ライフサイエンスコーパス: echo-planar imaging

1 lanar imaging, and three-dimensional [3D] SE echo-planar imaging).

2 Whole-brain DTI was acquired using echo planar imaging.

3 t-segmented (96%) than for single-shot (90%) echo-planar imaging.

4 r application in fast imaging sequences like echo-planar imaging.

5 as significantly larger than for single-shot echo-planar imaging (0.867) (P = .026).

6 e area under the curve for readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (0.981) was significantly larger tha

7 Electric, Milwaukee, WI) with gradient echo, echo planar imaging (3/1 mm; repetition time, 3000 ms; e

8 smell underwent multisection, gradient-echo, echo-planar imaging according to a blood-oxygen-level-de

9 mbining data acquisition with multiecho (ME) echo planar imaging and analysis with spatial independen

10 studies, motion estimates were obtained from echo planar imaging and cloverleaf navigator sequences e

11 red and compared by using inversion-recovery echo-planar imaging and autoradiographic phosphor imagin

12 s by using combined rs-EPI readout-segmented echo-planar imaging and parallel imaging with 0.9 x 0.9

13 n all patients, DW imaging, with single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar im

14 ho-planar imaging ( rs-EPI readout-segmented echo-planar imaging ) and single-shot echo-planar imagin

15 ion-weighted imaging with ss-EPI single-shot echo-planar imaging , and it improved image quality from

16 adient-echo [GRE] imaging, 2D spin-echo [SE] echo-planar imaging, and three-dimensional [3D] SE echo-

17 T1 measurement methods with GRE and echo-planar imaging are acceptable techniques with which

18 The technique uses echo-planar imaging at 3 T to generate functional images

19 as repeatedly measured at inversion-recovery echo-planar imaging before and for 1 hour after the admi

20 lity and lesion conspicuity than single-shot echo-planar imaging by reducing geometric distortions, i

21 in eight dogs by using a 1.5-T MR unit with echo-planar imaging capabilities.

22 resonance imaging techniques: (a) high-speed echo planar imaging combined with a bolus of magnetic su

23 ction-flow products were calculated with the echo-planar imaging data and were correlated with histol

24 could be reported) and collected whole-brain echo-planar imaging data from 12 listeners using sparse

25 n coefficient (ADC) using diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging (DWI) over a poststimulus period of

26 sition methods was used: gradient-echo (GRE) echo-planar imaging (echo time [TE], 30 msec; flip angle

27 ans in combination with a dual-echo gradient echo planar imaging (EPI) paradigm designed to ensure si

28 nt-recalled echo (GRE) and 2D spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) magnetic resonance (MR) elasto

29 Data obtained with modified SE and SE echo-planar imaging (EPI) MR elastographic pulse sequenc

30 Also, interleaved echo-planar imaging (IEPI) and interleaved gradient-reca

31 , and an inversion-recovery (IR) interleaved echo-planar imaging (IEPI) sequence.

32 our of reperfusion before inversion-recovery echo-planar imaging or autoradiography.

33 were rated superior to those of single-shot echo-planar imaging (P < .001).

34 DW imaging based on readout-segmented echo-planar imaging provided significantly higher image

35 Thereby, readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reached a higher diagnostic accuracy

36 arallel imaging and rs-EPI readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reduced artifacts (ie, blurring and

37 Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reduced geometric distortions by a f

38 ization and comparisons of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging ( rs-EPI readout-segmented echo-plan

39 tate functional MRI data using a novel multi-echo planar imaging sequence and independent components

40 uence was selected for high RF power, and an echo planar imaging sequence was selected for its high h

41 participants at 3.0 T by using a single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence (repetition time msec/echo

42 ed with images from a T2*-weighted segmented echo-planar imaging sequence performed during contrast m

43 The rs-EPI readout-segmented echo-planar imaging sequence with a b value of 0 sec/mm(

44 mented echo-planar imaging ) and single-shot echo-planar imaging ( ss-EPI single-shot echo-planar ima

45 During echo-planar imaging, subjects passively listened to a st

46 Next, GRE echo-planar imaging (TE, 30 msec; flip angle, 90 degrees

47 , 90 degrees ; n = 10), small-flip-angle GRE echo-planar imaging (TE, 54 msec; flip angle, 35 degrees

48 High-speed echo-planar imaging techniques evaluated fMRI signal cha

49 Unlike echo-planar imaging, the method maintains image resoluti

50 BF MRI images were acquired with echo-planar imaging using an arterial spin labeling tech

51 Single shot gradient echo planar imaging was performed using a 1.5 tesla Phil

52 Gradient echo-echo planar imaging was used to measure BOLD signal resp

53 r time-independent artifact suppression, and echo-planar imaging was used for rapid data sampling.

54 Gradient-echo (GRE) and echo-planar imaging were investigated for in vivo measur

55 adiabatic inversion pulses and ramp-sampled echo-planar imaging were performed to acquire 19 contigu

56 cuity and image quality of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging were rated superior to those of sing

57 has been accelerated by the introduction of echo-planar imaging, which allows for the very fast acqu

58 d in a single shot using inversion-recovery, echo-planar imaging with a nominal in-plane resolution o

59 ot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging with comparable imaging parameters,

60 enerated with diffusion tensor data by using echo-planar imaging with diffusion gradient encoding in

61 hot echo-planar imaging ( ss-EPI single-shot echo-planar imaging ) with or without parallel imaging w