ライフサイエンスコーパス: diverticulitis

1 aroscopic lavage for treatment of perforated diverticulitis.

2 a role for vitamin D in the pathogenesis of diverticulitis.

3 of circulating vitamin D are associated with diverticulitis.

4 surgical treatment strategies in complicated diverticulitis.

5 and treatment on the colon cancer rate after diverticulitis.

6 nds among 226 522 nonelective admissions for diverticulitis.

7 statement related to the management of acute diverticulitis.

8 nationally regarding the management of acute diverticulitis.

9 (>5 mm) and/or fat stranding consistent with diverticulitis.

10 superior to placebo in preventing recurrent diverticulitis.

11 atterns are associated with risk of incident diverticulitis.

12 ality of life of patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis.

13 2) who also underwent surgical treatment for diverticulitis.

14 older than 18 years with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis.

15 that are predictive of recurrence of colonic diverticulitis.

16 the TNFSF15 gene is associated with surgical diverticulitis.

17 n selected patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis.

18 has been proven to prevent the recurrence of diverticulitis.

19 e diverticulae become inflamed, resulting in diverticulitis.

20 successful nonoperative management of acute diverticulitis.

21 d at the time of sigmoidectomy for recurrent diverticulitis.

22 leostomy over HP in patients with perforated diverticulitis.

23 rform colonoscopy after a diagnosis of acute diverticulitis.

24 er (SERT) which is also seen following acute diverticulitis.

25 ibute to colonic dysmotility associated with diverticulitis.

26 dditional risk factors we evaluated included diverticulitis.

27 and 33,500 patients operated electively for diverticulitis.

28 erative treatment of recurrent mild/moderate diverticulitis.

29 rs67153654-A: P=3.0 x 10(-11), OR=0.82) with diverticulitis.

30 nut and popcorn consumption and the risk of diverticulitis.

31 pelvic abscess in a patient with perforated diverticulitis.

32 or poor outcomes if they develop complicated diverticulitis.

33 A compared with patients with >2 episodes of diverticulitis.

34 foration patients who died had no history of diverticulitis.

35 endicitis, pyelonephritis, pancreatitis, and diverticulitis.

36 month after the first US examination) showed diverticulitis.

37 matory changes, the most likely diagnosis is diverticulitis.

38 are occasional, specific CT signs of colonic diverticulitis.

39 ed at CT in 17 (27%) of the 64 patients with diverticulitis.

40 %) had a final clinical diagnosis of colonic diverticulitis.

41 Ms), and gastroenterologists (GIs) for acute diverticulitis.

42 el, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and diverticulitis.

43 se), but not in the lesions of patients with diverticulitis.

44 included, of whom 40,496 had a diagnosis of diverticulitis.

45 The primary end point was incident diverticulitis.

46 low-up, we identified 1063 incident cases of diverticulitis.

47 ary fiber is implicated as a risk factor for diverticulitis.

48 ercutaneous interventions, or admissions for diverticulitis.

49 2) antibiotic prescription claims related to diverticulitis.

50 395,838 were cholecystitis, and 412,163 were diverticulitis.

51 e, 18-64 years) with incident, uncomplicated diverticulitis.

52 acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, and diverticulitis.

53 xposure in relation to risk of admission for diverticulitis.

54 dietary interventions for the prevention of diverticulitis.

55 tigated the association between UV light and diverticulitis.

56 heir number of publications related to acute diverticulitis.

57 ery department with the diagnosis of jejunal diverticulitis.

58 ed for patients after emergent admission for diverticulitis.

59 cer (57%), inflammatory bowel disease (20%), diverticulitis (10%), and benign polyp disease (5%).

60 eatment beyond that necessary for perforated diverticulitis (12 in the laparoscopic lavage group vs 1

61 he 210,268 patients admitted emergently with diverticulitis, 179,649 (85%) were managed medically at

62 sease (5,426 cases) and its more severe form diverticulitis (2,764 cases).

63 diverticulitis (4.3%) and the group without diverticulitis (2.3%) differed significantly (P < 0.001)

64 trol cohort of patients having no history of diverticulitis (26 female).

65 incidence of colon cancer in the group with diverticulitis (4.3%) and the group without diverticulit

66 Other complications included diverticulitis (5), pancreatitis (4), peptic ulcer disea

67 ection (8%; 2%), nephrotoxicity (2%; 0), and diverticulitis (6%; 2%).

68 mpetent patients having at least 1 claim for diverticulitis, 6.4% (n = 5604) underwent a resection.

69 ears and 58.9% female) were hospitalized for diverticulitis (72.2% emergent/urgent).

70 -UV areas, low-UV areas had a higher rate of diverticulitis (751.8 vs 668.1 per 100 000 admissions; P

71 Patients with suspected perforated diverticulitis, a clinical indication for emergency surg

72 trauma; urinary tract stones; appendicitis; diverticulitis; abdominal aortic aneurysm; fractures of

73 sent a 67-year-old male patient with jejunal diverticulitis accompanying with abdominal pain and vomi

74 sks of readmission and emergency surgery for diverticulitis, accounting for death and elective colect

75 Acute diverticulitis accounts for 152,000 hospitalizations in

76 sure is associated with an increased rate of diverticulitis admissions and greater seasonal variation

77 We identified nonelective diverticulitis admissions in the Nationwide Inpatient Sa

78 l thickness and subjective severity of acute diverticulitis allow prediction of recurrent diverticuli

79 Diverticulitis also was a strong risk factor (hazard rat

80 ivariable RR of 1.62 (95% CI, 1.23-2.14) for diverticulitis and 1.91 (95% CI, 1.26-2.90) for divertic

81 ivariable RR of 1.56 (95% CI, 1.18-2.07) for diverticulitis and 1.96 (95% CI, 1.30-2.97) for divertic

82 as made correctly in 16 (40%) of 40 cases of diverticulitis and 21 (66%) of 32 cases of colon cancer.

83 We documented 939 cases of diverticulitis and 256 cases of diverticular bleeding du

84 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.94) for diverticulitis and 3.19 (95% CI, 1.45-7.00) for divertic

85 We documented 801 incident cases of diverticulitis and 383 incident cases of diverticular bl

86 follow-up, there were 801 incident cases of diverticulitis and 383 incident cases of diverticular bl

87 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.47) for diverticulitis and a HR of 1.70 (95% CI, 1.21-2.39) for

88 of the sigmoid colon chronically affected by diverticulitis and adjacent non-affected tissue.

89 ossible confounders, the association between diverticulitis and cancer remained significant with an o

90 To investigate the association between diverticulitis and colon cancer in a large, nationwide c

91 es have investigated the association between diverticulitis and colon cancer with inconclusive result

92 a strong association between development of diverticulitis and colon cancer.

93 olon cancer compared with those without both diverticulitis and colonoscopy with an OR of 2.72 (95% C

94 nfluence of aspirin and NSAID use on risk of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding in a large pros

95 AIDs is associated with an increased risk of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding.

96 st circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio and diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding.

97 p ratio significantly increased the risks of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding.

98 cted can manifest clinical syndromes, mainly diverticulitis and diverticular haemorrhage.

99 itis (seven), abdominal abscess (three), and diverticulitis and esophagitis (one each)], and dentitio

100 2366 of 3165 patients hospitalized for acute diverticulitis and followed up for 8.9 years, only 13.3%

101 ive ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and diverticulitis and from normal controls.

102 s consensus related to many aspects of acute diverticulitis and identifies other areas in need of res

103 cohort study of 46,295 men who were free of diverticulitis and known diverticulosis in 1986 (baselin

104 diverticulitis allow prediction of recurrent diverticulitis and may be useful for stratifying patient

105 e all ddAC (febrile neutropenia [FN], n = 2; diverticulitis and neutropenia, n = 1; and social/econom

106 status quo regarding the treatment of acute diverticulitis and provides important direction for futu

107 of patients with uncomplicated left colonic diverticulitis and to analyze differences in quality of

108 aims to determine the long-term outcomes of diverticulitis and to apply the findings to current prac

109 Among patients with likely perforated diverticulitis and undergoing emergency surgery, the use

110 rtmann procedure", OR "sigmoidectomy"), AND "Diverticulitis", AND "Peritonitis" AND "therapeutic irri

111 ived by 267,000 patients admitted with acute diverticulitis, and 33,500 patients operated electively

112 attern was associated with increased risk of diverticulitis, and a prudent pattern was associated wit

113 ng advocacy of primary anastomosis for acute diverticulitis, and nonoperative treatment of recurrent

114 the prevention of colonic diverticulosis and diverticulitis, and support the efficacy of a number of

115 Current practice guidelines for diverticulitis are based on limited evidence.

116 Antecedent episodes of diverticulitis are felt to increase the risk of developi

117 Patients with multiple (>2) episodes of diverticulitis are not at increased risk for poor outcom

118 The long-term morbidity and mortality of diverticulitis are not well defined.

119 increase the risk of developing complicated diverticulitis, as well as its subsequent morbidity and

120 s has been implicated in the pathogenesis of diverticulitis, associations between the microbial ecosy

121 g elective colon resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis because of uncertain effectiveness at red

122 cutive subjects diagnosed with acute colonic diverticulitis between January 2004 and May 2008 to dete

123 in ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and diverticulitis but was not detectable in the uninflamed

124 Of the 1497 patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis, cancer was found in 5 (proportional esti

125 ient, and antibiotic prescription claims for diverticulitis captured in the MarketScan (Truven Health

126 f our knowledge and treatment of complicated diverticulitis (CD) are based on outdated literature rep

127 After considering all types of diverticulitis claims, 56.3% (1720 of 3054) of elective

128 99 patients undergoing colonic resection for diverticulitis, colorectal cancer (CRC), benign neoplasm

129 hazard ratio of 1.55 (95% CI, 1.20-1.99) for diverticulitis compared to men in the lowest quintile.

130 t between patients with multiple episodes of diverticulitis compared with those with 1 or 2 prior att

131 In uncomplicated diverticulitis, consensus was reached regarding appropri

132 e questionnaire in 1986 until a diagnosis of diverticulitis, diverticulosis or diverticular bleeding;

133 on resection for patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis, early surgery (after <3 preceding episod

134 netic risk profiling, practice improvements, diverticulitis, enhanced recovery protocols, fecal incon

135 c obstructive pulmonary disease, chest pain, diverticulitis, enterovesical fistula, gastroenteritis,

136 eviously considered after a second confirmed diverticulitis episode, is being increasingly deferred.

137 of 46.6% had a history of at least one prior diverticulitis episode, whereas 53.4% presented with CD

138 d patients, 27,450 (16.3%) suffered a second diverticulitis episode.

139 analysis: group A = those with 1 or 2 prior diverticulitis episodes (n = 118) versus group B = patie

140 leeding) or the number of previously treated diverticulitis episodes for patients undergoing elective

141 cognition of "smoldering" (or nonrecovering) diverticulitis episodes.

142 The top 5 acute diverticulitis experts in 5 international geographic reg

143 survey website was used and a panel of acute diverticulitis experts was formed via the snowball metho

144 e cholecystitis (F = 37.13, P < 0.0001), and diverticulitis (F = 69.90, P < 0.0001).

145 from a single family with surgically managed diverticulitis [familial diverticulitis (FD), 4 female,

146 surgically managed diverticulitis [familial diverticulitis (FD), 4 female, mean age = 51.1 +/- 7] we

147 netic factors may play a significant role in diverticulitis, few genes have yet been implicated in di

148 osis and management of chronic and recurrent diverticulitis from January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2013.

149 The incidence of diverticulitis has been associated with geographic and s

150 Peritonitis secondary to perforated diverticulitis has conventionally been managed by resect

151 Consensus regarding the treatment of diverticulitis has evolved over time, with increasing ad

152 s; inflammatory bowel disease; incontinence; diverticulitis; hemorrhoids; fistulas; and quality impro

153 ge as treatment for patients with perforated diverticulitis Hinchey III was feasible and safe in the

154 cy of mesalamine in preventing recurrence of diverticulitis in 2 identical but separate phase 3, rand

155 ne vs placebo in the prevention of recurrent diverticulitis in 590 (PREVENT1) and 592 (PREVENT2) adul

156 aged nonoperatively after a first episode of diverticulitis in Ontario, Canada (2002-2012).

157 e multi-generational family with early onset diverticulitis in order to identify a genetic component

158 ) adult patients with >/=1 episodes of acute diverticulitis in the previous 24 months that resolved w

159 t dramatic changes in rates of treatment for diverticulitis in the United States.

160 ant seasonal variation, with a lower rate of diverticulitis in the winter (645 per 100 000) compared

161 atabase identified all patients admitted for diverticulitis in Washington State (1987-2012).

162 all annual age-adjusted admissions for acute diverticulitis increased from 120,500 in 1998 to 151,900

163 t recommended for average-risk patients with diverticulitis, irrespective of the number of episodes o

164 Diverticulitis is a chronic disease of the colon in whic

165 Diverticulitis is a common disease, especially in the We

166 Diverticulitis is a focal asymmetric process with fascia

167 The pathophysiology of diverticulitis is associated with altered gut motility,

168 Our understanding of complicated diverticulitis is based on outdated literature.

169 al therapy for SUDD and to prevent recurrent diverticulitis is being actively investigated.

170 ically proven episode of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis is low.

171 the mortality and morbidity from complicated diverticulitis is needed.

172 h elective colectomy following 2 episodes of diverticulitis is no longer accepted.

173 The natural history of uncomplicated diverticulitis is often benign.

174 definition of uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis is provided.

175 er recovery from an uncomplicated episode of diverticulitis is rare (<5%) and that age at onset young

176 A role for a genetic predisposition in diverticulitis is suggested by its association with here

177 In cases of diverticulitis it should be kept in mind that in patient

178 used in the management of Hinchey grade III diverticulitis leads to more reinterventions within 30 d

179 The choice of operation for perforated diverticulitis lies between HP and PRA.

180 surgical techniques, complex anal fistulas, diverticulitis, local excision techniques for rectal neo

181 ter computed tomography-proven uncomplicated diverticulitis may be low.

182 rticulitis, routine colonic evaluation after diverticulitis may represent a nonessential burden on he

183 The elective colectomy rate for diverticulitis more than doubled, without a decrease in

184 Results Colonic diverticulitis most commonly involved the rectosigmoid (

185 aspirin NSAIDs also had an increased risk of diverticulitis (multivariable HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.40-2.1

186 cores were associated with decreased risk of diverticulitis (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI,

187 (n = 115), perforating appendicitis (n = 6), diverticulitis (n = 16), tubo-ovarian inflammation (n =

188 for postoperative fluid collection (n = 3), diverticulitis (n = 2), or perforating appendicitis (n =

189 Fifty-eight CT scans in cases of proved diverticulitis (n = 27) or colon cancer (n = 31) were ev

190 actors driving early, elective resection for diverticulitis need to be determined.

191 54) of elective resections for uncomplicated diverticulitis occurred after fewer than 3 episodes.

192 Perforated diverticulitis occurred more often in group A compared w

193 Diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon is an increasingly c

194 derwent elective resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis, of whom 55.6% (n = 1699) were male.

195 tal questionnaires to men reporting incident diverticulitis on biennial follow-up questionnaires.

196 ients who were initially suspected of having diverticulitis or appendicitis but were later determined

197 tions were seen between corn consumption and diverticulitis or between nut, corn, or popcorn consumpt

198 occurs as a result of perforation, surgery, diverticulitis or cancer.

199 We identified men with diverticulitis or diverticular bleeding based on respons

200 to people who did not have a registration of diverticulitis or diverticulosis.

201 ion received glucocorticoids, had antecedent diverticulitis, or both.

202 Eighty-five percent of emergent diverticulitis patients do not recur after initial medic

203 4 in 148 non-familial and unrelated sporadic diverticulitis patients identified two additional rare v

204 resection should be strongly considered for diverticulitis patients older than 50 years or those who

205 life-threatening acute complications such as diverticulitis, perforation, intestinal hemorrhage and o

206 .012) were the most significant findings for diverticulitis; pericolonic lymph nodes (P < .0001) and

207 nally, elective 'prophylactic' surgery after diverticulitis, previously considered after a second con

208 fty consecutive patients suspected of having diverticulitis prospectively underwent helical CT after

209 ery are low after nonoperative management of diverticulitis, providing evidence for the practice of d

210 es pertaining to diagnosis and management of diverticulitis published between January 1, 2000, and Ma

211 Mesalamine did not reduce the rate of diverticulitis recurrence at week 104.

212 Diverticulitis recurrence was defined as surgical interv

213 Predictors of diverticulitis recurrence were assessed with univariate

214 ivariate analysis, significant predictors of diverticulitis recurrence were determined to be maximum

215 significantly worse outcomes associated with diverticulitis recurrence, resection should be strongly

216 ciations between the microbial ecosystem and diverticulitis remain largely unstudied.

217 were serious (2 perforations, 2 episodes of diverticulitis requiring surgery, 2 cases of bleeding re

218 T-cell maturation, in the pathophysiology of diverticulitis requiring surgery.

219 ith ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and diverticulitis revealed reiterative TCR-beta chain seque

220 Elective operations for diverticulitis rose from 16,100 to 22,500 per year durin

221 widespread computed tomographic scanning for diverticulitis, routine colonic evaluation after diverti

222 The SNP discovered to be associated with diverticulitis (rs7848647) was then confirmed in a separ

223 he gefitinib group (related to sigmoid colon diverticulitis/rupture complicated by pneumonia).

224 ry phase of this study, 21 sporadic surgical diverticulitis (SD) patients (9 female, mean age = 52 +/

225 Patients with diverticulitis should undergo endoscopic surveillance fo

226 Patients with complicated diverticulitis still have a significant risk of colorect

227 t standard management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis still is hospital admission both in Europ

228 e patient-reported frequency and severity of diverticulitis symptoms.

229 rgical intervention for chronic or recurrent diverticulitis than was previously thought necessary.

230 resection beyond 2 episodes of uncomplicated diverticulitis, the incidence of elective colectomy has

231 d on consideration of the risks of recurrent diverticulitis, the morbidity of surgery, ongoing sympto

232 y for colonic perforation, colonic bleeding, diverticulitis, the postpolypectomy syndrome, or other s

233 For patients undergoing surgery for acute diverticulitis, there was little change over time in the

234 lucocorticoids or had previously experienced diverticulitis, these individuals should be considered a

235 mmend routine colonic evaluation after acute diverticulitis to confirm the diagnosis and exclude mali

236 mmend elective resection after 2 episodes of diverticulitis to reduce morbidity and mortality.

237 mmend elective resection after 2 episodes of diverticulitis to reduce this morbidity and mortality.

238 Patients with diverticulitis treated by GIs have a shorter hospital st

239 in which patients with CT diagnosis of acute diverticulitis underwent surgery, colonoscopy, or barium

240 Perforated colonic diverticulitis usually requires surgical resection, whic

241 o determine an association of TNFSF SNP with diverticulitis versus the control groups.

242 rvention after the first episode of emergent diverticulitis was 0.3% compared to 4.6% for emergent re

243 Uncomplicated mild diverticulitis was found in three patients.

244 The association between dietary patterns and diverticulitis was predominantly attributable to intake

245 Complicated diverticulitis was present in 22% (98 of 440) of patient

246 for perforation, obstruction, ulceration, or diverticulitis, was determined.

247 surgical and percutaneous interventions for diverticulitis were calculated and temporal changes asse

248 Not all patients presenting with suspected diverticulitis were enrolled.

249 Patients with diverticulitis were identified from the registers and ma

250 ies of colonic evaluation after proven acute diverticulitis were included.

251 reporting newly diagnosed diverticulosis or diverticulitis were mailed supplemental questionnaires.

252 6879 patients with Hinchey III-IV perforated diverticulitis were obtained from two databases (n = 204

253 litis who were hospitalized with complicated diverticulitis were retrospectively analyzed.

254 total of 150 patients with prior episodes of diverticulitis who were hospitalized with complicated di

255 Those with diverticulitis, who had no colonoscopy, had an increased

256 hat laparoscopic lavage may treat perforated diverticulitis with less morbidity than resection proced

257 Perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis (Hinchey III) h

258 Perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis has traditional

259 c lavage and sigmoid resection in perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis.

260 ate treatment of choice for acute perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis.

261 rom 1990 to 1993 in Illinois caused by acute diverticulitis, with FPs, IMs, or GIs as the primary att

262 ich can become infected and inflamed causing diverticulitis, with potentially severe complications.