ライフサイエンスコーパス: eligibility criteria

1 Eight studies comprising 1511 patients (all children) met eligibility criteria.

2 58 were identified as potentially eligible and 18 fulfilled eligibility criteria.

3 he 490 articles identified by literature search, 16 met the eligibility criteria.

4 ed health analysis and 1138 in the K6 analysis met the DACA eligibility criteria.

5 age, 59 years; 440 [39%] women), 1074 (94%) of patients met eligibility criteria.

6 cities in the PLCO were compared to those based on the NLST eligibility criteria.

7 rty-two studies investigating 10 opioid drugs fulfilled the eligibility criteria.

8 A literature search was conducted using specific eligibility criteria across electronic databases, including O

9 Using only four BC eligibility criteria and all patients with OC, an estimated 1

10 From August 2010 to December 2016, 793 patients met Z0011 eligibility criteria and had SLN metastases.

11 met the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) eligibility criteria and may benefit from a SBP target goal o

12 Among 405 articles identified, 21 met the initial eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis.

13 Total 167 patients (95 males and 72 females) met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study.

14 Secondary eligibility criteria are described later.

15 Clinical trial eligibility criteria are necessary to define the patient popu

16 Eligibility criteria assessment was conducted by 2 of us.

17 anges in health outcomes among individuals who met key DACA eligibility criteria (based on age at immigration and at the

18 e included in our review, a study had to meet the following eligibility criteria: be published in a peer-reviewed journal

19 d better discrimination than standard lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (c-statistic = 0.66 [0.64 to 0.69]).

20 The broadening of clinical trial eligibility criteria can be considered to better reflect the

21 subject headings for randomized controlled trials that met eligibility criteria defined for each question.

22 Of 1026 potential participants who fulfilled eligibility criteria during telephone screening, 701 (68.3%)

23 viewers independently screened articles for congruence with eligibility criteria, engaged in data extraction, and assesse

24 The first addresses reporting of eligibility criteria for centers where the intervention is pe

25 linical trials, we have conducted a comprehensive review of eligibility criteria for commercial investigational new drug

26 Our findings suggest that eligibility criteria for current cancer clinical trials tend

27 e not reported in published studies included the following: eligibility criteria for donors (47%), materials used for col

28 y regimen between Jan 1, 2000, and Jan 9, 2015, and met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in our study.

29 Patients and Methods Eligibility criteria for patients from our database were: tre

30 individuals aged 60-75 y, consistent with Generation Study eligibility criteria, from the National Alzheimer's Coordinat

31 , and the US Food and Drug Administration examined specific eligibility criteria (ie, brain metastases, minimum age, HIV

32 Models for HIV-related eligibility criteria in National Cancer Institute-sponsored s

33 Eligibility criteria included a recently diagnosed adenoma an

34 Eligibility criteria included age 2 to 17 years, AD diagnosis

35 Eligibility criteria included all studies reporting on the pr

36 Eligibility criteria included any published English-language

37 Eligibility criteria included assessment of macronutrient qua

38 Key eligibility criteria included measurable disease, failure of

39 Patients and Materials Study eligibility criteria included patients with stage II to III N

40 Eligibility criteria included previous normal vision for >/=1

41 Eligibility criteria included WHO performance status 0 or 1,

42 utrient substitution.Thirteen observational studies met the eligibility criteria (n < 1700 cases).

43 For BC, 35.6% met one or more select eligibility criteria; of those, 29.0% discussed, 20.2% were a

44 The models outperformed the NLST eligibility criteria over a substantial range of risk thresho

45 can College of Cardiology/American Heart Association statin eligibility criteria to identify individuals at a higher risk

46 SPRINT eligibility criteria were applied to the 1999 to 2006 Nationa

47 The primary eligibility criteria were current nicotine dependence (DSM cr

48 Eligibility criteria were self-identification as transwomen,

49 ave received at least one dose of PCV13; cases had the same eligibility criteria with the addition of having WHO-defined

50 In contrast, the NLST eligibility criteria yielded a sensitivity of 71.4% and a spe