ライフサイエンスコーパス: echolocation

1 inked to high-frequency sound production and echolocation.

2 ded that O. finneyi may have been capable of echolocation.

3 ions and high frequencies of sounds used for echolocation.

4 e of the few megachiropteran bats capable of echolocation.

5 ue abilities of powered flight and laryngeal echolocation.

6 e superior sensory resolution of vision over echolocation.

7 y an increase in active localization through echolocation.

8 stly unknown how bats recognize places using echolocation.

9 he case of most bats and some other animals, echolocation.

10 emergence of Odontoceti and the evolution of echolocation.

11 ng is a feature characterizing more advanced echolocation.

12 ch opportunities within the context of human echolocation.

13 lications for understanding the evolution of echolocation.

14 deafness, consistent with an involvement in echolocation.

15 maintain long-term vigilant behavior through echolocation.

16 elevant neural sensory-motor coupling during echolocation.

17 ing have taken place during the evolution of echolocation.

18 ov.) that has several features suggestive of echolocation: a dense, thick and downturned rostrum; air

19 h dark and turbid aquatic environments using echolocation; a key adaptation that relies on the same p

20 ear morphology suggests that it lacked their echolocation abilities, supporting a 'flight first' hypo

21 One year after fire, we conducted surveys of echolocation activity at 14 survey locations, stratified

22 Rapid changes in echolocation allowed us to reveal the bats' dynamic reac

23 This stealth echolocation allows the barbastelle to exploit food reso

24 e, which suggest adaptations consistent with echolocation and hibernation, as well as altered metabol

25 d regions of response selectivity that serve echolocation and localization of prey-generated noise.

26 rganized as parallel pathways that may serve echolocation and prey localization behaviors.

27 y before prey capture and thus improve their echolocation and reduce their acoustic conspicuousness.

28 a in mammals that have independently evolved echolocation and show that convergence is not a rare pro

29 standing of other auditory functions such as echolocation and sound localization.

30 omplexly shaped objects, using the senses of echolocation and vision.

31 tant parallels between spatial perception by echolocation and vision.

32 th ears tuned to the high frequencies of bat echolocation and with evasive action through directed tu

33 primarily use other senses (e.g. olfaction, echolocation), and suppression was strongest in open hab

34 out locomoting, using distal sensing through echolocation, and (ii) theta was not continuous, but occ

35 onstructed flight data suggests that vision, echolocation, and spatial memory together with the possi

36 observations and biological relevance to bat echolocation are discussed.

37 Some blind humans have developed echolocation, as a method of navigation in space.

38 nd to tactile stimulation or playback of bat echolocation attack.

39 species that did not respond to touch or bat echolocation attack.

40 As they rely on echolocation, audio recordings of bats allow tapping int

41 rtilionid and rhinolophid bats broaden their echolocation beam in the final stage of pursuit, presuma

42 ay play a role in guiding motor responses in echolocation, because the bat adjusts its emissions with

43 noise (BFN; bandwidth 20 kHz) affected their echolocation behavior when BFN was centered on different

44 ges with dynamic adaptations in the animal's echolocation behavior.

45 Both animals demonstrated diel patterns in echolocation behavior.

46 h lasting five days, two dolphins maintained echolocation behaviors while successfully detecting and

47 Bats famously orientate at night by echolocation, but this works over only a short range, an

48 The bats responded by shortening their echolocation buzz gradually; the earlier prey was remove

49 elopmental experience with FM sweeps used in echolocation by the pallid bat leads to either a loss of

50 -independent species-specific differences in echolocation call design.

51 ctivorous bats use a predominantly pure-tone echolocation call matched to an auditory fovea (an over-

52 length were negatively related to open space echolocation call peak frequency, reflecting species-spe

53 lates with running speed in rodents and with echolocation call rate in bats.

54 Thalamic inputs to the cortical echolocation call- and noise-selective regions originate

55 compared with CB(+) cells was found in both echolocation call- and noise-selective regions.

56 ) of the constant-frequency component of the echolocation call.

57 insects, including some moths, to detect bat echolocation calls and evade capture [1, 2].

58 d to identify cortical regions selective for echolocation calls and noise.

59 spectral, and intensity parameters of their echolocation calls by precisely monitoring the character

60 e tree roosts faster by eavesdropping on the echolocation calls of conspecifics.

61 though there is evidence that some bats emit echolocation calls that are inconspicuous to eared moths

62 th very short stimuli, such as simulated bat echolocation calls that invoked only the initial, IID-se

63 ts accurately control the frequency of their echolocation calls through auditory feedback both when t

64 l-hawking bats generally emit high-amplitude echolocation calls to maximize detection range [4, 5].

65 By emitting echolocation calls, bats constantly provide public infor

66 -frequency cortical region selective for the echolocation calls, but not to a low-frequency cortical

67 argement of the facial muscles that modulate echolocation calls, which in turn led to marked, converg

68 and a novel perspective for interpreting bat echolocation calls.

69 onses of the constant-frequency component of echolocation calls.

70 nication and are often the only component in echolocation calls.

71 tfall taps that increase the reflectivity of echolocation calls.

72 gued that the most reliable trait indicating echolocation capabilities in bats is an articulation bet

73 Understanding the echolocation capabilities of bats comes down to isolatin

74 A challenge in echolocation click classification is to overcome the man

75 es identities for the animals producing some echolocation click types.

76 Echolocation clicks were produced with a mean inter-clic

77 e large numbers of short duration, broadband echolocation clicks which may be useful for species clas

78 sing two methods, one based on the number of echolocation clicks, and another based on the detection

79 sult of top-down auditory pathways for human echolocation, comparable with those described in echoloc

80 Here we present the first example of an echolocation counterstrategy to overcome prey hearing at

81 moving the frequency and intensity of their echolocation cries away from the peak sensitivity of mot

82 We analyzed gape, body mass, and echolocation data under a phylogenetic comparative frame

83 control are tightly coupled, and successful echolocation depends on the coordination between auditor

84 hose response delays, hearing thresholds and echolocation directionalities found to be used by bats.

85 eters (response delay, hearing threshold and echolocation directionality) beyond those observed in na

86 During echolocation, dolphin produce clicks and listen to retur

87 (5-35 kHz) to localize prey, while reserving echolocation [downward frequency-modulated (FM) sweeps,

88 f microbats are paraphyletic, then laryngeal echolocation either evolved more than once in different

89 Bat echolocation, especially the terminal buzz, provides a u

90 lizations produced by other bats) and active echolocation evoke neural activity in different populati

91 Ultrasonic echolocation evolved in Oligocene odontocetes, enabling

92 , the resulting trees suggest that laryngeal echolocation evolved in the common ancestor of fossil an

93 ading us to infer that a rudimentary form of echolocation evolved in the early Oligocene, shortly aft

94 hyletic but do not resolve whether laryngeal echolocation evolved independently in different microbat

95 oup having profound implications for whether echolocation evolved once or possibly multiple times.

96 ts associated with evolutionary innovations: echolocation (facilitating hunting prey at depth) and fi

97 The pallid bat uses echolocation for obstacle avoidance and listens to prey-

98 been an important driver in the evolution of echolocation for prey tracking.

99 ary pathways that led to flapping flight and echolocation in bats have been in dispute, and until now

100 d language in hominids, and the evolution of echolocation in bats.

101 ter state changes associated with flight and echolocation in bats.

102 he evolutionary history of mammals-laryngeal echolocation in bats.

103 Previous research suggests that echolocation in blind people activates brain areas that

104 Research has also shown that echolocation in blind people may replace vision for cali

105 forth along a linear flight track, employing echolocation in darkness or vision in light.

106 Here we alternated usage of vision and echolocation in Egyptian fruit bats while recording from

107 udied intensively; but except for studies on echolocation in the bat, little is known about how neuro

108 The current understanding of dolphin echolocation indicates that automatic gain control is no

109 d toothed whales have acquired sophisticated echolocation, indispensable for their orientation and fo

110 Indeed, echolocation involves adaptive changes in vocal producti

111 EchoLOCATION is a database that provides a comprehensive

112 Echolocation is a sensory mechanism for locating, rangin

113 Echolocation is a truly active sense because subjects an

114 Bat echolocation is an ability consisting of many subtasks s

115 Echolocation is an active sense enabling bats and toothe

116 The results indicate that echolocation is controlled mainly by acoustic feedback,

117 The implication of these findings to bat echolocation is discussed.

118 ed and least understood degree of freedom in echolocation is emission beamforming--the ability to cha

119 Increasing evidence suggests that echolocation is important not only for orientation and f

120 Our data provide evidence that human echolocation is supported by active sensing, both behavi

121 Echolocation is the ability to use sound-echoes to infer

122 place fields were sharper under vision than echolocation, matching the superior sensory resolution o

123 In the current study we investigated if echolocation may also draw on 'visual' resources in the

124 ultrasonic signals that interfered with the echolocation of conspecifics attacking insect prey.

125 This sensory adaptation, known as echolocation, operates most effectively when using high

126 linear frequency changes, but are limited to echolocation or communication frequencies.

127 between two frequency bands used for either echolocation or communication in natural vocalizations.

128 es included presumed foraging behavior, with echolocation pulsed sounds (presumed prey capture attemp

129 ations associated with the nasal-emission of echolocation pulses.

130 ound in 46 of 264 (17%) neurons tuned in the echolocation range (25-60 kHz) in the auditory cortex of

131 I are present at the onset of hearing in the echolocation range or whether the differences develop sl

132 teracting bats localise each other by active echolocation rather than eavesdropping.

133 in the noise-selective region (NSR) and the echolocation region [frequency-modulated sweep-selective

134 We find that the amplitude of the dolphins' echolocation signals are highly range dependent; this am

135 ndings produce acoustical "Dead Zones" where echolocation signals are severely distorted by purely ge

136 elate strongly with the regions of distorted echolocation signals as predicted by the model.

137 otor-sensory coupling via the environment in echolocation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Passive listening is

138 The possibility of echolocation, sonar, or electroreception was investigate

139 Species-specific frequency-modulated (FM) echolocation sound sequences with dynamic spectrotempora

140 aches a target, it continuously modifies its echolocation sounds and relies on incoming echo informat

141 kHz) for the purpose of communication and/or echolocation, suggesting that this capacity might be res

142 optimize the area that they sense with their echolocation system.

143 adening is not a fundamental property of the echolocation system.

144 This implies that echolocation systems either evolved independently in rhi

145 ning each group, including complex laryngeal echolocation systems in microbats and enhanced visual ac

146 If the echolocation target is a fish school with many sound sca

147 ired a sensory interference paradigm with an echolocation task.

148 cerebellar activity is greater during active echolocation than vocalization alone.

149 have long sought osteological correlates of echolocation that can be used to infer the behaviour of

150 a basis to develop synthetic models of human echolocation that could be virtual (i.e. simulated) or r

151 t method for examining brain activity during echolocation, the auditory analysis of self-generated so

152 how humans perceive enclosed spaces through echolocation, thereby revealing the interplay between se

153 ze and hunt terrestrial prey while reserving echolocation to avoid obstacles.

154 o-dimensional ray-dynamics model of cetacean echolocation to examine the role played by coastline top

155 y poor visibility in the ocean, dolphins use echolocation to interrogate their environment.

156 hat relies on passive hearing (as opposed to echolocation) to localize prey.

157 ribution (i.e. beam pattern) of human expert echolocation transmissions, as well as spectro-temporal

158 New research shows how bats use echolocation unexpectedly to detect silent and stationar

159 Laryngeal echolocation, used by most living bats to form images of

160 have developed extraordinary proficiency in echolocation using mouth-clicks.

161 representations remapped between vision and echolocation via two kinds of remapping: subiculum neuro

162 rstand how bats integrate sensory input from echolocation, vision, and spatial memory, we conducted a

163 rocessing of target distance information for echolocation, we found that units in the FM-FM area were

164 mic beam broadening is a general property of echolocation when catching moving prey.

165 with three blind people expertly trained in echolocation, which allowed us to perform unprecedented