ライフサイエンスコーパス: emotion

1 refers both to a sentiment and to a distinct emotion.

2 are made available to advance the science of emotion.

3 riatum, a brain region central to reward and emotion.

4 typically studied as a uniquely human moral emotion.

5 n and human neuroimaging studies of negative emotion.

6 regulation of motor activity, attention, and emotion.

7 data implicate this nigrostriatal circuit in emotion.

8 the absence of executive control) than with emotion.

9 ulation of speech production, attention, and emotion.

10 hin brain areas that regulate motivation and emotion.

11 scular and behavioral correlates of negative emotion.

12 age is associated with lability of mood and emotion.

13 hic distress marker was specific to negative emotion.

14 lue of stimulus intensity or self-reports of emotion.

15 be explained by a constructionist account of emotion.

16 inct downstream targets to regulate negative emotion.

17 a general evaluation rather than a specific emotion.

18 use contempt is a sentiment, it cannot be an emotion.

19 ave often been attributed to the presence of emotion.

20 to the high granularity of musically induced emotion.

21 ological implications for the study of other emotions.

22 ealth & Lifestyle, QoL for Work, and QoL for Emotions.

23 n tasks involving the recognition of others' emotions.

24 ed for a model-based valuation framework for emotions.

25 he regulatory power of the social sharing of emotions.

26 ess about pleasure than about exploration of emotions.

27 experience: current emotions predict future emotions.

28 under conditions that should elicit positive emotions.

29 bility to predict others' future actions and emotions.

30 not necessarily entail pleasure or positive emotions.

31 nts are functional networks of attitudes and emotions.

32 nces from positively and negatively valenced emotions.

33 s towards seclusion and restraint, and their emotions.

34 s, such computational methods must encompass emotions.

35 nd deactivation of two different clusters of emotions.

36 nctional connectivity and activation to face emotions.

37 arousing interplay of positive and negative emotions.

38 t elicits interest, feeling moved, and mixed emotions.

39 s provide a principled approach to examining emotions.

40 s' future emotions from currently observable emotions.

41 o distance post-experiencing/embracing their emotions.

42 intensities of angry, happy, or fearful face emotions.

43 scle paralysis triggered by strong, positive emotions.

44 physical aggression was unrelated to nurses' emotions.

45 nce has to incorporate human motivations and emotions.

46 re, we consider formal valuation accounts of emotions.

47 ansition likelihoods between the same set of emotions.

48 for, respectively, the negative and positive emotions.

49 ) receptivity, (2) deflection/rejection, (3) emotion, (4) characterization of patient, (5) considerat

50 ocial-relational value and moderate discrete emotions across scenarios.

51 LD responses were modulated by both fear and emotion ambiguity (the uncertainty that a facial express

52 primarily decreased as a linear function of emotion ambiguity.

53 i to be involved in the cognitive control of emotion and (2) within-person expression of a distribute

54 pt, like many other emotions, can be both an emotion and a sentiment.

55 sentations, suggesting a strict link between emotion and action.

56 FG) is a key cortical hub in the circuits of emotion and cognitive control, and it has been frequentl

57 f gain/loss framing as a competition between emotion and control.

58 in response to stress, and how drugs impact emotion and gastrointestinal function.

59 ation and more complex features such as face emotion and identity can be averaged across multiple ele

60 Participants completed a facial emotion and identity discrimination task prior to and fo

61 sham stimulation prior to completing facial emotion and identity perception tasks.

62 atory Disease Questionnaire emotional score (emotion and mastery domains) and physical score (dyspnea

63 res in brain regions involved with language, emotion and memory functions.

64 tion and learning, social and communication, emotion and mood regulation, and behaviour (n=5100-6952)

65 of a recently described cingular-prefrontal emotion and motor regulation network.

66 dergic modulation of the interaction between emotion and personality.

67 s of biological sex and estrous cyclicity on emotion and provide a framework for understanding fluctu

68 n, lower self-esteem increases the effort in emotion and stress processing and cognitive control, pos

69 how higher activation of regions involved in emotion and stress regulation, self-referential processi

70 stress, men recruit regions associated with emotion and stress regulation, self-referential processi

71 I explore the idea that emotions and attitudes are conceptually distinct by appl

72 sions interact to potentiate specific social emotions and behaviors in intergroup contexts.

73 rging from a stratification of diverse basic emotions and dispositional attitudes.

74 ese observations parallel recent concepts of emotions and entail implications for the understanding a

75 et al. (2014) and discuss the role of mixed emotions and fluency.

76 res distinguishing the phenomenon from basic emotions and highlights the fact that it comprises a coo

77 egulators of cataplexy triggered by positive emotions and identifies the amygdala as the brain region

78 areas could play a role in the regulation of emotions and in procedural motor and emotional memory co

79 ress broadly affects the ability to regulate emotions and may contribute to generalization of threat-

80 hedding light on the broader neurobiology of emotions and motor control.

81 distinctions among a wide range of positive emotions and reason about the probable causes of others'

82 th a thousand words." Iconic photos stir our emotions and transform our perspectives about life and t

83 hat was uninfluenced by spatial frequency or emotion, and a cortical-amygdala connection that conveye

84 y of technology but also of human cognition, emotion, and behavior.

85 with disruptions in prefrontal regulation of emotion, and callous behavior with abnormal fear process

86 The interaction of motivation, emotion, and cognition is the real strength of human int

87 ctions, including brain development, reward, emotion, and cognition.

88 Sex, emotion, and reproduction are fundamental and tightly en

89 ificantly impact quality of life for health, emotions, and especially careers.

90 nnection to values, general goals, language, emotions, and human development.

91 The constructs of attitudes, emotions, and sentiments are often only verbally defined

92 eglect of the biological, adaptive nature of emotions, and the absence of convincing empirical suppor

93 terized by the experience of strong negative emotions (anger and anxiety) in response to everyday sou

94 involvement in, coercive measures, and their emotions (anger, guilt, fear, fatigue, sadness), could i

95 labels, the boundaries between categories of emotion are fuzzy rather than discrete.

96 ions, but it remains unclear what aspects of emotion are processed.

97 the extent to which reported experiences of emotion are structured by discrete and dimensional geome

98 KEY POINTS: Emotions are accompanied by concordant changes in viscer

99 We argue that negative emotions are an important resource for the arts in gener

100 Emotions are centered in subjective experiences that peo

101 ncing-Embracing model proposes that negative emotions are constitutive of aesthetic experiences.

102 "Negative" emotions are never purely negative.

103 were slower when categorizing any of the two emotions as long as it was congruent with the emotion in

104 Gervais & Fessler's Attitude-Scenario-Emotion (ASE) model is a useful tool for the detection o

105 We develop the Attitude-Scenario-Emotion (ASE) model of sentiments, in which enduring att

106 ervais & Fessler's (G&F's) Attitude-Scenario-Emotion (ASE) model reduces sentiments to superficial pa

107 In the Attitude-Scenario-Emotion (ASE) model, social relationships are subpersonn

108 tly on Twitter, contains distinct collective emotions associated with those cultural celebrations.

109 onnally realized by sentiments: a network of emotions/attitudes representing relational values.

110 ompassing cognition, perception, action, and emotion behavioral domains, to determine the potential e

111 ables predicted future decisions to regulate emotion beyond what could be predicted from stimulus and

112 d those receiving sham stimulation on facial emotion, but not identity, perception tasks.

113 l prefrontal cortex in understanding others' emotions, by showing that even unilateral lesions result

114 periences, but little is known about whether emotion can prospectively enhance memory formation for t

115 ions, arguing that contempt, like many other emotions, can be both an emotion and a sentiment.

116 (activation vs deactivation) or (2) specific emotion categories (fear vs happy).

117 emotional states and the boundaries between emotion categories-that is, the geometric organization o

118 l emotional arousal value or a more specific emotion category distinction.

119 effects of valence independent of arousal or emotion category is a challenging task, given that these

120 al expressions because exemplars within this emotion category take on valence values spanning the dim

121 interest in sex is associated with specific emotions, characteristic of major cultural and religious

122 ssociations between iron exposures and mood, emotion, cognition, and memory; animal studies to determ

123 ia (difficulty in recognizing and expressing emotions) compared with healthy peers and may influence

124 Awe, a complex emotion composed by the appraisal components of vastness

125 ions between early ACEs and brain structure, emotion development, and health outcomes longitudinally.

126 e performance was a significant predictor of emotion discrimination performance change following tRNS

127 hich concept of altogether pleasurable mixed emotions does our model involve?

128 y and anxiety, on neural responses to facial emotions during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

129 changes in autonomic functions and negative emotions during, rather than in the absence of, migraine

130 ogy, including experience and recognition of emotion, dyadic and group dynamics, context-conditioned

131 al models contain accurate information about emotion dynamics above and beyond what might be predicte

132 rder (BPD) is thought to be mediated through emotion dysregulation via high trait anger.

133 l prefrontal cortex connectivity may mediate emotion dysregulation when very anxious and irritable yo

134 n we ourselves experience an empathized-with emotion (e.g., pain).

135 l processing, impacts sensitivity to musical emotion elicited by timbre and tonal system information.

136 ncing-Embracing model proposes that negative emotions embedded in literary works can be rewarding.

137 Besides these differences, all emotions enhanced amygdala functional integration with p

138 features that are inconsistent with a basic emotion, especially its protracted duration and frequent

139 otional faces correlated with performance on emotion evaluation (TASIT1), social inference - minimal

140 mplement the distinctive influence that each emotion exerts on perceptual, cognitive, and motor respo

141 onomic and behavioral correlates of negative emotion expectation, whereas inactivation of area 32 inc

142 to perform an explicit categorization of the emotion expressed in test PLDs.

143 findings give new insight into the origin of emotion expression.

144 -based model predicting decisions to control emotion, finding that activity in brain regions associat

145 stress disorder (PTSD), but a comprehensive, emotion-focused perspective on how psychotherapy affects

146 ataplexy has been closely linked to positive emotions for >130 years, the neural circuitry that under

147 ntly adopt the particular powers of negative emotions for art's purposes.

148 he structure-function relation between brain-emotion from the traditional one-to-one mapping toward a

149 ure to artworks, thereby preventing negative emotions from becoming outright incompatible with expect

150 ent aspect of recognizing others' actions or emotions from body cues.

151 motion transitions to predict others' future emotions from currently observable emotions.

152 ted emotional states we uncover gradients of emotion-from anxiety to fear to horror to disgust, calmn

153 s growth trajectory is associated with later emotion functioning.

154 The commonality of facial expressions of emotion has been studied in different species since Darw

155 ral signature distinctive of different basic emotions has recently come under renewed scrutiny.

156 The underlying rationale is that negative emotions have been shown to be particularly powerful in

157 metric organization of the semantic space of emotion-have sparked intense debate.

158 erventions), and "Self" (effort and fatigue, emotions, identity, and stigma).

159 I argue that boredom is a potentially useful emotion in art reception and show how the Distancing-Emb

160 ocial dimension to the enjoyment of negative emotion in art reception.

161 scripts in the hedonic valuation of negative emotion in art.

162 These results highlight the role of emotion in belief-change resistance and offer insight in

163 human amygdala processes both the degree of emotion in facial expressions and the categorical ambigu

164 derstanding the neural circuits underpinning emotion in humans and treating anxiety or other prevalen

165 Once we understand emotion in simulation, we largely understand emotion in

166 motions as long as it was congruent with the emotion in the adapter sequence.

167 Our results highlight the importance of emotion in the social transmission of moral ideas and al

168 emotion in simulation, we largely understand emotion in tragedy (and fiction).

169 ereby propose that the enjoyment of negative emotions in art and fiction is distinct from the immedia

170 aus et al. for tackling the role of negative emotions in art reception.

171 of self-sought hedonic exposure to negative emotions in art reception.

172 ith stipulating high levels of felt negative emotions in art reception?

173 ve model to explain why people pursue darker emotions in art, but we believe they underplay the consi

174 with differences in neural response to face emotions in several areas (F2, 888 >/= 13.45; all P < .0

175 torical contextualization modulates negative emotions in the arts.

176 nctionally integrated model of attitudes and emotions in the context of social relationships.

177 aiming to explain the enjoyment of negative emotions in the context of the arts should consider how

178 onsible for the processing and regulation of emotions, including ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPF

179 Contempt shares its features with other emotions, indicating that there is no justification for

180 im of this study is to better understand how emotions influence the end-of-life decision-making proce

181 ing patients in consultations, responding to emotions, informing patients about prognosis and treatme

182 a putative mechanism for perturbed attention-emotion interactions, which could bias salience processi

183 mixed emotions often help integrate negative emotions into altogether pleasurable trajectories.

184 n art as a vehicle for transforming negative emotions into pleasure.

185 tion by regulating and transforming negative emotions into positive experiences.

186 Here, we show that the expression of moral emotion is key for the spread of moral and political ide

187 tendency to eat more or less in response to emotion is learned rather than inherited.

188 cause its main connective tissue - "negative emotions" - is beyond the grasp of the authors' largely

189 ather thanks to, some of the strong negative emotions it provokes.

190 great detail, with much confidence, and with emotion, it doesn't mean that it is true.

191 and beyond what might be predicted by static emotion knowledge alone.

192 om each other or from healthy youths in face emotion labeling accuracy.

193 system is important for reward, motivation, emotion, learning, and memory.

194 article characterizes being moved as a mixed emotion linked to sadness through metonymy.

195 critically involves baby conveying negative emotions - literally compelling parents to respond and p

196 dency occurs and how symbiosis with negative emotions may arise, in art and in life.

197 We argue that emotions may implement such metareasoning approximations

198 gdala, a brain area important for processing emotion, may be part of this circuit.

199 ocesses, complementing the Attitude-Scenario-Emotion model in explaining similarities and differences

200 tempt, may be mapped onto a network of basic emotions moderated by attitudinal representations of soc

201 hether facial expressions of different basic emotions modulate the functional connectivity of the amy

202 We provide evidence that contempt is not an emotion, nor an attitude, but a reactive defensive mecha

203 anguage (EBL), its capability to express our emotions notwithstanding.

204 ted subset of our sample was asked to recall emotions of anxiety and fear connected to experiences of

205 recalling violent events from the effect of emotions of fear and anxiety.

206 ople with cognitive impairment; managing the emotions of patients, families and themselves; and havin

207 racing model proposes that concomitant mixed emotions often help integrate negative emotions into alt

208 nt that can potentially trigger individuals' emotion or motivate physical reactions.

209 well beyond the ability to distinguish basic emotions or draw different inferences from positively an

210 in apparently healthy individuals exposed to emotions or physical exercise.

211 & Fessler assert that contempt is (a) not an emotion (or an attitude) but (b) a sentiment.

212 These dual effects on memory and emotion originated from a common right prefrontal cortic

213 cate abnormal developmental processes in key emotion pathways in pediatric PTSD.

214 andom noise stimulation (tRNS) could enhance emotion perception abilities.

215 One brain region thought to support emotion perception is the inferior frontal cortex (IFC).

216 Facial emotion perception plays a key role in interpersonal com

217 e that tRNS may be a useful tool to modulate emotion perception when accounting for individual differ

218 cal sound, words/language, color, shapes) on emotion perception, and meaning-making efforts.

219 As emotions play an important role across many psychiatric

220 oked aspect of affective experience: current emotions predict future emotions.

221 ted brain pattern associated with regulating emotion predicted choosing to regulate responses to part

222 Overall, the findings implicate the IFC in emotion processing and demonstrate that tRNS may be a us

223 ted to be involved exclusively in social and emotion processing in frontotemporal dementia.

224 ons of sleep spindles, focused attention and emotion processing in these disorders.

225 , participants underwent a block design face-emotion processing task during fMRI known to activate th

226 dynamic signature prototypical of individual emotion processing, and seemingly represent a neural mec

227 circuitry underpinning social cognition and emotion processing.

228 for perception of interoceptive signals and emotion processing.

229 inhibitory control, reward anticipation, and emotion processing.

230 erlying social cognition, including negative emotion processing; however, the influence of oxytocin a

231 cutive dysfunction, and disrupting normative emotion reactivity and regulation.

232 ygdala, brain regions involved in valuation, emotion reactivity, and emotion regulation.

233 ) less left amygdala activation, both during emotion reactivity; 3) better inhibition of the left amy

234 Deficits in emotion recognition can be seen by either direct damage

235 al cognitive performance, including the Penn emotion recognition task, reading the mind in the eyes,

236 neuron regions are important for action and emotion recognition, damage to regions in this network s

237 aspects of social cognition, such as facial emotion recognition, theory-of-mind ability, and process

238 task to measure state affective empathy and emotion recognition.

239 Difficulties in emotion regulation are commonly reported among individua

240 us volume were significantly associated with emotion regulation at scan 3.

241 in decision-making under risk, and impaired emotion regulation in depressed patients with a history

242 onnectivity with ventromedial regions during emotion regulation is enhanced by psychotherapy and that

243 pression), interpersonal (e.g. empathy), and emotion regulation skills measures (e.g. emotional intel

244 to several intrapersonal, interpersonal, and emotion regulation skills.

245 nning during performance of a well-validated emotion regulation task.

246 In addition, emotion regulation via suppression, a detrimental emotio

247 attention regulation), and emotional-memory (emotion regulation) networks.

248 C) and supplementary motor area (SMA) during emotion regulation, although only change in the SMA over

249 ge on the same downstream targets to promote emotion regulation, taking us closer to a mechanistic un

250 o negative affective cues, as well as during emotion regulation.

251 volved in valuation, emotion reactivity, and emotion regulation.

252 entral frontolimbic neural system subserving emotion regulation.

253 ent; Working with Families; and Dealing with Emotions Related to Treatment Withdrawal.

254 he basolateral amygdala (BLA) contributes to emotion-related behaviors that differ between males and

255 xis in susceptibility to stress and negative emotion-related behaviors.

256 Moreover, multiple measures of emotion-related brain activity showed evidence of reinst

257 of EBL and the integration of face and body emotion-related information.

258 Study 5 used 2 million emotion reports on the Experience Project to replicate b

259 The appreciation of negative emotions requires cognitive elaboration and closure, whe

260 Literary authors concentrate on negative emotions, seemingly to try and understand them.

261 How do people make sense of the emotions, sensations, and cognitive abilities that make

262 stion these characterizations and argue that emotions should not be equated with their vernacular lab

263 essions and the categorical ambiguity of the emotion shown and that these two aspects of amygdala pro

264 Why are negative emotions so central in art reception far beyond tragedy?

265 ted a significant interaction effect between emotion (stimulus type) and cognitive conflict.

266 However, when all eight individual emotion subscales were combined into an overall ASR perf

267 ment with the environment eliciting positive emotion such as contentment, enthusiasm or happiness.

268 Disorders of dysregulated negative emotion such as depression and anxiety also feature incr

269 atrical magic is designed to elicit negative emotions such as feelings of vulnerability, loss of cont

270 usly, but is typically triggered by positive emotions such as laughter.

271 ent neural circuitry that underlies mood and emotion, such as the amygdala.

272 ut explaining contempt as a mixture of basic emotion system affects does not adequately address the f

273 We found that for each emotion the amygdala recruited a distinctive and spatial

274 sitional interplays of positive and negative emotions, the effects of aesthetic virtues of using the

275 urses' exposure to patient aggression, their emotions, their attitudes towards coercive containment m

276 itively embrace the experiencing of negative emotions, thereby rendering art reception more intense,

277 or the generation and regulation of negative emotion, through its interactions with the amygdala, bed

278 We suggest that guilt is a key emotion to appeal to when encouraging cooperation.

279 ounteract a relentless tendency for positive emotions to become boring.

280 ntal cortex and amygdala allows thoughts and emotions to influence actions.

281 Participants' ratings of emotion transitions predicted others' experienced transi

282 People could then use these mental models of emotion transitions to predict others' future emotions f

283 ese again people reported accurate models of emotion transitions, and these models were informed by t

284 By attending to regularities in emotion transitions, perceivers might develop accurate m

285 part of the mechanism through which positive emotions trigger cataplexy.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Catapl

286 t little is known about how strong, positive emotions trigger these episodes of muscle paralysis.

287 ne, we hypothesized that these cells promote emotion-triggered cataplexy.

288 Here, we show that emotion understanding in early childhood is more sophist

289 l prefrontal cortex connectivity during face emotion viewing (F4,888 = 9.20; P < .001 for mixed model

290 ciated with the generation and regulation of emotion was predictive of which people choose to regulat

291 ted brain pattern associated with regulating emotion was predictive of which stimuli regulation was c

292 t the association between light and positive emotions was stronger in control subjects than migraineu

293 Analyzing the contempt as an intergroup emotion, we suggest that contempt and anger are not buil

294 brain structures regulating social bonds and emotions were analyzed.

295 -being (i.e., life satisfaction and positive emotion) were central to networks characterized by fun,

296 s may attempt to regulate or reduce negative emotions, which can reduce empathy and willingness to he

297 ey molecular determinant regulating negative emotions, which may help to understand the molecular and

298 the role of context on learning, memory, and emotion while maintaining experimental control.

299 lation of affect and impaired integration of emotion with cognition.

300 Humans tend to share their negative emotions with close others, and they benefit from it.