ライフサイエンスコーパス: dose distribution

1 o compute the liver NTCP from the microscale dose distribution.

2 ton point kernel to produce images of (131)I dose distribution.

3 could be varied to better control the final dose distribution.

4 the biologic effect of a nonuniform absorbed dose distribution.

5 e integrated over time to obtain 3D absorbed dose distributions.

6 with standard radiotherapy but similar depth dose distributions.

7 ng IMRT is aimed at exploiting inhomogeneous dose distributions adapted to tumor heterogeneity.

8 mic-number struts, induced cold spots in the dose distribution adjacent to the wires of </=35%.

9 capacity of IMRT to produce highly conformal dose distributions affords the opportunity to decrease t

10 The dose distribution among individual cells, because of bot

11 Nonuniform dose distributions among disseminated tumor cells can be

12 d radiation therapy (IMRT) is that its tight dose distribution, an advantage in reducing RT morbidity

13 Using the MCNP4b code, both the spatial dose distribution and a dose-volume histogram were obtai

14 ransformed the 3D lesion distribution into a dose distribution and compared it with predictions from

15 hat in general allowing for heterogeneity in dose distribution and haematopoietic stem cell migration

16 o TOMO and IMRT, VMAT achieved better target dose distribution and similar sparing of critical struct

17 In larger tumor, VMAT provided the optimal dose distribution and sparing to heart.

18 ron radiotherapy offers advantages in either dose distribution and/or improved radiobiology that may

19 y tissues has led to attempts to improve the dose distributions and biological effects achievable wit

20 S values for constructing three-dimensional dose distributions and dose-volume histograms and techni

21 osures by integrating Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions, and successfully fit to cellular pro

22 Nonuniform absorbed dose distributions are inefficient in sterilizing tumors

23 Comparisons of radiation dose distributions between photon and proton techniques

24 del, it is possible to represent an absorbed dose distribution by a biologically effective dose (BED)

25 rmore, with HDR brachytherapy, the radiation dose distribution can be tailored around critical anatom

26 gave for the less irradiated tissue a lobule dose distribution centered around 103 Gy (full width at

27 There was no significant shift in dose-distribution curves due to the baking process, impl

28 inting by numbers is a strategy by which the dose distribution delivered by inverse planned intensity

29 m dose was also calculated from the absorbed dose distribution directly.

30 to the calculation of macroscopic nonuniform dose distributions: dose point-kernel convolution, Monte

31 heres could induce a sufficiently nonuniform dose distribution explaining this paradox.

32 We sought to define threshold dose distributions for 5 major allergenic foods in the E

33 We wanted to derive threshold dose distributions for major allergenic foods and to ela

34 Dose distributions imposed by the physics of 'standard'

35 To determine the radiation dose distribution in nonvascularized microtumors of vari

36 pose of this study was to analyze the actual dose distribution in routine chest CT examination protoc

37 Proton therapy generates even more exquisite dose distribution in some patients, thus potentially fur

38 es to a better understanding of the absorbed dose distribution in the fetus.

39 quantified the siRNA duplexes and cisplatin dose distribution in various tissues and organs using an

40 s can help in the detailed assessment of the dose distributions in the hepatic functional subunits an

41 T at multiple time points to obtain absorbed dose distributions in the presence of tumor deformation

42 a discussion of the use of three-dimensional dose distributions in understanding and predicting biolo

43 Our knowledge about the dose distribution is derived solely from modeling approa

44 optimum effect, real-time knowledge of skin-dose distribution is invaluable.

45 rd radiotherapy beams but more optimal depth dose distributions, making it particularly advantageous

46 Stents that minimally perturb the dose distribution may be deployed before irradiation.

47 By using a log-normal dose-distribution model, the ED5 was calculated to be 1.

48 erence doses were developed from statistical dose-distribution modeling of individual thresholds of p

49 A total of 40 samples from phosphate-dosed distribution networks were analyzed from across En

50 dge, the first quantification of the spatial dose distribution of charged particles in biologically r

51 s at low doses, compared to the more uniform dose distribution of electrons, juxtaposed with neuron m

52 opography and correlates positively with the dose distribution of solar light on the retinal sphere.

53 roperties of fast neutrons with the physical dose distributions of protons, and preliminary data indi

54 in relation to retinal topography and light dose distribution on the retinal sphere.

55 yielded mean organ-absorbed doses or spatial dose distributions over tumors and normal organs.

56 e this relationship and investigate if other dose-distribution parameters are better predictors for A

57 Both MHD and various dose-distribution parameters of the cardiac substructure

58 Dose distributions (percentiles) were calculated for eac

59 sing the biologic consequences of nonuniform dose distributions produced in tumors by biologically ta

60 s, as well as the effects of stents on gamma-dose distributions, requires further investigation.

61 Threshold dose distributions showed a good statistical and visual

62 Ions provide a more advantageous dose distribution than photons for external beam radioth

63 Original IMRT plans showed more conformal dose distributions than those in 3D CRT and 2D plans.

64 IMRT may result in a dose distribution that is more conformal than that achie

65 ite tailoring of three-dimensional radiation dose distributions that conform to the tumor treatment v

66 sibility of generating dramatically improved dose distributions that could be tailored to fit a compl

67 Based on the key assumption of uniform dose distributions, the LSA approach consistently produc

68 tments by conforming the delivered radiation dose distribution tightly to the tumor or target volume

69 es were used to convert the spatial absorbed dose distribution to a biologically effective dose distr

70 hnique was used to plan a uniform, conformal dose distribution to the target volume, which was the pr

71 There was little difference in dose distribution to the volume receiving 100% of the pr

72 Afterward, the microscale dose distribution was computed using a dose deposition k

73 The effect of tube start angles on dose distribution was investigated with Monte Carlo simu

74 racy of a skin dose tool to estimate patient dose distribution was verified with phantom studies by u

75 Depth dose distributions were calculated using Monte Carlo sim

76 Confidence intervals for the dose distributions were determined by using bootstrap re

77 Dose distributions were measured with Gafchromic film.

78 Dose distributions were modeled by using interval-censor

79 Dose distributions were obtained by means of Monte Carlo

80 The time-dependent 3D cumulative dose distributions were used to generate 3D BED distribu

81 ose distribution to a biologically effective dose distribution, which was then used to estimate a sin

82 pecific activities, the penetration rate and dose distribution will be more favorable for such tumors

83 We obtained a radial dose distribution with sub-micrometer resolution that de

84 e can be adequately achieved with comparable dose distributions with eight or more sources.

85 Shrimp provided radically different dose distributions, with an ED10 value of 2.5 g of prote

86 foods used for challenge, 4 produced similar dose distributions, with estimated doses eliciting react

87 The absorbed dose distribution within individual tumors was widely di