ライフサイエンスコーパス: election

1 referred candidate is more likely to win the election.

2 right before the rise of Nazism and Hitler's election.

3 ted voting behavior in the 2008 Presidential election.

4 ory of Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential election.

5 ir values when there are more bidders in the election.

6 health care issues in the months before the election.

7 canvassing shortly before the November 1998 election.

8 appeal that emphasizes the closeness of the election.

9 cational assignments, and voting in upcoming elections.

10 references of undecided voters in democratic elections.

11 are and Medicaid policy sometimes influences elections.

12 ffordable Care Act in the 2014 congressional elections.

13 ebook users during the 2010 US congressional elections.

14 more information becomes available in future elections.

15 n the United States next to the presidential elections.

16 islation, which is a major issue in the 2004 elections.

17 ves for voters to vote strategically in such elections.

18 for a Democrat during the next presidential election (88% chance); otherwise, it is likely to vote R

19 We find that, although the Compensation Election allows subjects to strategically bid above thei

20 nnealing, S: election and L: igation (RASL) assays, which are based o

21 rveys during the previous three presidential elections, and 3 conducted as national exit polls of vot

22 set covering 86 countries and more than 500 elections, and a separate data set with extensive pollin

23 built around the principle of free and fair elections, and that each citizen's vote should count equ

24 s with the importance of health care in past elections, and which issues voters regard as the most im

25 findings after the latest U.S. presidential election are discussed.

26 Given that many elections are won by small margins, our results suggest

27 at reported irregularities in recent Russian elections are, indeed, well-explained by systematic ball

28 This article surveys recent work on elections as mechanisms for aggregating information and

29 predicted the outcomes of U.S. congressional elections better than chance (e.g., 68.8% of the Senate

30 e use of territorially based representation (election by district).

31 he research on a large scale: in the 2004 US elections, California voters approved a state initiative

32 National elections can be regarded as large-scale social experime

33 The results suggest that global elections can be successfully modeled and that they are

34 The Compensation Election chooses the option that receives the highest su

35 bership Committee, Committee of Tellers, and Elections Committee.

36 bership Committee, Committee of Tellers, and Elections Committee.

37 bership Committee, Committee of Tellers, and Elections Committee.

38 in villages assigned a female leader for two election cycles.

39 e developed prediction models by means of an election data set covering 86 countries and more than 50

40 We find that a win in the 10 d before Election Day causes the incumbent to receive an addition

41 weekends after paydays, on holidays, and on election days.

42 Analysis of a recent general election demonstrates that people who were assigned to v

43 bstantially exceeding the kurtosis of normal elections, depending on the level of data aggregation.

44 effect of National Football League games on elections, despite their greater popularity.

45 al parties and other organizations to create election districts with increasingly precise political a

46 The alkyne may bear both election-donating and election-withdrawing substituents.

47 In hypothetical elections for two such positions, men and women listened

48 es the electron transport chain by shuttling elections from NADH and FADH2 to coenzyme Q (CoQ) and cy

49 on the outcome of the Russian parliamentary elections held on December 4, 2011.

50 to play a decisive role in the presidential election in 2004, but they might make a difference in so

51 y, competence judgments collected before the elections in 2006 predicted 68.6% of the gubernatorial r

52 l election of 2008 and in multiple statewide elections in 2010, citizens exhibited large differences

53 ultiyear program to predict direct executive elections in a variety of countries from globally pooled

54 Our models correctly predicted 80 to 90% of elections in out-of-sample tests.

55 presidential, senatorial, and gubernatorial elections in the home county of the team.

56 gubernatorial elections, the most important elections in the United States next to the presidential

57 to vote (experiment 1) and, in two statewide elections in the United States, voter turnout as assesse

58 of political parties during winner-takes-all elections, in networks of companies competing to establi

59 lling results, which can be used to identify election irregularities.

60 local college football games just before an election, irrelevant events that government has nothing

61 The outcome of the elections is likely to influence implementation of the A

62 A central role of elections is the aggregation of information dispersed wi

63 m-especially following the 2016 presidential election-is highly contentious.

64 India in the midst of India's 2014 Lok Sabha elections just before the final votes were cast.

65 to the results of the 2000 U.S. presidential election, lung cancer cases in the State of New York, an

66 receptor matrix was observed by transmission election microscopy (TEM).

67 high-speed microscopy and ultrastructure by election microscopy, but equipment and expertise is not

68 health care as an issue in the presidential election of 2004, how this ranking compares with the imp

69 an Life Panel shows that in the presidential election of 2008 and in multiple statewide elections in

70 ing all aspects of human social affairs: the election of Barack Obama, the war in Iraq, and the colla

71 ignificant rite of passage was marked by the election of pediatric hepatologists to leadership positi

72 These studies have motivated election of TER286 as a clinical candidate.

73 The election of the target gases has been due to their impor

74 We find that election of these routes is determined by venous endothe

75 nce for economic indicators as predictors of election outcomes is relatively weak.

76 nts, global polling is a robust predictor of election outcomes, even in developing states.

77 d large differences in their expectations of election outcomes.

78 ealthy participants took part in a simulated election paradigm, in which they voted for real-life (bu

79 voting patterns in the 2013 Israeli general elections: Participants who were exposed to the paradoxi

80 ve special attention to field experiments on election participation, environmentally sustainable beha

81 ommon knowledge provided by media reports of election polls.

82 The one-election reduction potentials for the M56L, M56I, and M5

83 which took place in proximity to the general elections, reported that they tended to vote more for do

84 Victories within 2 weeks of an election reportedly increase the success of the incumben

85 and prediction markets are used to forecast election results.

86 st detecting these statistical properties in election results.

87 le for the representation of census results, election returns, disease incidence, and many other kind

88 ata set with extensive polling data from 146 election rounds.

89 ates predicted the outcomes of gubernatorial elections, the most important elections in the United St

90 d a substantial impact on the outcome of the elections; they also confirm that the presence of observ

91 lude the message, "We may call you after the election to ask about your voting experience." Increasin

92 iticians who narrowly won or lost a previous election to play behavioral games that provide a measure

93 of his achievements came late in life, with election to the Royal Society of London in 2008 and endo

94 es of a bidding mechanism, the "Compensation Election," which is designed to implement a simple binar

95 on markets, the Iowa Electronic Presidential Election "winner-takes-all" markets.

96 entation, we find that vote distributions of elections with alleged fraud show a kurtosis substantial

97 t when we leverage situations where multiple elections with differing incumbent parties occur in the

98 uence the results of a substantial number of elections with impunity.

99 e in Senate, gubernatorial, and presidential elections, with the effect being larger for teams with s

100 e alkyne may bear both election-donating and election-withdrawing substituents.