1 ention from treatment and decisions such as 'do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR).

2  resuscitation in 25 cases, but a unilateral do-not-attempt-resuscitation order was written in only s

3 viewed: 44% had favorable outcome, 43% had a do-not-attempt-resuscitation order, and 38% died in hosp

4 o explore how the inclusion of patients with do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders affects intraparench

5  intraparenchymal hemorrhage cohorts in whom do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders were not used.

6 atients without and optimistic in those with do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders.

7  hemorrhage include patients irrespective of do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders.

8 s significantly higher than predicted in non-do-not-attempt-resuscitation patients and significantly

9 ostic score was no longer pessimistic in non-do-not-attempt-resuscitation patients but remained overl

10 n patients but remained overly optimistic in do-not-attempt-resuscitation patients.

11 citation patients and significantly lower in do-not-attempt-resuscitation patients.

12 d a modified prognostic score using only non-do-not-attempt-resuscitation patients.

13 presenting clinical characteristics, but not do-not-attempt-resuscitation status, we generated a prog

14 e outcome with that predicted, stratified by do-not-attempt-resuscitation status.