ライフサイエンスコーパス: dynamic light scattering

1 with the core of NBD1, a model supported by dynamic light scattering.

2 s, cryogenic electron microscopy imaging and dynamic light scattering.

3 AFM, and 2), prevention of aggregation using dynamic light scattering.

4 ture-dependent sigmoidal kinetic curves, and dynamic light scattering.

5 X-ray scattering, X-ray crystallography, and dynamic light scattering.

6 l properties of NPs were characterized using dynamic light scattering.

7 ron and atomic force microscopies as well as dynamic light scattering.

8 systematically studied through time-resolved dynamic light scattering.

9 , NMR, high resolution mass spectrometry and dynamic light scattering.

10 er time in acidic milieu, as investigated by dynamic light scattering.

11 a mean diameter of 150-200 nm as measured by dynamic light scattering.

12 itates, as measured here by turbidimetry and dynamic light scattering.

13 I) and caused expansion of FN as assessed by dynamic light scattering.

14 bigger hydrodynamic radius than dPcCDH using dynamic light scattering.

15 ate, (27)Al and (29)Si solid-state MAS), and dynamic light scattering.

16 as determined by fluorescence microscopy and dynamic light scattering.

17 rotein interactions can be quantitated using dynamic light scattering.

18 nd CTFs using photoinduced cross-linking and dynamic light scattering.

19 rmation, as determined by gel filtration and dynamic light scattering.

20 raditional test-tube swelling experiment and Dynamic Light Scattering.

21 sion electron microscopy, flow cytometry and dynamic light scattering.

22 asured by analytical ultracentrifugation and dynamic light scattering.

23 otein was assessed by circular dichroism and dynamic light scattering.

24 (CaCl2) electrolytes and using time-resolved dynamic light scattering.

25 7 and pH 2 by fluorescence spectroscopy and dynamic light scattering.

26 toward diffusion coefficients determined by dynamic light scattering.

27 between a buffer and a model wine system by dynamic light scattering.

28 low-coherence interferometry and heterodyne dynamic light scattering.

29 ed with transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering.

30 ed techniques such as electron microscopy or dynamic light scattering.

31 ization of macromolecular interactions using dynamic light scattering, a temperature controlled plate

32 ed by intrinsic fluorescence measurement and dynamic light scattering, above the critical micellar co

33 ch can be characterized by both cryo-TEM and dynamic light scattering analyses.

34 Dynamic light scattering analysis revealed a reversible

35 Moreover, dynamic light scattering analysis showed that Ca(2+) boo

36 Dynamic light scattering analysis showed that the sample

37 Using dynamic light scattering analysis, the dissolution of co

38 n inhibited Htt aggregation, as indicated by dynamic light scattering analysis.

39 s were: phase behavior, droplet dimension by dynamic light scattering, analytical curve, and robustne

40 matography with multiangle light scattering, dynamic light scattering, analytical ultracentrifugation

41 al lattice by size exclusion chromatography, dynamic light scattering, analytical ultracentrifugation

42 sing macromolecular hydrodynamic techniques (dynamic light scattering and analytical ultracentrifugat

43 tion of nanosized aggregates was detected by dynamic light scattering and atomic force microscopy.

44 to the population distributions provided by dynamic light scattering and atomic force microscopy.

45 ethod along with two other sizing techniques-dynamic light scattering and cryo-TEM.

46 Nanocube assembly is verified by gel assays, dynamic light scattering and cryogenic electron microsco

47 Dynamic light scattering and crystallographic studies es

48 ure on casein micelle size, as determined by dynamic light scattering and differential centrifugation

49 -like particles (lentiVLPs) by western blot, dynamic light scattering and electron microscopy reveale

50 The aggregates in water were investigated by dynamic light scattering and electron microscopy.

51 face charge (-30 to -41 mV), as confirmed by dynamic light scattering and electrophoretic mobility da

52 Dynamic light scattering and fluorescence studies demons

53 Dynamic light scattering and fluorescent microscale ther

54 gation propensity of these compounds through dynamic light scattering and fractional solubility analy

55 ated by UV-visible spectroscopy, Viscometry, Dynamic light scattering and FT-IR spectroscopy techniqu

56 Finally, dynamic light scattering and gel shift binding experimen

57 This was confirmed by dynamic light scattering and HR-TEM measurements.

58 ere studied using fluorescence spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering and molecular dynamic simulatio

59 ture of the association pathway, assessed by dynamic light scattering and molecular dynamics simulati

60 lved, different NMR techniques combined with dynamic light scattering and molecular modeling contribu

61 Moreover, the study by dynamic light scattering and negative stain electron mic

62 By using a combination of dynamic light scattering and NMR diffusion data we were

63 Transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering and nuclear magnetic resonance

64 ing a novel approach involving time-resolved dynamic light scattering and parallel experiments design

65 ectroscopy, Circular Dichroism spectroscopy, Dynamic Light Scattering and Polyacrylamide Gel Electrop

66 dditionally, particle size distributions via dynamic light scattering and PTIR image analysis were fo

67 lver nanoparticles (AgNPs), a combination of dynamic light scattering and quartz crystal microgravime

68 via, UV-Vis spectroscopy, FTIR spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering and scanning electron microscop

69 Dynamic light scattering and scanning electron microscop

70 and characterized the size distribution via dynamic light scattering and scanning electron microscop

71 photometric determination of protein amount, dynamic light scattering and SDS-PAGE profiling, mass sp

72 Dynamic light scattering and sedimentation velocity expe

73 Using dynamic light scattering and sedimentation velocity in t

74 A combination of dynamic light scattering and sedimentation velocity show

75 DLs (NP-HDLs) were characterized in vitro by dynamic light scattering and size exclusion chromatograp

76 Dynamic light scattering and small-angle X-ray scatterin

77 Dynamic light scattering and solution small angle x-ray

78 Use of dynamic light scattering and thermal denaturation experi

79 An apparatus that combines dynamic light scattering and Thioflavin T fluorescence d

80 sensitized LPD (LPDS) were characterized by dynamic light scattering and transmission electron micro

81 ared at up to 17.5% w/w solids, as judged by dynamic light scattering and transmission electron micro

82 Dynamic light scattering and transmission electron micro

83 the silver nanoparticles were tracked using dynamic light scattering and transmission electron micro

84 6 nm and a spherical shape, as determined by dynamic light scattering and transmission electron micro

85 es of aggregation properties of probes using dynamic light scattering and transmission electron micro

86 Dynamic light scattering and turbidity experiments confi

87 of colloidal dispersions was examined using dynamic light scattering and turbidity measurements.

88 The measured dynamic light scattering and viscosity properties are al

89 ic and anionic model lipid assemblies, while dynamic light scattering and zeta potential measurements

90 on calorimetry (ITC), turbidity measurement, dynamic light scattering and zeta-potential analyses.

91 ation by monitoring hydrodynamic diameter by dynamic light scattering and zeta-potential under condit

92 Peptide self-assembly was studied by dynamic light-scattering and transmission electron micro

93 Batch DLS (dynamic light-scattering) and NTA (nanoparticle tracking

94 timerization (as revealed by gel filtration, dynamic light scattering, and analytical ultracentrifuga

95 lytical ultracentrifugation, gel filtration, dynamic light scattering, and CD.

96 sion chromatography, NMR relaxation studies, dynamic light scattering, and circular dichroism experim

97 sion electron and atomic force microscopies, dynamic light scattering, and computations reveal a diam

98 ial scanning calorimetry, X-ray diffraction, dynamic light scattering, and cryo-TEM.

99 and time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering, and cysteine accessibility stu

100 aphy, mass spectrometry, elemental analysis, dynamic light scattering, and electron microscopy techni

101 t projection NMR analyses with fluorescence, dynamic light scattering, and electron microscopy to elu

102 omplexes were characterized by turbidimetry, dynamic light scattering, and electron microscopy, respe

103 plate) and characterized using Biacore 3000, dynamic light scattering, and electron microscopy.

104 CD, dynamic light scattering, and fluorescence studies indic

105 fied using transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, and gel electrophoresis, respe

106 performed using both infrared spectroscopic, dynamic light scattering, and impedimetric spectroscopy

107 clusion chromatography and analyzed by STEM, dynamic light scattering, and multi-angle light scatteri

108 d by fluorescence resonance energy transfer, dynamic light scattering, and nanoparticle tracking anal

109 force microscopy, cryo-electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, and polyacrylamide gel electro

110 ere we used fluorescence titrations methods, dynamic light scattering, and single-molecule atomic for

111 tic properties of concentrated formulations, dynamic light scattering, and size-exclusion chromatogra

112 pproaches (transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, and spectrophotometry) for exp

113 he size of casein micelles was determined by dynamic light scattering, and the water content and comp

114 Through size exclusion chromatography, dynamic light scattering, and transmission electron micr

115 petitive UV-vis and fluorescence titrations, dynamic light scattering, and transmission electron micr

116 asured using nanoparticle tracking analysis, dynamic light scattering, and ultraviolet-visible spectr

117 ctrophoresis, size-exclusion chromatography, dynamic light scattering, and Western blotting.

118 cterized using scanning electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, and zeta potential analysis.

119 lational diffusion coefficient obtained with dynamic light scattering at 20 degrees C and 27 degrees

120 Dynamic light scattering at a volume fraction beyond the

121 g their agglomeration-results obtained using dynamic light scattering at high particle concentrations

122 ncluding polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, dynamic light scattering, atomic force microscopy, and c

123 NMR spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering, atomic force microscopy, and t

124 Using dynamic light scattering, atomic force microscopy, circu

125 s characterized using infrared spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering, atomic force microscopy, trans

126 However, commonly employed dynamic light scattering based approaches for size distr

127 and limitations, results obtained from batch dynamic light scattering (batch-DLS) and transmission el

128 vitro with size exclusion chromatography or dynamic light scattering, but extracting mechanistic inf

129 Aggregation behavior was investigated using dynamic light scattering by monitoring the evolution of

130 Dynamic light scattering can be used to measure the diff

131 techniques and complementary measurements of dynamic light scattering, CD, and soluble protein deplet

132 -ray diffraction, electron microscopy, FTIR, dynamic light scattering, cell viabilility assay, and an

133 Dynamic light scattering confirmed that the fusion pepti

134 alyzed by a combination of methods including dynamic light scattering, confocal microscopy, cryogenic

135 , NMR relaxation and diffusion measurements, dynamic light scattering, controlled proteolysis, gel el

136 racteristic size (40 to 90 nm; determined by dynamic light scattering), cup-shaped morphology (electr

137 Simulated dynamic light scattering data are analyzed to (i) compar

138 Circular dichroism and dynamic light scattering data for shorter expressed C1-C

139 uorescence recovery after photobleaching and dynamic light scattering data indicate that the liposome

140 Dynamic light scattering data showed that no aggregation

141 stimator of particle size polydispersity for dynamic light scattering data, which quantifies the rela

142 ent similar to that used for the analysis of dynamic light scattering data.

143 anged from 275 to 764 nm, in accordance with dynamic light scattering data.

144 ICPMS to four established sizing techniques: dynamic light scattering, differential centrifugal sedim

145 ed on cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) alpha-Syn lipoprotein par

146 EM), centrifugal liquid sedimentation (CLS), dynamic light scattering (DLS) and by measuring the Z-po

147 o transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) and confirmed the existen

148 f PEG vesicles (~1 nm size) was confirmed by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and confocal laser micros

149 Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Fourier Transform Inf

150 Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and Fourier transform inf

151 onalized NPs to E2 in buffered water, we use dynamic light scattering (DLS) and resistive pulse sensi

152 Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and RNA absorbance were e

153 The nanoparticles were analyzed by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and scanning electron mic

154 -vis absorption, FT-IR, mercury-poison test, dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron

155 nm micelles in aqueous media as confirmed by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron

156 MIP receptors were then characterised using dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron

157 scopy (FTIR), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Ultraviolet-Visible (

158 Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and ultraviolet-visible (

159 nting, photopolymerized and characterized by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and UV/Vis spectroscopy.

160 In addition, dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta potential measur

161 , for a successful coating, was optimised by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta potential measur

162 Gold nanoparticle (GNP)-based dynamic light scattering (DLS) assay has been widely use

163 longated molecular envelope corroborates the dynamic light scattering (DLS) estimated size.

164 namics (DMD) simulations and high-throughput dynamic light scattering (DLS) experiments to study the

165 y X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) experiments, which could

166 , centrifugal liquid sedimentation (CLS) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) have been used to give co

167 e and semidilute concentration regime from a dynamic light scattering (DLS) instrument that uses an a

168 Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements demonstrated

169 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements revealed bim

170 D) simulations, circular dichroism (CD), and dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements were used to

171 n was confirmed by (1)H NMR spectroscopy and dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements, and its pho

172 vel design simultaneously facilitates online dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements.

173 Results were correlated with dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements.

174 scattering (MALS) detector with an embedded dynamic light scattering (DLS) module was introduced to

175 TEM) quantified particle size of 86.0 nm and dynamic light scattering (DLS) quantified hydrodynamic d

176 Experiments involving dynamic light scattering (DLS) show that, in aqueous sol

177 We introduce dynamic light scattering (DLS) spectroscopy as a new met

178 f polystyrene beads with known sizes using a dynamic light scattering (DLS) system with a microplate

179 py (FTIR), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) techniques are used to co

180 d by small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) techniques in the case of

181 Dynamic light scattering (DLS) techniques were also used

182 , transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) techniques.

183 Time resolved dynamic light scattering (DLS) was employed to monitor a

184 onfirmed, after DEAE column purification, by dynamic light scattering (DLS) where the hydrodynamic ra

185 opy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and cyclic voltammetry (

186 sing transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and electrophoretic mobi

187 es, including atomic force microscopy (AFM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and flow field-flow frac

188 d by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and infrared spectroscop

189 by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and nanoparticle trackin

190 Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and transmission electro

191 charge detection mass spectrometry (CD-MS), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and transmission electro

192 ster resonance energy transfer (FRET), SAXS, dynamic light scattering (DLS), and two-focus fluorescen

193 tography (SEC), microflow imaging (MFI), and dynamic light scattering (DLS), and water NMR (wNMR) tow

194 the two via conventional techniques such as dynamic light scattering (DLS), nanoparticle tracking an

195 40.7 fM and 2.45fM as measured by UV-vis and dynamic light scattering (DLS), respectively).

196 gold nanoparticle immunoprobes coupled with dynamic light scattering (DLS), we developed a label-fre

197 ic strength (IS) and type with time-resolved dynamic light scattering (DLS), zeta potential, and real

198 , transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS).

199 fluorescence scanning microscopy (CLSM), and dynamic light scattering (DLS).

200 noparticle distributions using time-resolved dynamic light scattering (DLS).

201 articles range from 8.3 to 43 nm measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS).

202 cterize their mechanical properties, whereas dynamic light scattering (DLS)and transmission electron

203 We show here, using dynamic light scattering, electron microscopy, and fluor

204 Sedimentation equilibrium, dynamic light scattering, electrophoretic mobility shift

205 odification of CNTs by amine groups, whereas dynamic light scattering established the presence of pos

206 Dynamic light scattering experiments and atomic force mi

207 circular dichroism/infrared spectroscopy and dynamic light scattering experiments to highlight the du

208 Circular dichroism spectroscopy and dynamic light scattering experiments verified that indiv

209 ere discernible from confocal microscopy and dynamic light scattering experiments.

210 f nanoscale particles was demonstrated using dynamic light scattering experiments.

211 nucleation-growth kinetic model, as shown by Dynamic Light Scattering experiments.

212 ed monolayers (SAMs) and characterized using dynamic light scattering, extinction spectroscopy, zeta

213 onstrated by analytical ultracentrifugation, dynamic light scattering, fluorescence correlation spect

214 ination of transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, fluorescence correlation spect

215 f-assembled vesicles are characterized using dynamic light scattering, fluorescence microscopy, and N

216 Based on dynamic light scattering, fluorescence, circular dichroi

217 obes greatly enhanced the sensitivity of the dynamic light scattering for protein complex/aggregate d

218 The smallest particle observed by dynamic light scattering has a hydrodynamic diameter of

219 fficient agrees with the value determined by dynamic light scattering in the absence and presence of

220 yses by SEC, blue native PAGE, SDS-PAGE, and dynamic light scattering indicated that the resulting ma

221 ncy generation, atomic force microscopy, and dynamic light scattering, is attributed to increased cha

222 s in bulk solution at a pH of 8.0 studied by dynamic light scattering, it behaves dramatically differ

223 The use of dynamic light scattering makes this approach generally a

224 h an affinity in the low nanomolar range and dynamic light scattering measurements confirmed formatio

225 The crystal structure of EF1143 and dynamic light scattering measurements in solution reveal

226 Dynamic light scattering measurements indicate that PEGy

227 A comparison with dynamic light scattering measurements indicates that eac

228 In addition, we show that dynamic light scattering measurements of diffusivity mad

229 e isolated B808-866 complex was suggested by dynamic light scattering measurements, and a smaller siz

230 in the presence of melittin is observed with dynamic light scattering measurements, and no increase i

231 H NMR spectroscopy, electron microscopy, and dynamic light scattering measurements, we postulated tha

232 two proteins that is in good agreement with dynamic light scattering measurements.

233 ic investigations based on HCl titration and dynamic light scattering measurements.

234 e of coatings, which is further confirmed by dynamic light scattering measurements.

235 ence reports beta-sheet fibril content while dynamic light scattering measures particle size distribu

236 t cells by light microscopy, flow cytometry, dynamic light scattering, measuring zeta potential, and

237 onance spectroscopy, circular dichroism, and dynamic light scattering methods to demonstrate the reco

238 sequent purification and characterization by dynamic light scattering, NMR and toxicity neutralizatio

239 evidenced by size exclusion chromatography, dynamic light scattering, nuclear magnetic resonance ((1

240 of GO were investigated using time-resolved dynamic light scattering over a wide range of aquatic ch

241 ments, transmission electron microscopy, and dynamic light scattering, provide compelling evidence th

242 c matter (NOM) were studied by time-resolved dynamic light scattering, quartz crystal microbalance, a

243 The low volume capability of dynamic light scattering reduced the required sample to

244 Finally, small-angle X-ray scattering and dynamic light scattering revealed similar binding modes

245 cal microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and dynamic light scattering revealed that such strands form

246 dissociation to activate the precatalyst and dynamic light scattering revealed the presence of nanopa

247 The conjugates were characterized with dynamic light scattering, scanning electron microscopy,

248 not reveal changes in LF structure; However, dynamic light scattering showed MR increased mean partic

249 Free solution measurements by dynamic light scattering showed PU.1 to be more dynamic

250 ed with tau, and atomic force microscopy and dynamic light scattering showed that both variants also

251 lusion chromatography and particle sizing by dynamic light scattering showed that the protein was pur

252 Dynamic light scattering shows that these particles have

253 Dynamic light scattering, size exclusion chromatography

254 a combination of Thioflavin T fluorescence, dynamic light scattering, size exclusion chromatography,

255 etermined by analytical ultracentrifugation, dynamic light scattering, size exclusion chromatography,

256 means of thioflavin T binding measurements, dynamic light scattering, size-exclusion chromatography,

257 r dichroism spectroscopy in combination with dynamic light scattering, size-exclusion chromatography,

258 say, antibody binding assay, gel filtration, dynamic light scattering, small angle x-ray scattering,

259 d by infrared and fluorescence spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering, small angle x-ray scattering,

260 ntary isodesmic analysis, 1- and 2D NMR, and dynamic light scattering spectroscopies.

261 Using dynamic light scattering spectroscopy and cell-based FRE

262 Transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering spectroscopy were used to exami

263 Transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering spectroscopy were used to exami

264 netics of folding and self-association using dynamic light scattering, stopped-flow fluorescence and

265 Dynamic light scattering studies reveal that NCp15 forms

266 Atomic force microscopy and dynamic light scattering studies show that the disassemb

267 able temperature tryptophan fluorescence and dynamic light scattering studies showed that WT transfor

268 Crystal packing analyses and dynamic light scattering studies suggest that the enzyme

269 r combined titration, circular dichroism and dynamic light scattering study indicated that the change

270 The very slow kinetics in the dynamic light-scattering study may be related to a refra

271 A monomer followed by circular dichroism and dynamic light scattering suggest that it unfolds noncoop

272 A Raman spectrometer and dynamic light scattering system were combined in a singl

273 he aggregation process has been monitored by dynamic light scattering technique, while both enzyme en

274 A recent study used a novel dynamic light-scattering technique to assay the assembly

275 tenuated total reflection-FTIR spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering techniques, and zeta-potential

276 alance, sand column, spectrofluorometry, and dynamic light scattering techniques.

277 (e.g., UV-vis absorption, FT-IR, (51)V NMR, dynamic light scattering, tetra-n-heptylammonium nitrate

278 tion and in situ by time-resolved static and dynamic light scattering, thereby precisely capturing th

279 engths, and lipid concentrations by means of dynamic light scattering, titration, and NMR spectroscop

280 o-8-naphthalene sulfonate, thioflavin T, and dynamic light scattering to develop a quantitative kinet

281 ared to an orthogonal size measurement using dynamic light scattering to validate the detection platf

282 eriments with CeO(2) NPs using time-resolved-dynamic light scattering (TR-DLS).

283 use small-angle and total X-ray scattering, dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microsco

284 Dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microsco

285 and polymorphisms was investigated via DSC, dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microsco

286 ar organization of dioleoyl-BMP (DOBMP) with dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microsco

287 ted sol-gel transitions) was monitored using dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microsco

288 tability was investigated with time-resolved dynamic light scattering (TRDLS) initial aggregation stu

289 By using isothermal titration calorimetry, dynamic light scattering, UV/vis spectroscopy, and cryog

290 ing small-angle X-ray scattering, static and dynamic light scattering, viscometry, molecular dynamics

291 proached the problem by combining static and dynamic light scattering, viscosity analysis, and high-r

292 Time-resolved dynamic light scattering was employed to investigate the

293 Time-resolved dynamic light scattering was employed to measure the agg

294 Dynamic light scattering was utilized to construct phase

295 logy, confocal microscopy and space-resolved dynamic light scattering, we demonstrate that actin netw

296 By dynamic light scattering, we observed that Q16, Q20, and

297 r flux across large pore membranes and using dynamic light scattering, with excellent agreement betwe

298 protein corona was characterized by means of dynamic light scattering, zeta potential, and liquid chr

299 ray diffraction, N(2) adsorption-desorption, dynamic light scattering, zeta potential, and solid-stat

300 ough different physicochemical measurements (dynamic light scattering, zeta-potential, and differenti