140 Our results are of importance for the discussion of end-of-life decisions and the evaluation o

141 re, a description of associated costs, and a discussion of evidence-based pathways for the delivery o

142 The review begins with a discussion of flexible and stretchable devices of all ty

143 benefits beyond sterilizing immunity, and a discussion of future approaches to engineer novel molecu

144 The article concludes with a short discussion of future directions and likely challenges.

145 ature published in the year 2016, along with discussion of general trends.

146 mmendations address specific topics, such as discussion of goals of care and prognosis, treatment sel

147 rties of notable water-lean solvents, with a discussion of how such properties could translate to eff

148 We conclude with a discussion of how synthetic data sets can be used by res

149 previous growth) and encourage the on-going discussion of how to measure and compare growth rates.

150 n, would permit therapeutic modification and discussion of individualized survivor care plans even at

151 diverse range of settings, thus leading to a discussion of key areas in which our knowledge of transm

152 cription of the study methodology, including discussion of key aspects such as antibiotic pretreatmen

153 with potential for clinical relevance, and a discussion of known related imaging findings, including

154 he risks for individual patients and after a discussion of known risks and realistic benefits with pa

155 he supporting role of short-term memory in a discussion of logopenic variant PPA, and components of l

156 rammatical comprehension and expression in a discussion of nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA, the supp

157 It concludes with discussion of ongoing trials, new approaches, emerging i

158 This is followed by a discussion of our current understanding of the molecular

159 o are at a high risk for fracture based on a discussion of patient preferences, fracture risk profile

160 l scenarios that lead into an evidence-based discussion of practical strategies for managing perioper

161 Purpose Some research has suggested that discussion of prognosis can disrupt the patient-physicia

162 This study assessed whether physician discussion of prognosis is associated with detrimental c

163 recipients gave significantly more cues for discussion of prognosis, end-of-life care, future care o

164 An initial discussion of QD materials along with key concepts surro

165 The original discussion of quantum crystals and supersolidity focused

166 otein kinase S-glutathionylation have fueled discussion of redox-sensitive signaling.

167 rch, and are useful reference points for any discussion of risk with prospective patients.

168 s on the representation of word meaning in a discussion of semantic variant PPA, grammatical comprehe

169 The discussion of serotype-specific regulator mutations focu

170 A point-by-point discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of both t

171 This Review opens with a brief discussion of the advantages and limitations of conventi

172 sures, such as website pageviews and Twitter discussion of the articles' specific subjects, and dista

173 s aged 60 years or older based on a periodic discussion of the benefits and harms of specific blood p

174 recommendations for their use, along with a discussion of the best reporting practices of NLO parame

175 Through further discussion of the capabilities (and limitations) of thes

176 Particular focus is placed on discussion of the concept of stereodivergent dual cataly

177 The discussion of the confined dynamics includes solvation a

178 inical implications of this research include discussion of the contribution of sleep disturbance to d

179 logy of New World arenaviruses, as well as a discussion of the current animal models of infection.

180 idance in the spinal cord that provide for a discussion of the current distinction between diffusible

181 arning is largely missing from Lake et al.'s discussion of the development of human-like artificial i

182 nimal residual disease is emphasized, with a discussion of the different methods used.

183 The data are included here along with a discussion of the existing literature about the half-lif

184 This work supports discussion of the idea that where native foundation spec

185 In this paper we present a physical discussion of the indirect two-photon absorption (TPA) o

186 A discussion of the literature on the formation of LGO fro

187 iption of techniques of metrology precedes a discussion of the mechanical properties of three classes

188 for these substrates, which includes a brief discussion of the mechanism, the latest developed chiral

189 A critical discussion of the newest findings in the field of bacter

190 (T4; > 4.0 mm in Breslow thickness), after a discussion of the potential benefits and risks of harm.

191 This article begins with a brief discussion of the proposed biosyntheses and biosynthetic

192 Here we offer a critical discussion of the pros and cons of each.

193 Following a discussion of the rationale for measuring costs, this re

194 first objective of this work was to catalyze discussion of the role of personal heat exposure informa

195 ted with "monogenic" conditions, including a discussion of the structural basis of mutations that cau

196 In this Minireview, a detailed discussion of the synthetic work within this family is p

197 wever, so far there has not been an in-depth discussion of the technical aspects.

198 present 4 illustrative cases together with a discussion of the underlying pathology.

199 retical principles of control selection, and discussion of the use of deceased controls.

200 detection is provided along with a critical discussion of their limitations, benefits and potential

201 Following discussion of these factors, their importance will be il

202 for implementation, and the importance of a discussion of treatment options among members of the mul

203 nthesis and properties is given along with a discussion of tuneable CD properties that can be optimis

204 Finally, a discussion of very few selected examples, which highligh

205 Any discussion of water as life's matrix must, however, begi

206 We conclude with a brief discussion of what comes next in understanding vitamin D

207 these advances have also prompted realistic discussion of writing and radically re-writing complex g

208 We explicitly did not seek to include discussions of bedside patient-family engagement or shar

209 Key discussions of higher than expected CO2 mass transfer, w

210 at emerged from this study, along with brief discussions of how these issues led to specific recommen

211 LLS workshop also provided a venue for panel discussions of innovative solutions as well as challenge

212 faunal organisms, have been at the center of discussions of the evolution of Metazoa, the biology of

213 Discussions of the hippocampus often focus on place cell

214 Detailed discussions of the spatial and temporal distribution are

215 e exhibits all of the features familiar from discussions of this phenomenon in bulk semiconductors, i

216 CMs will be presented followed by a detailed discussion on 3 major causes of RCM, for which tailored

217 This review will provide a thorough discussion on designing nano-barcodes, focusing on the e

218 urses' contributions to healthcare to inform discussion on future research agendas.

219 In this article, the first focus is a discussion on molecular engineering (e.g., backbone, sid

220 s medical history and imaging, followed by a discussion on symptoms and management.

221 This review provides a discussion on the current trends and evidence for both f

222 Integrating these two fields will stimulate discussion on the direction of future cross-disciplinary

223 age undergraduate physics students to open a discussion on the fundamental assumptions in thermodynam

224 oach with a chemical cleavage strategy, with discussion on the important insights each has uncovered

225 Leibovich et al. opened up an important discussion on the nature and origins of numerosity perce

226 A systematic discussion on the role of each modality in future studie

227 Also, a brief discussion on the use of multiple responses and robustne

228 In this review, we provide a detailed discussion on this new class of advanced materials.

229 We anticipate that these data will motivate discussions on DNA barcoding based species identificatio

230 amic ionic processes is included, along with discussions on systematic modeling efforts, device and m

231 This has provoked a range of discussions on the role of water and its impact on batte

232 Germline findings led to discussion or initiation of change to targeted therapy i

233 ies were resolved in a second round, by team discussion or methodologists' consulting.

234 DISCUSSION: Our assessment in Kenya found lower levels o

235 Discussion: Our exploratory analyses support the hypothe

236 DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that cerebellar changes

237 DISCUSSION: Our research has identified behavioral, situ

238 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Ozone caused greater increases in BAL IL-33,

239 Across the 19 discussion papers examined, 8 crosscutting policy direct

240 DISCUSSION: Patients with UC have a high risk of IRA fai

241 Discussion pertains to the relations of the model to sim

242 We here report highlights and discussion points from the QfO meeting 2015 held in Barc

243 These findings help set research and discussion priorities and provide geographical and ecolo

244 ians and patients may have an evidence-based discussion regarding the known risk of cutaneous surgica

245 nt for health care providers to initiate the discussion regarding the potential for cardiac dysfuncti

246 This review is designed to foster the discussion regarding the viability of postcombustion CO2

247 In high-risk patients, discussions regarding extended stays in the intensive ca

248 What should not be lost in the discussions regarding the diverse biology of these cells

249 ience, Modeling and Immunity' and subsequent discussions regarding the potential synergy of high-thro

250 This review aims at raising a fundamental discussion related to the resolution limits of tip-enhan

251 DISCUSSION: RPE humps were frequently observed in highly

252 ntify key areas for improvement, and improve discussion sections by shifting from speculation on the

253 Although the cause remains unknown, discussion sections highlight new insights into the epid

254 ted have been widely adopted without further discussion, some may take longer to achieve more general

255 DISCUSSION: Summit participants highlighted four main ba

256 he goal of this Perspective is to initiate a discussion that can help identify optimal ways of managi

257 marizes for the broader scientific community discussions that occurred at the two final meetings of t

258 amework to facilitate informed and inclusive discussions that spur progress, rather than stall it.

259 olar compounds, according to the theoretical discussion, the rate-limiting step is the diffusion thro

260 Discussion.: The utility of pneumococcal PCR on blood fo

261 Discussion: The availability of HEWs can increase access

262 DISCUSSION: The LEnS framework encourages organization o

263 Discussion: The PPA can be a valuable planning and progr

264 Discussion: The PPA results emphasized the need for a di

265 Discussion: The PVG/MVA-CMDR HIV-1 vaccine regimen is sa

266 DISCUSSION: The UPGRADE trial will answer the question w

267 DISCUSSION: The Visual Fields Easy test procedure is a p

268 Discussion: These findings suggest that declining antibo

269 DISCUSSION: These unique resources have the potential to

270 Discussion: This study highlights the necessity of valid

271 mmendations in greater detail and expand the discussion to include additional priority areas, includi

272 ty of invited speakers may allow the ongoing discussions to be informed.

273 ntific conferences exemplifies a present-day discussion topic usually occurring without facts to supp

274 DISCUSSION: Traditional and exposomic biomonitoring appr

275 actic presentations and facilitated breakout discussions using disaster-related case studies.

276 Prognostic discussion was assessed by coding transcribed audio-reco

277 Results Prognostic discussion was not associated with a temporal decline in

278 In discussion we present limitations of our research and di

279 By opening up this discussion, we hope to stimulate future debates on co-pr

280 To facilitate the discussion, we introduce a unified model of tile self-as

281 this Journal of Nuclear Medicine Hot Topics discussion, we review the historical pathways to trainin

282 For this discussion, we will use the relatively simple budding ye

283 DISCUSSION: We define personal heat exposure as realized

284 DISCUSSION: We identify existing knowledge gaps about ex

285 DISCUSSION: We identify research questions in seven doma

286 Results of the discussion were summarized in a policy statement that wa

287 ubstantial detrimental effects of prognostic discussion were unlikely.

288 Major thematic elements from these discussions were collected and documented into 15 workin

289 orts from morbidity and mortality conference discussions were linked to clinical data from the Duke D

290 We hope our discussion will generate a greater appreciation for natu

291 Here we start our discussion with a description of surface chirality and o

292 llocated to psychosocial assessments through discussion with clinical and managerial staff.

293 rone plus prednisone should be offered after discussion with patients about potential harms, benefits

294 tion may be considered only after a thorough discussion with patients about the potential risks and b

295 of the genetic testing process and point of discussion with patients.

296 thickness with ulceration) after a thorough discussion with the patient of the potential benefits an

297 mendations It is recommended that there be a discussion with the patient, initiated by a member of th

298 of the natural history of EoE is central to discussions with patients regarding disease prognosis an

299 CaCO3 nucleation is still a topic of intense discussion, with new pathways for its growth from ions i

300 us for factoring into early-stage management discussion, with stronger consensus in high-risk/advance