ライフサイエンスコーパス: disinfection

1 nd containment, environmental culturing, and disinfection.

2 HAAs) are formed during the process of water disinfection.

3 nd Leptospirillium and Penicillium following disinfection.

4 r energy) and achieve highly efficient water disinfection.

5 he bacterial cells is required to accomplish disinfection.

6 cal filtration is likely greater than silver disinfection.

7 ism that protects biofilms against long-term disinfection.

8 /AgNP cryogels) that demonstrate rapid water disinfection.

9 n shown to decrease the efficacy of chlorine disinfection.

10 gnificantly increased resistance to chlorine disinfection.

11 e.g. adsorption, catalysis, separation, and disinfection.

12 ulp tissue and, more recently, to root canal disinfection.

13 rogens are likely produced during wastewater disinfection.

14 edures to ensure optimal manual cleaning and disinfection.

15 -nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) during chemical disinfection.

16 was significantly impacted by free chlorine disinfection.

17 n whether TSNAs can be produced during water disinfection.

18 ng a significant change in the DOM caused by disinfection.

19 irs and monitoring the effectiveness of room disinfection.

20 ceramic tablet that provides long-term water disinfection.

21 ducts during chloramine-based drinking water disinfection.

22 ters as well as their resistance to chlorine disinfection.

23 mulas in samples taken both before and after disinfection.

24 that practiced chloramination for secondary disinfection.

25 rticles (AgNPs) for point-of-use (POU) water disinfection.

26 icidal UV irradiation for improving UV water disinfection.

27 que with broad applications in environmental disinfection.

28 fection control measures, alongside chemical disinfection.

29 sis, membrane-based separation, sensing, and disinfection.

30 enotoxicity to CHO cells than chlorine-based disinfection.

31 es, allowing for simultaneous filtration and disinfection.

32 mental cleaning (8/8); (7) medical equipment disinfection (7/8); (8) early detection of CDAD in sympt

33 it disease, even after undergoing high-level disinfection according to manufacturers' guidelines.

34 ypochlorite (dilute bleach) offers effective disinfection against adenovirus and HSV, the viruses com

35 We suspect that TAs are natural disinfection agents protecting groundwater from bacteria

36 d to Cl-containing components present before disinfection and CHO formulas in samples taken both befo

37 After disinfection and entering the distribution system, commu

38 ize byproduct formation without compromising disinfection and nutrient removal.

39 hogens by employing two mechanisms: metallic disinfection and physical filtration.

40 ciated with a virus' susceptibility to solar disinfection and proposes a model to estimate disinfecti

41 -water cells can be used to promote sunlight disinfection and remove pathogenic viruses from wastewat

42 stinal infections, is highly resistant to UV disinfection and therefore drives the virus disinfection

43 ning formulas were detected before and after disinfection and were therefore classified to identify D

44 als that can harvest visible light for water disinfection, and so speed up solar water purification,

45 on surfaces for sustainable, light-activated disinfection applications.

46 t the mechanisms that allow them to tolerate disinfection are poorly understood.

47 -action nanoparticles was demonstrated using disinfection assays with the pathogenic bacterium Pseudo

48 This suggests disinfections based on chemically aggressive destruction

49 alternative to UV alone or chlorination for disinfection because of the destruction of a wide variet

50 es must be targeted for routine cleaning and disinfection because there is a constant introduction of

51 ventilation is the most common means of air disinfection, but it is inherently unreliable and of lim

52 t amended with elevated Br(-) and I(-) after disinfection by chlorine, chloramines, or ozone.

53 y, the impact of EPS composition on bacteria disinfection by monochloramine was qualitatively determi

54 orovirus (hNoV) GI and GII reductions during disinfection by peracetic acid (PAA) and monochloramine

55 opportunity for advances in photobioreactor disinfection by using germicidal ultraviolet (UV) light.

56 oromethane, and bromoform) as surrogates for disinfection by-product (DBP) mixtures in a case-control

57 pact on the formation of currently regulated disinfection by-product compounds (THMs and HAAs).

58 Disinfection by-product exposures and the risk of specif

59 ise, the minimization of potentially harmful disinfection by-products (DBPs) becomes increasingly cri

60 ogical studies suggest that women exposed to disinfection by-products (DBPs) have an increased risk o

61 Cheese can contain regulated disinfection by-products (DBPs), mainly through contact

62 s) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) are regulated disinfection by-products (DBPs); their joint reproductiv

63 s (HAcAms), an emerging class of nitrogenous disinfection by-products (N-DBPs) of health concern, hav

64 Disinfection by-products exist as complex mixtures in wa

65 Water disinfection by-products have been associated with an in

66 Trihalomethanes (THMs) are water disinfection by-products that have been associated with

67 disinfected with chlorine, which originates disinfection by-products: haloacetic acids (HAAs) make u

68 of combined application of UV254/chlorine on disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation are incompletely

69 ize distribution, molecular composition, and disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation following the add

70 To control disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation in drinking water

71 in source waters, and consequently impacting disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation in finished water

72 ased bromide incorporation) as the surrogate disinfection byproduct (DBP) occurrence metric for infor

73 Measurements of disinfection byproduct (DBP) organic precursor concentra

74 antity of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and disinfection byproduct (DBP) precursors exported from fo

75 an lead to difficulty meeting drinking water disinfection byproduct (DBP) regulations.

76 -hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone) is a drinking water disinfection byproduct (DBP).

77 d organic matter (DOM) and increase specific disinfection byproduct formation potential (SDBP-FP).

78 itrosodimethylamine (NDMA) is a carcinogenic disinfection byproduct from water chloramination.

79 (GAC) adsorption of micropollutants and is a disinfection byproduct precursor.

80 nating agents influence bromination rates of disinfection byproduct precursors is, however, poorly un

81 etaldehyde, a common ozone and free chlorine disinfection byproduct, to form 1-(chloroamino)ethanol.

82 This paper demonstrates that disinfection byproducts (DBP) concentration profiles in

83 methylamine (NDMA) and other hazardous water disinfection byproducts (DBP) is currently hampered by a

84 matter (DOM) and DOM-associated formation of disinfection byproducts (DBP).

85 on the formation of BrO3(-) and halogenated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) (e.g., trihalomethanes, T

86 of total organic halogen (TOX), carbonaceous disinfection byproducts (DBPs) (trihalomethanes (THMs) a

87 s report associations between drinking water disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and adverse reproductive/

88 d iodide in HFW may promote the formation of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and alter their speciatio

89 this study was to evaluate the formation of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and cytotoxicity of natur

90 sult in the loss of volatile and hydrophilic disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and hence likely tend to

91 ty removing low molecular weight halogenated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and industrial chemicals.

92 However, during disinfection, toxic disinfection byproducts (DBPs) are formed.

93 Certain unregulated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) are more of a health conc

94 es and amides are two classes of nitrogenous disinfection byproducts (DBPs) associated with chloramin

95 b) waters or comprehensive identification of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) formed in spas.

96 benzoquinones (HBQs) are a group of emerging disinfection byproducts (DBPs) found in treated drinking

97 organic matter (NOM) serve as precursors for disinfection byproducts (DBPs) in drinking water product

98 none (DBBQ), have been recently confirmed as disinfection byproducts (DBPs) in drinking water; howeve

99 Exposure to chlorination disinfection byproducts (DBPs) is potentially associated

100 Halobenzoquinones (HBQs) are a class of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) of health relevance.

101 ) was transformed to known organic iodinated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) of low molecular weight.

102 nnovative approach to trace the formation of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) of MP UV water treatment,

103 se results confirm that NNK and NNAL are the disinfection byproducts (DBPs) resulting from NIC in raw

104 Ns) are an important class of drinking water disinfection byproducts (DBPs) that are reactive and can

105 HANs) are a chemical class of drinking water disinfection byproducts (DBPs) that form from reactions

106 e it would reduce the formation of regulated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) trihalomethanes and haloa

107 eatment plant in Sweden and the formation of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) were evaluated by using u

108 An extensively diverse array of brominated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) were generated following

109 of 35 regulated and unregulated halogenated disinfection byproducts (DBPs), 8 N-nitrosamines, and br

110 imited formation of brominated (chlorinated) disinfection byproducts (DBPs).

111 tion and evidence of TSNAs as a new class of disinfection byproducts (DBPs).

112 pecies responsible for generating brominated disinfection byproducts (DBPs).

113 the formation of potentially toxic iodinated disinfection byproducts (I-DBPs) while controlling the f

114 kynurenine (Kyn), precursors of nitrogenous disinfection byproducts (N-DBP), by ferrate(VI) (Fe(VI)O

115 The potential formation of nitrogenous disinfection byproducts (N-DBPs) was investigated from t

116 are a class of newly identified nitrogenous disinfection byproducts (N-DBPs) whose occurrence in dri

117 al, bacterial, and protozoan) and chemicals (disinfection byproducts [DBPs]) were used as reference h

118 g bromide levels and subsequent increases in disinfection byproducts at downstream drinking water pla

119 toxic brominated-, iodinated-, and nitrogen disinfection byproducts during chlorination at downstrea

120 DOM sorptive capacity, and the formation of disinfection byproducts during water treatment.

121 Ingestion of disinfection byproducts has been associated with bladder

122 Chronic exposure to drinking water disinfection byproducts has been linked to adverse healt

123 EPA) in its benefits analysis for regulating disinfection byproducts in drinking water.

124 s identified N-chlorinated dipeptides as new disinfection byproducts in drinking water.

125 cular ions matched the exact masses of known disinfection byproducts including diiodoacetic acid, dib

126 aters, a significant formation of brominated disinfection byproducts is expected.

127 st, high energy demands, and/or formation of disinfection byproducts limits their use.

128 onfirm and more accurately quantify selected disinfection byproducts of salicylic acid, bisphenol A,

129 , probable human carcinogens, are a group of disinfection byproducts under consideration for drinking

130 ing pharmaceuticals, personal care products, disinfection byproducts, and industrial chemicals is of

131 g concentration limits for, lead and copper, disinfection byproducts, chromium(VI), strontium, and PF

132 er, and leads to the formation of brominated disinfection byproducts, known to be more toxic than chl

133 major pool of organic precursors for harmful disinfection byproducts, such as haloacetic acids (HAAs)

134 s) are a structurally diverse class of water disinfection byproducts.

135 l formation of chlorinated intermediates and disinfection byproducts.

136 ), alkylphenols, and 21 of their halogenated disinfection byproducts.

137 ty monitoring of organic micropollutants and disinfection byproducts.

138 rated brominated transformation products and disinfection byproducts.

139 halogenated pollutants (chlorofluorocarbons; disinfection byproducts; pesticides, fungicides, and bac

140 a probable human carcinogen, while chemical disinfection can produce CNTs exhibiting surface chemist

141 ncreased N. fowleri's resistance to chlorine disinfection compared to that of the laboratory-cultured

142 converted into HClO which could be used as a disinfection compound.

143 uld be applied to antimicrobial research and disinfection control in clinical settings.

144 r, and provides evidence for assigning virus disinfection credit to similar MBRs used to reclaim wast

145 ing information in the form of probabilistic disinfection curves relating E. coli inactivation and pr

146 isition of pathogens; enhanced terminal room disinfection decreases this risk.

147 level disinfection (sHLD), double high-level disinfection (dHLD), or standard high-level disinfection

148 three enhanced strategies for terminal room disinfection (disinfection of a room between occupying p

149 For a typical UV disinfection dose (400 J/m(2)), various extents of photo

150 nochromatic ultraviolet light of 80 mJ/cm(2) disinfection dose was efficient for GR activity photolys

151 most resistant pathogen to ultraviolet (UV) disinfection due to its demonstrated resistance to monoc

152 monitoring of treated wastewater quality and disinfection effectiveness prior to reuse.

153 erial performance was evaluated based on the disinfection efficacies of E. coli and B. subtilis .

154 s there was no significant difference in the disinfection efficacies over five cycles of operation.

155 The PSA/Ag cryogels had excellent disinfection efficacies showing close to a 3 log reducti

156 Covering spills decreased disinfection efficacy against E. coli on heavy-duty tarp

157 Wiping did not increase disinfection efficacy and is not recommended because it

158 Specifically, the disinfection efficacy is closely correlated to the cell-

159 h microbial surrogate, which showed that the disinfection efficacy ranked as *OH > SO4(.-) > CO3(.-)

160 We developed a theoretical model to predict disinfection efficiency based on operational parameters

161 it with experimental results to predict the disinfection efficiency of a Bacillus subtilis spore cul

162 Cl(s) following AgNP oxidation, although the disinfection efficiency of OCl(-) may not be significant

163 (EPS) of bacteria have little effect on the disinfection efficiency.

164 day, and challenges related to cleaning and disinfection, environmental accumulation of viruses at m

165 erial survival more than species/type in the disinfection experiment.

166 In addition, we conducted laboratory disinfection experiments and discovered that personal ca

167 Disinfection experiments in a 10 L water volume demonstr

168 Disinfection experiments showed that 73% of E. coli O157

169 The benefit of full-mouth disinfection (FDIS) over traditional scaling and root pl

170 The benefit of full-mouth disinfection (FDIS) over traditional scaling and root pl

171 ning (SRP) over weeks or same-day full-mouth disinfection (FDIS), with or without adjunctive metronid

172 Treatments were (i) disinfection (filtration of water and baking of sediment

173 For a typical disinfection fluence of 40 mJ/cm(2), the apparent transf

174 nal practices, including chlorine-chloramine disinfection, flushing of DWDS, nutrient removal, and em

175 treatment performed by one-stage full-mouth disinfection (FMD) within 24 hours or conventional quadr

176 (SRP) per quadrant and one-stage full-mouth disinfection (FMD), on periodontal clinical parameters a

177 d deployment of Ag-capped nanoscavengers for disinfection followed by application of an external magn

178 disinfection (dHLD), or standard high-level disinfection followed by ethylene oxide gas sterilizatio

179 erged not only after repeated cycles of ClO2 disinfection followed by regrowth but also after dilutio

180 unlight inactivation is an important mode of disinfection for viruses in surface waters.

181 natural wastewater treatment systems to meet disinfection goals.

182 Disinfection had the greatest impact on microbial compos

183 offer a simpler approach for drinking water disinfection in disaster relief applications.

184 Used extensively for disinfection in household and industrial settings (i.e.

185 occi to survive desiccation, starvation, and disinfection in the modern hospital, foreordaining their

186 nuric acid is necessary to maintain chlorine disinfection in the waters.

187 arcinogenic compounds formed during chlorine disinfection in water treatment processes around the wor

188 on experiments were conducted to support the disinfection investigation.

189 sodimethylamine (NDMA) during drinking water disinfection is a major challenge.

190 we concluded that chlorination of NOM during disinfection is selective toward components with relativ

191 silver impregnation and to exhibit a longer disinfection lifetime than that of lower carbon content

192 physical filtration and silver nanoparticle disinfection likely contribute to treatment of C. parvum

193 itized processes during high dose wastewater disinfection may be creating antibacterially active tran

194 t test, p > 0.05), suggesting that long-term disinfection may not significantly remove net biomass.

195 The most appropriate disinfection method remains unclear, however, and it is

196 Enhanced disinfection methods (dHLD or HLD/ETO) did not provide a

197 To examine the efficacy of various disinfection methods for reusable tonometer prisms in ey

198 dustry, as a "green" alternative to existing disinfection methods.

199 In conventional drinking water disinfection, N-chloroisobutyraldimine can potentially b

200 With our approach, we achieved water disinfection of >99.999% inactivation of bacteria in 20

201 d strategies for terminal room disinfection (disinfection of a room between occupying patients) on ac

202 osion protection, degradation of pollutants, disinfection of bacteria and material synthesis.

203 HAAs) are generated as byproducts during the disinfection of drinking water and are cytotoxic, genoto

204 However, solar disinfection of drinking water mostly relies on ultravio

205 Disinfection of drinking water protects public health ag

206 Efficient photocatalytic disinfection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 was achieved by

207 iorefinery pharmaceutical industries and the disinfection of large-volume fluid for the water and foo

208 nactivation by (1)O2 also contributed to the disinfection of MS2 and adenovirus.

209 these parameters accurately estimated solar disinfection of MS2 and phiX174 in a natural water sampl

210 Chlorination has long been used for disinfection of municipal wastewater (MWW) effluent whil

211 Ps) were generated following electrochemical disinfection of natural coastal/estuarine water, which i

212 Disinfection of such wastewater is essential to prevent

213 Rapid disinfection of the hospital WDS with a chlorinated, alk

214 The implementation of thorough, daily disinfection of the market environment as well as of tra

215 ted the challenge of cleaning and high-level disinfection of these instruments.

216 ypochlorite, and generated hypochlorite) for disinfection of three surface types (stainless steel, he

217 asound and ozone treatment on the biological disinfection of water on a large-scale application using

218 y was to measure the effect of in-home water disinfection on diarrhoea among children under five.

219 11 fixed sites, the impact of monochloramine disinfection on Legionella, heterotrophic bacteria (36 d

220 The impact of monochloramine disinfection on the complex bacterial community structur

221 munity beta-diversity, with the exception of disinfection on the fungal community structure.

222 nation with MDRO or any other bacteria after disinfection or sterilization by 3 different methods.

223 Assuring appropriate cleaning and disinfection or sterilization of medical equipment is ne

224 e use of sterilization instead of high-level disinfection or the use of routine microbial culturing t

225 eliminated by ozonation (which also provides disinfection) or PAC (which provides micropollutants rem

226 gly, in this study sunlight/H2O2 was used as disinfection/oxidation treatment for urban WW treatment

227 arges and treated effluent processed by a UV-disinfection plant following activated sludge treatment

228 on and ozonation protocols mimicking typical disinfection practice to compare loadings of ambient spe

229 Wastewater treatment plant disinfection practices informed by MS2 inactivation data

230 ting a range of water quality parameters and disinfection practices over a 91 day period.

231 ibit genogroup dependent resistance and that disinfection practices targeting hNoV GII will result in

232 sociated outbreaks were due to inappropriate disinfection practices.

233 ile AR E. faecalis was more resistant to the disinfection process (240 min to reach DL).

234 l resistance to monochloramine, and that the disinfection process selects for resistant bacterial pop

235 monochloramine, we investigated the bacteria disinfection process using Fourier transform infrared sp

236 conveying antibiotic resistance survive the disinfection process, environmental bacteria may take th

237 that EPS underwent during the monochloramine disinfection process.

238 only minor isotope fractionation during the disinfection process.

239 a is not indispensable in the photocatalytic disinfection process.

240 e further understanding of UV-based advanced disinfection processes (ADPs).

241 Ps), we monitored three WWTPs with different disinfection processes (chlorine, peracetic acid (PAA),

242 Wastewater disinfection processes are typically designed according

243 y of bacteria and of associated ARGs, of the disinfection processes only PAA efficiently removed bact

244 been considered potentially highly effective disinfection processes.

245 iated LD, even in the setting of a long-term disinfection program.

246 resolved after we implemented an intensified disinfection protocol and used sterile water for heater-

247 3% of E. coli O157:H7 died within 2 h with a disinfection rate constant of k = 0.01 min(-1), which is

248 sing the hand hygiene compliance of HCWs and disinfection rate of environment, and decreasing the tra

249 ation and promote the generation of ROS, the disinfection rate was increased a further sixfold.

250 isinfection and proposes a model to estimate disinfection rates and to apportion the contributions of

251 gregation within flocs resulted in very slow disinfection rates necessitating extended flocculation/c

252 disinfection and therefore drives the virus disinfection regulations set by the U.S. Environmental P

253 g with the disinfectant and the mechanism of disinfection remains elusive.

254 er understanding of the mechanism underlying disinfection resistance in waterborne viruses, and proce

255 attention has been devoted to characterizing disinfection resistance.

256 In these pools, chlorine added for disinfection results in the formation of bromine, due to

257 1H NMR before and after disinfection revealed an approximately 2% change in the

258 racts and bromide were treated under various disinfection scenarios to elucidate the mechanisms of Br

259 complex DBP mixtures formed under different disinfection scenarios.

260 ic matter (DOM) isolates were subjected to 3 disinfection scenarios: NH2Cl, prechlorination followed

261 randomly reprocessed by standard high-level disinfection (sHLD), double high-level disinfection (dHL

262 ents in treatment, and changes in wastewater disinfection since the 1960s.

263 natural wastewater treatment systems, solar disinfection (SODIS), and the use of indicator organisms

264 ted fouling, the application of an oxidation/disinfection step can be an effective complement to coag

265 mparison to qPCR results across the chlorine disinfection step saw no significant change in slow grow

266 se in relative abundance across the chlorine disinfection step.

267 device reprocessing steps such as cleaning, disinfection/sterilization, and storage have been report

268 nsors to detect infectious viruses and novel disinfection strategies to provide safe water.

269 rinking water treatment plants than altering disinfection strategies.

270 e changes and will help to optimize UV-based disinfection strategies.

271 ial as a non-invasive, minimally destructive disinfection strategy.

272 Here we show that electrochemical disinfection, suggested as a candidate for successful ba

273 on, rendering the cells vulnerable to common disinfection techniques.

274 tal knowledge are key for development of new disinfection technologies and novel sensors to detect in

275 development of novel wavelength-specific UV disinfection technologies.

276 espect to potential improvements in UV-based disinfection technologies.

277 system affords a promising method for water disinfection that is better than treatment using either

278 ion plays a role when viruses are exposed to disinfection that targets the capsid, but less so when t

279 at after sodium hypochlorite (dilute bleach) disinfection, the virus was undetectable, but only 2 of

280 is case also highlights the role of adequate disinfection throughout drinking water distribution syst

281 sts that it will be beneficial to upgrade UV disinfection to UV/H2O2 ADP for the inactivation of vira

282 However, during disinfection, toxic disinfection byproducts (DBPs) are f

283 ection against temperature and the classical disinfection treatments used in drinking water productio

284 normally used to assess the effectiveness of disinfection treatments; however flow cytometry proved t

285 tructure were detected during monochloramine disinfection using PMA-pyrosequencing, while the communi

286 gnificant change in slow grower counts at CT disinfection values </=90 mg.min/L; only an increase to

287 The efficiency of monochloramine disinfection was dependent on the quantity and compositi

288 selected unregulated DBPs following chlorine disinfection was evaluated.

289 lication as antibacterial materials in water disinfection was investigated with particular attention

290 lternate days when upper room germicidal air disinfection was turned on throughout the ward.

291 e bacterial community is primarily driven by disinfection while the eukaryotic community is primarily

292 mpregnated silica plays an important role in disinfection, while AgNP-mediated bactericidal action do

293 environmental decontamination, and bacteria disinfection will be presented in detail.

294 After disinfection with 1.25% NaOCl and triple antibiotic past

295 Upper room germicidal ultraviolet (UV) air disinfection with air mixing has been shown to be highly

296 Upper room germicidal UV air disinfection with air mixing was highly effective in red

297 d triclosan derivatives (CTDs, formed during disinfection with chlorine) react photochemically to for

298 oroacetaldehyde, a DBP formed during primary disinfection with free chlorine, forming and reaching ps

299 AgNPs on the cryogel pore surface for rapid disinfection with minimal Ag release (<100 mug L(-1)).

300 ocessing procedure from automated high-level disinfection with ortho-phthalaldehyde to gas sterilizat