ライフサイエンスコーパス: drinking water

1 deline limit (1 mug/L of MC-LR equivalent in drinking water).

2 can be modulated by providing the inducer in drinking water.

3 he concentration of this chemical present in drinking water.

4 he detection of heavy metal contamination in drinking water.

5 g, indicating persistent nitrate problems in drinking water.

6 g-term exposure to microlevels of lithium in drinking water.

7 d method for the analysis of free cyanide in drinking water.

8 y chlorination products of other peptides in drinking water.

9 for in-field detection of fluoride level in drinking water.

10 nsors are ideal for heavy metal detection of drinking water.

11 ated arsenical, or arsenobetaine exposure in drinking water.

12 scientifically sound guidelines for PFAAs in drinking water.

13 ffects in communities where they contaminate drinking water.

14 icle during the entire pregnancy time in the drinking water.

15 generated by addition of L-thyroxine (T4) to drinking water.

16 and depression, effects that were reduced by drinking water.

17 rs for detecting uranyl ion contamination in drinking water.

18 ere people lack improved sanitation and safe drinking water.

19 l levels of inorganic arsenic (iAs) in their drinking water.

20 tribute estrogen to waterways used to supply drinking water.

21 currently relying on private wells for their drinking water.

22 fication and identification of metal ions in drinking water.

23 tial means of rapid screening to ensure safe drinking water.

24 concentrations of arsenic from contaminated drinking water.

25 al and anthropogenic barriers, even reaching drinking water.

26 and analyze fluoride concentration level in drinking water.

27 senite (As(III)) that contaminates crops and drinking water.

28 or microbial community structure in finished drinking water.

29 ovided with DOCA pellets and sodium chloride drinking water.

30 dipeptides as new disinfection byproducts in drinking water.

31 e resources for recreation and as sources of drinking water.

32 mmunities from the impact of contaminants in drinking water.

33 aking groundwater as their primary source of drinking water.

34 or the removal of E. coli and turbidity from drinking water.

35 tual DCAN degradation product in chlorinated drinking waters.

36 forcing factors of the toxicity of finished drinking waters.

37 radation are generally atypical for finished drinking waters.

38 ual tracer for food and environmental (e.g., drinking) water.

39 confidence interval, .47-.67), treatment of drinking water (0.76; 0.70-0.83), access to an improved

40 Agency (USEPA) tolerance limit of Hg(2+) in drinking water (10nM, 2 ppb).

41 mental Protection Agency limit for Cu(2+) in drinking water (20 muM).

42 ed PI-IBS following exposure to contaminated drinking water 7 years ago.

43 easurement of progress toward universal safe drinking water access.

44 The 1974 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) regulates >170,000 public wate

45 fs that are not presently considered in Safe Drinking Water Act regulatory analyses.

46 hnologies for remediating dilute organics in drinking water, activated carbon, and ozone, are insuffi

47 ronmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s National Drinking Water Advisory Council (NDWAC) recommended esta

48 is dramatically exceeded recommendations for drinking water after one treatment cycle ( approximately

49 ol disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation in drinking water, an understanding of the source water tot

50 presence of other complex species in natural drinking water and an affordable water-purification devi

51 s of Cr(III) solids oxidation by chlorine in drinking water and associated Cr(VI) formation.

52 relationship between lead concentrations in drinking water and BLLs in children.

53 investigated the association between TTC in drinking water and diarrhea using data from seven previo

54 ociation between thermotolerant coliforms in drinking water and diarrhea: an analysis of individual l

55 Nitrate from drinking water and diet and bladder cancer among postmen

56 ed the ingestion of nitrate and nitrite from drinking water and diet and bladder cancer risk in women

57 ng nonoccupationally exposed U.S. residents, drinking water and diet are considered primary exposure

58 irs exposed to low levels of arsenic through drinking water and diet, we assessed in utero arsenic ex

59 to two groups: controls provided with normal drinking water and DOCA provided with DOCA pellets and s

60 health concerns around the Flint, Michigan, drinking water and East Chicago, Indiana, lead in soil c

61 at all sites, but contamination levels above drinking water and ecological standards were observed in

62 or health-based targets for levels of TTC in drinking water and for interventions to improve drinking

63 Drinking water and other sources for lead are the subjec

64 cases, also affecting the taste and odor of drinking water and promoting the corrosion of pipes.

65 a key role in determining lead pollution in drinking water and receiving water bodies.

66 tudies that measured TTC levels in household-drinking water and reported prevalence of diarrhea among

67 EDS) model estimated mean iAs exposures from drinking water and rice were 4.2 mug/day and 1.4 mug/day

68 EDS) model estimated mean iAs exposures from drinking water and rice were [Formula: see text] and [Fo

69 uvial flood-risk management and forecasting, drinking water and sewer network operation and managemen

70 of increasing awareness of their presence in drinking water and their potential to cause adverse heal

71 n potential cumulative endocrine activity in drinking water and to inform prioritization of future mo

72 illimolar sodium chloride level (freshwater, drinking water, and aquarium water, as well as dechlorid

73 he existence of a variety of heavy metals in drinking water, and the four-electrode sensor can distin

74 lication of our strategy in aqueous samples (drinking water, apple juice, and skim milk).

75 , especially among those with relatively low drinking water arsenic exposure.

76 entration of 1.0mgL(-1) (71.4muM) allowed in drinking water as defined by U.S. Environmental Protecti

77 ltiple markers of cardiometabolic risk using drinking-water As measurements and urinary As species da

78 most commonly identified causative agent in drinking water associated with disease outbreaks, can be

79 h-based, household action level" for lead in drinking water based on children's exposure.

80 Knowledge of the unique microbial members of drinking water biofilms and, importantly, the influence

81 identification of microbial fingerprints in drinking water biofilms is achievable with DNA sequencin

82 breaks, can be harbored by and released from drinking water biofilms.

83 inc in various samples including well water, drinking water, black tea, rice, and milk.

84 tant strategy for reducing lead exposure via drinking water, but jurisdictional issues can sometimes

85 the removal of trace metal contaminants from drinking water by electrocoagulation (EC).

86 bsequent accumulation of cadmium in food and drinking water can result in accidental consumption of d

87 GenX was also detected in drinking water collected from 3 out of 4 municipalities

88 cess 10(-6) cancer risk is associated with a drinking water concentration of 0.35 mug/L.

89 lo simulations to vary the year-by-year PFOA drinking-water concentration by randomly sampling from l

90 Ongoing exposures to even relatively low drinking water concentrations of long-chain PFAAs substa

91 uate impact of uncertainty in estimated PFOA drinking-water concentrations on estimated serum concent

92 ing mixed cultures grown under more relevant drinking water conditions and harvested from sand-packed

93 uation was conducted based on representative drinking water conditions to determine a minimal model (

94 el (3 reactions, 8 constants) applicable for drinking water conditions.

95 observed with the addition of doxycycline in drinking water, confirming that the cystatin E/M gene is

96 e attributable to microbial contamination in drinking water, constituting approximately 7.3% (95% CI:

97 and therefore they may pose greater risks to drinking water consumers given their widespread occurren

98 Drinking water containing the highest level of GenX also

99 Nitrate is a drinking water contaminant arising from agricultural sou

100 Among the different classes of drinking water contaminants, toxic trace elements (e.g.,

101 n, however, whether consumption of sodium in drinking water could have similar effects on health.

102 s by bloom-forming cyanobacteria can lead to drinking water crises, such as the one experienced by th

103 pplication of this sensor in the analysis of drinking water demonstrates that the proposed method wor

104 t 1,4-dioxane is frequently detected in U.S. drinking water derived from both groundwater and surface

105 of hM4D by administering CNO for 2 weeks in drinking water did not affect motivation due to a tolera

106 nic waterborne viruses become inactivated by drinking water disinfectants would facilitate the develo

107 water sources can lead to difficulty meeting drinking water disinfection byproduct (DBP) regulations.

108 nogenic N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) during drinking water disinfection is a major challenge.

109 In conventional drinking water disinfection, N-chloroisobutyraldimine ca

110 In drinking water distribution systems (DWDS), biofilms are

111 the accumulation and release of pathogens in drinking water distribution systems (DWDS).

112 m climates and has the potential to colonize drinking water distribution systems (DWDSs).

113 bacterial and fungal taxa commonly found in drinking water distribution systems through the treatmen

114 cilities within five different chloraminated drinking water distribution systems.

115 ramine loss during nitrification episodes in drinking water distribution systems.

116 in mixed cultures similar to those found in drinking water distribution systems; therefore, monochlo

117 strategies for the control of N. fowleri in drinking-water-distribution systems.

118 e to trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids in drinking water during pregnancy in the Born in Bradford

119 rently installed treatment processes at U.S. drinking water facilities to be on the order of $500 mil

120 s) since the U.S. EPA analysis suggested few drinking water facilities would be affected by bromide d

121 n credits by distributing almost one million drinking water filters in rural Kenya to avert the use o

122 lm-associated L. pneumophila under simulated drinking water flow containing a disinfectant residual w

123 of 2014, when the city was rendered without drinking water for >2 days.

124 h salt diet with or without 0.1% caffeine in drinking water for 15 days.

125 Some mice were given antibiotics via their drinking water for 4 weeks to deplete their microbiota.

126 y addition of 2.5% dextran sodium sulfate to drinking water for 5-9 consecutive days.

127 and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water for all people by the year 2030.

128 Mice were given (13)C-acetate in drinking water for measurement of cholesterol synthesis.

129 bent with the potential to improve access to drinking water for millions living in developing countri

130 Groundwater is the major source of drinking water for people living in rural areas of India

131 L/6 mice placed on beta-alanine (0.1% w/v in drinking water) for 2 weeks lead to a 3-fold increase in

132 ite [none (control), 10 ppb, or 42.5 ppm] in drinking water from gestational day 10 to birth, the win

133 he 44.5 million U.S. residents drawing their drinking water from private wells face higher risks of w

134 population at risk from elevated arsenic in drinking water from private wells.

135 trix spikes yielded recoveries of 86-115% in drinking water, groundwater, surface water, and wastewat

136 Exposure to arsenic (As) concentrations in drinking water > 150 mug/L has been associated with risk

137 ssment issues that impact the development of drinking water guidelines for PFAAs, including choice of

138 to belong to households that did not purify drinking water, had no home latrine, and had no members

139 for direct determination of free cyanide in drinking water has been reported.

140 However, its removal and fate in drinking water has never been reported before.

141 tion byproducts (N-DBPs) whose occurrence in drinking waters has recently been reported in several DB

142 onmental Protection Agency to issue lifetime drinking water health advisories for perfluorooctanoic a

143 e fed a high fat diet with 5% sucrose in the drinking water (HFS) for 7 months and then were fed for

144 -diet (AIN-93 diet with ascorbic acid in the drinking water); HT-B diet (containing high amount of MR

145 In drinking water, iAs is the primary form of arsenic (As),

146 Arsenic exposure via drinking water impacts millions of people worldwide.

147 Drinking water improved memory and focused attention.

148 detectable incidence of waterborne AGI from drinking water in the systems and time periods studied.

149 ndicator of microbiological contamination of drinking water in time-series studies attempting to disc

150 )(1), was significantly lower than that from drinking water in vast regions of Argentina.

151 lms under high and turbulent flow regimes of drinking water, in comparison to the more porous and loo

152 Arsenic-free drinking water, independent of electrical power and pipe

153 formation poses a significant problem to the drinking water industry as a potential source of bacteri

154 reported MCL violations to the national Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS).

155 Daily drinking water intake and rice consumption rate distribu

156 ) I and II in samples collected at WWTPs and drinking water intakes (source water) during one year we

157 the distribution of iAs exposure rates from drinking water intakes and rice consumption in the U.S.

158 watershed approach to identify Pennsylvania drinking water intakes downstream of wet FGD discharges

159 ection Agency (EPA) for inorganic mercury in drinking water is 0.002 mg L(-1) (10 nM).

160 Providing access to safe drinking water is a global challenge, for which groundwa

161 Access to safe drinking water is a human right, crucial to combat inequ

162 Endocrine activity of drinking water is a matter of growing interest for scien

163 Leakage of lead and other heavy metals into drinking water is a significant health risk and one that

164 Arsenic (As) exposure from drinking water is associated with modest intellectual de

165 Fecally contaminated drinking water is believed to be a major contributor to

166 etection marker for mercury ions (Hg(2+)) in drinking water is of great interest for toxicology asses

167 Universal access to safe drinking water is prioritized in the post-2015 Sustainab

168 e broadly speaking, N-Cl-HAMs in chlorinated drinking waters is of significance because they are orga

169 approach that can be used to determine what drinking water lead concentrations keep children's blood

170 d service lines (LSLs) are a major source of drinking water lead, and high iron levels are frequently

171 han the US Environmental Protection Agency's drinking water limit (2 ppb), within 10 min.

172 ace waters largely remain below California's drinking water limit.

173 Drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCL) are esta

174 Long-term increased lithium exposure in drinking water may be associated with a lower incidence

175 a on municipality of residence and data from drinking water measurements combined with time-specific

176 Drinking water microbial communities impact opportunisti

177 ng water treatment processes shape the final drinking water microbial community via selection of comm

178 However, solar disinfection of drinking water mostly relies on ultraviolet light, which

179 he highest versus lowest quartile of average drinking water nitrate concentration (HR = 1.48; 95% CI:

180 fat diet supplemented with 30% d-fructose in drinking water (obesogenic diet) for 25-33 weeks.

181 d on phenol addition and recovery studies in drinking water, obtaining recoveries rates between 90% a

182 the WHO health-based normative guideline for drinking water of 10(-6) DALYs per person per year.

183 In vivo, 200 mmol/L NaHCO3 added to the drinking water of 4-week-old TRAMP mice increased the in

184 mide riboside (NR), an NAD precursor, in the drinking water of mice subjected to partial hepatectomy.

185 fectiveness of formate in the pregnant dam's drinking water on the incidence of neural tube defects i

186 idepressant, acetyl-l-carnitine (LAC) in the drinking water opposed the direction of these changes.

187 the reaction of BMAA with chlorine, a common drinking-water oxidant/disinfectant, was investigated.

188 Comparison of drinking water PFOA concentrations to those study findin

189 N-Cl-DCAM tends to deprotonate under typical drinking water pH conditions, and the anionic form of N-

190 ses in disinfection byproducts at downstream drinking water plants.

191 Complexities associated with drinking water plumbing systems can result in undesirabl

192 ) adsorbed to granular activated carbon in a drinking water production plant, which cannot be labeled

193 he classical disinfection treatments used in drinking water production.

194 ts both carbon cycling in surface waters and drinking water production.

195 ty in surface waters and treatability during drinking water production.

196 Chlorination of drinking water protects humans from water-born pathogens

197 Disinfection of drinking water protects public health against waterborne

198 Peatland ecosystem services include drinking water provision, flood mitigation, habitat prov

199 reverse osmosis (RO) processes are used for drinking water purification, and it is important to unde

200 ate for routine environmental monitoring and drinking water quality assessment since the guideline va

201 nking water and for interventions to improve drinking water quality to prevent diarrhea.

202 In the USA, impacts to drinking water quality, biogeochemical cycles, and aquat

203 sehold sanitation access on child health and drinking water quality.

204 (TTC) bacteria, a WHO-approved indicator of drinking water quality.

205 wo-day summit to identify options to improve drinking-water quality for N.C. residents served by priv

206 ation of free chlorine used for disinfecting drinking water, recreational water, and food processing

207 Lead exposure via drinking water remains a significant public health risk;

208 ions on the chemical composition of DOC in a drinking water reservoir by Fourier transform ion cyclot

209 oundwater from 125 shallow wells, a dominant drinking water resource in rural Bangladesh, monitored o

210 ng effects on aquatic ecosystem functioning, drinking water resources and carbon cycling between land

211 fracturing-related chemicals were to impact drinking water resources.

212 the bioanalytical assessment of disinfected drinking water result in the loss of volatile and hydrop

213 l for the protection of human health and for drinking water safety and security.

214 water quality is of widespread importance to drinking water safety in many areas where hydraulic frac

215 ate change to hydraulic fracturing, and from drinking water safety to wildfires, environmental challe

216 d their PWS for drinking, provided urine and drinking water samples for total As determination by ind

217 Additionally, drinking water samples were collected from municipalitie

218 of EVIAN natural mineral water, 14 different drinking water samples were concentrated and screened fo

219 cible results were obtained from analysis of drinking water samples with recoveries of 98.3-101.2% an

220 tform for measurements of fluoride levels in drinking water samples.

221 The mean lithium exposure in drinking water since 1986 was estimated for all study in

222 rt study in which we assessed the effects of drinking-water sodium (DWS) on blood pressure (BP) in co

223 Drinking water source and duration were assessed in a 19

224 n switched to the Flint River as a temporary drinking water source without implementing corrosion con

225 e higher exposures than adults from the same drinking water source.

226 dwater is becoming an increasingly important drinking water source.

227 pical de facto potable reuse scenario, where drinking water sources are located downstream of treated

228 wever, elevated concentrations of bromide in drinking water sources can lead to difficulty meeting dr

229 with widespread reliance on such unregulated drinking water sources is unknown.

230 d on farms and gardens, is often detected in drinking water sources of various countries at concentra

231 Norovirus (NoV) that enters drinking water sources with wastewater discharges is a c

232 ng increasing sodium concentrations in their drinking-water sources, likely partially due to climate

233 e U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) drinking water standard (10 ppb) and at tumor-inducing l

234 proportion of samples exceeding the nitrate drinking water standard (DWS), peak (>90th quantile) nit

235 research was key to the nation's first-ever drinking water standard for CrVI adopted by California i

236 levels more than twenty-times the California drinking water standard.

237 (2-), is being considered for more stringent drinking water standards by regulatory agencies.

238 s required post-treatment filtration to meet drinking water standards.

239 nd groundwaters at levels above health-based drinking water standards.

240 cal levels of D-mannose safely achievable by drinking-water supplementation suppressed immunopatholog

241 re wildfires in forested watersheds threaten drinking water supplies and aquatic ecology.

242 cterial blooms in western Lake Erie threaten drinking water supplies and are promoted by nutrient loa

243 the lack of epidemiological data linking the drinking water supplies to disease incidence, we gathere

244 e on water recycling, become disseminated in drinking water supplies.

245 impact that ambient air quality can have on drinking water supplies.

246 rtant role in the removal of impurities from drinking water supplies.

247 dies of the association between turbidity of drinking-water supplies and incidence of acute gastroint

248 ill identify the dangers hidden in America's drinking water supply and redirect attention to ensure s

249 m these regions contribute up to half of the drinking water supply for some European countries.

250 To simulate drinking water system conditions, biofilms were prepared

251 known to be present at different stages of a drinking water system, their potential functions and abi

252 val of BMAA in the chlorination process of a drinking-water system.

253 eningoencephalitis (PAM) and can be found in drinking water systems in many countries.

254 The two municipal drinking water systems of New Orleans, LA, U.S.A. were s

255 Twenty-two (22) public drinking water systems serving 2.5 million people were i

256 tormwater systems differ from wastewater and drinking water systems to which LCA is more frequently a

257 re, for each 100 mg/L reduction in sodium in drinking water, systolic/diastolic BP was lower on avera

258 Given that groundwater is a major source of drinking water, the main objective of this work was to i

259 ore than a billion people lacking accessible drinking water, there is a critical need to convert nonp

260 21 and exposed to same dose of BPA via their drinking water through PND35.

261 e children chronically exposed to Mn through drinking water to investigate the effect of Mn exposure

262 tile DBPs from chlorinated and chloraminated drinking water to minimize the loss of analytes.

263 n potential in Lake Michigan, which provides drinking water to over 10 million people.

264 wnstream water quality, aquatic ecology, and drinking water treatability.

265 cost and 7.3% of GWP of the background from drinking water treatment and competitive with the best p

266 and estriol) and overall SSF performance for drinking water treatment could be improved.

267 was observed in samples near the location of drinking water treatment plant (WTP) intakes, eight or m

268 or 2EDD were measured at the entrance of the drinking water treatment plant.

269 luated in samples from sand filters (SFs) of drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs).

270 taminated groundwater in filtration units of drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs).

271 entrations of 2,6-dichlorobenzamide (BAM) in drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs).

272 fouling of ultrafiltration (UF) membranes in drinking water treatment process.

273 Study results suggest that centralized drinking water treatment processes shape the final drink

274 amined the effect of lake water chemistry on drinking water treatment processes.

275 subsurface environments and potentially also drinking water treatment processes.

276 water distribution systems, and centralized drinking water treatment represents a potential control

277 ferric iron waste from an electrocoagulation drinking water treatment system were used to evaluate th

278 ntial operational challenges for distributed drinking water treatment systems.

279 pH 6.0 and a chlorine dose representative of drinking water treatment, Cl2O is predicted to have at b

280 Promotion of exclusive breastfeeding, drinking water treatment, improved latrines, and targete

281 mples taken from an ozonation process during drinking water treatment.

282 ) removal at conditions directly relevant to drinking water treatment.

283 DISCUSSION: Positive associations between drinking-water turbidity and AGI incidence were found in

284 city and chemical consumption for individual drinking water unit processes are used to estimate embed

285 to evaluate impact to Underground Sources of Drinking Water (USDWs) as a result of acid stimulation a

286 can be categorized as underground sources of drinking water (USDWs; <10,000 ppm TDS).

287 nated dipeptides as chlorination products in drinking water using complementary high-resolution quadr

288 n, weighting the iAs concentrations for each drinking water utility in the Second Six-Year Review dat

289 Long-term ingestion of elevated nitrate in drinking water was associated with an increased risk of

290 The distribution of iAs in drinking water was estimated by population, weighting th

291 Drinking water was shown, for the first time to our know

292 Administration of bacterial strains in drinking water was used, respectively, as a preventive o

293 yses have suggested that unregulated private drinking water wells carry a higher risk of exposure to

294 dicators to investigate the sources of Mo in drinking-water wells from shallow aquifers in a region o

295 Samples from drinking-water wells were collected in areas near and aw

296 lyses are needed to predict and manage Mn in drinking-water wells.

297 cation systems are easy ways to obtain clean drinking water when there is no large-scale water treatm

298 course of non-absorbable antibiotics via the drinking water, which resulted in a substantial reductio

299 ociations among those exposed >/= 4 years to drinking water with > 5 mg/L NO3-N (HR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1

300 Female C57BL/6 mice were administered drinking water with 0, 250 ppb, or 25 ppm sodium arsenit