ライフサイエンスコーパス: emmetropia

1 nts by ray tracing, aiming for postoperative emmetropia.

2 at 10 years postoperatively in eyes aimed at emmetropia.

3 pia and 34 (65.3%) had SE within +/-1.0 D of emmetropia.

4 continues to occur in an attempt to maintain emmetropia.

5 error was defined as refractive error minus emmetropia.

6 e can maintain coordinated growth to achieve emmetropia.

7 ed us closer to the ultimate surgical result-emmetropia.

8 ategorized as myopia (</=-0.50 diopter [D]), emmetropia (-0.50 to +0.50 D), and hyperopia (>/=+0.50 D

9 ssified into 4 groups: hyperopia (>/=1.0 D), emmetropia (-0.99 D to 0.99 D), mild myopia (-1.0 D to -

10 The predictor was refractive status; emmetropia (-0.99 to +0.99 diopters [D]), mild myopia (-

11 odds of prevalent AMD (pooled OR myopia vs. emmetropia: 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92).

12 for optical biometry and SRK/T formula, the emmetropia (+/-1.00 D) of SE, was able to get near 100%

13 ds of prevalent AMD (pooled OR hyperopia vs. emmetropia: 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.2

14 ll known and can negatively affect achieving emmetropia after concomitant cataract surgery.

15 Ten subjects with emmetropia and 10 with myopia were tested.

16 rs of age to 9.5% (standard error, 0.01) for emmetropia and 15.3% (standard error, 0.06) for high hyp

17 e can maintain coordinated growth to achieve emmetropia and 2) disruptions of emmetropization resulti

18 spherical equivalent (SE) within +/-0.5 D of emmetropia and 34 (65.3%) had SE within +/-1.0 D of emme

19 s requesting a surgical procedure to achieve emmetropia and also address presbyopia.

20 s requesting a surgical procedure to achieve emmetropia and also address presbyopia.

21 function are not significantly different in emmetropia and LOM, the ETs are significantly different.

22 igate retinotopic accommodation responses in emmetropia and myopia under dynamic conditions.

23 Five subjects with emmetropia and six subjects with myopia were tested (+0.

24 7.1%, 7.7%, and 11.7%, in eyes with myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia, respectively.

25 es of refractive development had been toward emmetropia, and the control subjects with myopia were no

26 One eye was set for emmetropia, and the fellow eye received an additional as

27 of teenagers in comparison to teenagers with emmetropia, and to confirm whether the level of trait an

28 s a spherical equivalent of -1.00 D or less, emmetropia as -0.75 to +0.75 D and hyperopia as +1.00 D

29 If the goal is emmetropia at age 5 years, then the immediate postoperat

30 0.377, both P < .001) than control eyes with emmetropia at the macular region.

31 n subjects with myopia than in subjects with emmetropia before and after timolol instillation.

32 Compared to control eyes with emmetropia, choroidal vascularity was greater in eyes wi

33 r hyperopic subjects was consistently nearer emmetropia compared to their horizontal meridian.

34 However, the emmetropia decreased to 80% when the enclavation is retr

35 byopia-correcting intraocular lenses require emmetropia for the best visual outcome, as small amounts

36 hed subjects with emmetropia or mild myopia (emmetropia group) and 34 subjects with moderate to sever

37 gmatism </=1.5 D, anisometropia </=1.0 D) or emmetropia (hyperopia </=1.0 D; astigmatism, anisometrop

38 -astigmatism with refractive status (myopia, emmetropia, hyperopia).

39 alent -8.66 +/- 2.00 D) and 88 controls with emmetropia in both eyes underwent choroidal imaging usin

40 ral high myopia in their right eyes and near emmetropia in their left eyes from infancy.

41 Maintaining emmetropia is an active process.

42 This negative shift toward emmetropia is associated with ocular alignment, which su

43 A total of 54.5% of eyes were within 1 D of emmetropia (n = 12) and 77.3% were within 2 D of emmetro

44 tropia (n = 12) and 77.3% were within 2 D of emmetropia (n = 17) 6 months (n = 22) after surgery.

45 compared with DSBCS patients (compared with emmetropia: odds ratio for ametropia was 1.02, confidenc

46 After eyes have achieved emmetropia or have compensated for a minus lens, continu

47 ia group) and 17 age-matched volunteers with emmetropia or mild myopia (control group) were housed fo

48 conditions from 32 age-matched subjects with emmetropia or mild myopia (emmetropia group) and 34 subj

49 tial postoperative refractive error was near emmetropia or undercorrected by 2 diopters or more.

50 summation with the fellow eye, adjusted for emmetropia, produces an excellent binocular distance VA

51 ranges of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 D of target and emmetropia, respectively.

52 Emmetropia (spherical equivalent -0.5 to 0 diopter) was

53 Compared with those with emmetropia, those with high myopia had a significantly i

54 Acceptable emmetropia was considered if the resulting spherical equ

55 refractive error within +/- 0.25 diopters of emmetropia was higher than in the WF-optimized group (67

56 ropia was present in 222 subjects (52%), and emmetropia was present in 111 subjects (26%).

57 Seven of 84 (8.3%) children achieved emmetropia while an equal proportion were myopic (45%) o