ライフサイエンスコーパス: distal pancreatectomy

1 (19 Whipple, four total pancreatectomy, one distal pancreatectomy).

2 undergoing either pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy.

3 tal stay, and recovery as compared with open distal pancreatectomy.

4 aticoduodenectomy and 257 +/- 93 minutes for distal pancreatectomy.

5 resection such as pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy.

6 my, 22% via total pancreatectomy, and 8% via distal pancreatectomy.

7 g the current indications and outcomes after distal pancreatectomy.

8 e largest single-institution experience with distal pancreatectomy.

9 dications, complications, and outcomes after distal pancreatectomy.

10 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy.

11 ients in groups 2A and 2B, 24% and 58% had a distal pancreatectomy, 0% and 13% had a hepatic resectio

12 6%) (11 with pancreaticoduodenectomy, 2 with distal pancreatectomy, 2 with central pancreatectomy, 1

13 Fourteen underwent an operation (6 distal pancreatectomy, 4 total pancreatectomy, and 4 pan

14 Distal pancreatectomy (40%), enucleation (34%), and panc

15 0.25 to 0.95) and 80 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy (7% vs. 23%; relative risk, 0.32;

16 For distal pancreatectomies (7085 patients; 6.2% mortality),

17 ere analyzed; pancreaticoduodenectomy (132), distal pancreatectomy (83), central pancreatectomy (13),

18 ational level, this projected to 42,320 open distal pancreatectomies and 1908 MIDPs.

19 dvanced surgical procedures such as combined distal pancreatectomy and left nephrectomy can be safely

20 present the first reported combined robotic distal pancreatectomy and left nephrectomy from a live d

21 pancreaticoduodenectomy, and 1 patient had a distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy.

22 erwent total pancreatectomies, 10% underwent distal pancreatectomies, and 3% underwent distal subtota

23 Two patients had total pancreatectomy, 2 had distal pancreatectomy, and the remaining had pancreatico

24 sections, including pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and total pancreatectomy, remain

25 Pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy are associated with significant pe

26 ospective analysis of all minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies at University of Pittsburgh Medi

27 ctive review of 721 patients who underwent a distal pancreatectomy between February 1986 and February

28 hospital records of all patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy between January 1994 and December

29 trate that, as with pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy can be performed with minimal peri

30 ve outcomes and hospital charge measures for distal pancreatectomy, comparing the surgical approaches

31 the development of PL in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy (DP) at a single high-volume insti

32 true rate of new-onset diabetes (NODM) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) is not known.

33 al level, the early and long-term outcome of distal pancreatectomy (DP) performed by laparoscopy (Lap

34 f this study was to test the hypothesis that distal pancreatectomy (DP) without intraperitoneal drain

35 nt covering on pancreatic fistula rate after distal pancreatectomy (DP).

36 enectomy (PD, n = 218), central (n = 16), or distal pancreatectomy (DP, n = 96).

37 es (124 modified Puestow procedure [LPJ], 29 distal pancreatectomies [DP], and 46 pancreatic head res

38 ts undergoing laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for benign or low-grade malignant

39 who underwent laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for benign or lowgrade malignant t

40 stomosis during pancreaticoduodenectomy; and distal pancreatectomy for benign/borderline neoplasm of

41 Distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis from any

42 A personal series of 90 patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis over the

43 factors, among patients undergoing elective distal pancreatectomy from 1998 to 2009 in the Nationwid

44 junostomy, cholecystectomy, splenectomy, and distal pancreatectomy have been performed successfully v

45 Superior outcomes of MIDP compared with open distal pancreatectomy have been reported.

46 1% of patients, total pancreatectomy in 15%, distal pancreatectomy in 12%, and central pancreatic res

47 enectomy was performed in 139 patients and a distal pancreatectomy in 40 cases.

48 gly performed as an alternative approach for distal pancreatectomy in selected patients.

49 Three patients underwent noncurative distal pancreatectomy in the early period.

50 of the pancreatic head in this disease, but distal pancreatectomy is a less popular option attended

51 These data demonstrate that elective distal pancreatectomy is associated with a mortality rat

52 Distal pancreatectomy is performed for a variety of beni

53 Distal pancreatectomy is the standard procedure for remo

54 Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) reduces postoperative morbid

55 al 9 men and 16 women underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) using a technique similar to

56 ase selection factors for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) and identify actual risk fa

57 utcomes of open (ODP) and minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) are equivalent for benign l

58 Interest in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has grown in recent years,

59 r to pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 514; 88.2%), distal pancreatectomy (n = 62; 10.6%), or total pancreat

60 y (n=50), Whipple or Beger procedure (n=14), distal pancreatectomy (n=8), or lateral pancreaticojejun

61 tors for adverse outcomes compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP).

62 gher islet yield compared with those who had distal pancreatectomy or lateral pancreaticojejunostomy.

63 liver disease (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.23-4.24), distal pancreatectomy (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.11-2.84), and

64 mortality), there were 2 cut-offs (13 and 25 distal pancreatectomies per year), but neither was an in

65 The proportion of distal pancreatectomies performed via minimally invasive

66 tients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy [POPF: pasireotide (n = 152), 9% v

67 We hypothesized that robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RADP) was superior to LDP as a re

68 that reinforcement of stapled closure during distal pancreatectomy reduces the rate of fistula format

69 -one of 36 patients who failed to respond to distal pancreatectomy required further intervention, inc

70 ogic examination of five patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy revealed striking changes of advan

71 associated with mortality ranging from 7.3% (distal pancreatectomy) to 22.9% (total pancreatectomy).

72 Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy was performed increasingly in late

73 n the Netherlands (2005 to 2013) only 10% of distal pancreatectomies were in a minimally invasive fas

74 A total of 8957 distal pancreatectomies were included in this analysis,

75 often requires a pancreatoduodenectomy or a distal pancreatectomy with or without a splenectomy.

76 Patients who underwent a distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (n = 198) had a s