ライフサイエンスコーパス: drought

1 y facilitating compensatory growth following drought.

2 riety of environmental conditions, including drought.

3 d were retained across periods of heightened drought.

4 ther the decline and mortality are driven by drought.

5 urvival capabilities of plant species during drought.

6 ) has been nearly reached during the current drought.

7 at causes ecosystems to shift in response to drought.

8 of future TWS impacts including flooding and drought.

9 y a particular role in shoots in response to drought.

10 an help cope with the detrimental effects of drought.

11 ising dramatically during the fourth year of drought.

12 change and CO2-induced warming) to the 2016 drought.

13 ecame prevalent as a response to the extreme drought.

14 ers were also measured before and during the drought.

15 ion to male organs (stamens) decreased under drought.

16 anism for plants and ecosystems to cope with drought.

17 ient in Panama that have experienced El Nino droughts.

18 treatments further modified the severity of droughts.

19 aits under increased temperature and intense droughts.

20 under mild to moderate soil and atmospheric droughts.

21 severe and extensive than the 2005 and 2010 droughts.

22 interactions, although it was constrained by drought (-18%).

23 Recent events include two droughts (2005 and 2010) exceeding the 100-year return v

24 Drought, a recurring phenomenon with major impacts on bo

25 recovery of microtubule organization during drought acclimation.

26 but an increasing frequency and intensity of drought across northern ecosystems is threatening to dis

27 e a better understanding of the mechanism of drought adaptation in barley.

28 gin, indicating its potential involvement in drought adaptation.

29 ize how C cycling is shaped by tree size and drought adaptations and how these patterns relate to spa

30 increased whole-plant wilting in response to drought and ABA.

31 tter able to withstand harsh conditions like drought and alkaline pH.

32 e analyse and model the impact of coincident drought and antecedent wet conditions (proxy for the cli

33 terest of breeders for its high tolerance to drought and as potential genetic source in breeding prog

34 ption factor RD26 mediates crosstalk between drought and BR signalling.

35 r, many turfgrass species are susceptible to drought and demand frequent irrigation thus consuming la

36 accumulation trends of miRNAs, observed upon drought and in different genotypes and organs, were conf

37 a and attempted to investigate the effect of drought and insect outbreaks on growth decline, and simu

38 Furthermore, the influence of drought and insect outbreaks showed spatiotemporal varia

39 , most studies only provide singular view of drought and lack the integration with specific crop phen

40 of ecosystem C to 8-12 years of experimental drought and night-time warming across an aridity gradien

41 indicate the conserved role of this gene in drought and other abiotic stress tolerance in several pl

42 Insects, diseases, fire and drought and other disturbances associated with global cl

43 h this crop displays high productivity under drought and poor soil conditions, it is susceptible to d

44 content than the control wheat plants under drought and salt stresses.

45 e vulnerability of electric power systems to drought and the potential for both climate change and a

46 ntial and foliar abscisic acid (ABA), during drought and through the subsequent rehydration period fo

47 rstanding of the biological responses during droughts and contributes to elucidate the molecular mech

48 results show that frequency and severity of droughts and floods can have characteristic effects on t

49 Droughts and other extreme precipitation events are pred

50 Brachypodium dystachion to single salinity, drought, and heat stresses, as well as their double and

51 ccumulated upon high temperatures, UV-light, drought, and nutrient deficiencies, and may contribute t

52 y from reduction in vegetation uptake due to drought, and to a lesser degree from increased biomass b

53 ocesses modulate the severity of heat waves, droughts, and other extreme events.

54 e ecohydrological consequences from the 2016 drought are more severe and extensive than the 2005 and

55 e methods to mitigate the adverse effects of drought are not available.

56 evidence, the interactions between fires and droughts are a more direct mechanism that may describe s

57 across many regions more frequent and severe droughts are expected in the twenty-first century.

58 Droughts are expected to become more frequent and more i

59 everal hot spot regions experiencing highest droughts are identified.

60 If droughts become more frequent, as expected, the time bet

61 gion vulnerable economically and socially to drought, but glaciers are a uniquely drought-resilient s

62 increased xylem sap sulfate is achieved upon drought by reduced xylem unloading by PtaSULTR3;3a and P

63 xide uptake occur, are closed in response to drought by the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA).

64 Drought can cause major damage to plant communities, but

65 ter table; in between, high productivity and drought can send roots many meters down to the groundwat

66 Drought can severely damage crops, resulting in major yi

67 Drought can shift the balance between the biotic and abi

68 Severe drought caused major declines in leaf water potential, e

69 In 2011, a record drought caused widespread tree mortality in Texas.

70 upport previous findings from peatlands that drought causes reduced magnitude of growing season FCH4

71 hubs transcription factors regulated during drought conditions in sunflower, useful for applications

72 Reduced NO production under drought conditions in UHb plants was associated with inc

73 Measurements on whole plants in drought conditions were combined with assays on detached

74 coli were also comparable during wet versus drought conditions, and the relative abundance of strain

75 brary of their transcripts under control and drought conditions.

76 deficit as an index of damage under natural drought conditions.

77 increased levels of Na(+) under salinity and drought conditions.

78 Results suggest that extreme drought could cause profit shortfalls of more than $100

79 ion in response to soil flooding (CsPYL5) or drought (CsPYL8).

80 otic constraints such as soil water deficit (drought [D]) and high temperature (heat [H]).

81 ty rates and biomass declines in response to drought depend on stomatal and xylem flow regulation.

82 Drought disproportionately affects larger trees in tropi

83 High temperatures and drought during the growing season promoted carotenoid bi

84 n crop yield anomalies and all four kinds of drought during the wheat growing season was established.

85 Drought effects on miRNA abundance differed between the

86 We used an El Nino drought event as a natural experiment to test whether po

87 Drought events are increasing globally, and reports of c

88 Drought events continue to increase in frequency and sev

89 longer, and more frequent global change-type drought events may profoundly impact terrestrial ecosyst

90 The role that the Green Revolution played in drought evolution was also studied.

91 upon results from two large-scale ecosystem drought experiments in the eastern Brazilian Amazon that

92 sensitivity of butterflies to four extremes (drought, extreme precipitation, extreme heat and extreme

93 r understanding of their growth responses to drought extremes is still limited.

94 uptake of shallow sources following extended droughts for pinon.

95 l-scale modeling to highlight that increased drought frequency and severity pose a formidable challen

96 same mean soil moisture, but with different drought frequency caused by wet-dry cycles of varying pe

97 Here, we assessed the effect of drought frequency on the ecophysiology and SNF rate of a

98 Climate change is increasing drought frequency, which may affect symbiotic N2 fixatio

99 fferently to wet and dry phases depending on drought frequency.

100 Understanding drought from multiple perspectives is critical due to it

101 study demonstrates a novel approach to study drought from multiple views and integrate it with crop g

102 hydrological, soil moisture, and vegetation droughts from 1981 to 2013 were reconstructed for the fi

103 Experimentally exacerbated droughts further reduced the capacity for the fen to act

104 We found that previous drought had a legacy effect on bacterial and fungal comm

105 lts indicated that prolonged and large-scale droughts had a strong negative impact on trembling aspen

106 35S::ERF74 showed enhanced tolerance to drought, high light, heat and aluminum stresses, whereas

107 When nutrient uptake occurs during drought, high nutrient availability can increase water u

108 and adaptation to abiotic stresses, such as drought, high salinity and low temperature.

109 ng that the environmental filters exerted by drought impact adult tree survival most strongly.

110 of Earth's climate system) and second, that drought impacts (assessed using the area of ecosystems a

111 After an intense drought in 2005, the assemblage assumed a different and

112 led about the genetic basis of adaptation to drought in conifers.

113 O protease, OsOTS1 in mediating tolerance to drought in rice.

114 the NAO have been associated with a shift to drought in the areas of origin for the Cimbri, Quadi, Vi

115 Prolonged periods of extreme heat or drought in the first year after fire affect the resilien

116 Periodic weakening of the NAO caused drought in the regions of origin for tribes in antiquity

117 nt relationship between fire and same-summer droughts in most regions, while antecedent climate condi

118 ion, which in turn contributed to persistent droughts in North America and the Mediterranean.

119 nd Atlantic were the main drivers of extreme droughts in South America, but are unable to explain the

120 terrestrial carbon (C) exchange, and recent droughts in the Amazon Basin have contributed to short-t

121 rn value in the Amazon and recurrent extreme droughts in the Nordeste region, with profound eco-hydro

122 Triggering sources for multi-year droughts in this region include randomly occurring atmos

123 The changes of aNPP and Rs in response to drought indicated that wet systems had an overall risk o

124 red by the two most prominent meteorological drought indices: the Standardized Precipitation Index (S

125 ndent of abiotic stress, and another that is drought induced.

126 During drought-induced dehydration, the leaf hydraulic conducta

127 l and temporal domains can better reveal the drought-induced green-up phenomenon, which appears less

128 ating experimental and observational data of drought-induced mortality across the Neotropics to the l

129 investigate whether the relationship between drought-induced mortality and distributions holds contin

130 in X. viscosa was found to be uncoupled from drought-induced senescence.

131 Rising temperatures are amplifying drought-induced stress and mortality in forests globally

132 Drought induces a suite of physiological responses; howe

133 limate change, yet little is known about how drought influences plant-soil feedbacks with respect to

134 as enhanced resistance to and recovery from drought, instead arise from dynamic interactions in our

135 models predict widespread increases in both drought intensity and duration in the next decades.

136 ignificantly higher water potentials for the drought-intolerant PFT compared to the drought-tolerant

137 Drought-tolerant and drought-intolerant seedlings grew similarly when provide

138 ught-tolerant seedlings grew 25% larger than drought-intolerant seedlings under dry conditions when e

139 Drought is a key limiting factor for cotton (Gossypium s

140 in the transcriptomic response of species to drought is a significantly better indicator of natural c

141 Recent studies suggest drought is causing a decline in boreal spruce growth, le

142 spects of plant function that are related to drought is critical.

143 size that this high range edge resistance to drought is driven primarily by local environmental facto

144 portance of VPDant suggests that atmospheric drought is important for predicting GPP under current an

145 However, severe drought is only one component of global change, and ecol

146 Drought is the main abiotic stress constraining sugarcan

147 California during a 4-year statewide extreme drought lasting from 2012 to 2015.

148 the first to reveal a regional divergence in drought likelihood as measured by the two most prominent

149 of global change, and ecological effects of drought may be compounded by other drivers, such as anth

150 more frequent, as expected, the time between droughts may become shorter than drought recovery time,

151 Our results suggest that future droughts may lead to phases of rapid C accumulation in s

152 Conversely, in ombrotrophic peat domes, droughts may lead to reduced C accumulation or even net

153 lts illustrate the importance of appropriate drought measures and, as a global study that focuses on

154 , thus providing valuable guidance for local drought mitigation.

155 er field conditions to inform the design of 'Drought-Net', a relatively low-cost CDE that simulates e

156 ated the response of plant and soil fungi to drought of different intensities using a water table gra

157 heat stress take over the dominant stress of drought on maize under RCP8.5.

158 dependent on a legacy effect of the previous drought on plant-soil interactions.

159 While the effect of drought on the overall composition of prokaryotic and eu

160 ly so for angiosperms and in case of intense drought or bark-beetle outbreaks.

161 limited by physical protection, but also by drought or wetting-induced shifts in hydrologic connecti

162 Past severe droughts over North America have led to massive water sh

163 roved understanding and forecasting of Sahel drought, paramount for successful adaptation strategies

164 A third drought phase centred on ca. 1.8-1.1 ka BP led to marked

165 protected salt marshes experiencing a severe drought, plant-eating grazers eliminated drought-stresse

166 ering plants from water stress during severe droughts, plant water storage (PWS) alters many features

167 Conversely, under high-frequency droughts, plants fixed C and N at low rates during dry p

168 er fir trees from lower elevations were more drought prone than trees at higher elevations.

169 wever, areas of high risk were also found in drought-prone regions for beech and in the southern Alps

170 ovement has progressed slowly, especially in drought-prone regions where annual crop production suffe

171 ime between droughts may become shorter than drought recovery time, leading to permanently damaged ec

172 insights into the spatiotemporal patterns of drought recovery time: first, that recovery is longest i

173 Although twentieth-century trends in drought regimes are ambiguous, across many regions more

174 ased on the expression levels of ANNEXIN1, a drought-related marker.

175 bolism, we investigated whether the observed drought-related NO changes could involve polyamine pathw

176 at affect ABA levels and may act in upstream drought-related sensing and signaling mechanisms.

177 rotubule-related factors limit growth during drought remains unclear.

178 r and Norway spruce, however, revealed lower drought resilience at higher altitudes.

179 itions selected to enhance or suppress plant drought resilience is discussed.

180 ally to drought, but glaciers are a uniquely drought-resilient source of water.

181 With the ultimate goal of improving drought resistance in turfgrass, we identified several A

182 The greatest increase in drought resistance is achieved when AMFs are applied to

183 y of agb1-2 plants, and explain the enhanced drought resistance of esk1 plants.

184 Developing drought-resistance varieties is a major goal for bioener

185 To investigate the role of NO in drought response we employed transgenic barley plants (U

186 between NO and polyamine biosynthesis during drought response.

187 s taken in the study of genetic variation in drought responses, the advantages and shortcomings of ea

188 ssion of RD26 and its homologues and inhibit drought responses.

189 sm in which rice plants govern ABA-dependant drought responsive gene expression by controlling the st

190 ine coracana) by cDNA subtraction identified drought responsive genes that have a potential role in d

191 1 SUMO protease directly targets the ABA and drought responsive transcription factor OsbZIP23 for de-

192 Furthermore, we observed that in drought-responsive genes, levels of H2A.Z in the gene bo

193 Herein, we report an essential drought-responsive network in which plants trigger a dyn

194 reclaimed wastewater for agriculture because drought, rising temperatures, and expanding human popula

195 Climate models project rising drought risks over the southwestern and central U.S. in

196 rought while OsOTS1 overexpressing lines are drought sensitive but ABA insensitive.

197 ongoing increases in global temperature and drought severity.

198 The XET promoter sequence harbors the drought signaling responsive cis-elements.

199 016, California experienced one of the worst droughts since the start of observational records.

200 via NO as interactions between pH, SOM, and drought stimulate chemodenitrification.

201 Under drought, stomatal conductance decreased at similar level

202 Identifying vulnerable ecological systems to drought stress and climate thresholds associated with ca

203 va shoot apices and young leaves under cold, drought stress and control conditions.

204 yield compared to the control genotype under drought stress conditions.

205 impaired stomatal closure in response to the drought stress hormone ABA and increased whole-plant wil

206 ed tolerance to osmotic stress, salinity and drought stress in addition to conferring insensitivity t

207 el is highly induced by salt and PEG-induced drought stress in both shoots and roots in both Nipponba

208 the OsNHX1 response to salt and PEG-induced drought stress in either shoots or roots was quite simil

209 criptional and metabolic pathways related to drought stress in sunflower plants, by using a system bi

210 Drought stress is a major threat to crop production, but

211 tress within a generation and under repeated drought stress over five successive generations.

212 FACTOR 3 (GBF3) were identified as candidate drought stress response genes and the role of GBF3 in dr

213 t are important to mediate ABA signaling and drought stress response.

214 of the molecular mechanisms involved in the drought stress responses of sugarcane impairs the develo

215 hese TFs may be associated with the salt and drought stress tolerance observed for this genotype.

216 Such a shift was possible due to reduced drought stress under glacial conditions at La Brea.

217 Gradual changes in response to drought stress were monitored.

218 ted the malleability of the DNA methylome to drought stress within a generation and under repeated dr

219 d water transport are critical indicators of drought stress, they can be unrelated to visible metrics

220 tified 318 lncRNAs responsive to cold and/or drought stress, which were typically co-expressed concor

221 s was conducted on Brachypodium leaves under drought stress.

222 he desert ecosystem characterized by extreme drought stress.

223 better performance of wheat varieties under drought stress.

224 gulated MAP kinase activation in response to drought stress.

225 lome, which appears relatively impervious to drought stress.

226 as disproportionately elevated under El Nino drought stress.

227 howing that the CFE declined with increasing drought stress.

228 ypasses miRNA-mediated down-regulation under drought stress.

229 ere drought, plant-eating grazers eliminated drought-stressed vegetation that could otherwise survive

230 parate impacts of high temperature, heat and drought stresses on the current and future US rainfed ma

231 tain, however, whether tree mortality across drought-stricken landscapes will be concentrated in part

232 This could cause enhanced floods or droughts, stronger soil erosion and nutriment loss, ques

233 availability may play a detrimental role in drought survival due to preferential biomass allocation

234 mework for understanding nutrient impacts on drought survival that allows a more complete analysis of

235 nts 'Harry' (drought tolerant) and 'Wesley' (drought susceptible) were used to develop a recombinant

236 nses to abiotic and biotic stresses, such as drought, temperature, salinity, nutrient deprivation, ba

237 ved sulfate seems to be a chemical signal of drought that induces stomatal closure via QUAC1/ALMT12 a

238 verts occurred concurrently with a multiyear drought that resulted in a decrease in the lake elevatio

239 stic description of plant response to lethal drought that would improve predictive understanding of m

240 up-regulate wax accumulation in response to drought, the hormonal regulation of cuticle biosynthesis

241 act the negative effects of greater heat and drought this century.

242 ients of manipulations, ranging from extreme drought to extreme precipitation increases into future c

243 % to +60% of ambient precipitation to form a drought to wet precipitation gradient) was conducted ove

244 Our results indicated that SeCspA conferred drought tolerance and improved physiological traits in w

245 ts demonstrate the role of GBF3 in imparting drought tolerance in A. thaliana and indicate the conser

246 ion of acetic acid successfully enhanced the drought tolerance in Arabidopsis, rapeseed, maize, rice

247 for improvement of water use efficiency and drought tolerance in crops.

248 n of Oryza sativa GRXS17 (OsGRXS17) improved drought tolerance in rice.

249 s therefore an excellent choice for studying drought tolerance in trees.

250 ecosystems are resilient, often using plant drought tolerance models, have been frustrated.

251 re significantly (P < 0.001) associated with drought tolerance related traits in barley.

252 tress response genes and the role of GBF3 in drought tolerance was studied in Arabidopsis thaliana.

253 of ROS eliminating processes in response to drought tolerance were mechanisms exclusive to cv. RB867

254 e three traits are important for determining drought tolerance, and are largely independent of wood d

255 significantly enhanced water use efficiency, drought tolerance, and soil water conservation propertie

256 ay for engineering crop plants with improved drought tolerance.

257 rstanding the molecular mechanism underlying drought tolerance.

258 in UHb plants was associated with increased drought tolerance.

259 y enriched for polymorphisms associated with drought tolerance.

260 al a mechanism coordinating plant growth and drought tolerance.

261 r the ultimate design of crops with enhanced drought tolerance.

262 nt of new technologies to increase sugarcane drought tolerance.

263 sponsive genes that have a potential role in drought tolerance.

264 sture gradients can be used to predict their drought tolerance.

265 jasmonate (JA) signalling pathway to confer drought tolerance.

266 ploid wheat have already shown a significant drought tolerance.

267 identifying genomic regions associated with drought tolerance.

268 ecreased levels of transpiration and display drought tolerance.

269 ory node in polyamine biosynthesis linked to drought tolerance/susceptibility in barley.

270 O2 ] for integrated plant-water dynamics and drought tolerance; and (3) CO2 effects on symbiotic inte

271 Sorghum bicolor is a drought tolerant C4 grass used for the production of gra

272 Winter wheat parents 'Harry' (drought tolerant) and 'Wesley' (drought susceptible) wer

273 Drought-tolerant and drought-intolerant seedlings grew s

274 ere is an urgent need for the improvement of drought-tolerant bread and durum wheat.

275 r the drought-intolerant PFT compared to the drought-tolerant PFT; however, there were no significant

276 arly when provided sterile EMF inoculum, but drought-tolerant seedlings grew 25% larger than drought-

277 lines were found for gymnosperms, shade- and drought-tolerant species, and trees that died from compe

278 tsuga menziesii) have both been described as drought-tolerant species, our understanding of their gro

279 Drought transcriptome analysis of finger millet (Eleusin

280 ollowing a long-term (>10 year) experimental drought treatment in Amazonian forest.

281 sponded differentially at each time point of drought treatment.

282 However, the surviving droughted trees maintained or increased transpiration be

283 rovide the knowledge of the most influential drought type, conjunction, spatial-temporal distribution

284 ssure internally at utilities to incorporate drought vulnerability into long-term strategic planning,

285 rs and policy-makers in identifying the most drought-vulnerable forests across broad geographic areas

286 p Brassica rapa during initial perception of drought, we applied a co-expression network approach to

287 antly elevated proline levels in response to drought were demonstrated for the grapevine.

288 plant and microbial responses to subsequent drought were dependent on a legacy effect of the previou

289 olutionary process among these four types of droughts were also quantified.

290 fferences between provenances in response to drought, where provenances sustaining higher CO2 assimil

291 rained, whereas soil moisture and ecological droughts, which drive vegetation productivity and compos

292 ibit more productive agronomic traits during drought while OsOTS1 overexpressing lines are drought se

293 ents seem readily attributable to an ongoing drought while others do not.

294 llocation decreased by half in pistils under drought, while stamen phosphorus was unaffected by envir

295 But thus far, attempts to predict when drought will cause a major regime shift or when ecosyste

296 Our simulations suggest that drought will continue to be the largest threat to US rai

297 ed, if the frequency and intensity of summer droughts will continue to increase.

298 sing temperatures, it is likely that severer droughts with a higher frequency will occur in western C

299 reasingly prone to climate extremes, such as drought, with long-lasting effects on both plant and soi

300 The study included major flood and drought years, where wetting and drying treatments furth