ライフサイエンスコーパス: effective regurgitant orifice

1 e of functional mitral regurgitation (larger effective regurgitant orifice).

2 R augmentation was demonstrated by increased effective regurgitant orifice (0.21 cm(2); 25th to 75th

3 orce, regurgitant volume increased less than effective regurgitant orifice (120 [25th to 75th percent

4 ns (regurgitant volume, 66+/-40 ml per beat; effective regurgitant orifice, 40+/-27 mm2).

5 ge, the presence of diabetes, and increasing effective regurgitant orifice (adjusted risk ratio per 1

6 Direct measurements of the effective regurgitant orifice are also feasible and serv

7 4.7 +/- 2.1 ml to 3.1 +/- 0.5 ml, p < 0.05), effective regurgitant orifice area (0.130 +/- 0.010 cm(2

8 gitant volume (69 +/- 47 to 69 +/- 56 ml) or effective regurgitant orifice area (0.5 +/- 0.4 to 0.5 +

9 Significant reductions in effective regurgitant orifice area (0.9+/-0.3cm(2) versu

10 nificant reduction in annular area (57%) and effective regurgitant orifice area (53%) measured with 3

11 evaluate the accuracy of determining aortic effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and aortic reg

12 he definition of severe secondary MR from an effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) of 0.4 to 0.2

13 s of mitral regurgitant flow rate (MRFR) and effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) on mitral regu

14 Echocardiographic measurements (TA diameter, effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA], left ventricu

15 Using an in vitro model of MR, the effective regurgitant orifice area and regurgitant volum

16 VCW, effective regurgitant orifice area and regurgitant volum

17 nitroprusside was concordant with changes in effective regurgitant orifice area and regurgitant volum

18 In patients (n=30, functional MR), 3D effective regurgitant orifice area correlated well with

19 cuspid valve annular area of 14.1 cm(2), and effective regurgitant orifice area was 1.35 cm(2).

20 Effective regurgitant orifice area was calculated by div

21 ate and severe primary degenerative MR (mean effective regurgitant orifice area, 0.45 +/- 0.25 cm)(2)

22 ted moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (effective regurgitant orifice area, 38+/-18 mm(2)) and p

23 During inspiration, a large increase in effective regurgitant orifice causes, despite a decline

24 Effective regurgitant orifice changes are independently

25 Effective regurgitant orifice during inspiration was ind

26 all P<0.0001) were obtained between VC-W and effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) area and regurgitant

27 IMR patients, regurgitant volume (RVol) and effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) area were 36+/-24 mL

28 Whether effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) by the flow converge

29 The VCW correlated well with the effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) by the flow converge

30 urface area (PISA) method for calculation of effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) of aortic regurgitat

31 ified simultaneously by echocardiography the effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) of FMR by using 2 me

32 volume (RVol), regurgitant fraction (RF) and effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) to define progressio

33 PHTN-FTR and Id-FTR were also matched for TR effective-regurgitant-orifice (ERO).

34 cardiographic quantitation of IMR (measuring effective regurgitant orifice [ERO] and regurgitant volu

35 oppler-echocardiographic quantitation of MR (effective regurgitant orifice [ERO]) and left ventricula

36 ntricular end-systolic dimension, and mitral effective regurgitant orifice increased the C-statistic

37 , left ventricular ejection fraction, mitral effective regurgitant orifice, indexed LV end-diastolic

38 Mean LVEF, mitral effective regurgitant orifice, indexed LV end-systolic d

39 Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 had a f

40 Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 should

41 if < 150 ms, 48.8 [14.8 to 161]) and mitral effective regurgitant orifice (r = 0.50, p = 0.0001; odd

42 g left ventricular ejection fraction, mitral effective regurgitant orifice, resting right ventricular

43 Mitral effective regurgitant orifice size (n=84) influenced RV

44 flow rate could be determined from the known effective regurgitant orifice times the orifice velocity

45 and correlation with angiographic grades for effective regurgitant orifice were 43+/-37 mm and r=.79