ライフサイエンスコーパス: donation after cardiac death

1 reported to promote graft outcome in case of donation after cardiac death.

2 ssess their views on the ethics of pediatric donation after cardiac death.

3 e care physicians on the ethics of pediatric donation after cardiac death.

4 fe support is of specific interest for organ donation after cardiac death.

5 lemented in published articles on controlled donation after cardiac death.

6 ion following a renal transplantation from a donation after cardiac death.

7 n-heart-beating donation, now referred to as donation after cardiac death.

8 nterests as obstacles to acceptance of organ donation after cardiac death.

9 are providers and limits acceptance of organ donation after cardiac death.

10 gan donation may improve acceptance of organ donation after cardiac death.

11 community misunderstanding of the process of donation after cardiac death.

12 unknown whether similar disparities occur in donations after cardiac death.

13 at the Dead Donor Rule should be applied for donation after cardiac death and that donation after car

14 ith Cox regression, expanded criteria donor, donation after cardiac death, and earlier year of transp

15 ls, focusing on end-of-life decision making, donation after cardiac death, and living organ donation.

16 on, barriers to organ donation, brain death, donation after cardiac death, and organ trafficking.

17 tives of colleagues who participate in organ donation after cardiac death, apprehensive that real or

18 ncerns as a barrier to the practice of organ donation after cardiac death, but the specific issues th

19 or strongly agreed that the time of death in donation after cardiac death can be conclusively determi

20 ed for donation after cardiac death and that donation after cardiac death can be consistent with the

21 Pediatric donation after cardiac death can be performed successful

22 ak serum sodium >170, HBV/HCV/HTLV reactive, donation after cardiac death, cold ischemia time >12 hou

23 plications were more common in recipients of donation after cardiac death compared to donation after

24 ne expanded criteria donors (ECD) within the donation after cardiac death (DCD) and donation after br

25 Kidney graft survival is comparable between donation after cardiac death (DCD) and donation after br

26 ative bodies have promulgated guidelines for donation after cardiac death (DCD) and the Joint Commiss

27 nsplantation with donor organs procured from donation after cardiac death (DCD) are compared with tra

28 ation (ReTx) of liver allografts obtained by donation after cardiac death (DCD) are examined to ident

29 rolonged ischemic time before procurement in donation after cardiac death (DCD) donation in 1 partici

30 Increasingly, donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors are used in vi

31 Liver transplantation (LT) from controlled donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors has increased

32 e national experience with liver grafts from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors have resulted

33 Liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors is an increasi

34 d Kingdom, in the utilization of grafts from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors.

35 ival in kidney transplants using organs from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors.

36 to receive expanded-criteria donor (ECD) or donation after cardiac death (DCD) grafts than patients

37 has declined in the United Kingdom, whereas donation after cardiac death (DCD) has increased markedl

38 adolinium-perfusion was applied in simulated Donation after Cardiac Death (DCD) in porcine kidneys to

39 Donation after cardiac death (DCD) increases the number

40 Organ donation after cardiac death (DCD) is one promising poss

41 Donation after cardiac death (DCD) is recognized as an i

42 n (DGF) is an established complication after donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidney transplants, b

43 en from donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidneys before donati

44 Donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidneys suffer a high

45 he best preservation method, particularly in donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidneys.

46 m the increased donor organ pool provided by donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver transplantation

47 Donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver transplantation

48 Donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver transplantation

49 This study examines donation after cardiac death (DCD) practices and outcome

50 ies for increasing the number hospitals with donation after cardiac death (DCD) protocols, the suppor

51 Donation after cardiac death (DCD) to overcome the donor

52 rgan demand has increased, so has the use of donation after cardiac death (DCD).

53 from a ventilator and allowed to die, termed donation after cardiac death (DCD).

54 ys from donation-after-brain-death (DBD) and donation-after-cardiac-death (DCD) donors is now well es

55 plications after liver transplantation from "donation after cardiac death" (DCD) donors.

56 The objective of this study was to identify donation after cardiac death donor characteristics that

57 agreed or strongly agreed that the pediatric donation after cardiac death donor may feel pain or suff

58 A center's proportion of donation after cardiac death donors (OR, 1.12; per 5% in

59 All potential donation after cardiac death donors in The Netherlands b

60 not possible to reliably identify potential donation after cardiac death donors who will die within

61 d to the use of extended criteria donors and donation after cardiac death donors with other comorbidi

62 Of the 242 potential donation after cardiac death donors, 211 entered analysi

63 patitis C virus positive donors, livers from donation after cardiac death donors, livers with >30% st

64 In controlled donation after cardiac death donors, the period between

65 ver, ethical concerns have been raised about donation after cardiac death, especially in children.

66 Donation after cardiac death has been endorsed by profes

67 biopsy, cytomegalovirus seropositive status, donation after cardiac death, hepatitis B and C seroposi

68 ebrovascular cause of death, height, weight, donation after cardiac death, hepatitis C virus status,

69 Organ donation after cardiac death increases the number of don

70 Kidney donation after cardiac death leads to vascular damage as

71 Donation after cardiac death liver transplantation is ma

72 Donation after cardiac death liver transplantation leads

73 idneys during 18 hr of PP in an uncontrolled Donation after Cardiac Death model.

74 Regarding who initiated conversation about donation after cardiac death, nine cases were family ini

75 rain-dead patients, managing a candidate for donation after cardiac death, or caring for a living don

76 and of controversies involved in controlled donation after cardiac death organ transplantation.

77 four pancreases, but was lowest in an older donation after cardiac death pancreas.

78 4%) agreed or strongly agreed that regarding donation after cardiac death, parents should be able to

79 Deceased-donor EDC included: age >65 years, donation after cardiac death, positive viral serology (h

80 and 160 (60.6%) participated in at least one donation after cardiac death procedure at the time of su

81 nt until death, organs may be procured under donation after cardiac death protocols.

82 Donation after cardiac death recipients also experienced

83 Donation after cardiac death recipients had a 2.4 times

84 Biliary complications in donation after cardiac death recipients independently in

85 d from the donors' preserved fluid from DCD (donation after cardiac death) renal transplantation and

86 e reviewed studies on controlled human organ donation after cardiac death that were published in PUBM

87 h with subsequent organ donation (controlled donation after cardiac death transplantation) has raised

88 Charts for 12 patients were located, and donation after cardiac death was confirmed.

89 Organ donation after cardiac death will save lives by increasi