戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 fect) and empirical data (i.e., derived from Electronic Health Records).
2 rd the use of existing resources such as the electronic health record.
3 racterization of clinical phenotypes from an electronic health record.
4 cal, pharmacy, and surgical records from the electronic health record.
5 ceived clinical relevance and entered in the electronic health record.
6 betes patient panels were extracted from the electronic health record.
7 chemic stroke that are integrated within the electronic health record.
8 ost SR adherence programs integrated with an electronic health record.
9 d setting characteristics extracted from the electronic health record.
10 ted from a remote office, facilitated by the electronic health record.
11 t the patient that might not be coded in the electronic health record.
12                 Data were extracted from the electronic health record.
13 porary threats to documentation posed by the electronic health record.
14 re performed using software tools within the electronic health record.
15 academic medical ICU with a well-established electronic health record.
16 atients, and 70.9% had HCV documented in the electronic health record.
17 ician care coordinators and decision-support electronic health records.
18 tments, and clinical outcomes using national electronic health records.
19 ication, use, and CVD risk was captured from electronic health records.
20 nal cohort analysis of geocoded longitudinal electronic health records.
21  treatment data were obtained from patients' electronic health records.
22 sease, was identified using validated linked electronic health records.
23                     Data were collected from electronic health records.
24 ms for diabetes case identification by using electronic health records.
25 f clinical diabetes, which we extracted from electronic health records.
26 cted a cohort study spanning 2001-2013 using electronic health records.
27 hysician "group intelligence" that exists in electronic health records.
28 and patient care environments, including all electronic health records.
29 ions, alarm management, and documentation in electronic health records.
30 ral capabilities as performance feedback and electronic health records.
31 of the United States were more likely to use electronic health records.
32 st effect on decisions about the adoption of electronic health records.
33 p efforts, and feasibility in hospitals with electronic health records.
34 er-recorded diagnosis of dementia within the electronic health records.
35      Baseline covariates were collected from electronic health records.
36 dings, health outcomes, and integration with electronic health records.
37 s a single-center, retrospective analysis of electronic health records.
38                               We used linked electronic health records (1995 to 2015) in The Health I
39  1654 [47.7%], P < .001), and at least basic electronic health records (80 [6.5%] vs 445 [13.9%], P <
40                                              Electronic Health Records aggregated in Clinical Data Wa
41 diction treatment with health care using the electronic health record and a patient activation approa
42 older at diagnosis with data recorded in the electronic health record and follow-up after diagnosis.
43 medical and demographic information from the electronic health record and from parent answers to ques
44 oaches have been increasingly applied to the electronic health record and have led to the discovery o
45  and laboratory data were extracted from the electronic health record and investigated as potential p
46 ily ICU rounds compared with data within the electronic health record and on presenters' paper prerou
47 ened 660 CIEDI cases from 2005 to 2015 using electronic health records and a CIEDI institutional data
48                                              Electronic health records and care management systems ca
49 vailability of detailed phenotypic data from electronic health records and epidemiological studies, t
50                         Inclusion of PROs in electronic health records and hospital patient portals,
51                                      We used electronic health records and natural language processin
52 atient information gathered from high-volume electronic health records and participatory surveillance
53                                              Electronic health records and pharmacy dispensing data w
54 of "high-throughput clinical phenotyping" of electronic health records and speculates on the impact s
55                       The faster adoption of electronic health records and their use in England to as
56 demographic information were abstracted from electronic health records and Wisconsin Division of Heal
57 inal IOP measurements were collected through electronic health records and, in total, 356,987 measure
58  model and an a priori model developed using electronic health records) and a least absolute shrinkag
59  engagement in health care (by interview and electronic health record), and alcohol, drug, and depres
60 aking process, (2) integrating PROs into the electronic health record, and (3) measuring quality in s
61 equencing and the advent of medical imaging, electronic health records, and "omics" technologies have
62 ompt but careful transition to measures from electronic health records, and allocation of sufficient
63 mentia diagnosis by general practitioners in electronic health records, and needs to be taken into ac
64                                              Electronic health records are being increasingly used by
65 ature of genomic information, which existing electronic health records are ill equipped to manage.
66 our novel conceptual framework that uses the electronic health record as a platform on which external
67 alth information technology resources in the electronic health record, as well as facilitated communi
68 teristics (within 2 years of diagnosis) from electronic health records, as well as information about
69                        Using a definition of electronic health records based on expert consensus, we
70                            We implemented an electronic health record-based "best practice advisory"
71 face prompting was superior to an unprompted electronic health record-based checklist at reducing emp
72 rompting mechanism with a more generalizable electronic health record-based checklist.
73                              An open-source, electronic health record-based clinical decision support
74 ctronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage score, an electronic health record-based early warning score.
75                                          The electronic health record-based methodology demonstrated
76 ss potential sample selection bias in future electronic health record-based periodontitis research wa
77                         Implementation of an electronic health record-based prompt increased HCV scre
78 f this study were to assess the impact of an electronic health record-based prompt on hepatitis C vir
79                                              Electronic health record-based retrospective cohort stud
80                                           An electronic health record-based retrospective cohort stud
81         We tested whether prospective use of electronic health record-based trigger algorithms to ide
82 equires electronic reporting of quality from electronic health records, beginning in 2014.
83                           Physicians who use electronic health records believe such systems improve t
84  primary care settings (repeated mailing, an electronic health record best practice alert [BPA], and
85 eir incident prescriptions from primary care electronic health records between 2006 and 2009 linked t
86 dapting to new technologies and implementing electronic health records, but the efforts need to be al
87 recorded in the immunization registry via an electronic health record by March 31, 2011.
88                                          The electronic health record can be used to feed decisions a
89 t characteristics derived from review of the electronic health record can be used to refine risk pred
90 linical decision support integrated with the electronic health record can improve appropriate use of
91 ional rounding script and a well-established electronic health record, clinician laboratory data retr
92 mpting for evidence-based practices using an electronic health record could impact ICU care delivery
93 e emergence of population-based resources in electronic health records, coupled with the rapid expans
94 ed CVD at baseline (51% women), using linked electronic health records covering primary care, hospita
95  health records (n=12), and secondary use of electronic health record data (n=19).
96           Three other models, 1 developed in electronic health record data and 2 developed in adminis
97  challenges in and the potential for merging electronic health record data and genomics for cardiovas
98                                              Electronic health record data can identify patients with
99                  Cross-sectional analysis of electronic health record data collected between January
100                                          The electronic health record data for all study eyes were an
101                                          The electronic health record data for each of the 3 groups w
102                                      We used electronic health record data from 162 patients enrolled
103                 This study used longitudinal electronic health record data from 2005 through 2010 for
104   Alternatively, the growing availability of electronic health record data has facilitated the possib
105  care patients in the Geisinger Clinic using electronic health record data.
106 ating ICU transfer as a competing risk using electronic health record data.
107 lergy and other allergies in childhood using electronic health record data.
108 47690 patients with HS were identified using electronic health record data.
109 ithms for heart failure identification using electronic health record data: (1) heart failure on prob
110  a nationally representative UK sample using electronic health records data collected between January
111                                              Electronic health records data from 446,480 Geisinger Cl
112                                        Using electronic health records data to predict events and ons
113                                              Electronic health records data were then linked with New
114 e onset predictive models using longitudinal electronic health records data.
115  in primary care patients using longitudinal electronic health records data.
116 Data on these children were obtained from an electronic health record database.
117 etwork database, a population-representative electronic health records database from the United Kingd
118 ough meetings, Delphi processes, analysis of electronic health record databases, and voting, followed
119  that information extracted from cloud-based electronic health records databases, in combination with
120 ity inherent in disease histories of a large electronic health records dataset with over half a milli
121                       Using a multihospital, electronic health record-derived data set, we identified
122 mographic, insurance, and clinical data from electronic health records, determined each patient's nei
123 ove clinical practice, information exchange, electronic health record documentation, harmonization of
124               The widespread adoption of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) by physicians will create
125                  A retrospective analysis of electronic health record (EHR) data from 50,515 adult pr
126            Data-driven phenotype analyses on Electronic Health Record (EHR) data have recently drawn
127                         Exome sequencing and electronic health record (EHR) data of 50,726 individual
128 try subjects) and clinical diagnoses from an electronic health record (EHR) data set (n=19 093).
129 California (KPNC) (2009-2013; n = 1,847,165) electronic health record (EHR) data sets.
130                    Despite interest in using electronic health record (EHR) data to assess quality of
131 of extracting these dimensions from existing electronic health record (EHR) notes.
132 ns to document code status in the outpatient electronic health record (EHR) of patients with advanced
133                                           An electronic health record (EHR) review of 1,062 unique RA
134 al visits for concussion in the CHOP unified electronic health record (EHR) system (July 1, 2010, to
135  of previous reports examining the impact of electronic health record (EHR) system migration in ophth
136  were collected during routine visits via an Electronic Health Record (EHR) system.
137             Patient portals tied to provider electronic health record (EHR) systems are increasingly
138                                  Adoption of Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems has led to collec
139                                     Although electronic health record (EHR) systems have potential be
140                                              Electronic health record (EHR) systems have transformed
141 trends using detailed clinical data from the electronic health record (EHR) systems of diverse hospit
142 are systems are increasingly adopting robust electronic health record (EHR) systems that not only can
143 dinal historical data, commonly available in electronic health record (EHR) systems, can be used to p
144 ently, new information technologies, such as electronic health record (EHR) systems, have led to furt
145 onal barriers that inhibit their adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems.
146  approach to GWAS using data embedded in the electronic health record (EHR) to define the phenome.
147                        We used an integrated electronic health record (EHR) to identify characteristi
148 icians and patients, and modification of the electronic health record (EHR) to include FBSE as a reco
149                          The availability of electronic health record (EHR)-based phenotypes allows f
150 referral hepatology clinic and the impact of electronic health record (EHR)-based reminders on adhere
151                        Purpose To develop an electronic health record (EHR)-based trigger algorithm t
152 n of common Neandertal variants to over 1000 electronic health record (EHR)-derived phenotypes in ~28
153       Comparisons between data from PROs and Electronic Health Records (EHR) are lacking.
154 land health-care system were identified from electronic health records (EHR), and each diagnostic gro
155 sing a combination of adverse event reports, electronic health records (EHR), and laboratory experime
156 ation is vital for study findings drawn from Electronic Health Records (EHR).
157  on 4 activities (direct clinical face time, electronic health record [EHR] and desk work, administra
158 legislation promoted wide-spread adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) across US hospitals; ho
159                                              Electronic health records (EHRs) and clinical decision s
160                                              Electronic health records (EHRs) are an increasingly uti
161                                              Electronic health records (EHRs) are being increasingly
162                                              Electronic health records (EHRs) are highlighted as a cr
163  is aiming to achieve nationwide adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) but lacks robust empiri
164                                              Electronic health records (EHRs) contain information on
165               The increasing availability of electronic health records (EHRs) creates opportunities f
166    The study was designed to validate use of electronic health records (EHRs) for diagnosing bipolar
167 er it can be predicted with secondary use of electronic health records (EHRs) in early pregnancy.
168                                              Electronic health records (EHRs) may be key tools for im
169 e prevalence of drug allergies documented in electronic health records (EHRs) of large patient popula
170                      The ability to mine the electronic health records (EHRs) of patients followed as
171 have shown few quality-related advantages of electronic health records (EHRs) over traditional paper
172                             Secondary use of electronic health records (EHRs) promises to advance cli
173 ng, but epidemiological data using patients' electronic health records (EHRs) remain sparse.
174 nt of internal SAF workflows within existing electronic health records (EHRs) should be the standard
175 meet meaningful use criteria or their use of electronic health records (EHRs) to manage patient popul
176                         Furthermore, whether electronic health records (EHRs) with chronic disease ma
177                  The PCMH typically involves electronic health records (EHRs), organizational practic
178                                        Using Electronic Health Records (EHRs), we identified in 2010
179 grated health care system using longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs).
180 ncentives to encourage the meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs).
181 nts for meaningful use of complete certified electronic health records (EHRs).
182 r patients to be estimated from free text in electronic health records (EHRs).
183 nguished effects of the PCMH (which involves electronic health records [EHRs] plus organizational cha
184 ter-generated random number sequence, to use electronic health records either alone (control) or with
185 and fellows were trained once to complete an electronic health record-embedded checklist daily for ea
186                                           An electronic health record-embedded, cluster-randomized, m
187                                          The electronic health record enables long-term outlooks on h
188                            Among 1.3 million electronic health record encounters from January 1, 2010
189 nitial work has confirmed the utility of the electronic health record for understanding mechanisms an
190 n California (KSPC) cancer registry data and electronic health records for 663 AYA patients with eith
191 upport systems (CDSS) can scan the patient's electronic health records for clinical risk factors pred
192                 ESP-VAERS monitors patients' electronic health records for new diagnoses, changes in
193 earched and retrieved comprehensive clinical electronic health records for over 200 000 patients from
194 orting the successful integration and use in electronic health records for two standardized nursing t
195                                   The use of electronic health records for vision and eye health surv
196                               We used linked electronic health records from 1997 to 2010 in the CALIB
197                               We used linked electronic health records from 1997 to 2010 in the CALIB
198 , with HealthLNK, a 2006 to 2012 database of electronic health records from 6 Chicago health systems.
199                      Our sample consisted of electronic health records from 9310 HIV-infected and 510
200                                  We utilized electronic health records from a large New England healt
201 ing nationally representative United Kingdom electronic health records from January 1, 1995, until De
202             Dementia diagnoses obtained from electronic health records from January 1, 1996, to Octob
203 s cohort and nested case-control study using electronic health records from January 1, 2004, to Decem
204                                              Electronic health records from January 2011 to April 201
205                           Information in the electronic health records from managed health care organ
206 hat could be reliably detected in anonymised electronic health records from South London and Maudsley
207                   METHODS AND We used linked electronic health records from the United Kingdom Clinic
208               The two major data sources are electronic health records from traditional health system
209                                      We used electronic health records, genetic co-heritability analy
210 analysis computer algorithms, as well as the electronic health record, genomics, and other disparate
211 ncer from 1995 to 2007 using UK primary care electronic health records (GPRD).
212 mic data to the information contained in the electronic health record has been demonstrated.
213                                              Electronic health records have the potential to improve
214                                              Electronic health records hold great promise for clinica
215 m by applying natural language processing to electronic health records (i2b2 cohort).
216     Using longitudinal IOP measurements from electronic health records improves our power to identify
217 integrated health-care delivery systems with electronic health records in 10 US states.
218  The Health Improvement Network primary care electronic health records in the UK.
219           The very low levels of adoption of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals suggest that
220 e estimates of the prevalence of adoption of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals.
221                                  The federal Electronic Health Record Incentive Program requires elec
222            Recommendations for incorporating electronic health records into such a system are present
223               Natural language processing of electronic health records is increasingly used to study
224 ns but tools contained only 78% of available electronic health record laboratory data.
225                                   By linking electronic health records, laboratory and imaging data,
226                               Application of electronic health record-leveraged SR interventions may
227                                              Electronic health records may provide additional informa
228 or older, younger, and all patients using an electronic health record measure of AMI mortality endors
229 sing (HVBP) Program method computed with the electronic health record measure.
230            Applying the previously validated electronic health records model to our study sample yiel
231 n of standardized nursing terminologies into electronic health records (n=12), and secondary use of e
232             Co-morbidity was evaluated using electronic health records obtained from the PennOmics da
233  then conducted a manual chart review in the electronic health record of all patients with a code for
234 d clinical information through review of the electronic health record of each patient.
235                                              Electronic health records of >1.6 million adult patients
236                              We reviewed the electronic health records of 392 patients with noninfect
237  study, we used linked primary and secondary electronic health records of 4 million individuals from
238  used geocoded residential address data from electronic health records of 49,770 children and adolesc
239                              We reviewed the electronic health records of 500 patients with scleritis
240                                          The electronic health records of 500 patients with scleritis
241  data were extracted from administrative and electronic health records of 623,358 patients aged 6-19
242  Other recent developments include access to electronic health records of daytime primary care practi
243 ducted using data obtained from the complete electronic health records of Kaiser Permanente Southern
244 antidiabetic medications were extracted from electronic health records of Kaiser Permanente Southern
245 hallenges by collecting information from the electronic health records of large numbers of patients w
246 hallenges by collecting information from the electronic health records of large numbers of patients w
247                                              Electronic health records offer the potential to assess
248                                 Longitudinal electronic health records on 99,785 Genetic Epidemiology
249                  The data were obtained from electronic health records, operative reports, discharge
250                                              Electronic health record OR management system implementa
251                                              Electronic health record OR management system implementa
252 s for prescribing antibiotics into patients' electronic health records; peer comparison sent emails t
253                        Subsequent linkage to electronic health records permitted analysis of major in
254 e financial incentives for meaningful use of electronic health records, physicians and hospitals will
255 ighlight how the expansion of patient-facing electronic health record portals could exacerbate existi
256 ar research using LInked Bespoke studies and Electronic health Records) programme to assemble a cohor
257 ar research using linked bespoke studies and electronic health records) programme to investigate the
258                     Tumor registry and other electronic health records provided information on sociod
259  major limitation of our study is the use of electronic health records rather than comprehensive deme
260   Intervention steps included queries of the electronic health record repository for patients with ab
261                                  A search of electronic health records revealed an odds ratio of 2.4
262                   The study also included an electronic health records review approved by the institu
263                            We used data from electronic health records routinely entered in the Clini
264 f eligibility for specialist consultation by electronic health record searches for triggers was most
265                                              Electronic health records should be used to facilitate b
266 l and process measures derived from a common electronic health record system provided real-time feedb
267 ening algorithms that are integrated into an electronic health record system.
268                Second is the emerging use of electronic health record systems and other large clinica
269 lyses of the vast phenotypic repositories in electronic health record systems and population-based bi
270 tes that support of such analytics in future electronic health record systems can improve cohort iden
271                                The spread of electronic health record systems has been the basis for
272                                  Adoption of electronic health record systems has increased the avail
273 s intervention can be easily integrated into electronic health record systems to increase HCV diagnos
274 able triggers are difficult to abstract from electronic health record systems.
275                       Using a definition for electronic health records that was based on expert conse
276 ion-research and having them use a dedicated Electronic-Health-Record that provides feedback, improve
277  assessed physicians' adoption of outpatient electronic health records, their satisfaction with such
278 arning Score and could be implemented in the electronic health record to alert caregivers with real-t
279 ssover trial using software tools within the electronic health record to compare saline to balanced c
280 en up to age 7 years from Geisinger Clinic's electronic health record to conduct a sex- and age-match
281 e system (IHS) that uses case management and electronic health records to determine mortality from CV
282                                      We used electronic health records to extract prescribing data an
283 ort outpatient quality measures from data in electronic health records to facilitate care improvement
284 bjects were passively followed through their electronic health records to identify HZ incidence.
285 hat applies a set of rules to data stored in electronic health records to offer actionable recommenda
286 lso examined the relationship of adoption of electronic health records to specific hospital character
287 ice physiological data, and information from electronic health records to ultimately provide better c
288  curated medical phenome, often derived from electronic health records, to search for associations be
289                           We used anonymized electronic health records totaling >100 million person-y
290 stratification tool using commonly collected electronic health record variables in a large multicente
291          In January 2012, the default in the electronic health record was changed for IM providers fr
292                                        Using electronic health records, we defined a cohort of 2479 a
293                   Last available data in the electronic health record were used to assess end points.
294 ructured data retrospectively extracted from electronic health records were analyzed for 3 months fol
295                                   Abstracted electronic health records were assembled from inpatients
296              Frequently used multifunctional electronic health records were associated with higher pe
297 ural capabilities of primary care practices, electronic health records were associated with higher pe
298             Baseline data from comprehensive electronic health records were linked with vital status
299 rge quantities of digital content within the electronic health record, which is potentially a valuabl
300 s is an important aspect of text mining from electronic health records, which are increasingly recogn

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top