ライフサイエンスコーパス: emergency physician

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します

1 hs between emergency nurse practitioners and emergency physicians.

2 ionnaire was filled from 2008 to 2010 by the emergency physicians.

3 nurse practitioners was 91% and 88% for the emergency physicians.

4 ital-based attending physicians, including 6 emergency physicians, 13 hospitalists, and 8 intensivist

5 Twenty-four emergency physicians, 37 hospitalists, and 37 intensivis

6 % (95% confidence interval, 78%-85%); 17% of emergency physicians, 40% of neurologists, and 52% of ra

7 Of 569 computed tomography readings by emergency physicians, 67% were correct; of 435 readings

8 ency nurse practitioners was 85% and for the emergency physicians 91%.

9 Approximately 800,000 times a year, an emergency physician admits a patient with symptomatic he

10 One emergency physician and emergency nurse practitioner ind

11 The sensitivity and specificity of emergency physicians and emergency nurse practitioners w

12 ediatric critical care physicians, pediatric emergency physicians, and trainees in these subspecialti

13 intra intravenous fibrinolysis, even though emergency physicians are most commonly the first to eval

14 spitalization/discharge) were established by emergency physicians before and after CT scan results.

15 29% by emergency medical technicians, 71% by emergency physicians) between December 2008 and December

16 cancellation because of reinterpretation of emergency physicians' ECG (4.6%).

17 tivation by emergency medical technicians or emergency physicians has been shown to substantially red

18 NINDS-compliant strategy (ie, evaluation by emergency physician in less than 10 minutes, interpretat

19 ivation by emergency medical technicians and emergency physicians in a large group of hospitals organ

20 efore assessed anaphylactic patients seen by emergency physicians in the Berlin area covering 4 milli

21 ntially changed the malpractice standard for emergency physicians in three states had little effect o

22 on of thrombolytic drugs outside hospital by emergency physicians is becoming more common.

23 re and included heart failure cardiologists, emergency physicians, laboratory medicine specialists, n

24 Emergency physicians must determine both the location an

25 givers (n=24) and individual interviews with emergency physicians (n=23) and advanced practice nurses

26 In public health emergencies, physicians need to address the patient's ne

27 unravels a strong underuse of adrenaline by emergency physicians, not reflecting treatment protocols

28 literature from the perspective of pediatric emergency physicians, offer suggestions for family membe

29 Intensivists and emergency physicians (p = 0.048) were more likely to adm

30 Six emergency nurse practitioners and ten emergency physicians participated.

31 l diagnostic ultrasonography performed by an emergency physician (point-of-care ultrasonography), ult

32 Emergency physicians practice in an information-poor, re

33 then assessed by an experienced accident and emergency physician (research registrar) who completed a

34 ate the catheterization laboratory, allowing emergency physicians to activate the catheterization lab

35 ect the emergency medical services provider, emergency physician, trauma surgeon, and anesthesiologis

36 etween the emergency nurse practitioners and emergency physicians was 0.83.

37 y to create a route to CCM certification for emergency physicians who complete a critical care fellow

38 intervals, and triage decisions were made by emergency physicians who were unaware of point-of-care r

39 After identifying the emergency physicians within a hospital who cared for the

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。