ライフサイエンスコーパス: emergency surgery

1 congestive heart failure were predictive of emergency surgery.

2 een patients admitted following elective and emergency surgery.

3 of bronchoaspiration in patients undergoing emergency surgery.

4 90, respectively) and poorer calibration for emergency surgery.

5 plications associated with GI-PTLD requiring emergency surgery.

6 c dissection is a lethal condition requiring emergency surgery.

7 he practice of elective colectomy to prevent emergency surgery.

8 pecialty of trauma and critical care include emergency surgery.

9 and often result in incidental detection at emergency surgery.

10 ain effectiveness at reducing recurrence and emergency surgery.

11 otic cover, return to work and activity, and emergency surgery.

12 pment of complications and avoid the risk of emergency surgery.

13 terations of the mortality rates of ELHR and emergency surgery.

14 and older (10.5% vs 8.4%; P < 0.001) but not emergency surgery (1.8% vs 2.0%; P = 0.52).

15 hospitals (91%) reported capacity to perform emergency surgery, 1 in 6 hospitals (16%) reported havin

16 ht patients were evaluated: 1,053 acute care emergency surgery, 1,964 general surgery, 1,491 transpla

17 care emergency surgery patients: acute care emergency surgery 10.8% versus general surgery 4.3%, tra

18 engths of stay than other groups: acute care emergency surgery (13.5 +/- 17.4 d) versus general surge

19 lished studies overestimate the mortality of emergency surgery (17% vs. 5.4%).

20 s were more likely than controls to have had emergency surgery (33 percent vs. 7 percent, P<0.001) or

21 2%; P < 0.001), as well as increased risk of emergency surgery (4.3% vs 1.4%, P < 0.001).

22 care emergency surgery patients: acute care emergency surgery 73.4% versus general surgery 64.9%, tr

23 ere significant reductions in utilization of emergency surgery (8.8% vs 14.9%; P < 0.0001), 30-day (5

24 ther determinants of adverse outcome include emergency surgery, advanced age, and cardiovascular dise

25 , peripheral vascular surgery, neck surgery, emergency surgery, albumin level less than 30 g/L, blood

26 The other 3 included both emergency surgery and a private elective component.

27 y stent placement, MACE were associated with emergency surgery and advanced cardiac disease but not s

28 regional referral hospital with capacity for emergency surgery and blood transfusion.

29 omorbidities were similar between acute care emergency surgery and general surgery, whereas transplan

30 ricans should focus on reducing the need for emergency surgery and improving perioperative management

31 cans were younger but more likely to undergo emergency surgery and present with hypertension, dyspnea

32 ilar to those for younger patients with age, emergency surgery and prior CABG being the powerful pred

33 ncluded 2764 pregnant women (50.5% underwent emergency surgery) and 516,705 nonpregnant women (13.2%

34 incidence was 9.0% for readmission, 1.9% for emergency surgery, and 14.1% for all-cause mortality.

35 awsuit risk and incidence in trauma surgery, emergency surgery, and elective surgery at a single acad

36 ed diverticulitis, a clinical indication for emergency surgery, and free air on an abdominal computed

37 emodynamically stable, had no indication for emergency surgery, and had an US scan followed by subxip

38 essures, lung injury scores, elective versus emergency surgery, and presence or absence of pneumonia.

39 nemia, history of cerebral vascular disease, emergency surgery, and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass

40 rgery (ACS, a combination of trauma surgery, emergency surgery, and surgical critical care) has been

41 arette smoking, chronic respiratory disease, emergency surgery, anesthetic time of 180 min or more, a

42 Absolute risks of readmission and emergency surgery are low after nonoperative management

43 Three included emergency surgery as part of their practice, but no priv

44 and critical care surgeons who had included emergency surgery but no private elective component had

45 throughout the 4 Eras, whereas the need for emergency surgery declined (p = 0.002).

46 The addition of emergency surgery did not improve the financial viabilit

47 o national estimates of the excess burden of emergency surgery exist.

48 H is high in patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery for colorectal diseases.

49 to characterize the risks of readmission and emergency surgery for diverticulitis, accounting for dea

50 been suggested as a promising alternative to emergency surgery for left-sided malignant colonic obstr

51 e procedure of choice for patients requiring emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer disease.

52 Emergency surgery for type A dissection in patients with

53 ic surgery, abdominal surgery, neurosurgery, emergency surgery, general anesthesia, head and neck sur

54 , nonsurgical admission, and admission after emergency surgery had a greater impact on prognosis than

55 Emergency surgery has a higher cost and worse outcomes c

56 Emergency surgery has become a rare event after percutan

57 Tamponade occurred in 16.6% and emergency surgery in 3.4% of cases.

58 Patients requiring emergency surgery in the recent time periods had a highe

59 ry is considering combining SCC, trauma, and emergency surgery into "acute care surgery" fellowship t

60 MARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Mortality following emergency surgery is a key quality improvement metric in

61 medicine, care of the elderly, elective and emergency surgery), located in four NHS hospital organiz

62 ent, blood urea nitrogen level, transfusion, emergency surgery, long-term steroid use, smoking, and a

63 included patient-related factors (severity, emergency surgery, malignancy, Candida colonization, and

64 septal rupture must always be considered as emergency surgery may be life saving.

65 ; 95% CI 1.08 to 2.96); operative variables: emergency surgery (odds ratio 2.12, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.51)

66 ed organs (odds ratio 2.13); admission after emergency surgery (odds ratio 3.08); and nonsurgical adm

67 ospital mortality rate of 2.5% and a rate of emergency surgery of 4.3%.

68 ot impact on survival in patients undergoing emergency surgery of the aorta and support the concept t

69 We studied 122 patients who underwent emergency surgery of the aorta between January 1982 and

70 ics for labor and emergencies, in trauma for emergency surgeries or life-saving (resuscitative) situa

71 farction patients with successful PCI and no emergency surgery or Q-wave myocardial infarction were f

72 ce that age, dementia, hypertension, pre-ICU emergency surgery or trauma, Acute Physiology and Chroni

73 stics (ICU admission after elective surgery, emergency surgery, or medical admission; Simplified Acut

74 : OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.30-1.45; P < .001; and emergency surgery: OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.55-1.76; P < .001

75 : OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 2.00-2.68; P < .001; and emergency surgery: OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 2.48-3.41; P < .001

76 Emergency surgery patients are at high risk for retained

77 Acute care emergency surgery patients had statistically significant

78 The greater complexity of emergency surgery patients may bias outcome comparisons

79 Acute care emergency surgery patients were more likely interhospita

80 vice, was significantly higher in acute care emergency surgery patients: acute care emergency surgery

81 ion, was significantly higher for acute care emergency surgery patients: acute care emergency surgery

82 tis more than doubled, without a decrease in emergency surgery, percutaneous interventions, or admiss

83 for the resuscitation of patients coming for emergency surgery procedures.

84 acute procedural success to 98%, reduced the emergency surgery rate to 0.2%, and reduced the incidenc

85 ons on use of elective colectomy or rates of emergency surgery remains undetermined.

86 sed risk of retention of a foreign body were emergency surgery (risk ratio, 8.8 [95 percent confidenc

87 l surgery patients admitted to an acute care emergency surgery service with other general surgery pat

88 Our Trauma and Emergency Surgery Services treated 228 patients with dog

89 Multivariate analysis showed that only emergency surgery status (OR 3.59, P < 0.01), redo CABG

90 o intraprocedural deaths, cardiac tamponade, emergency surgery, stroke, myocardial infarction, or maj

91 n is greater in patients admitted following "emergency" surgery than in patients admitted following "

92 ely perforated diverticulitis and undergoing emergency surgery, the use of laparoscopic lavage vs pri

93 Preventing emergency surgery through improved care coordination and

94 entilation 24 hrs after admission, male sex, emergency surgery, trauma, presence of critical care fel

95 ographics, preoperative organ insufficiency, emergency surgery, type of surgical procedure, cardiopul

96 Patients undergoing emergency surgery typically require resuscitation, eithe

97 rolled clinical trial in patients undergoing emergency surgery under general anesthesia at Geneva Uni

98 d 516,705 nonpregnant women (13.2% underwent emergency surgery) undergoing general surgery.

99 Hospital performance in emergency surgery was found to not depend on its share o

100 Emergency surgery was necessary in 16 and 13 patients, r

101 Emergency surgery was performed in 24 patients (20%) and

102 Emergency surgery was required in 3% of cases.

103 Emergency surgery was the only independent predictor of

104 Urgent or emergency surgery was undertaken in 17 patients (25%).

105 In this paper in The Lancet Series about emergency surgery we summarise the available data on acu

106 20 published studies, while those for WW and emergency surgery were derived from the 1997 HCUP-NIS da

107 ility of developing acute symptoms requiring emergency surgery with the WW strategy was 1.1%.

108 sions were associated with increased risk of emergency surgery, yet age less than 50 years was not.