ライフサイエンスコーパス: disgust

1 o recognize overtly different intensities of disgust.

2 of happiness and anger, but not for fear or disgust.

3 dicated a relative impairment in recognizing disgust.

4 r emotion-recognition impairments, including disgust.

5 eduction in the anterior insular response to disgust.

6 lated to bodily injury from those related to disgust.

7 tance of the basal ganglia in the emotion of disgust.

8 is the amygdala for fear and the insula for disgust.

9 ting behavior and impairments in recognizing disgust.

10 ppiness, surprise, anger, sadness, fear, and disgust.

11 ual analysis of two threat subtypes-fear and disgust.

12 f negative emotions such as fear, anger, and disgust.

13 ditioned taste avoidance but not conditioned disgust.

14 nisms in alternative threat emotions such as disgust.

15 Facial expressions were neutral, fearful, or disgusted.

16 entified the food stimuli as threatening and disgusting.

17 ht have commented that parasites were rather disgusting.

18 ted intense saltiness as anything other than disgusting.

19 r insular responses to facial expressions of disgust, a signifier of potential physical contamination

20 Infants generalize information about food disgust across all people, regardless of those people's

21 Both strong and mild expressions of disgust activated anterior insular cortex but not the am

22 I further explore how the disgust adaptive system, which coordinates avoidance beh

23 Potential cues include facial reactions of disgust, alarm-call vocalizations, and reduction in food

24 insular cortex but not the amygdala; strong disgust also activated structures linked to a limbic cor

25 edicted more impairment in recognizing fear, disgust and anger, and no impairment in recognizing faci

26 iness is a positive emotion to contrast with disgust and anger.

27 The role of emotional disgust and disgust sensitivity in moral judgment and de

28 ings suggest that potentiation of the ASR by disgust and fear depends on the integrity of the anterom

29 ir convergence on the core affect of threat, disgust and fear instigate distinct response profiles, p

30 untington's disease-associated modulation of disgust and happiness processing was negatively correlat

31 Attitudes toward disgust and hygiene behaviors were assessed using questi

32 ncerns the reason for the connection between disgust and specific political and moral attitudes; the

33 iation occurred in the partial regulation of disgust and taste avoidance by selective 5-HT(3) recepto

34 wledge that ingroup relations attenuate core disgust and that this helps explain the ability of group

35 Both the feeling of disgust and the observation of disgust in others are kno

36 ditions per subject: happiness, sadness, and disgust and three control conditions, each induced by fi

37 irst-hand and vicarious experiences of pain, disgust and unfairness.

38 bstrates which mediate responses to fearful, disgusted and happy expressions.

39 hey were biased to label neutral faces with "disgust" and "fear." On odor identification, IED subject

40 l emotion recognition, particularly fear and disgust, and did not benefit from increased emotional in

41 on, guilt, and shame and potentiating anger, disgust, and mirth.

42 emotions: happiness, surprise, fear, anger, disgust, and sadness.

43 s performed worse on recognition of fearful, disgusted, and neutral expressions.

44 e intensities of happy, sad, angry, fearful, disgusted, and neutral faces, balanced for gender and et

45 suicide is intuitively considered impure and disgusting, and discuss implications of this purity-base

46 jects were impaired at recognizing "anger," "disgust," and "surprise," and they were biased to label

47 Disgust, anger and happiness were chosen as emotions of

48 nal emotional states (happy, surprise, fear, disgust, anger, and sad) using the same facial movements

49 ched pictures of faces to the words "fear," "disgust," "anger," "sadness," "surprise," and "happiness

50 perience of core and body-boundary-violation disgust are dissociable in both peripheral autonomic and

51 As feelings of disgust are thought to be an important psychological mec

52 Happiness, sadness, and disgust are three emotions that differ in their valence

53 emergence of discrimination between fear and disgust as early as 96 ms after stimulus emphasizes the

54 provoke the emotions of happiness, fear, or disgust as well as a neutral state.

55 lays of happiness, sadness, anger, fear, and disgust as well as neutral faces.

56 ined the brain correlates of the presence of disgusting behavior and impaired recognition of disgust

57 ume was associated with both the presence of disgusting behavior and impairments in recognizing disgu

58 These findings suggest that regulating disgusting behaviors and recognizing disgust in others i

59 gressive aphasia were most likely to exhibit disgusting behaviors and were, on average, the most impa

60 nalysis revealed that patients who exhibited disgusting behaviors had significantly less gray matter

61 quired for recognizing disgust or regulating disgusting behaviors remains unknown.

62 of emotion-from anxiety to fear to horror to disgust, calmness to aesthetic appreciation to awe, and

63 has demonstrated that facial expressions of disgust consistently engage different brain areas (insul

64 ressions; this enhanced amygdala response to disgust correlated with the magnitude of attentional red

65 physiological arousal we found that arousing disgust cues modulated the encoding of sensory noise.

66 vel psychophysical paradigm, in which unseen disgust-cues induced unexpected, unconscious arousal jus

67 tances of "contempt speech" - being based on disgust-driven contempt rather than hate.

68 especially those related to animal-reminder disgust (e.g., mutilated body), generate neural response

69 oral, physiological, and immune responses to disgust-evoking cues in both cocaine-dependent and healt

70 cipants (N = 61) were exposed to neutral and disgust-evoking photographs depicting food and nonfood i

71 Response times to disgust-evoking photographs were prolonged in all partic

72 examine the neural substrate for perceiving disgust expressions.

73 attention enhanced the amygdala response to disgust expressions; this enhanced amygdala response to

74 neutral expressions; patients overattributed disgusted expressions and underattributed happy expressi

75 n of, and autonomic responding to, angry and disgusted expressions; attributing the emotions of fear,

76 For example, processing of disgust faces was associated with interactions in medial

77 cantly (P<0.005) smaller signal responses to disgusted faces in the bilateral insular cortex compared

78 ssociated with visible skin lesions, such as disgusted facial expressions of others.

79 onal responses by blocking the processing of disgusted facial expressions.

80 8 females) with facial expressions of anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness and emotional neutrali

81 Target emotions were: amusement, anger, disgust, fear, pleasure, relief, and sadness.

82 Recognition of anger, disgust, fear, sadness and surprise (but not happiness)

83 recognition of all negative emotions (anger, disgust, fear, sadness).

84 the placebo group, suggesting a salience of disgust for the former group.

85 ording to dissect experience of two distinct disgust forms and their relationship to peripheral and c

86 particularly affect people's recognition of disgust from facial expressions, and functional neuroima

87 ral system for recognizing social signals of disgust from multiple modalities.

88 behavioral and neural divergence of fear and disgust further indicates that despite their convergence

89 Conversely, disgust generated an opposite pattern of effects, reflec

90 e experience, expression, and recognition of disgust; however, whether this brain region is required

91 Greeble objects presented after fear versus disgust images also overlapped despite their clear depar

92 While viewing the disgusting images, cocaine-dependent individuals exhibit

93 Disgusting images, especially those related to animal-re

94 ted before and after exposure to neutral and disgusting images, respectively.

95 We note that though the role of disgust in moral judgment has been questioned recently,

96 he feeling of disgust and the observation of disgust in others are known to activate the insula corte

97 ulating disgusting behaviors and recognizing disgust in others involve two partially overlapping neur

98 The neural response to facial expressions of disgust in others is thus closely related to appraisal o

99 on average, the most impaired at recognizing disgust in others.

100 ory perceptual and attentional processing of disgust information, akin to the central ecological func

101 of the three domains of disgust, only sexual disgust is associated with more deontological moral pref

102 s are seen as embedded within social groups, disgust is interpreted as socially universal, which coul

103 Disgust is the emotion in which recognition deficits hav

104 ession (e.g., with "fear" being faster than "disgust," itself faster than "happy").

105 d," occurrent or enduring, and anger-like or disgust-like.

106 Disgust-literally 'bad taste'-is another important emoti

107 ecially on the amygdala and the detection of disgust may rely on the insula and basal ganglia.

108 e norms, which were piggybacking on pathogen disgust mechanisms.

109 condition than in the other conditions, and disgust mediated the relationship between condition and

110 rast, later ERP waveforms evoked by fear and disgust merged gradually over time (130-425 ms).

111 The modulated disgust network included insulae, cingulate cortices, pr

112 esults indicate that of the three domains of disgust, only sexual disgust is associated with more deo

113 r brain areas process only facial signals of disgust or disgust signals from multiple modalities.

114 dence of relative impairments in recognizing disgust or fear, and no evidence to support a link betwe

115 presented with faces showing mild or strong disgust or fear.

116 his brain region is required for recognizing disgust or regulating disgusting behaviors remains unkno

117 nses to carefully controlled images of fear, disgust, or neutral emotion (as a baseline condition).

118 the eyes in fear, the corners of the nose in disgust, or the mouth in happiness).

119 hors investigated ASR modulation to fearful, disgusting, pleasant, and neutral stimuli in 12 patients

120 he comparative online processing of fear and disgust prosody and semantics.

121 universal facial expressions of "fear" and "disgust." Rather than distributing their fixations evenl

122 iated with emetic drugs produces conditioned disgust reactions in rats (predominantly gaping), unlike

123 ggests nausea is a prerequisite for learning disgust reactions to tastes.

124 the production of nausea-induced conditioned disgust reactions, while activation of 5-HT(3) receptors

125 he nucleus prevents LiCl-induced conditioned disgust reactions.

126 ortex (IC) prevents LiCl-induced conditioned disgust reactions.

127 Conversely, scopolamine increased aversive 'disgust' reactions elicited by bitter quinine at all NAc

128 e to support a link between the striatum and disgust recognition.

129 For all emotions except disgust, recognition of extreme intensity was better tha

130 that participate in happiness, sadness, and disgust, regions that distinguish between positive and n

131 faster to approach and avoid faces depicting disgust relative to the placebo group, suggesting a sali

132 motion recognition suggest that detection of disgust relies on processing within the basal ganglia an

133 of interoception of bodily signals, aberrant disgust responses might lead to increased infection susc

134 ssify which of five categories--fear, anger, disgust, sadness, or happiness--is engaged by a study wi

135 ed the associations between The Three Domain Disgust Scale and the most commonly used 12 moral dilemm

136 anger are not built upon each other, whereas disgust seems to be the most elementary and specific bas

137 The role of emotional disgust and disgust sensitivity in moral judgment and decision-makin

138 questioned recently, few studies have taken disgust sensitivity to account.

139 tastes in art to desire for closure and from disgust sensitivity to the tendency to pursue new inform

140 mechanism might have evolved through sexual disgust sensitivity.

141 as process only facial signals of disgust or disgust signals from multiple modalities.

142 federates) to equally unpleasant painful and disgusting stimulations, as well as unfair monetary trea

143 te lack of ASR potentiation to both fear and disgust stimuli.

144 ta provide evidence of a hypersensitivity to disgusting stimuli in cocaine-dependent individuals, pos

145 Remarkably, brain responses to a single disgusting stimulus were sufficient to make accurate pre

146 Indeed, fear enhanced and disgust suppressed early (115 ms) response in visual cor

147 than controls to identify all intensities of disgust tested.

148 They showed worse recognition of fear and disgust than the healthy subjects.

149 d to "avoidance" emotions (like contempt and disgust) than to "punitive" emotions (like anger).

150 ral and behavioral response between fear and disgust thus highlights general threat categorization in

151 , akin to the central ecological function of disgust to minimize contact with contagious objects to a

152 l sense, and false propositions may actually disgust us.

153 ociated with altered cognitive processing of disgust using (i) a covert recognition of faces task con

154 gusting behavior and impaired recognition of disgust using voxel-based morphometry in a sample of 305

155 Moreover, impaired recognition of disgust was associated with decreased gray matter volume

156 We also found that pathogen disgust was associated with more utilitarian preferences

157 ghly selective deficit in the recognition of disgust was confirmed in the subgroup of 15 individuals

158 emotions used was examined separately, only disgust was found to be significantly impaired.

159 Self-reported disgust was lower in the ingroup condition than in the o

160 wash hands and pumps of soap indicated that disgust was lower where the relationship between partici

161 Happiness, sadness, and disgust were each associated with increases in activity

162 Nurture and disgust were found to be key motivators, and are used as

163 (i.e., below conscious perception) associate disgust with high-calorie foods with the aim of reducing

164 Impaired recognition of fear and disgust, with relatively preserved recognition of other