戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 he study was conducted in an urban, academic emergency department.
2 teral chest radiographs were obtained in the emergency department.
3 T in patients who presented with BAPT to the emergency department.
4 nciples for improving palliative care in the Emergency Department.
5 ife pharmacotherapies and who boarded in the emergency department.
6 for patients with suspected infection in the emergency department.
7 2-3 days, and his family took him to a local emergency department.
8 dex (PSI) were calculated with data from the emergency department.
9 n presents with severe abdominal pain to the emergency department.
10 acute chest pain in patients admitted to the emergency department.
11 nd 64% of hospitalizations originated in the emergency department.
12 t be able to be directly discharged from the emergency department.
13 nts with community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department.
14 etween centralized laboratories and hospital emergency departments.
15 zed, double-blind, superiority trial at 5 US emergency departments.
16 egimen suitable for prompt administration in emergency departments.
17 in the model were race and pain level in the emergency department (3 months), and race and baseline d
18 er rates of antibiotic administration in the emergency department (81% vs 94%; p < 0.01), lower mean
19 ved head computed tomographic imaging in the emergency department, 839 (5.5%) had ICI.
20 tive, controlled trial at an academic center Emergency Department, a device that diverts and sequeste
21 ood sampled from ischemic stroke patients at emergency department admission, and BBB permeability was
22  was randomly selected from 1100 consecutive emergency department admissions for minor injury.
23 capacity, estimated by adjusting for routine emergency department admissions, was about 50% (range, 4
24 mperature >100.4 degrees F documented in the emergency department; afebrile patients lacked both.
25  continues to present a major burden to U.S. emergency departments, affecting up to nearly 850,000 em
26 33-year-old male patient was admitted to the emergency department after a car accident.
27  numbers of exacerbations, and visits to the emergency department (all P </= .02) 3 and 12 months aft
28 plied, in the 12 months after a visit to the emergency department among patients treated by high-inte
29                            Increasing use of emergency departments among older patients with palliati
30 -blind, randomized superiority trial in 5 US emergency departments among outpatients older than 12 ye
31           PTSD symptoms were assessed in the emergency department and 1, 3, and 6 months posttrauma.
32 homatis (CT)-infected patients in a hospital emergency department and confirmed that mobiNAAT showed
33 nitiated within 6 hours after arrival in the emergency department and had all items in a 3-hour bundl
34                                              Emergency department and ICUs of an academic center.
35 hrough patient-level linkage to California's Emergency Department and Inpatient Databases.
36 indings support the expanded use of REBOA in emergency department and prehospital settings.
37 project, significant time constraints in the Emergency Department and the ability of older patients a
38 ith suspected infection who presented to the emergency department and were admitted to the hospital b
39 nts who presented to a level 1 trauma center emergency department and who underwent dual-energy CT fo
40 g in primary care clinical settings, such as emergency departments and community health centers, were
41                          Thirteen U.S.-based emergency departments and ICUs.
42  the patient entered the door of the MSTU or emergency department, and any problems encountered durin
43 ry, retail pharmaceutical, nursing facility, emergency department, and dental care increased by $933.
44        Data were also extracted from office, emergency department, and hospital records.
45  among physicians practicing within the same emergency department, and rates of long-term opioid use
46             Radiography was performed in the emergency department, and the patient was released with
47 tional coagulation tests at admission to the emergency department, and the presence of coagulopathy i
48 and nonhospital-owned ambulatory facilities, emergency departments, and hospitals from January 1, 200
49 k, afebrile patients received lower rates of emergency department antibiotic administration, lower me
50 ate greater than or equal to 24 breaths/min, emergency department antibiotics, and emergency departme
51          In many Western countries, hospital emergency departments are overcrowded, leading to the de
52 whose antimicrobials began within 3 hours of emergency department arrival ranged from 0% to 100%.
53 charge, return of spontaneous circulation on emergency department arrival, and favorable neurologic s
54 ransferred, received antimicrobials prior to emergency department arrival, or were treated by an atte
55 4% received antimicrobials within 3 hours of emergency department arrival.
56 could serve as an initial triage tool in the emergency department as well as a method of determining
57  severe sepsis patients admitted through the emergency department, as longer time to initial antimicr
58 rial pressure </=65 mm Hg) presenting to the emergency department at a 1500-bed referral hospital in
59          Adult patients admitted through the emergency department at risk for acute respiratory distr
60  patients treated with antimicrobials in the emergency department between 2009 and 2015 for fluid-ref
61 elected inpatients with sepsis treated at 21 emergency departments between 2010 and 2013 in Northern
62  study of the NEXUS Head CT DI in 4 hospital emergency departments between April 2006 and December 20
63 ural patients with sepsis seek care in local emergency departments, but demographic and disease-orien
64  an outside facility (45%-70%; P<0.001), and emergency department bypass for emergency medical servic
65                                              Emergency department bypass was also associated with sho
66 ivation, single call transfer protocols, and emergency department bypass.
67 n = 731) bypassed a rural hospital for their emergency department care.
68 d in the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada emergency departments, children receiving routine vaccin
69 admissions, and in some cases, visits to the emergency department compared with those produced by sus
70 se series analysis using data from the State Emergency Department Database and State Inpatient Databa
71 using the ambulatory surgery, inpatient, and emergency department databases from the states of Califo
72 ld, not receiving initial antibiotics in the emergency department, death before antibiotic redosing,
73 1.00-1.05] per 1-hr delay; p < 0.01), as was emergency department delay (p = 0.04) but not prehospita
74               Both total medical contact and emergency department delay in antibiotic administration
75 erquartile range, 0.40-0.66 hr) and a median emergency department delay of 3.6 hours (interquartile r
76 ween total medical contact, prehospital, and emergency department delays in antibiotic administration
77 than or equal to 90 mm Hg or explicit sepsis emergency department diagnoses; 2) quick Sequential Orga
78           We defined serious infection as an emergency department diagnosis of a serious infection or
79 ncy department sepsis-serious infection plus emergency department diagnosis of organ dysfunction, end
80 septic shock receiving antimicrobials in the emergency department, door-to-antimicrobial times varied
81 on of </=20 minutes (38%-56%; P<0.0001), and emergency department dwell time of </=20 minutes (33%-43
82 % of patients with heart failure seen in the emergency department (ED) are admitted, less is known ab
83 atients with end-stage renal disease use the emergency department (ED) at a 6-fold higher rate than d
84 ent of severe sepsis/septic shock (SS/SS) in Emergency Department (ED) has yet to be assessed.
85                                 Although the emergency department (ED) is an opportune setting for in
86                                          The emergency department (ED) is used to manage cancer-relat
87 oice of analgesic to treat acute pain in the emergency department (ED) lacks a clear evidence base.
88                            Physicians in the emergency department (ED) need additional tools to strat
89 ional study using patients admitted from the emergency department (ED) of a large urban hospital with
90 onnaire for adult patients presenting at the emergency department (ED) of the St. Pierre hospital in
91  who are discharged either directly from the emergency department (ED) or after a brief period of ED-
92 e criteria for suspicion of infection in the emergency department (ED) or hospital wards from Novembe
93  is a substantial public health problem, and emergency department (ED) physicians require a clinical
94                   Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) represent a heterogeneous popu
95 y, Ohio were enrolled from the inpatient and emergency department (ED) settings at a children's hospi
96  diplopia presentations in US ambulatory and emergency department (ED) settings.
97 e expansion affects the location and type of emergency department (ED) use.
98 e expansion affects the location and type of emergency department (ED) use.
99                                    Avoidable emergency department (ED) utilization and hospital readm
100                 The effect of vaccination on emergency department (ED) utilization for herpes zoster
101                        Primary outcomes were emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization for s
102 thma was defined by at least 1 outpatient or emergency department (ED) visit with a primary diagnosis
103 ource-specific PM2.5 and respiratory disease emergency department (ED) visits and examined between-ci
104                         Hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits for asthma are more fre
105                To determine the frequency of emergency department (ED) visits for nonurgent and urgen
106                                      Data on emergency department (ED) visits for selected cardioresp
107              Ketorolac use, reinterventions, emergency department (ED) visits, and readmissions in ad
108 ded rates of outpatient visits, readmission, emergency department (ED) visits, fever (temperature >/=
109 ves' impact on population morbidity, such as emergency department (ED) visits.
110 ciated with 30-day inpatient readmission and emergency department (ED) visits.
111 ental illness (SMI), when they face extended emergency department (ED) waits, higher thresholds for a
112  to rule out AMI in adults presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain.
113 ents with chest pain are discharged from the emergency department (ED) with the diagnosis "unspecifie
114 e childhood acute wheezing conditions in the emergency department (ED), and there is variation within
115 Tennessee residents 18 years or older in the emergency department (ED), outpatient clinics, or hospit
116 omographic (CT) pulmonary angiography in the emergency department (ED).
117 tonic saline (HS) treatment in the pediatric emergency department (ED).
118 n from blood obtained at presentation to the emergency department (ED).
119 tative care delivered across the spectrum of emergency departments (EDs) in the United States is poor
120                A challenge for clinicians in emergency departments (EDs) is rapid identification of t
121                                        Urban emergency departments (EDs) seem to be able to detect ne
122 ath in the 30 days following an inpatient or emergency department encounter listing an influenza Inte
123 ut underlying medical conditions came to the emergency department for evaluation of persistent pain o
124 care physicians can prevent transport to the emergency department for many residents of assisted livi
125 dard criteria including: presentation to the emergency department for medical care within 24h of a ph
126 welve centers evaluated 1282 patients in the emergency department for possible AMI from 2011 to 2013.
127                      In the 30 participating emergency departments, for a 4-week period, consecutive
128 he Netherlands have integrated with hospital emergency departments, forming "emergency care access po
129 luded patients enrolled in 25 North American emergency departments from 2004 to 2006.
130 tem-wide efforts affecting multiple hospital emergency departments have ever been evaluated.
131 center sample of patients with sepsis in the emergency department, hourly delays in antibiotic admini
132                                           an Emergency Department in a large teaching hospital in the
133 corticoids and methotrexate presented to the emergency department in December with worsening shortnes
134 o study the prognostic value of fever in the emergency department in septic patients subsequently adm
135 ected patients with chest pain presenting at emergency departments in 2013 and 2014.
136                                              Emergency departments in 9 Dutch hospitals.
137 al cohort study was conducted in 6 pediatric emergency departments in Canada between July 10, 2010, a
138          The model was tested at 3 pediatric emergency departments in level I pediatric trauma center
139 ive observational cohort study comprising 26 emergency departments in the Pediatric Emergency Care Ap
140                               Large academic emergency departments in the United States.
141                                          The emergency department is an important venue for initial s
142 ting a mechanical ventilator protocol in the emergency department is feasible and associated with imp
143 s/min, emergency department antibiotics, and emergency department IV fluids volume, being afebrile re
144        In children treated for sepsis in the emergency department, lactate levels greater than 36 mg/
145 tment nurse managers and physicians from all emergency departments listed in the California Office of
146                 To evaluate the impact of an emergency department mechanical ventilation protocol on
147 ading cause for drug-abuse-related visits to emergency departments, most of which are due to cardiova
148                                              Emergency department nurse managers and physicians from
149                                     Surveyed emergency department nurse managers and physicians indic
150  risk factors were inpatient boarding in the emergency department (odds ratio, 2.67; CI, 1.74-4.09),
151         Participants were recruited from the emergency department of a large level I trauma center wi
152             Adult patients presenting to the emergency department of a large urban hospital with pres
153 iatric patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department of a tertiary children's hospital f
154                                              Emergency department of an academic medical center.
155         Participants were recruited from the Emergency Department of an urban hospital in the United
156 ain and hs-cTnT analyzed concurrently in the emergency department of Karolinska University Hospital,
157 tus (absence of cachexia) who arrived at the emergency department of one of 24 hospitals in France be
158 8 years of age who were admitted through the emergency department of the hospital were included.
159 tal of 105 patients evaluated for AMI in the emergency departments of 2 teaching hospitals in the Hen
160                                              Emergency departments of a rural Midwestern state.
161 njuries of any severity who presented to the emergency departments of ten Australian and New Zealand
162 /=18 years) within 24 h of presenting to the emergency department or acute medical unit of a large UK
163    Participants were all patients seen in an emergency department or admitted to a hospital from 2004
164 e respiratory distress syndrome while in the emergency department or after admission to the ICU.
165               Patients evaluated through the emergency department or as inpatient consults were exclu
166 anically ventilated patients admitted to the emergency departments or ICUs of participating study hos
167 a patient's admission to the operating room, emergency department, or intensive care unit.
168  access to patients in office waiting areas, emergency departments, or hospital wards.
169  shock who were admitted to the ICU from the emergency department, other wards, or directly from out
170 improvement priorities leading to changes in Emergency Department-palliative care processes.
171        Crystalloid initiation was faster for emergency department patients (beta, -141 min; CI, -159
172                      Mechanically ventilated emergency department patients experiencing acute respira
173 lled consecutive adult (aged 18 yr or older) emergency department patients from November 11, 2012, to
174                                              Emergency department patients greater than or equal to 1
175        GUIDED-HF (Get With the Guidelines in Emergency Department Patients With Heart Failure) is a m
176                                        Adult emergency department patients with moderate to severe ac
177 ng into a clinical risk model for evaluation emergency department patients with possible acute myocar
178                                           In emergency department patients with septic shock, afebril
179                                              Emergency department patients with suspected infection a
180  Efforts to safely reduce length of stay for emergency department patients with symptoms suggestive o
181  determine suicide risk from the language of emergency department patients.
182     In the 6 hours after presentation to the emergency department, patients in the sepsis protocol gr
183 ds (N=28) were recruited from the community, Emergency Department, Pediatric Pulmonary Department, an
184  are prescribed inappropriately in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs), but little data are availa
185 ppropriate scoring system for use in similar emergency department populations with a wide spectrum of
186 195) or placebo (n = 195) within 24 hours of emergency department presentation and continued to hospi
187 n exposure was TTA, defined as the time from emergency department presentation to appendectomy.
188 at least 2 calendar days, within 72 hours of emergency department presentation.
189  younger who received sedation for a painful emergency department procedure were enrolled in the stud
190 acute infections in patients admitted in the emergency department, promoting antibiotics by oral rout
191 cies often require immediate transport to an emergency department regardless of the patient's conditi
192 psis receiving antibiotics within 6 hours of emergency department registration.
193 sure was antibiotics given within 6 hours of emergency department registration.
194  some settings, and their added value in the emergency department remains unknown.
195                               The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample data set was examined for te
196 uary 2006-December 2012) from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample were analyzed.
197                          Previous studies of emergency department sedation are limited by their singl
198 2) quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment emergency department sepsis 318,832 (0.31%; 95% CI, 0.26
199 t sepsis visits were as follows: 1) original emergency department sepsis 665,319 (0.64%; 95% CI, 0.57
200 2 (0.31%; 95% CI, 0.26-0.37); and 3) revised emergency department sepsis 847,868 (0.82%; 95% CI, 0.74
201                             We defined three emergency department sepsis classifications: 1) original
202 sifications may impact national estimates of emergency department sepsis epidemiology.
203                       Adult (age, >/= 18 yr) emergency department sepsis patients.
204 ues for the entire cohort were: Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score of 0.92, Simplified Ac
205                             The Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score outperformed more comp
206                      The estimated number of emergency department sepsis visits were as follows: 1) o
207 lood pressure </= 100 mm Hg); and 3) revised emergency department sepsis-original or quick Sequential
208 partment sepsis classifications: 1) original emergency department sepsis-serious infection plus emerg
209 2) quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment emergency department sepsis-serious infection plus prese
210 or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment emergency department sepsis.
211                 This study evaluates whether emergency department septic shock patients without a fev
212  in patients undergoing blood cultures in an Emergency Department setting.
213 ts from any cause to either the inpatient or emergency department setting.
214  and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) criteria in the emergency department setting.
215 HF (Multiple Estimation of risk based on the Emergency department Spanish Score In patients with AHF)
216                                        In an emergency department study we recruited 31 patients with
217                                       In the emergency department, the intervention was associated wi
218 diagnostic, multicenter study conducted at 9 emergency departments, the present study evaluated patie
219                     There was a reduction in emergency department tidal volume from 8.1 mL/kg predict
220        Secondary outcomes included time from emergency department to operating room, length of surger
221 es, the use of imaging techniques, time from emergency department to operating room, percentage of co
222  with rural sepsis patients' bypassing rural emergency departments to seek emergency care in larger h
223 evere wheezing episode (90% hospitalized/10% emergency department treated) were followed for 7 years.
224 ss points." This collaboration has decreased emergency department use by 13% to 22%, and treatment of
225                                           An emergency department ventilator protocol which targeted
226 y readmission (26262 [11.1%]), postdischarge emergency department visit (34204 [14.4%]), any predisch
227 ving Medicare beneficiaries who had an index emergency department visit in the period from 2008 throu
228 s an adverse event, defined as any unplanned emergency department visit or inpatient admission within
229 e of recurrent biliary events (defined as an emergency department visit or unplanned hospitalization
230 ajor bleeding, defined as hospitalization or emergency department visit with a primary diagnosis of i
231 posure (ozone concentrations 1 day after the emergency department visit) had slightly or modestly les
232  Hematuria-related complications, defined as emergency department visit, hospitalization, or a urolog
233 , 30-day postdischarge mortality, and 30-day emergency department visit.
234 362.0) and diminished with duration from the emergency department visit: RR 6.1 (95% CI, 3.5-10.7) at
235 otherapy < 14 days from death; more than one emergency department visit; and more than one hospitaliz
236 ad larger increases than comparison sites in emergency department visits (30.3 more per 1000 benefici
237 rin use accounts for more medication-related emergency department visits among older patients than an
238  were 34 511 312 encounters, with 25 226 014 emergency department visits and 9 285 298 observation or
239 ter autologous HSCT measured by frequency of emergency department visits and hospitalizations and Mya
240 s treated with IMiDs had significantly fewer emergency department visits and hospitalizations compare
241  departments, affecting up to nearly 850,000 emergency department visits annually.
242     We may amend these approaches to include emergency department visits as a further outcome.
243 h that categorizes hospital readmissions and emergency department visits as separate event types is p
244 stimated 2,920 (95% CI: 2,650, 3,190) annual emergency department visits could be prevented by extend
245                         Hospitalizations and emergency department visits due to rotavirus AGE were re
246 and statins), and adverse clinical outcomes (emergency department visits for hypoglycemia or hypergly
247 , and December 31, 2014, and followed up for emergency department visits for MVCs.
248                                              Emergency department visits for MVCs.
249  source-specific fine particulate matter and emergency department visits for respiratory disease in f
250 porary estimates of the epidemiology of U.S. emergency department visits for sepsis.
251                                              Emergency department visits for skin infections in the U
252 whether the patient has experienced multiple emergency department visits or hospitalizations, particu
253  the risk of substance-related events (i.e., emergency department visits related to substance use dis
254 as calculated by summing costs for avoidable emergency department visits using the Billings algorithm
255 o produce national estimates of annual adult emergency department visits using updated sepsis classif
256                                              Emergency department visits were only significantly high
257                                         U.S. emergency department visits, 2009-2011.
258 ad exacerbations in the last 12 months, 9.7% emergency department visits, and 7.3% hospitalizations.
259 lar numbers of office visits, urgent care or emergency department visits, and hospitalizations (moder
260  shows) and rates of firearm-related deaths, emergency department visits, and inpatient hospitalizati
261      Outcomes included 90-day complications, emergency department visits, and readmissions.
262                                              Emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and inten
263 icare, components of cost, and resource use (emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and inten
264 f hematuria-related complications (including emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and urolo
265 e, and preenrollment characteristics (costs, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, intensive
266  Demonstration sites had larger increases in emergency department visits, inpatient admissions, and M
267 e burden variables (pain variables, hospital/emergency department visits, missed school days) were co
268  in early discharge, readmissions, recurrent emergency department visits, outpatient visits, or visit
269 to reduce pressure on hospital services from emergency department visits.
270 time-series study of ozone effects on asthma emergency department visits.
271 lems with after-hours care and inappropriate emergency department visits.
272 09-2011, there were 103,257,516 annual adult emergency department visits.
273 eek or more, and (5) oral corticosteroid use/emergency department visits.
274 zing heart failure hospital readmissions and emergency department visits.
275 cute kidney injury, altered gas exchange, or emergency department (vs inpatient) presentation.
276  patients, increased body temperature in the emergency department was strongly associated with lower
277                                          The emergency department was the main location of exposure.
278 gment elevation myocardial infarction to the emergency department, we assessed the diagnostic perform
279  characteristics, including diagnoses in the emergency department, were similar in the two treatment
280 ental injury, in patients discharged from an emergency department who were given a diagnosis of a per
281 g patients evaluated for possible AMI in the emergency department with a modified HEART score </=3, e
282  of a 9-year-old boy who was admitted to our Emergency Department with an intracranial hypertension s
283   History A 30-year-old man presented to the emergency department with epigastric pain.
284              The patient was admitted in the emergency department with jaundice, dark urine and pale
285 tal admissions of children presenting to the emergency department with moderate to severe asthma.
286 g difficulties presented to the Accident and Emergency Department with right ankle pain after an inve
287               All patients admitted from the emergency department with sepsis or septic shock (define
288 ed from pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department with signs and symptoms of pharyngi
289             Among patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected infection, the use o
290 n, 34 ng/L) in 1555 adults presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggesting ischemia.
291 rolled unselected patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of acute m
292 selected patients (N=1954) presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of AMI, co
293 period, consecutive patients who visited the emergency departments with suspected infection were incl
294 cation sample, n = 31) were recruited in the emergency department within 24 hours of trauma exposure.
295 , and hospital readmissions or visits to the emergency department within 30 days of discharge.
296 dren aged 5 to 18 years who presented to the emergency department within 48 hours after head injury a
297 for same duration) were both delivered in an emergency department within 6 h of a motor vehicle accid
298  concussion were enrolled across 9 pediatric emergency departments within the Pediatric Emergency Res
299             The patient elected to leave the emergency department without undergoing treatment, and h
300 g painful procedures is standard practice in emergency departments worldwide.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top