ライフサイエンスコーパス: elastography

1 d immediately before or immediately after MR elastography.

2 and hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography.

3 med to review the data on thyroid ultrasound elastography.

4 HODS: Patients with HC were evaluated by USG elastography.

5 train index (SI) which is the unit of strain elastography.

6 wo independent examiners by using shear-wave elastography.

7 on stiffness measured by magnetic resonance elastography.

8 fness, as measured with the use of transient elastography.

9 ions of liver fibrosis assessed by transient elastography.

10 redictive factors of technical failure of MR elastography.

11 o underwent liver biopsy within 1 year of MR elastography.

12 ficant decrease in the reproducibility of MR elastography.

13 ancement in MR examination or less strain in elastography.

14 stic radiation force impulse, and shear wave elastography.

15 tiffness by ultrasound or magnetic resonance elastography.

16 such as serum fibrosis markers and transient elastography.

17 otal of 46 breast lesions were examined with elastography.

18 nd adult subjects at magnetic resonance (MR) elastography.

19 ions of liver fibrosis assessed by transient elastography.

20 robe (six of 260 patients), and 0% with ARFI elastography (0 of 321 patients).

21 4.3 for contrast-enhanced US, 3.6 for strain elastography, 14.3 for strain elastography combined with

22 nd fibrosis score as determined by transient elastography [- 2.98 (-3.6, -2.37) compared with -0.77 (

23 hown that two-dimensional magnetic resonance elastography (2D-MRE), a novel MR method for assessment

24 and liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography (6.3 vs. 8.6 kilopascals; P < 0.001).

25 echo pattern, on LSM values and on transient elastography accuracy for the diagnosis of liver fibrosi

26 ue and solid thyroid lesions, such as strain elastography, acoustic radiation force impulse, and shea

27 ic stiffness between 2D GRE and 2D SE-EPI MR elastography across multiple reviewers.

28 SE-EPI MR elastography allowed for stiffness measurement across la

29 sizes were 8495 mm(2) +/- 4482 for 2D GRE MR elastography and 15 176 mm(2) +/- 7609 for 2D SE-EPI MR

30 Transient elastography and 2-dimensional shear wave elastography i

31 ication of significant fibrosis by transient elastography and 2-dimensional shear wave elastography w

32 ess was 2.92 kPa +/- 1.29 measured at GRE MR elastography and 2.76 kPa +/- 1.39 at SE-EPI MR elastogr

33 ss rate was 95.8% (92 of 96 patients) for MR elastography and 81.3% (78 of 96 patients) or 88.5% (85

34 MR elastography and anatomic image analysis were performed

35 By combining strain elastography and contrast-enhanced US, a sensitivity of

36 The accuracy of three-dimensional MR elastography and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the de

37 Transient elastography and FibroTest are effective noninvasive too

38 Only transient elastography and FibroTest were compared with histologic

39 Transient elastography and FibroTest were performed, and patients

40 ight patients underwent three-dimensional MR elastography and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-

41 hniques utilizing endoscopic ultrasonography-elastography and MRI hold promise.

42 tion parameter (CAP) obtained with transient elastography and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) obta

43 tudy helped confirm the equivalence of SE MR elastography and SE-EPI MR elastography to GRE MR elasto

44 ignificant difference was found between ARFI elastography and the M probe in the diagnosis of cirrhos

45 ignificant difference was found between ARFI elastography and the XL probe in the diagnosis of modera

46 In patients with successful MR elastography and VCTE examinations (excluding unreliable

47 uding unreliable VCTE examinations), both MR elastography and VCTE had excellent diagnostic accuracy

48 on In this obese patient population, both MR elastography and VCTE had excellent diagnostic performan

49 tion success rate of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography and vibration-controlled transient elastogr

50 nt state-of-the-art US technology, including elastography, and applications of US in clinical practic

51 using ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence elastography, and apply it to characterizing the stiffne

52 assessed by means of liver biopsy, transient elastography, and clinical cirrhosis.

53 molecular MR imaging is complementary to MR elastography, and combining the two techniques in a sing

54 g of gray-scale US, color Doppler US, strain elastography, and contrast agent-enhanced US in the asse

55 characterized with color Doppler US, strain elastography, and contrast-enhanced US.

56 R imaging, three-dimensional steady-state MR elastography, and DW MR imaging at 7 T.

57 ed ultrasonography, elastography, shear-wave elastography, and histoscanning.

58 olled attenuation parameter (CAP), real-time elastography, and magnetic resonance imaging approaches

59 l blood oxygen level-dependent MRI, renal MR elastography, and renal susceptibility imaging, show pro

60 Conventional ultrasonography (US), strain elastography, and SW elastography were performed with QM

61 We present a magnetic resonance elastography approach for tissue characterization that i

62 n acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography (ARF-OCE) system that uses an integrated mi

63 ARF) orthogonal excitation optical coherence elastography (ARFOE-OCE) to visualize shear waves in 3D.

64 orce orthogonal excitation optical coherence elastography (ARFOE-OCE).

65 Elastography as a method for evaluation of tissue elasti

66 Elastography as a method of thrombus evaluation, provide

67 The main limitation of elastography as a technique is above all the variability

68 scusses recent findings regarding the use of elastography as a tool in the evaluation of thyroid mass

69 ients underwent both 2D GRE and 2D SE-EPI MR elastography at 1.5 T during separate breath holds.

70 Results The technical failure rate of MR elastography at 1.5 T was 3.5% (12 of 338), while it was

71 men, five women]) were obtained with 3-T MR elastography at 28, 56, and 84 Hz.

72 r stiffness was assessed in vivo by using US elastography at low (40-130-Hz) and high (130-220-Hz) fr

73 nvestigate the diagnostic performance of the elastography-based strain index ratio in the differentia

74 ge, 0-21 years) undergoing clinical liver MR elastography between July 2014 and November 2015 were pr

75 In this work, we evaluated how well vascular elastography can detect intimal changes in a mouse model

76 AFLD, hepatic stiffness measurements with MR elastography can help identify individuals with steatohe

77 Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance MR elastography claim: A measured change in hepatic stiffne

78 ons in liver stiffness on magnetic resonance elastography, collagen content and lobular inflammation

79 3.6 for strain elastography, 14.3 for strain elastography combined with color Doppler US, and 14.3 fo

80 d with color Doppler US, and 14.3 for strain elastography combined with contrast-enhanced US.

81 nding molecular MR probe and stiffness by MR elastography, complementary techniques.

82 stiffness, as assessed by magnetic resonance elastography, correlated with portal pressure and preced

83 derwent liver biopsy within 1 year of the MR elastography date, mean liver stiffness as assessed with

84 nal and three-dimensional magnetic resonance elastography-derived liver stiffness between the ezetimi

85 igate the utility of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography-derived mechanical properties in the discri

86 These results suggest that MR elastography-derived shear stiffness may provide an obje

87 Conclusion Our results demonstrate that MR elastography-derived shear stiffness measurements are hi

88 the repeatability of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography-derived shear stiffness measurements of the

89 The Pfirrmann degeneration grade and MR elastography-derived shear stiffness of the nucleus pulp

90 oth nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus MR elastography-derived shear stiffness with increasing Pfi

91 PDFF-derived fat maps and magnetic resonance elastography-derived stiffness maps of the liver before

92 t incorporating QM were used to determine SW elastography diagnostic performance.

93 tabases was performed for publications on MR elastography during the 10-year period between 2006 and

94 ver stiffness (LS) was measured by transient elastography; endoscopy was used as the standard for det

95 Vibration-controlled transient elastography estimates liver stiffness measurement (LSM)

96 Ultrasound elastography (EUS) is a new method that shows structural

97 A total of 1377 consecutive MR elastography examinations performed between 2007 and 201

98 Seven hundred eighty-one MR elastography examinations performed in 691 consecutive p

99 were clearly depicted in the last follow-up elastography examinations.

100 All subjects underwent same-day transient elastography (FibroScan), 2-dimensional shear wave elast

101 Liver fibrosis was assessed by elastography (FibroScan), providing a quantitative fibro

102 rosis estimated as stiffness using transient elastography (FibroScan).

103 s assessed semiannually from 2006 to 2011 by elastography (FibroScan, Echosens, Paris, France) and us

104 versus high-frequency ultrasonographic (US) elastography for detection of steatohepatitis in rats by

105 Vibration-controlled transient elastography for estimation of LSM and CAP can be succes

106 planar imaging (EPI) magnetic resonance (MR) elastography for measurement of hepatic stiffness in ped

107 ublications on the application of ultrasound elastography for musculoskeletal imaging.

108 leagues (1) studied the potential role of MR elastography for this diagnostic task in rat models of s

109 f highly specialized ultrasound devices, has elastography gained widespread use in numerous applicati

110 22) had hepatic fibrosis (magnetic resonance elastography >/=3 kPa).

111 Hepatic MR elastography had a success rate of 94.4% (1300 of 1377 c

112 nfidence level in 47 patients in whom GRE MR elastography had failed.

113 of 4.5 m/sec or greater as test positive, SW elastography had lesion-level sensitivity of 50% (95% CI

114 and low QM were treated as test positive, SW elastography had lesion-level sensitivity of 93% (95% CI

115 h higher mean stiffness values at shear-wave elastography had poorer prognostic features.

116 Ultrasound elastography has proven valuable in discriminating these

117 al coherence tomography (OCT), optical micro-elastography has the ability to determine elastic proper

118 Elastography has the potential to be useful in the evalu

119 spectroscopy, diffusion weighted MR, and MR elastography have also emerged for detecting fibrosis.

120 scoelasticity measured by magnetic resonance elastography have not been investigated up to date.

121 retrieve liver stiffness as assessed with MR elastography, histologic analysis, blood work, and other

122 noninvasive testing with magnetic resonance elastography (ICER= pound9,189).

123 nt elastography and 2-dimensional shear wave elastography identified subjects in each group with sign

124 promising capability of this high resolution elastography imaging system for characterizing tissue bi

125 developed multi-functional ultrasonic micro-elastography imaging system in which acoustic radiation

126 originated from micron sized structures, an elastography imaging system of fine resolution ( 100 mic

127 The diagnostic performance of ARFI elastography improved when it was applied in nonobese pa

128 Then, liver stiffness was measured with MR elastography in 12 healthy volunteers (eight men, four w

129 stages as assessed by non-invasive transient elastography in a German cohort of patients.

130 ioritized clinical guidelines on the role of elastography in CLDs, focusing on vibration-controlled t

131 ions demonstrate possible uses of ultrasound elastography in examinations of the musculoskeletal syst

132 presents possible applications of ultrasound elastography in musculoskeletal imaging based on the ava

133 pleen elastography was not superior to liver elastography in predicting portal hypertension.

134 The ELF test correlated with ultrasound elastography in separate assessments.

135 o arrive at a consensus regarding the use of elastography in the assessment of liver fibrosis in chro

136 lity of extending indications for the use of elastography in the future.

137 r-dependent techniques except for shear wave elastography, in which data acquisition is operator-inde

138 de, and fibrosis stage were assessed from MR elastography, in-phase and out-of-phase gradient-echo im

139 Ultrasound elastography is a new and still poorly researched method

140 Ultrasonographic elastography is a new, developing method that shows incr

141 Strain elastography is a promising, safe, non-invasive, and pra

142 Conclusion MR elastography is a reliable method for assessing liver st

143 al clinical practice environment, hepatic MR elastography is a robust imaging method with a high succ

144 MR elastography is a useful diagnostic tool for detecting a

145 To the extent that transient elastography is able to measure "liver stiffness," which

146 e combination of serum markers and transient elastography is able to significantly reduce the need fo

147 Compression-based ultrasonographic (US) elastography is associated with time-dependent mechanica

148 ARFI elastography is reliable in the assessment of liver fibr

149 Shear-wave elastography is reproducible for assessment of the SSP m

150 astography (SWE) and magnetic resonance (MR) elastography liver shear-wave speed (SWS) measurements i

151 and repeatability of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography liver stiffness measurements across imager

152 Conclusion Point SWE and MR elastography liver SWS measurements correlate well in pa

153 ent, liver stiffness was evaluated with ARFI elastography, M and XL probes, and FibroTest within 1 mo

154 treatment liver biopsies, magnetic resonance elastography, magnetic resonance imaging-estimated proto

155 Ultrasound elastography may be a very useful tool for visualisation

156 ng of Young's modulus with optical coherence elastography may become an important tool in vascular bi

157 method used, clinical translation of tendon elastography may enable clinicians to diagnose tendon da

158 Their results suggest that MR elastography may have a potentially important role for n

159 on, noninvasive techniques such as transient elastography may help provide data on fibrosis in youth

160 e regression after controlling for transient elastography-measured liver stiffness and traditional an

161 and viral factors associated with transient elastography-measured liver stiffness in 314 participant

162 Magnetic resonance elastography measurements of liver stiffness were also p

163 sion, we developed a robust ultrasound-based elastography method for early detection of intimal chang

164 Complementary magnetic resonance elastography, micro-computed tomography, and histochemic

165 hted (DW) imaging, functional MR imaging, MR elastography, MR spectroscopy, perfusion-weighted imagin

166 Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) enables the noninvasive quantitation

167 Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a promising technique for noninvas

168 ompare the performance of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) vs TE for diagnosis of fibrosis, and

169 Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), an advanced magnetic resonance-based

170 t elastography (VCTE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).

171 eater than 3.63 kPa using magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).

172 aluating liver stiffness (magnetic resonance elastography [MRE]) and biomarkers may be useful indicat

173 y and 15 176 mm(2) +/- 7609 for 2D SE-EPI MR elastography (n = 290; P < .001).

174 stography and 2.76 kPa +/- 1.39 at SE-EPI MR elastography (n = 290; P = .15).

175 for high-resolution and quantitative dynamic elastography of soft tissue at near real-time imaging ra

176 e, 1 month to 17 years) underwent shear-wave elastography of the kidneys immediately before and immed

177 technical failure of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography of the liver in a large single-center study

178 MR elastography of the liver is feasible and shows promise

179 endent factors associated with failure of MR elastography of the liver with a two-dimensional gradien

180 coefficient (RC) for magnetic resonance (MR) elastography of the liver.

181 nt transabdominal ultrasonography for strain elastography of the pancreas.

182 We performed transient elastography on 964 people chronically infected with HCV

183 radiation force pulse imaging or shear wave elastography) or steatosis (controlled attenuation param

184 osis staging assessed with biopsy, transient elastography, or serum biomarkers.

185 osis (as assessed by liver biopsy, transient elastography, or serum markers).

186 significantly associated with failure of MR elastography (P < .004).

187 significantly associated with failure of MR elastography (P < .004); but on the basis of multivariab

188 ography and SE-EPI MR elastography to GRE MR elastography (P = .0212 and P = .0001, respectively).

189 MR elastography parameters comprised elasticity, viscosity,

190 de ultrasound characteristics and shear wave elastography parameters were computed.

191 ver stiffness measurement [LSM] by transient elastography, platelet count, and spleen diameter with c

192 Elastography plays a key role in characterizing soft med

193 usion Liver shear stiffness measured with US elastography provided better distinction of steatohepati

194 Elastography provides a powerful tool for histopathologi

195 LV SWA measured with cardiac MR elastography provides image contrast sensitive to myocar

196 Here, we use confocal elastography, quantitative polarized light microscopy, a

197 The measured lateral/axial elastography resolution and field of view are 223.7 +/-

198 t-enhanced US, and 100% and 72.1% for strain elastography, respectively.

199 When comparing MR elastography results with liver biopsy results, the best

200 Although elastography seems promising in identifying malignant th

201 Addition of QM can improve SW elastography sensitivity, with no significant change in

202 sound are contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, elastography, shear-wave elastography, and histoscanning

203 those of diagnostic accuracy suggest that MR elastography should be preferred over diffusion-weighted

204 Consequently, elastography should be used as an additional tool in the

205 Ultrasound-based elasticity images (elastography) showed significant predominant red and gre

206 48 malignant lesions, eight (17%) had no SW elastography signal; 20 (42%), Vs of less than 4.5 m/sec

207 In 95 benign lesions, 13 (14%) had no SW elastography signal; 77 (81%), Vs of less than 4.5 m/sec

208 hort, we evaluated CD4N, CD4%, and transient elastography staging of liver fibrosis.

209 owever, prior vibration-controlled transient elastography studies reported high failure rates in pati

210 graphy (FibroScan), 2-dimensional shear wave elastography (Supersonic Aixplorer), and liver biopsy af

211 tween ultrasonographic (US) point shear-wave elastography (SWE) and magnetic resonance (MR) elastogra

212 indices using ultrasound (US) and shear wave elastography (SWE) in a Fontan cohort.

213 otential value of ultrasound (US) shear wave elastography (SWE) in assessing the relative change in e

214 aluate the diagnostic accuracy of shear-wave elastography (SWE) in identifying different degrees of f

215 Purpose To evaluate the value of shear-wave elastography (SWE) in the detection of diabetic peripher

216 Real-time shear wave elastography (SWE) is a novel, noninvasive method to ass

217 Shear-wave elastography (SWE) was used to evaluate elasticity of th

218 nship and agreement between point SWE and MR elastography SWS measurements.

219 as fair correlation between point SWE and MR elastography SWS values for all patients (rho = 0.33, P

220 Standardization on Shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWUE) technical settings will not only ens

221 or spleen stiffness measurement by transient elastography (TE) and hepatic venous pressure gradient (

222 invasive fibrosis assessment using transient elastography (TE) and serum biomarkers (Fibrotest [FT]).

223 nt assessment of liver fibrosis by transient elastography (TE) and testing to characterize HIV type 1

224 Liver fibrosis was assessed by transient elastography (TE) and/or histology.

225 I) techniques and ultrasound-based transient elastography (TE) can be used in noninvasive diagnosis o

226 I) techniques and ultrasound-based transient elastography (TE) can be used in noninvasive diagnosis o

227 We compared HVPG and transient elastography (TE) for the prediction of liver-related ev

228 igated the potential usefulness of transient elastography (TE) in the noninvasive evaluation of liver

229 Transient elastography (TE) is increasingly employed in clinical p

230 SH at the authors' institution had transient elastography (TE) to evaluate hepatic steatosis and fibr

231 is objective, LSM was performed by transient elastography (TE) using FibroScan in 437 healthy subject

232 nges in hepatic fibrosis, based on transient elastography (TE), among human immunodeficiency virus (H

233 atitis C (CHC), in comparison with transient elastography (TE), by using liver biopsy (LB) as the ref

234 liver stiffness (LS), measured by transient elastography (TE), for clinical outcome in human immunod

235 l-characterized cohort by means of transient elastography (TE).

236 ssion: alkaline phosphatase (ALP); transient elastography (TE); histology; combination of ALP+histolo

237 d liver stiffness (LS) measured by transient elastography (TE, Fibroscan(R)) have been used for steat

238 ver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography (TE, FibroScan) and unreliable results occu

239 We evaluated 2 elastography techniques for diagnosis of alcoholic fibro

240 Elastography techniques have been widely used to assess

241 In contrast to other magnetic resonance elastography techniques, this noise-based approach is, t

242 Thus, elastography tecnhnique is objective for HC but not appr

243 Interobserver agreement was higher with MR elastography than with biopsy (intraclass correlation co

244 employ a method of quasi-static compression elastography that measures volumetric axial strain and u

245 ibrosis due to alcohol consumption, we found elastography to be an excellent tool for diagnosing live

246 ivalence of SE MR elastography and SE-EPI MR elastography to GRE MR elastography (P = .0212 and P = .

247 ing ratio measurements can extend hepatic MR elastography to potentially enable assessment of necroin

248 r stiffness measurement (LSM) with transient elastography together with detailed metabolic profiling

249 ned for the pancreas using ultrasound strain elastography (Toshiba Applio 500 device).

250 Transient elastography uses pulse-echo ultrasonography to measure

251 Thyroid stiffness index calculated with elastography using carotid arterial pulsation as the com

252 e thyroid stiffness index calculated from US elastography using carotid arterial pulsation.

253 sent a fundamentally new approach to dynamic elastography using non-contact mechanical stimulation of

254 te the hydatid cyst (HC) types by ultrasound elastography using two different sizes (4 mm and 8 mm) o

255 , focusing on vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and magnetic resonance elastography

256 stography and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) in the detection of hepatic fibrosis

257 health tests, vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), and a physician referral.

258 t (LSM) using vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE).

259 or agreement between 2D GRE and 2D SE-EPI MR elastography was 0.93 (range, 0.91-0.95).

260 Anisotropic MR elastography was able to be used to distinguish between

261 nal and three-dimensional magnetic resonance elastography was also performed.

262 was most sensitive to early fibrosis, while elastography was more sensitive to advanced fibrosis.

263 rformance for assessing hepatic fibrosis; MR elastography was more technically reliable than VCTE and

264 Spleen elastography was not superior to liver elastography in p

265 MR elastography was performed at 3.0 T (n = 443) or 1.5 T (

266 Elastography was performed in 68 of 69 patients with bio

267 MR elastography was performed in the same imaging session.

268 n a cross-sectional study, in vivo lumbar MR elastography was performed once in the morning and once

269 Strain elastography was performed to assess tissue elasticity,

270 Transient elastography was performed using the M probe.

271 Multifrequency three-dimensional MR elastography was performed, and shear stiffness, storage

272 In 3 patients ultrasound elastography was performed, which appeared very useful i

273 te, mean liver stiffness as assessed with MR elastography was significantly higher in patients with a

274 Anisotropic MR elastography was used to obtain mechanical anisotropic s

275 nt elastography and 2-dimensional shear wave elastography were 9.6 kPa and 10.2 kPa, and for cirrhosi

276 ferase-to-platelet ratio index and transient elastography were collected and analyzed with liver hist

277 Unreliable results with ARFI elastography were more frequent in obese patients (those

278 sonography (US), strain elastography, and SW elastography were performed with QM.

279 ding liver fibrosis diagnosed with transient elastography, when possible.

280 by a very high stiffness value at transient elastography, which decreased with clinical improvement.

281 has become feasible using magnetic resonance elastography, which quantifies biomechanical properties

282 f which the most commonly used are transient elastography-which estimates liver fibrosis by measuring

283 iographically triggered SWA-based cardiac MR elastography with 24.13-Hz external vibration frequency

284 Conclusion The technical failure rate of MR elastography with a gradient-recalled-echo pulse sequenc

285 Transient elastography with FibroScan is used to calculate the deg

286 on, 24 volunteer adult subjects underwent MR elastography with four MR imaging systems (two vendors)

287 -dimensional gradient-recalled-echo 1.5-T MR elastography with point SWE performed immediately before

288 A short US examination and elastography with pulsation of the carotid artery used a

289 leen stiffness (SS) measurement by transient elastography with that of liver stiffness (LS) and of ot

290 Patients underwent MR elastography with two readers and VCTE with three observ