コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 s is due to chronic effects, ongoing use, or drug withdrawal.
2 ndary motoneurons that is not ameliorated by drug withdrawal.
3 of 1 or more black box warnings per drug, or drug withdrawal.
4 ly) that returned to preinduction size after drug withdrawal.
5 oliferation persisted for several days after drug withdrawal.
6 duced graft survival after immunosuppressive drug withdrawal.
7 g calcium-permeable AMPARs (CP-AMPARs) after drug withdrawal.
8 e performed serially for up to 10 days after drug withdrawal.
9 evelopment as well as residual effects after drug withdrawal.
10 recovery was evident within 3 days following drug withdrawal.
11 nded to either immunomodulating therapies or drug withdrawal.
12 relapse effects of EE can be unleashed after drug withdrawal.
13 ional state may exist between depression and drug withdrawal.
14 ) and elicits negative affective states upon drug withdrawal.
15 levels similar to the healthy controls after drug withdrawal.
16 on symptoms in chronic drug users long after drug withdrawal.
17 ations in reward valuation during protracted drug withdrawal.
18 is unpredictable and almost always leads to drug withdrawal.
19 eizures, an effect that persists weeks after drug withdrawal.
20 nib, 100% of the diseased mice relapsed upon drug withdrawal.
21 l biopsies performed up to 3 years following drug withdrawal.
22 idepressant effect was still seen 2 wk after drug withdrawal.
23 oing colistin treatment, and upon subsequent drug withdrawal.
24 as been implicated in negative affect during drug withdrawal.
25 duced liver injury (DILI) is a main cause of drug withdrawal.
26 lammation and also ameliorate the effects of drug withdrawal.
27 l population, an effect that was reversed on drug withdrawal.
28 gic EPSC frequency persisted 10-20 min after drug withdrawal.
29 owed regrowth of the tumor vasculature after drug withdrawal.
30 seizure susceptibility, a common symptom of drug withdrawal.
31 tological features should be normal prior to drug withdrawal.
32 and neural consequences following 2 weeks of drug withdrawal.
33 Drd1-EGFP-positive neurons after 30 days of drug withdrawal.
34 predictive of the viral RNA set point after drug withdrawal.
35 on the negative affective state after acute drug withdrawal.
36 in Drd1-EGFP-positive neurons 30 days after drug withdrawal.
37 ients and their providers about an important drug withdrawal.
38 the antagonist MK801, and accelerates after drug withdrawal.
39 prognostic value in predicting relapse after drug withdrawal.
40 adaptations remain unopposed and may lead to drug withdrawal.
41 ment in myocardial pathology after inotropic drug withdrawal.
42 e peripheral and is usually reversible after drug withdrawal.
43 imals ultimately rejected their grafts after drug withdrawal.
44 eases in development costs, and high-profile drug withdrawals.
45 , seizure-free interval before antiepileptic drug withdrawal, age at onset of epilepsy, history of fe
46 blood samples obtained before initiation of drug withdrawal and at rejection, alongside blood sample
47 2 T cell recovery correlated with time since drug withdrawal and inversely correlated with patient ag
48 eloped fluid retention, which reversed after drug withdrawal and presented predominantly as periphera
49 the aversive motivational state produced by drug withdrawal and the development of the drug-dependen
50 d by DDC refeeding lasted for 4 months after drug withdrawal and was not manifest when SAMe was added
51 about the mechanism by which MPDZ influences drug withdrawal and/or other CNS hyperexcitability state
52 d into several sections: the first describes drug withdrawals and new general reviews of drug-induced
54 s have just completed or are in the midst of drug withdrawal, and four patients were not withdrawn du
55 pecimens from 27 long-term recipients before drug withdrawal, and from 10 patients with recent transp
56 ls in the viral RNA set point after complete drug withdrawal, and none of the animals was able to ach
57 are an integral part of acute and protracted drug withdrawal, and several lines of evidence have show
58 of +/- cells failed to reach anaphase after drug withdrawal, and those that entered anaphase showed
59 The frequencies of remission, relapse after drug withdrawal, and treatment failure were comparable i
62 e inhibitors (TKIs) underwent apoptosis upon drug withdrawal as a consequence of ERK1/2 hyperactivati
63 rring only with physiological stress such as drug withdrawal) at 2 years and 5 years after surgery on
64 d Drd2-EGFP-positive neurons after 2 days of drug withdrawal but only in Drd1-EGFP-positive neurons a
65 the chromatin structure were reversible upon drug withdrawal, but obligatory for the potentiation of
68 QT syndrome (aLQTS), is a leading cause for drug withdrawal by the United States Food and Drug Admin
71 viously implicated in both schizophrenia and drug withdrawal delirium, exhibited frequent replacement
72 cell cycle, and differentiated normally upon drug withdrawal, demonstrating reversibility of the effe
74 te (DDC) for 10 weeks followed by 1 month of drug withdrawal (drug-primed mice) and then 7 days of dr
75 emission, time to first seizure, and time to drug withdrawal due to inadequate seizure control or sid
76 rapy, time to 12-month remission, or time to drug withdrawal due to unacceptable side-effects or to l
78 trate that nicotine exposure, independent of drug withdrawal effects, increases stress sensitivity, a
80 facilitate prediction of outcomes following drug withdrawal for the individual patient, including bo
81 us joint-action analysis to investigate poly-drug withdrawal from fixed-ratio cocaine/kappa-opioid ag
82 ver injury (DILI) remains a leading cause of drug withdrawal from human clinical trials or the market
84 sible for over 60% of black box warnings and drug withdrawals from the market place in the United Sta
92 withdrawal of rofecoxib, one of the largest drug withdrawals in United States history, and instruct
93 (BNST), each of which has been implicated in drug-withdrawal-induced anxiety and stress-induced respo
95 ssists in identifying those patients in whom drug withdrawal is likely to be unsuccessful and in whom
96 icts that the first step in the induction of drug withdrawal is the activation of reward-related circ
101 al output and suggest one mechanism by which drug withdrawal may influence limbic dopamine-dependent
102 ntipsychotic agents and the possibility that drug withdrawal may negatively affect subsequent drug re
103 , seizure-free interval before antiepileptic drug withdrawal, number of antiepileptic drugs before wi
104 icant bradycardia/hypotension, necessitating drug withdrawal, occurred in 2 of 40 (5%) patients on so
105 ee times normal), all of which reversed with drug withdrawal, occurred in five patients (P=.03 vs pla
108 ommon variation influences either seizure or drug withdrawal outcomes after initiation of antiepilept
109 used negative symptom ratings obtained in a drug withdrawal paradigm to compare symptom profiles in
110 re in hypertension, reduction in alcohol and drug withdrawal phenomena, reduction in nicotine withdra
113 nference, liver for up to 6 months following drug withdrawal required a replication efficiency of at
115 A-type glutamate receptors (CP-AMPARs) after drug withdrawal results in profound remodeling of NAc ne
116 seizures, the diagnosis excluding alcohol or drug withdrawal seizures or such recurring exogenous eve
117 orly understood, and strategies for complete drug withdrawal should be selected carefully to avoid gr
119 t of primary NSCLC, and they persisted after drug withdrawal, suggesting the benefits were durable.
120 Drug administration to avoid unpleasant drug withdrawal symptoms has been hypothesized to be a c
121 for alleviating incisional pain and narcotic drug withdrawal symptoms, which are now in clinical tria
123 tal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a postnatal drug withdrawal syndrome primarily caused by maternal op
124 dence of the neonatal abstinence syndrome, a drug-withdrawal syndrome that most commonly occurs after
125 euromuscular blockers, pain assessments, and drug withdrawal syndromes were gathered during the first
126 rigorously tested in comparative studies of drug withdrawal treatment; their use as additional or al
128 Y/F zidovudine resistance mutation following drug withdrawal were estimated to be 96 to 98% that of t
130 pirin and the kinetics of its recovery after drug withdrawal were similar in patients and control sub
131 expression is dramatically increased during drug withdrawal, which would suggest a direct connection
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。