コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 and from 167.6 to 216.4 nm in the wastewater effluent).
2 matrices (such as wastewater treatment plant effluents).
3 can be attributed to direct exposure to WWTP effluent.
4 itors in a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent.
5 levated brominated DBP concentrations in the effluent.
6 aceuticals, and illicit drugs) in wastewater effluent.
7 effluent, chlorinated effluent, and wetland effluent.
8 water, and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent.
9 contaminant removal in municipal wastewater effluent.
10 monitored conventionally in the FAVE lumenal effluent.
11 pproach to concentrate the fractions of (1)D effluent.
12 edium-chain fatty acids from lumen to venous effluent.
13 r pollution control plants (WPCPs) in sewage effluent.
14 ct tanks fed by secondary settled wastewater effluent.
15 ocess wetland receiving municipal wastewater effluent.
16 ly treat antibiotics in water and wastewater effluent.
17 n the resistant starch (RS) content of ileal effluent.
18 that allows comprehensive sampling of the IC effluent.
19 to the formation of silver chloride in WWTP effluent.
20 cs may compromise the quality of the treated effluent.
21 rli-producing E. coli in subsurface drainage effluent.
22 sources in PRO, such as secondary wastewater effluent.
23 s and poorer nitrogen removal from biofilter effluent.
24 uent or the molar ratios of Si/N and Si/P in effluent.
25 harges of wastewater treatment works (WwTWs) effluents.
26 tment plants and those subject to wastewater effluents.
27 stems through meat products or environmental effluents.
28 evant exposure in wastewater treatment plant effluents.
29 runoff samples, and 12 municipal wastewater effluents.
30 reatment processes for cleanup of industrial effluents.
31 fy the public health risk posed by livestock effluents.
32 s, and 1.96-5.57 and 2060-2550 ng/L in final effluents.
33 ent primarily via wastewater treatment plant effluents.
34 to Me(O)NPs in streams receiving wastewater effluents.
35 ese SMPs to understand what is in wastewater effluents.
36 tted to aquatic environments with wastewater effluents.
37 th hospital and pharmaceutical manufacturing effluents.
38 lso confirmed in spiked municipal wastewater effluents.
39 and diversity were compared in influents and effluents.
40 Ps to minimize the eutrophication effects of effluents.
41 is drug is prevalent in municipal wastewater effluents.
42 /L for TMPP to 12600 ng/L for TBOEP in final effluents.
45 +/- 1.9; 149.7 +/- 289.5, respectively) and effluent (58.5 +/- 29.1; 2.3 +/- 1.4; 70.2 +/- 121.8, re
46 ates (+/-95% confidence interval) of treated effluent (67800 +/- 1500 kmol DSi year(-1)) compared to
50 related compounds in raw sewage and in plant effluent after chlorination were statistically indisting
53 ls induced by municipal secondary wastewater effluent amended with elevated Br(-) and I(-) after disi
55 nalysis was comparable to that measured from effluent analysis using inductively coupled plasma mass
56 on flow to decrease the strength of the (1)D effluent and a modulation unit that uses trap columns.
59 istent pharmaceuticals in treated wastewater effluent and in surface water has been frequently report
60 - and citrate-coated 80 nm nAg in aerobic WW effluent and mixed liquor and the related changes in nAg
63 e that PRO power generation using wastewater effluent and seawater desalination plant brine may becom
67 uary were primarily attributed to wastewater effluent and, to a lesser extent, geese and gull wastes.
68 ere found at part-per-billion levels in WWTP effluents and at part-per-trillion levels in river water
69 ticals are active substances found in sewage effluents and can negatively impact aquatic systems even
70 pollution including mutagens from wastewater effluents and discontinuity by man-made barriers are con
73 s of dissolved CH4 and CO2 concentrations in effluents and receiving streams at nine WWTPs in Germany
74 biosensor was further explored with real AD effluents and the results did not show significance diff
75 urces (communities, industrial, and hospital effluents) and are recognized as reservoir for antibioti
77 tter leachate, wastewater treatment facility effluent, and concentrated river DOM (used as a referenc
79 of North American dairy and beef production effluents, and identify factors that significantly impac
80 d to aquatic environments through wastewater effluents, and their bioaccumulation potential is debate
82 reducing ARG-like sequence abundances, with effluent ARG levels of 29, 34, and 74 ppm (198 ppm influ
87 led several order-of-magnitude reductions in effluent-associated beta-lactamase genes in effluent-sat
91 eating textile wastewater and other impaired effluents because of their great separation performance
92 ere detected at low levels in the wastewater effluents but not in the river water; synthetic DNA cont
93 upport the conclusion that suppression of PD effluent cell immune function in human subjects by stand
95 L in raw sewage, primary effluent, secondary effluent, chlorinated effluent, and wetland effluent.
96 l core and compared the resulting changes in effluent colloid concentration through multiple sampling
97 tion have enabled direct introduction of the effluent coming from a nanoLC column into the high-vacuu
99 in constructed wetlands to clean wastewater effluents containing IBP and possibly also other micropo
104 ates under different land covers, wastewater effluent contributions, population densities, and hydrol
105 scharges in three rivers receiving differing effluent contributions: Hockanum R., CT (22% (v/v) efflu
106 of microplastics being released per liter of effluent could result in significant amounts of micropla
108 allow better control of the chromatographic effluent density on its route toward and into the ion so
109 e transforming growth factor-beta1 and in PD effluent-derived MCs exhibiting mesenchymal phenotypic c
111 to the environment occurs both through WWTP effluent discharge and runoff following land application
112 tant to ecosystem function, especially where effluent discharge results in high nitrogen inputs.
116 nce, we ultimately evaluated implications of effluent dynamics and retransformation on environmental
117 ant when dealing with such a large volume of effluent even a modest amount of microplastics being rel
118 apenemase blaOXA was dominant in most of the effluents, except for Cyprus and Israel where blaGES was
121 minization in roach derived from either WwTW effluent exposed or dilution water exposed mothers.
122 e, a breeding study revealed that roach with effluent-exposed mothers reproduced with an equal succes
124 utical metabolites that were detected in the effluent exposome of fish, 6 were nonsteroidal anti-infl
125 mothers and dilution water exposed mothers, effluent exposure for up to 3 years and 9 months induced
126 here is little information on the effects of effluent exposure on fish metabolism, especially the sma
127 ings provide no evidence for impacts of WwTW effluent exposure on reproduction or gonadal disruption
129 contaminants improved following ozonation of effluent filtered with smaller pore size filters, indica
130 s determined in wastewater influent, primary effluent, final effluent, suspended particulate matter (
136 e, and a promising biomarker in the dialysis effluent for membrane change in patients receiving PD.
139 esults suggest that the input of a mutagenic effluent from a WWTP resulted in a strong increase in pr
141 s that had been exposed to an undiluted WwTW effluent from early life to sexual maturity had altered
144 l flux of dissolved silicon (DSi) carried by effluent from the second largest treatment plant by flow
146 acterization tools were used to benchmark 81 effluents from 20 mills across Canada, representing the
147 aromatic amines in six mutagenic wastewater effluents from a chemical-industrial area in Germany, co
149 stewater treatment plants (WWTP) receive the effluents from various sources (communities, industrial,
150 ive overview of gene cassette composition in effluents from wastewater treatment facilities across Eu
153 the capture solvent from infrastructure and effluent gases via microencapsulation provides possible
155 plish separation of biomass from the treated effluent; however, accumulation of salts in the wastewat
156 ically exposed to wastewater treatment plant effluents (i.e., press disturbance) before experiencing
157 se, or the incidental presence of wastewater effluent in a water source, is common at power plants, r
161 ant with each cycle, while phosphorus in the effluent increased by 1 mg/L and 3 mg/L in the first and
162 whereas the reverse was found in wastewater effluent, indicating that humic-like fluorescence is ass
163 trogens in wastewater treatment works (WwTW) effluents induces feminized responses in male fish, incl
164 ally downgradient former domestic wastewater effluent infiltration beds both act as continuous PFAS s
165 trogen standards for discharge of wastewater effluent into aquatic bodies are becoming more stringent
166 he transport of solvent clusters from the LC effluent into the mass analyzer was prevented by a "wavy
167 (BPA) with wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents into surface waters results in deleterious eff
170 eeply raised, the IPR is washed out, and the effluent is sent to waste via a diverter valve until it
172 Worldwide, ozonation of secondary wastewater effluents is increasingly considered in order to decreas
175 ted constituent in the recent steam electric effluent limitations guidelines and standards (ELGs) sin
176 ed wastewater characteristics with permitted effluent limits and ambient monitoring limits and capaci
180 esponses were detected in the presence of an effluent matrix; importantly, in the absence of morpholo
181 inactivation of coliforms in the discharged effluent (Mean Log removal Value (MLRV) = 3.51), accompa
183 agricultural, and domesticated) and treated effluent (n = 233) was used to generate a fecal library
184 nificantly increased NOx content in coronary effluent (n = 8), but not in the presence of mecamylamin
190 Measurement of the "protein" content in the effluent of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor was then ca
191 ion products in the urine, plasma, and ileal effluent of healthy volunteers and ileostomists (subject
199 eatment systems and the impact of wastewater effluent on benthic invertebrate communities in arctic r
201 uppressor cell to desalt the chromatographic effluent online prior to the electrospray mass spectrome
203 ed the Si load of a large wastewater plant's effluent or the molar ratios of Si/N and Si/P in effluen
206 um, were optimized as sorbents for secondary effluent organic matter (EfOM) including emerging microp
208 d WWTPs influx and pre- and postdisinfection effluent over 24 h, followed by incubation experiments l
209 his Article, we demonstrate the influence of effluent particles (in the range of <50 mum) on ozone de
212 OWR was first treated with phospholipid, the effluent pH remained at approximately 6.5 and the averag
214 wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) influent, effluent, primary sludge, and secondary sludge matrices
215 ewage from storm tank discharges and treated effluent processed by a UV-disinfection plant following
216 estuarine bioassays, predenitrification BNR effluents produced more phytoplankton biomass than CAS e
218 rily to differences in effluent volume, with effluent quality and receiving water hydrodynamics playi
219 d that investment in MWWTP upgrades improved effluent quality and was associated with an immediate ch
220 ent plants (WWTP), ozonation can enhance the effluent quality by eliminating organic micropollutants.
221 assess whether upgrades designed to improve effluent quality could also remediate the intersex previ
222 e of intersex remains unknown, indicators of effluent quality including nutrients, pharmaceuticals, a
223 sh downstream of the Waterloo MWWTP (poorest effluent quality) suggested that approximately 15.5% of
226 entration of organic selenium species in the effluent, relative to influent water, and the fraction o
227 dy thus reveals that ozone treatment of WWTP effluent results in the oxidation of Ag2S and, hence, an
228 t of blaOXA and blaGES genes in the European effluents revealed similar trends to those displayed in
229 fficiency of WW ozonation, by increasing the effluent's ozone demand and decreasing contaminant degra
230 Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) of a 200 mL effluent sample showed the best performance using a mixt
233 of 69 elements in digested sewage sludge and effluent samples from 64 municipal wastewater treatment
234 ter reservoir and wastewater treatment plant effluent samples had an oxidative flux of 0.015 +/- 0.00
235 ompounds found in wastewater treatment plant effluent samples possessed a negative log D (pH 7) value
236 e using technical replicates of influent and effluent samples taken from an ozonation process during
237 the "protein" concentration in the different effluent samples, with or without spiked additions of Bo
238 effluent-associated beta-lactamase genes in effluent-saturated soils, suggesting marginal persistenc
239 urrence at 12-31 ng/L in raw sewage, primary effluent, secondary effluent, chlorinated effluent, and
241 and detection of nano-size aggregates in the effluent show that the solubilization is based on a sub-
242 ON additions from wastewater treatment plant effluents significantly increased the activation energie
243 acidic waters should be avoided to minimize effluent silver concentrations and preserve silver treat
245 ounting for fractions sorbed in influent and effluent solids may cause slight underestimation of cipr
247 communities (<225 m linear distance from the effluent source) in four out of the five communities (Gr
250 has been proposed that livestock production effluents such as wastewater, airborne dust and manure i
251 gly increased Al and Fe concentration in the effluent suggested that soil colloids facilitated the re
252 gher concentrations of OXO-LMG in wastewater effluent, suggesting its formation in the wastewater tre
255 wastewater influent, primary effluent, final effluent, suspended particulate matter (SPM), and sludge
257 estrogenic effects persisted in the treated effluent that may still be environmentally relevant.
258 BAC system treating two nitrified wastewater effluents, this study characterized the effect of differ
259 sing X-ray microtomography (XMT) and collect effluent to assess the individual mineral dissolution.
260 t technologies to treat municipal wastewater effluent to meet existing drinking water quality standar
264 rporating deposit-feeding invertebrates into effluent treatment systems, particularly when the sedime
270 antithrombin was largely undetectable in the effluent unless Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro (GPRP) was added to bloc
272 s was attributed primarily to differences in effluent volume, with effluent quality and receiving wat
274 ation of dissolved (nonparticulate) Ag in WW effluent was 0.89 +/- 0.05 ppb at 168 h and was 71% lowe
282 ce of curli-producing E. coli in soil column effluents was greater (P < 0.05) when manure was surface
290 toxicity of the O3/BAC-treated chloraminated effluents were comparable or slightly higher than those
293 a lesser degree, nutrient removal wastewater effluents were the dominant source of NDMA and its chlor
294 Ps) enter estuaries via wastewater treatment effluents, where they can inhibit microorganisms, becaus
295 hence, an increase of the Ag toxicity in the effluent, which may become relevant at elevated Ag conce
296 r disinfection of municipal wastewater (MWW) effluent while the use peracetic acid (PAA) has been pro
297 ing nitrosamines from the absorber waterwash effluent with activated-carbon sorbents was developed to
298 pharmaceuticals entered the system via WWTP effluent with relatively stable loadings across sampling
299 alve-based approach enables dilution of (1)D effluent with weak solvent prior to transfer to the (2)D
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。