ライフサイエンスコーパス: electric field strength

1 characteristic dependence of ion mobility on electric field strength.

2 and is found to be nonlinearly dependent on electric field strength.

3 on, as well as with cation concentration and electric field strength.

4 150 ps to many nanoseconds, depending on the electric field strength.

5 dependent on both exosome concentration and electric field strength.

6 ocess is only weakly affected by the applied electric field strength.

7 of rapid buffer exchange and an increase in electric field strength.

8 8-mm separation channel length under 30 V/cm electric field strength.

9 segment, the migration time, and the overall electric field strength.

10 ulled by a gradient force to regions of high electric field strength.

11 may be attained by simple adjustment of the electric field strength.

12 eorganization increased nonlinearly with the electric field strength.

13 f electrochemiluminescence at relatively low electric field strengths.

14 ssDNA at a range of Mg2+ concentrations and electric field strengths.

15 ight separation channel over a wide range of electric field strengths.

16 ntrol of the cluster orientation at very low electric field strengths (0.18 V mum(-1) ) is achieved.

17 r ds-DNA fragments are stronger functions of electric field strength and buffer concentration than th

18 Experimental conditions, such as electric field strength and column temperature, as well

19 Separately, it was found that both the electric field strength and duration of injection affect

20 open segment with concomitant changes of the electric field strength and the flow velocity at the int

21 matography (CEC) have discontinuities of the electric field strength and the flow velocity at the int

22 l cross-sectional area determining the local electric field strength and, thus, the local interaction

23 coefficients of the DNA at several different electric field strengths and extrapolating the results t

24 The effects of the liquid sheath flow rate, electric field strength, and integration time on sensiti

25 s longer surface propagation lengths, higher electric field strengths, and sharper angular resonance

26 d different thermostability depending on the electric field strength applied.

27 eral hundred million volts per centimetre of electric-field strength are required to field-ionize gas

28 ase protein diameter and to E*, the critical electric field strength at which ion emission from dropl

29 After PEF treatment at the electric field strength between 0.2 and 0.5kV/cm, AAO be

30 Various PEF treatments using electric field strength between 0.2 and 1.2kV/cm and pul

31 We conclude that RH421 detects intramembrane electric field strength changes arising from charge tran

32 s by appropriately adjusting temperature and electric field strength could facilitate their applicati

33 r from the field to the material (for a peak electric field strength exceeding 2.5 volts per angstrom

34 ical potentials needed to achieve 100's V/cm electric field strengths for rapid electrophoresis.

35 olution was further enhanced by reducing the electric field strength from 200 to 125 V/cm.

36 The MIPEF processing variables studied were electric field strength (from 0.4 to 2.0kV/cm) and numbe

37 nce of longitudinal diffusion coefficient on electric field strength has been verified.

38 An estimate of the electric field strength in the CT state yields approxima

39 oard without amplification, producing modest electric field strengths in the nanochannels (0.2-2 kV/c

40 Treating fruit mash with a moderate electric field strength increased juice yield and improv

41 llular recording techniques, and the applied electric field strength is continuously updated using a

42 ions of the pulse amplitudes increase as the electric field strength is increased.

43 Defining E(bo) to be the electric field strength necessary to get rotational resp

44 At optimal PEF parameters: electric field strength of 3kV/cm and pulse width of 10m

45 rovides the best separation efficiency at an electric field strength of 400 V/cm.

46 The PMMA micro-chip was tested under an electric field strength of 705 V cm-1.

47 Using a separation length of 22 cm and an electric field strength of 750 V/cm, analysis times were

48 ccur at flow rates of 8 mL/min and less, and electric field strengths of 25 V/cm and greater.

49 Exponential decay pulses with initial electric field strengths of approximately 13.3 kV/cm and

50 s with the monolithic capillaries when using electric field strengths of up to 300 V cm(-1).

51 to characterize the effects of pressure and electric field strength on compensation voltage, ion tra

52 for treating grapes using moderate and high electric field strength on the enhancement of CI and TPI

53 ignificantly related to either the simulated electric field strength or the distance between the IRE

54 erences and strongly affected by non-uniform electric field strength profile.

55 he advantage of highly focused and localized electric field strength provided by the micronozzle arra

56 in 3-10 min using broad-range ampholytes at electric field strengths ranging from 25 to 100 V/cm.

57 of IEF were completed in less than 25 min at electric field strengths ranging from 50 to 214 V/cm.

58 tration to width ratios as a function of the electric field strength ratio in the control channels an

59 A range of electric field strengths resulting in transient electrop

60 itioned within a nanofunnel at sub-threshold electric field strengths, suggesting the utility of nano

61 Even at high electric field strengths the cell remained largely intac

62 lectrochromatographic parameters such as the electric field strength, the potential drop, and the flo

63 re probed as they electromigrated at varying electric field strength through a crystalline array of s

64 arious conditions of electrophoresis such as electric field strength, time of electrophoresis, switch

65 eved in approximately 30 min by reducing the electric field strength to 125 V/cm.

66 f variance was used to compare the simulated electric field strength to histologic findings.

67 ca tubers were treated with PEF at different electric field strengths up to 1.2kV/cm.

68 Square waves applied to the device generated electric field strengths up to 1.3 x 10(5) V/cm at the t

69 this offset results from the differences in electric field strength used in the techniques.

70 microfluidic channel and applying a range of electric field strengths, we produce protocells that exh

71 The electric field strengths were 200 V/cm for MEKC and 2400

72 stopathologic characteristics, and simulated electric field strengths were assessed.

73 Electric field strengths were strongest in superficial b

74 d multiple forms of BSA detected at elevated electric field strengths (with and without urea).

75 ates an ionic current with a greatly reduced electric field strength, with particular benefits for li