戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 kg with the restricted normal-food diet (26% dropout).
2 omized with 33 in each arm (accounting for 2 dropouts).
3 outs) and biological mesh closure (n = 50; 2 dropouts).
4 patient characteristics and rate of waitlist dropout.
5  treatment groups, even after accounting for dropout.
6 xed-effects model accounting for informative dropout.
7 and contact lens use and selection bias from dropout.
8 ecovery, other interview-based outcomes, and dropout.
9  analyses; 18 of these had relapsed prior to dropout.
10 and survival model to adjust for informative dropout.
11 n static over the next decade due to patient dropout.
12 allowed for the extrapolation of the risk of dropout.
13 ferences between groups after accounting for dropout.
14 yping errors from sources other than allelic dropout.
15 n 11 (P=0.04) were independent predictors of dropout.
16 ytical challenges, such as outcome-dependent dropout.
17 which two demonstrated evidence of mecA gene dropout.
18  trait interrelatedness, and random genotype dropout.
19 s diabetic renal injury, especially podocyte dropout.
20 salvaged by OLT), without resultant death or dropout.
21 o prevent tumor progression and thus prevent dropout.
22 nfection was characterized by hepatocellular dropout.
23  with pericyte (vascular smooth muscle cell) dropout.
24 erience an increase from 53% to 64% waitlist dropout.
25 mbrane thickening, albuminuria, and podocyte dropout.
26 ach to achieve the target dose without early dropout.
27 ter retinal tubulations and choriocapillaris dropout.
28 fter listing) owing to tumor progression and dropout.
29 cially for males and children of high school dropouts.
30 ox, arbitrary choice of threshold value, and dropouts.
31 on of artefenomel) but there were no further dropouts.
32 outs, and insufficient response: 26 (33%) of dropouts.
33 ." RESULTS: There were no deaths or patients dropouts.
34 B/RIF group were on treatment due to reduced dropout (15 [8%] of 185 in the MTB/RIF group did not rec
35 38% vs. 22%; P = 0.017) and a higher risk of dropout (22% vs. 8%; P = 0.01).
36 he outcomes and no difference in participant dropout (24.5% in PE and 20.0% in EMDR, P = .57).
37 t and CABG patients had similar rates of CRP dropout (27.9% vs. 37.2% respectively, P=0.4).
38 iectasias (40.6%), lid debris (50.9%), gland dropout (42.8%), and acini appearance (54.5%).
39 ges were -11.4 +/- 9.1 kg with the VLCD (18% dropout), -6.8 +/- 6.4 kg with the LCD (23% dropout), an
40   Overall, the ARMS-qPCR had frequent allele-dropout (ADO), rendering it inappropriate as the sole di
41  treating extensive BCLM with the pitfall of dropout after the first stage.
42 ies by comparative genomics methods based on dropout alignments.
43 egraded evidence leading to allele and locus dropout; allele sharing of contributors leading to allel
44 s, have introduced new problems such as data dropout and "information overload" for the clinical team
45 ent randomized trials did not handle patient dropout and "rescue" medication properly.
46                                     Vascular dropout and angiogenesis are hallmarks of the progressio
47                        Measures of capillary dropout and capillary hemodynamics were also quantified.
48 on heterogeneity but suffers from stochastic dropout and characteristic bimodal expression distributi
49                     The high rate of subject dropout and data management errors substantially reduced
50 ter program, Pedant, which estimates allelic dropout and false allele error rates with 95% confidence
51 rrently methods to estimate rates of allelic dropout and false alleles depend upon the availability o
52 tween two distinct classes of error, allelic dropout and false alleles.
53  family involvement is important in limiting dropout and improving outcomes.
54 ral smoothing, thereby decreasing the signal dropout and increasing the temporal signal-to-noise rati
55 gostino Kaplan-Meier approach to account for dropout and loss to follow-up before 10 years.
56                                     Rates of dropout and loss to follow-up were low (6.3%), and the a
57                                  Participant dropout and lower-than-expected disease event rate limit
58 g units and deep learning techniques such as dropout and momentum training to accelerate the DNN trai
59                                        Gland dropout and potentially lid telangiectasia grading from
60 cytes and proximal tubules prevents podocyte dropout and reductions in nephrin levels in diabetic mic
61  signal was digitally filtered for noise and dropout and reported using time-window averaging for 19,
62 ation of exogenous Epo prevented both vessel dropout and subsequent hypoxia-induced neovascularizatio
63 ity analyses examining the effect of patient dropout and treatment adherence did not alter the result
64 t tests except for grids with 70% random dot dropout and two gray levels.
65                  Compared with placebo, more dropouts and adverse events (anorexia, nausea, vomiting,
66                                              Dropouts and adverse events were limited and did not dif
67 fect among GT 2/3 patients, who showed fewer dropouts and higher SVR rates.
68    The primary endpoint was analyzed without dropouts and was reached in 43% (7 of 16) of the control
69  are subject to stochastic effects, such as "dropout" and "dropin" of alleles, and highly variable st
70 domly assigned to primary closure (n = 54; 1 dropouts) and biological mesh closure (n = 50; 2 dropout
71  dropout), -6.8 +/- 6.4 kg with the LCD (23% dropout), and -5.1 +/- 5.9 kg with the restricted normal
72  computed according to the predicted risk of dropout, and drop-out equivalent MELD (deMELD) points we
73 ariable risks of tumor progression, waitlist dropout, and posttransplant recurrence.
74 orbidity, including suicide attempts, school dropout, and substance abuse, but many depressed adolesc
75 methods to account for missing data, patient dropout, and use of rescue medication.
76 nd one missed mutation resulting from allele dropout, and we characterized the pattern of deep intron
77  events or intercurrent illness: 27 (34%) of dropouts, and insufficient response: 26 (33%) of dropout
78 aluation of the dropout rate and reasons for dropout are important not only in the planning of clinic
79               The RPE in regions of vascular dropout are presumably hypoxic, which may result in an i
80 -term trends in density while accounting for dropout as well as for measurement error.
81                                 Treating all dropouts as relapse to baseline, topiramate was more eff
82 een groups with no significant difference in dropouts attributable to adverse events.
83 e in the placebo group); the main reason for dropout before completion was because of adverse events.
84  median follow-up was 31 months (IQR 14-62); dropout before starting antiretroviral therapy or AIDS o
85        Our aim was to identify predictors of dropout before transplantation and predictors of cancer
86 for measured confounders and determinants of dropout by inverse probability weighting, the full cohor
87                                  Participant dropouts can reduce the power of allergen immunotherapy
88 ted a self-reported survey on factors behind dropout cases and poor adherence cases.
89    Our method considers estimates of allelic dropout caused by both sample-specific factors and locus
90 lthy participants, likely due to fMRI signal dropout caused by the air/bone interface of the petrous
91 )nalysis (ZIFA), which explicitly models the dropout characteristics, and show that it improves model
92 e 1- and 2-year cumulative probabilities for dropout (competing risk) were 24.1% and 34.2% in the dow
93 ography, spirometry, 6-minute-walk distance, dropouts, compliance, and side effects were evaluated.
94 trodecrement and paraspinal electromyography dropout consistent with atonic seizures.
95                              Focal capillary dropout could be visualized in the SVC, but not the ICP
96 t least 3 dots/charwidth were presented, and dropout did not exceed 50%.
97 ied as muscle wasting diseases with myofiber dropout due to cellular necrosis, inflammation, alterati
98            In patients with a higher risk of dropout due to GT 1/4 or mental distress, PE was shown t
99 ignificant reduction in the risk of waitlist dropout due to progression (relative risk [RR], 0.32; 95
100  measures of pain at rest, walking pain, and dropouts due to adverse effects.
101 n the yoga group; serious adverse events and dropouts due to adverse events were comparable between g
102 nonserious, or serious adverse events and of dropouts due to adverse events were found when comparing
103   Adverse events (most mild or moderate) and dropouts due to adverse events were more common with nal
104 d by multiple averse factors, notably signal dropouts due to magnetic inhomogeneity and low signal-to
105 e associated with an increased likelihood of dropouts due to side effects (meta-regression: beta=0.00
106 of the study was to quantify weight loss and dropout during a commercial weight-loss program in Swede
107 ifferences in inclusion criteria and patient dropout during the study.
108 tment failure, recurrence, or death or study dropout during treatment) measured 24 months after the e
109 he important roles of Ang-2-induced pericyte dropout during tumor vessel regression.
110 nder what conditions of treatment uptake and dropout elimination of HIV is feasible.
111 d, including the computational management of dropout events, the reconstruction of biological pathway
112 duction methods because of the prevalence of dropout events, which lead to zero-inflated data.
113 ial confounders, missing covariate data, and dropout, ever-use of two pesticide classes, fumigants an
114 quencing, as they do not account for allelic dropout, false-positive errors and coverage nonuniformit
115 ms, categorical response to treatment, study dropout for any reason and for inefficacy of treatment,
116 ophrenia, categorical response to treatment, dropouts for any reason and for inefficacy of treatment,
117  area less than 17% of the target image, 70% dropout, four or fewer gray levels, and a gap of 40.5 ar
118 LD scores, will have an increase in waitlist dropout from 30% to 44%.
119  [CI], 0.06-1.85; I(2) = 0%) and of waitlist dropout from all causes (RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.060-2.370;
120                   In one series, the rate of dropout from all causes at 6 months in T1 HCC patients w
121                                    Selective dropout from graft failure did not affect the cell loss
122 Carlo) accounted for missing data, selective dropout from graft failure, correlations between fellow
123  to side effects could be a factor affecting dropout from SLIT.
124 sidered the factors of poor adherence to and dropout from sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) by verifyin
125  liver disease may lead to increased risk of dropout from the liver transplant waitlist.
126 tes of failure to adhere to the protocol and dropout from the study, the greater the risk of bias.
127                                              Dropout from the transplant list was equal in both group
128 5 to 34 years were less likely to experience dropout from the waiting list compared with those aged 1
129 etwork Organ Sharing priority; nevertheless, dropout from the waiting list is common.
130 s for cadaveric livers, however, may lead to dropout from the waiting list or worsened post-OLT progn
131                                              Dropout from treatment was higher in trauma-focused grou
132 ne drug screens and self-report) and time to dropout from treatment.
133 olates showed results compatible with a mecA dropout genotype.
134  foveal avascular zone, perifoveal capillary dropout grade, and presence of morphologic features of d
135                                      Time to dropout had a significant main effect of dose, with mean
136 t, intention-to-treat analysis, and adequate dropout handling.
137                    Post-mortem ganglion cell dropout has been observed in multiple sclerosis; however
138  loss of MMP-12 attenuated retinal capillary dropout in early OIR and mitigated pathological retinal
139 LRT mitigates tumor progression and waitlist dropout in HCC patients within MC, but data on its impac
140  cell death contributed to the cardiomyocyte dropout in Jup mutant hearts.
141                           Factors predicting dropout in the downstaging group included pretreatment a
142                  To overcome the fMRI signal dropout in the neighborhood of the NFA, we combined high
143 tion methods to account for the high rate of dropouts in all 3 groups yielded similar results.
144                                There were no dropouts in this group and all 3 patients were assessed
145 disease progression, serious adverse events, dropouts) in pivotal trials.
146                                Predictors of dropout include multiple tumors and tumors with a diamet
147    One general approach for avoiding allelic dropout involves repeated genotyping of homozygous loci
148                                      Allelic dropout is a commonly observed source of missing data in
149                                      Risk of dropout is related to patient and tumor characteristics
150 , 0.16-0.32) to moderate agreement for gland dropout (kappa(w) = 0.50, 0.40-0.59) and telangiectasias
151 4 individuals, missing data and differential dropout, limited ethnic and racial diversity, and differ
152 ng 252 subjects, at 4 months, there were 30% dropouts, mainly due to side-effects.
153 ies aimed at preventing or delaying pericyte dropout may avoid or attenuate the retinal microangiopat
154 ipants (n = 33) were censored at the time of dropout, mean cumulative response rate for escitalopram
155  and counterselection of ura3 using a uracil dropout medium and 5-fluoroorotic acid.
156 cherichia coli serC mutant to grow in serine-dropout medium, demonstrating that M. tuberculosis serC
157 =2.98) and decreased likelihood of all-cause dropout (meta-regression: beta=-0.00093, 95% CI=-0.00165
158 erms of a stringent p-value) obtained by the dropout method by comparing them to null models construc
159 igning sequences after modifying them by the dropout method, i.e., by disregarding poly(N) runs durin
160 ltiple imputations of alleles in cases where dropout might have occurred.
161 nclear reporting for allocation concealment, dropouts, missing data on outcomes, and heterogeneity in
162                          Neuronal damage and dropout must therefore be due to indirect effects of HIV
163                        The rate of mecA/mecC dropout mutants was also evaluated.
164 nformation and takes into account of allelic dropouts, null alleles and prior knowledge of inbreeding
165                   Abnormalities and vascular dropout observed within the choriocapillaris for pvOCT a
166                                              Dropouts occurred due to palpitations (one patient on el
167 plet MDA product to achieve a median allelic dropout of 15%, and using whole genome sequencing to ach
168 icant main effect of dose, with mean time to dropout of 27, 36, and 48 days for the placebo, 192 mg o
169 cant decrease in density of RGCs, as well as dropout of axons within the optic nerve at 8 weeks after
170                                  The risk of dropout of HCC patients was independently predicted by M
171        Results indicate that aging mice show dropout of meibomian glands with loss of gland volume an
172  magnetic resonance imaging leads to greater dropout of patients over time because of device implanta
173                          Despite substantial dropout of patients, the healing pattern in event-free S
174 ding diabetes causes renal injury with early dropout of podocytes, albuminuria, glomerular and tubulo
175 ieve comparable OS and DFS, despite the high dropout of the 2-stage strategy.
176 relativistic energies and produce a profound dropout of the ultra-relativistic radiation belt fluxes.
177 ricular (AV) node and then develop selective dropout of these conduction cells.
178 nd depression symptoms, potential for school dropout) of DSPD, as several biological features underpi
179  is evolving to reduce tumor progression and dropout on the list as well as to influence posttranspla
180                         An increased risk of dropout on the waiting list can be expected, but with eq
181                            Overall, only two dropouts (one rebound activity and one gastrointestinal
182        Methods used to account for selective dropout only marginally changed these observed associati
183  who enrolled had surgery, and there were no dropouts or patients lost to follow-up.
184 ths; treatment failure; hospitalization; and dropout owing to any cause, non-adherence and intolerabi
185      SGAs showed trend-level superiority for dropout owing to intolerability (P=0.05).
186 should be regarded as a major risk factor of dropout owing to tumor progression and should be taken i
187 as the only other independent risk factor of dropout owing to tumor progression.
188                          Group A exhibited 1 dropout patient and 1 failure, resulting in a survival r
189                                    Including dropout patients from LT list in the analysis, the outco
190  good and poor adherence groups, except four dropout patients, the adherence tended to be poor in pat
191 ppear to be a major problem with a composite dropout percentage of 14% (95% CI:11.9-16).
192 rs (dot size, grid size, dot spacing, random dropout percentage, and gray-scale resolution).
193 r eventually leading to glomerular capillary dropout (rarefaction) and further increases in intraglom
194                                          The dropout rate (15/313) was low.
195         These findings are limited by a high dropout rate (34%) and by suboptimal dietary adherence o
196  baseline or during the study, or annualised dropout rate (7.7% [95% CI 6.2-9.5] for vaccine recipien
197 al group, those in the TES group had a lower dropout rate (hazard ratio=0.72, 95% CI=0.57, 0.92) and
198 w initial weight loss predicted an increased dropout rate (P < 0.001).
199 arried out in order to establish the overall dropout rate among published double-blind, placebo-contr
200                                Tumor-related dropout rate and post-OLT outcome compared favorably wit
201                            Evaluation of the dropout rate and reasons for dropout are important not o
202 T1 HCC patients who did not receive LRT, the dropout rate at median follow-up of 2.4 years and the pr
203 on as it was likely impacted by an increased dropout rate before treatment, which led to crossover th
204                                          The dropout rate due to AEs was 8.3%.
205 his study (8.0 vs. 9.1, P<0.02), and a lower dropout rate due to intolerance (12.5 percent vs. 20.6 p
206 -month regimen, was associated with a higher dropout rate during treatment (5.0% vs. 2.7%) and more t
207 ad for HSC and researchers, and increase the dropout rate for proposed studies when investigators are
208 median adherence was 97.6% after 1 year; the dropout rate for treatment-related AEs was 0.9%.
209        Only 2 (14%) of 14 studies reported a dropout rate greater than 0%.
210                                  The overall dropout rate in the 22 selected trials was 12.4%.
211 al-therapy group, P=0.009) owing to a higher dropout rate in the medical-therapy group.
212 he medical-therapy group), owing to a higher dropout rate in the medical-therapy group.
213  1.1, 6.3) were associated with an increased dropout rate in the VLCD group.
214 n anemia but is poorly tolerated (an adverse dropout rate of > 50% in 3 months).
215 culated as 35 patients for each group with a dropout rate of 10%.
216 ion group had a significantly higher overall dropout rate than the monotherapy groups but did not hav
217 dividuals completed the 24-wk study, and the dropout rate was 27%.
218  cases, 21 (17%) were withdrawn; the overall dropout rate was 46% (56/122) in the remaining patients.
219                                          The dropout rate was high (11 of 25) in the pirfenidone 2400
220                                          The dropout rate was higher in the lithium/sertraline combin
221          On an intention-to-treat basis, the dropout rate was higher in the M+ group and the 5-year a
222                           The STAIR/Exposure dropout rate was lower than the rate for the exposure co
223                                          The dropout rate was more pronounced in the Everolimus group
224                                          The dropout rate was similar to regular cognitive behavior t
225            Response rates and acceptability (dropout rate).
226      The grid size, dot size, gap width, dot dropout rate, and gray-scale resolution were varied sepa
227 chemical response (as measures of efficacy), dropout rate, and lamivudine resistance (as measures of
228     However, the trial was limited by a high dropout rate, and longer-term neurological and metabolic
229 rcise training was well tolerated with a low dropout rate, and no major adverse events were related t
230                              Due to the high dropout rate, only 31 individuals were evaluated.
231            Small sample size and appreciable dropout rate.
232 ytopenia, and predicted a higher therapeutic dropout rate.
233 d while enrollment was ongoing due to a high dropout rate.
234 a primary care setting is hampered by a high dropout rate.
235 ample weighting methods accounted for higher dropout rates among ethnic minorities and those with low
236            Differing characteristics predict dropout rates and acceptance, which need to be carefully
237 zation algorithm to jointly estimate allelic dropout rates and allele frequencies when only one set o
238 approach to reliably model the cell-specific dropout rates and amplification bias by use of external
239                      Secondary outcomes were dropout rates and measures of personality disorder trait
240                                              Dropout rates and occurrence of adverse events did not d
241  In contrast, psychotherapy trials had lower dropout rates and provided follow-up data.
242  mania or hypomania, and tolerability (using dropout rates as a proxy).
243 ning new PhDs is complex and has significant dropout rates associated with loss of financial and time
244                                              Dropout rates did not differ between groups, and treatme
245 BT-I group, the standard DBT group had lower dropout rates from treatment (8 patients [24%] vs 16 pat
246 ctive direct analysis of both recurrence and dropout rates in comparable patient cohorts with HCC und
247                                     Relative dropout rates in placebo and active groups as well as re
248                                              Dropout rates in sublingual immunotherapy controlled stu
249              No between-group differences in dropout rates or patients' ratings of satisfaction with
250  Acceptance of treatment and relatively high dropout rates pose a major problem for research in the t
251                               High treatment dropout rates suggest the importance of improving retent
252                                          The dropout rates were 49.4% in the MMT+P and 26.3% in the M
253 s reports of stomach upset and headache, yet dropout rates were comparable between groups.
254                                              Dropout rates were highest in the first 12 to 18 months
255 ample-specific dropout rates, locus-specific dropout rates, and the inbreeding coefficient; and (3) s
256                                         High dropout rates, dosing inequalities, small sample sizes,
257  model parameters, including sample-specific dropout rates, locus-specific dropout rates, and the inb
258 likelihood of more rapid efficacy may reduce dropout rates.
259 m of treatment), and monitoring differential dropout rates.
260 ll efficacy (primary outcome); responder and dropout rates; positive, negative, and depressive sympto
261  between good adherence, poor adherence, and dropout regarding level of understanding of the treatmen
262 ple data set (for example, because of animal dropout), repeated-measures analysis of covariance may f
263 ch causes poor compliance and high treatment dropout, resulting in the development of drug-resistant
264                           Nearly half of the dropouts returned for their 16- and 30-month radiographs
265                               We carried out dropout screens for shRNAs that affect cell proliferatio
266 rmed whole-genome small hairpin RNA (shRNA) "dropout screens" on 77 breast cancer cell lines.
267        In addition, the metrics of capillary dropout showed small changes (between 3% and 7%), leukoc
268  multiple replicates with different rates of dropout, sporadic dropins, different amounts of DNA from
269 behavioral therapy was associated with fewer dropouts than pill placebo or medications.
270 for measured confounders and determinants of dropout, the weighted hazard ratio for acquired immunode
271  died (1 UC patient and 4 HNC patients after dropout); thus, uncensored hazard ratio was 0.62 (0.40-0
272 ing (outcome), co-interventions, compliance, dropouts, timing, and intention to treat.
273 ies with variable surveillance protocols and dropout to active treatment.
274 y apparent bias due to the effects of allele dropout typical of RAD data.
275 arceration, suicide, school difficulties and dropout, unemployment, and poor interpersonal relationsh
276  orthopaedic care group; the main reason for dropout was death.
277                                         mecA dropout was detected in 9/130 (6.9%) patients.
278 idal neovascularization (CNV) in wet AMD, CC dropout was evident in the absence of retinal pigment ep
279 s (4 vs. 7 months P=0.04) but hazard rate of dropout was higher (26%, 46%, and 73% at 6,12, and 24 mo
280                                      Risk of dropout was higher for patients beyond Milan, but within
281                                              Dropout was lower in the schema therapy and clarificatio
282                                          VEN dropout was not attributable to general neuronal loss an
283                                     Waitlist dropout was observed in 18.4% at a median of 11.3 months
284 om exceeding 50% and poor outcomes following dropout, we must explore innovative strategies for enhan
285                               To account for dropouts, we applied a pattern-mixture model.
286                The most frequent reasons for dropout were adverse events or intercurrent illness: 27
287 ebo and active groups as well as reasons for dropout were also assessed.
288          Demographic predictors of treatment dropout were also examined.
289                                Predictors of dropout were carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) >/= 500
290 angiogenesis/neovascularization and vascular dropout were dominated first by remodeling of arteries a
291                      Reasons for participant dropout were loss to follow-up and withdrawal of consent
292                                              Dropouts were analysed in regards to allergen, formulati
293                                              Dropouts were similar between groups, and compliance and
294 dinal studies are complicated by participant dropout, which could be related to the presence of psych
295                                The hazard of dropout will increase from 41% to 46% nationally.
296 orderzone sign-that is, bilateral ASL signal dropout with surrounding cortical areas of hyperintensit
297 ical trials involving 10 to 120 patients (no dropouts) with early to moderately advanced prion diseas
298 phy demonstrated variable areas of capillary dropout within the superficial and deep retinal capillar
299                                Submacular CC dropout without retinal pigment eipthelial (RPE) loss wa
300 gion lies within or close to the fMRI signal-dropout zone produced by the nearby auditory canal and v

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top