ライフサイエンスコーパス: electron pair

1 e sufficient electrons to give every bond an electron pair.

2 to an in-plane hydrogen bond to an unshared electron pair.

3 porting artificial genetic systems lack this electron pair.

4 f 2'-deoxyadenosine lacking the minor groove electron pair.

5 nd acceptor materials in strongly bound hole-electron pairs.

6 tive and absolute distribution of individual electron pairs.

7 of the copper oxides--is correlated with the electron pairing.

8 which is unrelated and perhaps competes with electron pairing.

9 er oxides, and a candidate for mediating the electron pairing.

10 ate bonding geometry is inconsistent with an electron pair along the Fe-O bond as the Fe-O-C angle is

11 ed out by local pair natural orbital coupled-electron pair and coupled-cluster methods.

12 H2 exhibits a strongly bonded, almost inert electron pair and requires transition metals for activat

13 and thus suggest that it plays a role in the electron pairing and superconductivity.

14 en atoms, ease of alignment of the nonbonded electron pairs, and the overall size of the ligand as ga

15 ours mechanisms in which the superconducting electron pairs are pre-formed in the normal state of und

16 ubbard interaction that describes real-space electron pairing as a precursor to superconductivity.

17 ined by assuming the association of the lone electron pair at sulfur to the Co-alkyne complexes.

18 results rekindle the long-standing idea that electron pairing at interfaces between two different mat

19 nvolves a twofold bonding interaction of two electron pairs between cerium and carbon.

20 simple formation of a sigma-complex through electron-paired bonding within the triplet manifold.

21 This Single Electron Pair Distribution Analysis (SEPDA) reveals quan

22 es of related heteroaryl groups with similar electron pair donor properties have also been found to f

23 least a single hydrogen bond acceptor group (electron pair donor).

24 )NH(3) serves as a good example to study the electron pair donor-acceptor complexes.

25 ence of the hydrogen-bonding acceptor or the electron-pair donor capacity of the solvent on the posit

26 In the absence of electron-pair donor ligands, 4 aggregates (>dimer) in hy

27 of alpha-arylvinyllithiums by 0, 1, 2, and 3 electron-pair donor ligands.

28 t of substrates that neither ionize nor have electron pair donors and that are much simpler in struct

29 lassical picture of chemical bonds as shared-electron pairs evolved to the quantum-mechanical valence

30 group, M-M bonding consists of three shared electron pairs, except for M = Pb.

31 One explanation could be that electron pair formation and related electron-boson inter

32 perconductivity, however, no boson mediating electron pairing has been identified.

33 -vertex heteroboranes containing 14-skeletal electron pairs, have been synthesized by the direct elec

34 f B atoms deviates from Wade's rule by three electron pairs (if treated as a distorted arachno system

35 The mechanism of electron pairing in high-temperature superconductors is

36 rect experimental insight into the nature of electron pairing in SrTiO3 has remained elusive.

37 of magnitude as that of the spin exchange of electron pairing in the high-temperature superconducting

38 Electron pairing in the vast majority of superconductors

39 tational studies support the sharing of five electron pairs in five bonding molecular orbitals betwee

40 e transfer and the charge separation of hole-electron pairs in isolated polymers versus the device fi

41 unusual gap symmetry which implies that the electron pairing interaction is repulsive at short range

42 hrieffer (BCS) explains the stabilization of electron pairs into a spin-singlet, even frequency, stat

43 ds no information regarding how any specific electron pair is distributed.

44 ts for Ca(H(2)O)(n2)(+) indicate that an ion-electron pair is formed when clusters with more than app

45 Electron pairing is stable at temperatures as high as 90

46 Formation of electron pairs is essential to superconductivity.

47 the quantum condensation of superconducting electron pairs is understood as a Fermi surface instabil

48 This phase is an electride, with electron pairs localized in interstices, forming eight-c

49 The main theme of this review is the electron-pairing mechanism responsible for their superco

50 All three classes of compounds have a free electron pair near Arg364, a residue that if mutated con

51 of the conventional type, involving the lone electron pair of an oxygen donor, the latter is perpendi

52 occupied by a sterically active free valence electron pair of chlorine.

53 We propose that the lone electron pair of Pb(II) precludes Pb(II) to function in

54 nd OP identification confirmed that the lone electron pair of the amine-N is the predominant site of

55 ng the short axis and bonds through the lone electron pair of the nitrogen atom instead, and both qui

56 erconductors, but their possible role in the electron pairing of superconductivity remains an open qu

57 mpty p orbital of the carbene and nonbonding electron pairs of heteroatoms of the solvent.

58 erent types of hyperconjugation between lone electron pairs of nitrogen atoms and sigma*C-N orbitals

59 d that the alkylation of 2 involves the lone electron pairs of the N-N-O atoms, and the calculated ac

60 resence of a sterically active, free valence electron pair on Xe.

61 reactant through weak interactions with the electron pairs on alcohol O, while water and parent alco

62 ing constants confirm that the inward-facing electron pairs on the pyridyls destabilize the 1:1 compl

63 sition metals can form bonds with six shared electron pairs, only quadruply bonded compounds can be i

64 most claimed mechanisms, including preformed electron pairing, quantum criticality or density-wave fo

65 Concepts from the very general Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) model to the most esoter

66 d(10) species is stabilized by valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR).

67 glet states is attributed to the decrease in electron pair repulsion resulting from increased delocal

68 Using computational analysis, we reveal that electron pair repulsion within the deprotonated anion is

69 tice vibrations) drives the formation of the electron pairs responsible for conventional superconduct

70 manium and tin, as well as greater nonbonded electron pair stabilization for tin, are more important

71 This enabled control of the electron pairing symmetry by tuning the degree of magnet

72 empty bridge in the catalytic cycle, and the electron pair that constitutes this bond thus plays a cr

73 In conventional superconductors, the electron pairing that allows superconductivity is caused

74 d in terms of underlying polyhedral skeletal electron pair theory (PSEPT) concepts.

75 when oxidized to oxaloacetate, transfers an electron pair to reduce NAD to NADH.

76 er of molecules of MgATP hydrolyzed for each electron pair transferred to substrate, from ca. 5 (the

77 ar, a fundamentally different picture of the electron pairs, which are believed to be formed locally

78 ion between itinerant electrons that creates electron pairs, which condense into a macroscopic quantu

79 ted in single-layer graphene (SLG), with the electrons pairing with a p-wave or chiral d-wave symmetr

80 stence of a robust electronic phase in which electrons pair without forming a superconducting state.