ライフサイエンスコーパス: diverticular disease

1 f fiber in the pathogenesis and treatment of diverticular disease.

2 d with a greater and not lower prevalence of diverticular disease.

3 nary evidence that it might be effective for diverticular disease.

4 ctors appear to contribute to development of diverticular disease.

5 known about the role of heritable factors in diverticular disease.

6 matory bowel disease, pouchitis, and colonic diverticular disease.

7 comitant rise in the number of patients with diverticular disease.

8 harmacological abnormalities associated with diverticular disease.

9 wel disease 34%, cancer 18%, polyps 17%, and diverticular disease 13%.

10 S) of 15,220 Icelanders for association with diverticular disease (5,426 cases) and its more severe f

11 ion of M3 receptors in diverticular disease (diverticular disease 7.8% [1.9-20.4], controls 1.7% [0.8

12 e area was 13.2% (6.0-23.3) in patients with diverticular disease and 2.5% (1.6-3.7) in controls (p<0

13 was 17.5% (range 10.0-37.0) in patients with diverticular disease and 47.0% (29.0-54.0) in controls (

14 rs7609897-T: P=1.5 x 10(-10), OR=0.87) with diverticular disease and in FAM155A (family with sequenc

15 cohort study using patients with perforated diverticular disease and population controls identified

16 ons of sigmoid colons from ten patients with diverticular disease and ten controls, after resections

17 ad surgery for colorectal cancer, 14,019 for diverticular disease, and 7222 for inflammatory bowel di

18 th or without epidural analgesia for cancer, diverticular disease, and benign polyps.

19 Patients with diverticular disease are frequently advised to avoid eat

20 nts with primary diagnoses for colon cancer, diverticular disease, benign colonic neoplasm, and ulcer

21 represents the most serious complication of diverticular disease, but little is known regarding its

22 rcinoma is best differentiated from masslike diverticular disease by the absence of diverticula in th

23 nd pain in the left quadrant of the abdomen, diverticular disease causing mortality and morbidity doe

24 receptors were upregulated in patients with diverticular disease compared with controls: the median

25 of laparoscopy in the elective treatment of diverticular disease decreases rates of complications co

26 ies, we identified 142,123 incident cases of diverticular disease diagnosed at a hospitalization (197

27 n of heritable factors to the development of diverticular disease diagnosed at a hospitalization or o

28 .0001), with upregulation of M3 receptors in diverticular disease (diverticular disease 7.8% [1.9-20.

29 atients who underwent elective surgeries for diverticular disease from 2005 to 2008.

30 The incidence of perforated diverticular disease has doubled over the period of the

31 Much of our previous understanding of diverticular disease has recently been challenged.

32 Diverticular disease imposes an impressive clinical burd

33 n's disease in 95, ulcerative colitis in 18, diverticular disease in 17, carcinoma in 25 (16 after ra

34 essionals (40-75 years old) who were free of diverticular disease in 1986 (baseline) was performed.

35 e are the first loci shown to associate with diverticular disease in a genome-wide study.

36 The RR of diverticular disease in one twin when the other had dive

37 The RR for diverticular disease in siblings of index cases was 2.92

38 The use of laparoscopy for treating diverticular disease, in the absence of absolute contrai

39 Diverticular disease is characterized by pouches (that i

40 Diverticular disease is commonly associated with the old

41 he use of laparoscopy in colon resection for diverticular disease is feasible and results in fewer co

42 The pathogenesis of diverticular disease is likely multifactorial and comple

43 Diverticular disease is the most commonly reported findi

44 oline did not differ between the two groups (diverticular disease mean 5.6% [SD 0.3], controls 5.2% [

45 acetylcholine was increased in patients with diverticular disease (mean -log EC(50) 5.6 [SD 0.3]) com

46 nsferase activity was lower in patients with diverticular disease (median 19.5%, range 12.0-30.0) tha

47 lon at CT colonography, representing chronic diverticular disease (n = 97) or sigmoid carcinoma (n =

48 oing aneurysm repair (n=21) or colectomy for diverticular disease (n=13, control).

49 arge, prospective study of men without known diverticular disease, nut, corn, and popcorn consumption

50 gy, clinical presentation, and management of diverticular disease of the colon and its complications.

51 Men reporting newly diagnosed diverticular disease on biennial follow-up questionnaire

52 ned as surgical intervention at any time for diverticular disease or presence of computed tomography

53 colorectal resection for colorectal cancer, diverticular disease, or inflammatory bowel disease.

54 gastritis, gastric cancer, diarrhea, colonic diverticular disease, polyps, cancer, liver disease incl

55 Perforated diverticular disease represents the most serious complic

56 t 53% (95% CI, 45%-61%) of susceptibility to diverticular disease results from genetic factors.

57 y, 16 sequence variants are followed up in a diverticular disease sample from Denmark (5,970 cases, 3

58 This SNP may be a marker of diverticular disease severity that might assist in surgi

59 de inflammation in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD), and the role of anti-inflam

60 laboratory investigations into the causes of diverticular disease suggests that disturbances in choli

61 acetyltransferase was lower in patients with diverticular disease than in controls: median percentage

62 cular disease in one twin when the other had diverticular disease was 14.5 (95% CI, 8.9-23) for monoz

63 Patients with diverticular disease were identified by International Cl