ライフサイエンスコーパス: dressing

1 (ADL) limitations (transferring, eating, and dressing).

2 s pertaining to hand function (grip, eating, dressing).

3 presentation, cross-presentation, and cross-dressing.

4 erse and depended on type of herring and its dressing.

5 octasulfate dressing and 114 to the control dressing.

6 activated by a third mechanism, called cross-dressing.

7 cells requires both cross-priming and cross-dressing.

8 ed with full-fat than with reduced-fat salad dressing.

9 ng; and frequent consumption of creamy salad dressing.

10 nd the site was covered with a semipermeable dressing.

11 with sutures; and placement of a periodontal dressing.

12 ompression device; and no use of compressive dressing.

13 sts, and no evidence supports one particular dressing.

14 he photo-oxidation of vegetable oil in salad dressing.

15 ation of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressings.

16 cies of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in wound dressings.

17 susceptible to the irritant effects of these dressings.

18 ssed by the use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings.

19 al wound care, and alternative antimicrobial dressings.

20 ), Italian (I) and Thousand Island (T) salad dressings.

21 lorhexidine versus standard nonchlorhexidine dressings.

22 ve several advantages over traditional wound dressings.

23 cytotoxic concentrations of silver in these dressings.

24 s antisepsis and silver alginate-impregnated dressings.

25 ich may range from smart filtration to smart dressings.

26 procedure eliminates bandages, sutures, and dressings.

27 orhexidine rinses, systemic antibiotics, and dressings.

28 ith fat-free, reduced-fat, or full-fat salad dressings.

29 function, pharmaceutical delivery and wound dressings.

30 tronics and the emerging area of smart wound dressings.

31 t previously treated with silver-impregnated dressings.

32 orhexidine gluconate-impregnated transparent dressings.

33 Among 54 RCTs evaluating absorbent wound dressings, 1 found calcium alginate dressings improved h

34 t previously treated with silver-impregnated dressings: (1) the appearance of pseudo-ochronotic fiber

35 in 300 procedures, 2.67%) than non-use of a dressing (14 infections in 753 procedures, 1.86%).

36 s [n = 562]; high consistency), radiant heat dressings (4 studies [n = 160]; moderate consistency), a

37 Current second-degree burn wound dressings absorb wound exudate, reduce bacterial infecti

38 Therefore, the routine use of compression dressings after invasive cardiac procedures cannot be re

39 A higher intake of oil and vinegar salad dressing, an important source of alpha-linolenic acid, w

40 to treatment: 126 to the sucrose octasulfate dressing and 114 to the control dressing.

41 are and low-strength evidence for biological dressing and a biological skin equivalent compared with

42 with a bioabsorbable collagen wound-healing dressing and a coronally advanced flap (CAF) to a subepi

43 Toileting, dressing and continence dependency was higher in institu

44 patients assigned to the sucrose octasulfate dressing and four (4%) assigned to the control dressing

45 n between the amount of soybean oil in salad dressing and the absorption of 1) carotenoids, phylloqui

46 Products in the salad dressing and vegetable oils category had the highest mea

47 leg ulcer healing compared with usual care (dressings and bandages without antimicrobials) or an alt

48 s traditionally been managed with 'low tech' dressings and bandages.

49 ) with chlorhexidine versus nonchlorhexidine dressings and catheter colonization rate with highly adh

50 roducts containing emulsions such as sauces, dressings and creams for stabilizing purposes.

51 We also evaluate novel hemostatic dressings and their application in the current era.

52 ions on wound physiology, and the effects of dressings and treatments.

53 ed and included both paraphilic (e.g., cross-dressing) and nonparaphilic (e.g., compulsive masturbati

54 ormed without pedicle ligature or anal-canal dressing, and a diclofenac suppository was administered

55 , high in lettuce, fish, wine, low-fat salad dressing, and coffee and tea.

56 entiate to cytolytic effectors through cross-dressing, and indeed which DC subset would be responsibl

57 es of daily living (such as walking, eating, dressing, and using the toilet) (odds ratio, 3.79; 95 pe

58 Thirty-seven received dry dressings, and 44 received NPWT.

59 beds, protein supplementation, radiant heat dressings, and electrical stimulation.

60 ng glues, bandages, tamponades, tourniquets, dressings, and procoagulant powders.

61 red chlorhexidine dressings, highly adhesive dressings, and standard dressings from May 2010 to July

62 plication, including tissue adhesives, wound dressings, and tissue repair.

63 crobial-impregnated catheters, catheter site dressings, antibiotic lock solutions, anticoagulation, c

64 in vitro experiments demonstrate that cross-dressing APCs do not acquire peptide-MHC complexes in th

65 polymer derivatives for antimicrobial wound-dressing applications.

66 ubjects had a standardized topical capsaicin dressing applied to the distal lateral thigh.

67 e Biobrane must be removed and a traditional dressing approach should be employed.

68 CTG and rhPDGF-BB + beta-TCP + wound-healing dressing are effective treatment modalities for clinical

69 CD8+ T cells activated by cross-dressing are restricted to the MHC class I genotype of t

70 Insertion site dressings are a major mean to reduce catheter infections

71 When the dressings are used, patients should be monitored closely

72 dings support the use of sucrose octasulfate dressing as a local treatment for neuroischaemic diabeti

73 of wound infection identified standard wound dressings as the only significant predictor of SSI devel

74 nce of wound infections, the total number of dressings at 8 weeks, and the percentage of change in ar

75 of their activities of daily living (eating, dressing, bathing), and most had limitations of moderate

76 f concomitant IADL and ADL, with bathing and dressing being the earliest ADL losses, and finally tota

77 ailure to induce T cell proliferation, cross-dressing by donor DCs contributes to generation of the i

78 We conclude that the process of cross-dressing by donor DCs serves as an efficient alternative

79 An alternative way, referred to as 'cross-dressing', by which an uninfected APC could present anti

80 Novel applications include a smart wound dressing capable of sensing the temperatures of various

81 h the 3-day chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge dressing change strategy, and $83 with the 7-day standar

82 ge strategy, and $83 with the 7-day standard dressing change strategy.

83 igned to NPWT (n=77) received treatment with dressing changes every 48 h.

84 r thousand catheter days, and that scheduled dressing changes every 7 days was not inferior to schedu

85 Frequencies of dressing changes were decided by the investigator on the

86 ostoperative day 3 were not closed and daily dressing changes were instituted.

87 Of the 11,036 dressings changes, 7,347 (67%) were performed before the

88 : a sandbag placed over the site; a pressure dressing constructed from surgical gauze and elastic tap

89 During the intervention period a salad dressing containing 21 g safflower oil providing 16 g LA

90 each consumed 5 vegetable salads with salad dressings containing 0, 2, 4, 8, or 32 g soybean oil.

91 a-TCP + bioabsorbable collagen wound-healing dressing; contralateral control sites were treated with

92 By contrast, occlusive dressing control wounds showed generalized hypoxia, with

93 hysiological function, compared to occlusive dressing control wounds that showed formation of tortuou

94 ological blood vessels compared to occlusive dressing control wounds.

95 Each dressing cost $9.08 (146 observations) and each chlorhex

96 Dressing cost (especially staff cost) was inversely rela

97 The hydrogel burn dressing covers the wound and acts as a barrier to bacte

98 er, they mediate their effect through "cross-dressing." Cross-dressing, or peptide-MHC (pMHC) transfe

99 In cross-dressing, DC directly acquire MHC class I-peptide comple

100 Highly adhesive dressings decreased dressing detachment but increased sk

101 onstrated that chlorhexidine-gel-impregnated dressings decreased the CRI rate in patients in the ICU

102 Highly adhesive dressings decreased the detachment rate to 64.3% versus

103 -0.868; P = 0.02) than with nonchlorhexidine dressings; decreases were noted in catheter colonization

104 The use of a post-surgical dressing demonstrated a slightly higher rate of infectio

105 Highly adhesive dressings decreased dressing detachment but increased skin and catheter colo

106 essing and four (4%) assigned to the control dressing died, but none of the deaths were related to tr

107 sed by more than three-fold after the second dressing disruption and by more than ten-fold if the fin

108 We also compared the rates of dressing disruption and skin colonization.

109 After the fourth day, dressing disruption became more frequent with femoral ca

110 nsertion site and enhanced efforts to reduce dressing disruption in postinsertion bundles of care.

111 Dressing disruption occurred more frequently in patients

112 rmed in order to determine the importance of dressing disruption on the risk for development of cathe

113 Subclavian access protected from dressing disruption.

114 However, the importance of dressing disruptions in the occurrence of major catheter

115 The number of dressing disruptions was related to increased risk for c

116 )2SO4 was introduced pre-sowing and as a top dressing, each dose of 100 kg N ha(-1).

117 However, the strong dressing effect of the pump beam will dramatically affec

118 Such dressing effects are also visually evidenced by the obse

119 ified four-wave mixing (PA-FWM) process with dressing effects in a three-level "double-Lambda" config

120 etraacetate (EDTA)] in a sunflower oil salad dressing emulsion (SOSDE) and shelf life affecting condi

121 ely (refined anticoagulation, improved wound dressings, etc).

122 levels of the atomic ground state, where the dressing field is spatially modulated by inductive effec

123 issolvable dendritic thioester hydrogel burn dressing for second-degree burn care.

124 Prophylactic use of negative pressure dressings for closed laparotomy wounds significantly red

125 n therapies that currently require occlusive dressings for hours or day(s).

126 rn patients who had received living pig-skin dressings for up to 8 wk for the presence of PERV as wel

127 hich could be exploited in developing better dressings for wounds and burns.

128 g that riboflavin protected the oil in salad dressing from photo-oxidation.

129 ngs, highly adhesive dressings, and standard dressings from May 2010 to July 2011.

130 bricated hierarchical copper- and zinc- buds dressing gamma-AlOOH mesostrands (Cu- and Zn-AMSs) with

131 ted that hierarchical copper- and zinc- buds dressing gamma-AlOOH mesostrands, which are oriented in

132 g group and 34 patients (30%) in the control dressing group (18 percentage points difference, 95% CI

133 , 9 in the NPWT group (21%) and 8 in the dry dressing group (22%) required reoperation.

134 ifference in dehiscence between NPWT and dry dressing group (36.4% vs 29.7%; P = 0.54) or mean time t

135 dly reduced in the chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing group (random effects relative risk, 0.52; 95%

136 gnificantly reduced in the negative pressure dressing group [6.1 vs 14.7 days, P = 0.019 (2-sided)].

137 patients randomized to the negative pressure dressing group and 25 to the standard dressing group.

138 60 patients (48%) in the sucrose octasulfate dressing group and 34 patients (30%) in the control dres

139 ) patients of 126 in the sucrose octasulfate dressing group and 36 in 32 (28%) patients of 114 in the

140 Overall, 35% of the dry dressing group and 40% of the NPWT group had a wound inf

141 one (1%) patient in the sucrose octasulfate dressing group and two (2%) patients in the control dres

142 6.8% of the NPWT group and 13.5% of the dry dressing group developed wound infection, but this was n

143 essure dressing group and 25 to the standard dressing group.

144 ction or dehiscence between the NPWT and dry dressing group.

145 6 in 32 (28%) patients of 114 in the control dressing group.

146 g group and two (2%) patients in the control dressing group.

147 Chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressings have become widely adopted as a means to reduc

148 Neonicotinoid seed dressings have caused concern world-wide.

149 However, these dressings have delivered only soluble EGF, and the nativ

150 t in dermal repair, but EGF-containing wound dressings have not been successful clinically.

151 Biological dressings have several advantages over traditional wound

152 in 12 French ICUs, we compared chlorhexidine dressings, highly adhesive dressings, and standard dress

153 with physician from four functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position, and pain).

154 nt wound dressings, 1 found calcium alginate dressings improved healing compared with dextranomer pas

155 s resolved 7 days after removal of occlusive dressing in all three groups of mice, without evidence o

156 Despite the importance of thymic DC cross-dressing in negative selection, the factors that regulat

157 large polyurethane sponge under an occlusive dressing in the wound and allows for constant medial tra

158 ffect of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressings in critically ill patients has not been descri

159 nds that clinicians use hydrocolloid or foam dressings in patients with pressure ulcers to reduce wou

160 ncer risk were legumes, low mayonnaise-salad dressing intake, and possibly cabbage.

161 Cross-dressing is a mechanism of antigen presentation used by

162 We demonstrate that cross-dressing is a robust pathway of antigen presentation fol

163 Thus, cross-dressing is an important pathway of antigen presentation

164 lysis shows that a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing is beneficial in preventing catheter colonizati

165 cy linewidth, measured relative to the Raman dressing laser, that is less than that of single-particl

166 ed the wound with the dextran hydrogel and a dressing layer.

167 on of the chlorhexidine gluconate-containing dressings, local wound care, and alternative antimicrobi

168 s randomly received collagen resorbable plug dressing material (control group).

169 al) or control (bioabsorbable collagen wound dressing material only) group.

170 (Putty P15 and bioabsorbable collagen wound dressing material) or control (bioabsorbable collagen wo

171 wound, aid healing, and an anti-inflammatory dressing material.

172 Thus, cross-dressing may be an important mechanism by which DC prime

173 orhexidine-impregnated and strongly adherent dressings may decrease catheter colonization and CRI rat

174 , particularly in association with occlusive dressings, may favour cutaneous fungal invasion and put

175 rs vs. 34 hrs; p = 0.05) and less protective dressings (n = 2, 9.5% vs. n = 8, 53.3%; p = 0.007).

176 tention was enhanced with 1 of 2 periodontal dressings (non-eugenol [NE] or 2-octyl cyanoacrylate [2-

177 2.19; 95% CI, 1.00-4.82], performing a wound dressing [odds ratio, 8.35; 95% CI, 2.07-33.63] and inte

178 The effect of prophylactic negative pressure dressing of closed incisional wounds on SSI rate is unkn

179 s rich, including ponderomotive interaction, dressing of the electronic states, creation of coherent

180 mbrane alloantigen acquisition (mAAQ; "cross-dressing") of host dendritic cells (DCs).

181 onal guides for ultracold atoms through the 'dressing' of hyperfine sublevels of the atomic ground st

182 s (95% CIs) were 0.95 (0.87, 1.04) for salad dressing olive oil and 0.85 (0.74, 0.98) for olive oil a

183 ucrose octasulfate dressing versus a control dressing on wound closure in patients with neuroischaemi

184 of three neonicotinoid insecticides as seed dressings on bee-attractive crops.

185 any sublethal effects of neonicotinoid seed dressings on Bombus colonies are potentially offset by t

186 the effect of prophylactic negative pressure dressings on postoperative surgical site infection (SSI)

187 linical trial comparing NPWT to standard dry dressings on surgical incisions.

188 ment with either a sucrose octasulfate wound dressing or a control dressing (the same dressing withou

189 ood transfusion; hematoma requiring pressure dressing or change in anticoagulation therapy; or prolon

190 infection, utilizing devices imbedded within dressings or as point-of-care techniques to allow for co

191 their effect through "cross-dressing." Cross-dressing, or peptide-MHC (pMHC) transfer, involves the g

192 cols, involving moisture-retentive occlusive dressing, or standard of care alone.

193 pacity for cross-presentation and for "cross-dressing" other DCs.

194 rts the use of a specific support surface or dressing over other alternatives.

195 .C. (KCI, San Antonio, TX) or a standard dry dressing over their incision at the conclusion of surger

196 ds with full-fat than with reduced-fat salad dressing (P < 0.02).

197 ingestion of the salads with fat-free salad dressing (P < 0.04).

198 disability in four areas: personal hygiene, dressing, pain, and limb position (on a four-point scale

199 ed with a clinically approved collagen wound dressing, peptide-free hydrogel, or blank wound controls

200 versus 71.9% (P < 0.0001) and the number of dressings per catheter to two (one to four) versus three

201 from non-mAAQ, mice reproduced the DC cross-dressing phenomenon in vitro.

202 , HAQ disability (overall, grip, eating, and dressing), physician's global assessment, and tension, b

203 alternating-pressure surfaces, hydrocolloid dressings, platelet-derived growth factor, and light the

204 eatment of injured skin with a semiocclusive dressing preserves the hydration of the skin and results

205 These dressings release antiseptic under occlusion onto the sk

206 level of patient discomfort before and after dressing removal, as well as site tenderness at 24-h fol

207 xchange reaction, allowing for a facile burn dressing removal.

208 An adhesive yet easily removable burn wound dressing represents a breakthrough in second-degree burn

209 ted cell and an uninfected APC, termed cross-dressing, represents an important mechanism of Ag presen

210 Use of a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing resulted in a reduced prevalence of catheter-re

211 virgin olive oil in commercial vinaigrettes, dressing salad and in-house reference materials (i-HRM)

212 e compounds and peroxide values of the salad dressing samples simultaneously decreased with the addit

213 College of Surgeons (bathing, transferring, dressing, shopping, and meals), history of falling or ga

214 argyria or treatment with silver-impregnated dressings should be considered before treatment with fra

215 INTERPRETATION: A sucrose octasulfate dressing significantly improved wound closure of neurois

216 y substituting other types of fats and salad dressings (stick margarine, butter, and mayonnaise) with

217 The randomized two-way factorial Dressing Study (1,636 patients, 28,931 catheter days) sh

218 catheter-related infection according to the Dressing Study results.

219 Biological dressings, such as Biobrane, are commonly used for treat

220 edures were randomly assigned to one of four dressing techniques applied after achieving hemostasis:

221 rol) or rhPDGF-BB + beta-TCP + wound-healing dressing (test), plus CAF.

222 consumption of foods such as oil-based salad dressing that provide polyunsaturated fats, including al

223 developing electronically controllable wound dressings that can deliver drugs with desired temporal p

224 man keratinocytes are covered with occlusive dressings that induce hypoxia.

225 dration status and that the use of occlusive dressings that prevent water loss from wounds decreases

226 ying interactions between ultracold atoms by dressing the bare atomic states with light, creating an

227 rose octasulfate wound dressing or a control dressing (the same dressing without sucrose octasulfate)

228 ingestion of the salads with fat-free salad dressing, the appearance of alpha-carotene, beta-caroten

229 gestion of the salads with reduced-fat salad dressing, the appearance of the carotenoids in plasma ch

230 With chlorhexidine dressings, the major-CRI rate was 67% lower (0.7 per 1,0

231 l are being developed from negative pressure dressing therapies to acellular allograft meshes.

232 Furthermore DC origin influenced cross-dressing; thymic versus splenic DC exhibited an increase

233 ect to the wound, and 74% combine a range of dressings to try and manage odour.

234 gh intakes of green, leafy vegetables; salad dressings; tomatoes; other vegetables (eg, peppers, gree

235 ing: walking, bathing, upper- and lower-body dressing, transferring from a chair, using the toilet, e

236 eater nerve reinnervation, compared with the dressing-treated group.

237 a neutral atomic Bose-Einstein condensate by dressing two atomic spin states with a pair of lasers.

238 By dressing up such lattices with small-world bonds, a nove

239 ized argyria secondary to silver-impregnated dressings used years earlier.

240 red for female, nonchlorhexidine-impregnated dressings users, and when catheters are left in place mo

241 o assess the effect of a sucrose octasulfate dressing versus a control dressing on wound closure in p

242 the need for personal assistance in bathing, dressing, walking inside the house, or transferring from

243 assistance with 1 or more key ADLs (bathing, dressing, walking, and transferring), was assessed durin

244 sential activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, walking, and transferring.

245 our key activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, walking, or transferring.

246 A standardized wound dressing was applied blinding both patients and independ

247 DC cross-dressing was cell-contact dependent and unaffected by li

248 ption and by more than ten-fold if the final dressing was disrupted, independently of other risk fact

249 inserted into the pocket, and a periodontal dressing was placed.

250 After 3 months, the periodontal dressing was removed, the defect sites debrided and eval

251 No other dressing was superior to alternatives.

252 demand flow device use while undressing and dressing was the subjects' Spo2 (90 +/- 3%) significantl

253 Disruption of catheter dressings was common and was an important risk factor fo

254 acquire viral peptide-MHC complexes by cross-dressing, we show that such presentation can promote the

255 mmune responses induced exclusively by cross-dressing were as strong as those induced exclusively thr

256 was observed when salads with fat-free salad dressing were consumed.

257 Dressings were applied by nursing staff (or by instructe

258 Identical wound dressings were applied in both groups so that carers cou

259 Periodontal dressings were placed in the defect sites so as to creat

260 The dressings were removed, and ambulation was encouraged 5

261 Charcoal and silver based dressings were the most frequently used odour management

262 Vacuum dressings were used in all 45 but VAFC was not attempted

263 ractive ground-state potential and adiabatic dressing with an excited state whose potential is engine

264 Salad dressings with 0, 5, 20, 50 and 100 ppm added riboflavin

265 und dressing or a control dressing (the same dressing without sucrose octasulfate) for 20 weeks.