コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 favirenz, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and emtricitabine).
2 daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine.
3 6%; 95% CI, 0.03% to 1.1%) had tenofovir and emtricitabine.
4 h zidovudine or tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine.
5 nofovir and 212.5 ng/mL (140.0 to 405.0) for emtricitabine.
6 y dose of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine.
7 ormulated tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine.
8 mivudine than those including tenofovir plus emtricitabine.
10 up) or dolutegravir 50 mg with co-formulated emtricitabine 200 mg and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg (th
11 5 mg or dolutegravir 50 mg with coformulated emtricitabine 200 mg and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg, wi
12 r dolutegravir 50 mg given with coformulated emtricitabine 200 mg and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg.
13 (SOC) (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and ATV/RTV 300 mg/100 mg) for 28
14 T in pregnancy (once-daily tenofovir 300 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and efavirenz 600 mg) and achievin
16 combination tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg and emtricitabine 200 mg, and once-daily oral dolutegravir 5
17 ion tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg and emtricitabine 200 mg, and once-daily oral dolutegravir 5
18 ning elvitegravir 150 mg, cobicistat 150 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 10 mg (t
19 n of elvitegravir 150 mg, cobicistat 150 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 10 mg on
20 taining darunavir 800 mg, cobicistat 150 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 10 mg, w
21 to receive co-formulated bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg (t
22 with either co-formulated bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg (t
23 , to receive coformulated bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg or
24 al fixed-dose combination bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg or
25 n to receive coformulated bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg, o
26 imen) or tenofovir (245 mg once per day) and emtricitabine (200 mg once per day; standard regimen).
27 f tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg) and emtricitabine (200 mg) and advised to take one tablet pe
28 assign (1:1) participants to receive either emtricitabine (200 mg) and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg)
29 itabine and tenofovir alafenamide group), or emtricitabine (200 mg) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
30 d tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (245 mg) and emtricitabine (200 mg) either immediately or after a def
31 elvitegravir (150 mg), cobicistat (150 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (10 mg
32 ingle-tablet regimen of rilpivirine (25 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg
33 ablet regimen of either rilpivirine (25 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg
34 single-tablet regimen of efavirenz (600 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarat
35 ingle-tablet regimen of rilpivirine (25 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarat
37 ted TFV-DP in DBS following daily oral PrEP (emtricitabine 200mg/tenofovir diphosphate 300mg) among p
38 vir (MONCAY trial), or to continue tenofovir/emtricitabine + a third agent or switch to tenofovir/emt
39 bo plus the fixed-dose combination of 200 mg emtricitabine and 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide for 48 wee
40 ine combinations (dolutegravir combined with emtricitabine and either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate o
41 essed on tenofovir (TFV) disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV) und
42 icipants were randomly assigned and received emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (n=2694) or emtr
43 gravir group] and 330 with dolutegravir plus emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide [dolutegravir gr
44 udy drug to 98 (65 received bictegravir plus emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide and 33 received
47 tions-coformulated with the NRTI combination emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide as a fixed-dose
48 and safety of bictegravir coformulated with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide as a fixed-dose
50 tenofovir alafenamide and dolutegravir plus emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide both showed high
52 iagnosed with HIV, seven participants in the emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide group (0.16 infe
53 ) of 65 participants in the bictegravir plus emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide group versus 22
54 dy drug (36 [1%] of 2694 participants in the emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide group vs 49 [2%]
55 tablets daily, with matched placebo tablets (emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide group), or emtri
60 fety of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide versus emtricita
61 ted 48 weeks and 50% had completed 96 weeks) emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferior
64 existing INSTI options with the backbone of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide, might provide a
66 observed dosing of daily oral co-formulated emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF
67 tabine and tenofovir alafenamide (n=2694) or emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (n=2693)
68 egimen) or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (proteas
69 n who has sex with men and had been on daily emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for 8 mo
70 nd tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferior to emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV
71 tricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide versus emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV
72 enamide shows non-inferior efficacy to daily emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV
73 % CI 0.06-0.33]), and 15 participants in the emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group (0
74 group vs 49 [2%] of 2693 participants in the emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group).
75 tablets daily, with matched placebo tablets (emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group).
76 ne and tenofovir alafenamide was superior to emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in all s
78 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors: emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or abaca
79 f emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide to emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was esta
80 ts with current or previous use of PrEP with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate were not
81 ith a third regimen (efavirenz combined with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) previou
86 rEP programme with sexual event-based use of emtricitabine and tenofovir for MSM who had condomless a
87 vir plus either lamivudine and zidovudine or emtricitabine and tenofovir), versus zidovudine alone.
91 r combined tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine and whether the benefits vary by risk grou
93 Participants in the tenofovir alafenamide, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir group had fewer changes
94 1 participants in the tenofovir alafenamide, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir group, 275 (78%) of 351
95 domly assigned to the tenofovir alafenamide, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir group, 351 to the tenofo
96 [6.7] in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir group, and 2.3 kg [7.0]
97 ipants in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir group, and 258 (74%) of
98 p, 351 to the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir group, and 351 to the te
99 .1 kg [SD 7.4] in the tenofovir alafenamide, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir group; 4.3 kg [6.7] in t
100 conception to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz (TDF-FTC-EFV) (901 of 2472
101 ipants in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz group discontinued due to t
102 ipants in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz group had achieved a plasma
103 [7.0] in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz group), and was greater amo
105 or ART (fixed-dose combination of tenofovir, emtricitabine, and efavirenz) regardless of CD4 cell cou
106 eive tenofovir-disoproxil fumarate (DF) plus emtricitabine, and either cobicistat-boosted elvitegravi
107 use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), emtricitabine, and lamivudine and potential transmission
108 onavir (zidovudine-based ART); or tenofovir, emtricitabine, and lopinavir-ritonavir (tenofovir-based
109 ndomly assigned to elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (n=111 [66%]) o
110 cipants to receive coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (n=316) or cofo
111 rolled and randomly assigned to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (n=316) or dolu
112 TION: At 48 weeks, coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide achieved virolo
113 assigned and treated (438 with rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide and 437 with ef
114 cacy of single-tablet darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide as a potential
115 These week 96 data support bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide as a safe, well
116 These week 96 data support bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide as a safe, well
117 ng-term data support the use of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide as a safe, well
118 acy, safety and tolerability of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide compared with c
119 cy, safety, and tolerability of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide compared with d
120 ingle-tablet regimen containing rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide compared with r
122 assigned to treatment (327 with bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide fixed-dose comb
123 INTERPRETATION: Switching to rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide from efavirenz,
124 up and 273 (84%) of 325 in the dolutegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group (differen
125 versus six (2%) of 325 in the dolutegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group (study 2)
126 % (SD 3.27) in the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and -0.10
127 .33% (2.20) in the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and -0.73
128 ss than 50 copies per mL in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and 265 (
129 ss than 50 copies per mL in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and 273 (
130 patients (n=290 of 314) in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and 93.0%
131 articipants in the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and one (
132 participant in the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group did not r
133 ) of 438 in participants in the rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group experienc
134 rted for no participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group versus fi
135 eight [7%]) in the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; and bron
136 (four [4%] in the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; and one
138 ose combination of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in HIV-infected
139 proxil fumarate to elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in virologicall
140 ose combination of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide is a once-daily
141 le-tablet regimen consisting of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide is recommended
143 Exposures to the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide regimen were si
144 ss frequently in patients given bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide than in those g
145 tudy drug were less common with bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide than with dolut
146 emonstrating non-inferiority of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide to dolutegravir
147 gle-tablet regimen of darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus continui
148 1), and six (2%) of 320 in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus six (2%)
149 ose combination of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide was efficacious
151 INTERPRETATION: Switching to rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferio
153 o phase 3 studies, coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferio
155 The fixed-dose combination of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide was safe and we
157 ine) and 645 in study 2 (327 to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide, 325 to doluteg
158 and treated in study 1 (314 to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide, and 315 to dol
159 ndomly assigned (1:1) adults to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide, or dolutegravi
160 on of therapy with elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (combin
161 d (1:1) to receive elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (integr
162 regimen containing elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate compare
163 (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) on efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for at
164 HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) on rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for at
165 pared with 45 (10%) of 437 in the efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group.
166 e, and tenofovir alafenamide from efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was non
174 including coformulation with rilpivirine and emtricitabine, as initial and ongoing treatment for HIV-
175 mg (DOR/3TC/TDF) or to efavirenz at 600 mg, emtricitabine at 200 mg, and TDF at 300 mg (EFV/FTC/TDF)
176 and EVGcobi, associated to tenofovir-DF and emtricitabine, behave similarly and achieve an undetecta
177 ples were collected to measure tenofovir and emtricitabine concentrations (a measure of adherence and
179 s high incidence population, daily tenofovir-emtricitabine conferred even higher protection against H
180 h participants initiated PrEP with tenofovir/emtricitabine during very early Fiebig stage I (detectab
181 viral therapy with elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine (E/C/F) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
182 n individuals prescribed primarily tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz in rural KwaZulu-Natal within a
184 , mostly on fixed-dose combination tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz, presence of both nonnucleoside
185 th elvitegravir (EVG, E), cobicistat (C) and emtricitabine (F), a recommended antiretroviral regimen,
186 h elvitegravir (EVG; E), cobicistat (C), and emtricitabine (F), a recommended antiretroviral regimen,
188 er option than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine (F/TDF) for HIV preexposure prophylaxis (P
190 daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumurate and emtricitabine for HIV PrEP, quarterly HIV and STI testin
193 PrEP) with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine for the prevention of HIV infection is rol
194 f tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg/emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg among adults living with huma
195 we compared a triple-therapy combination of emtricitabine (FTC) and DTG plus either of two tenofovir
196 Oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) are effective in HIV-1 pre-exposure
198 estigated whether the combination of TAF and emtricitabine (FTC) could prevent simian/human immunodef
199 dministrated tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and emtricitabine (FTC) loaded nanoparticles (NPs) to soluti
200 n of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) or placebo before and after sexual a
202 184V/I cause high-level lamivudine (3TC) and emtricitabine (FTC) resistance and increased tenofovir d
203 184V/I cause high-level lamivudine (3TC) and emtricitabine (FTC) resistance, and increased tenofovir
204 oside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) emtricitabine (FTC), and injectable aqueous nanodispersi
205 olled trial of daily oral TDF, alone or with emtricitabine (FTC), in HIV-uninfected African men and w
206 d, comparing 4 regimens: MVC alone, MVC plus emtricitabine (FTC), MVC plus tenofovir disoproxil fumar
208 he NRTIs tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC), tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)/FTC, ab
210 eceiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC)/EFV 600 mg with a viral load (VL) <5
211 decreases the prophylactic efficacy of oral emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).
212 f antiviral drugs lamivudine ((-)3TC-TP) and emtricitabine ((-)FTC-TP) provide little structural evid
213 g antiviral drugs lamivudine ((-)3TC-TP) and emtricitabine ((-)FTC-TP), we structurally reveal the co
214 il fumarate [TDF] or DOR [100 mg daily] with emtricitabine [FTC]/TDF or abacavir [ABC]/3TC [n = 747])
217 mivudine, the use of tenofovir-lamivudine or emtricitabine in combination with nevirapine was a stron
218 steady-state concentrations of tenofovir and emtricitabine in infant plasma ingested via breastfeedin
219 ART) for HIV/HBV (tenofovir, lamivudine, and emtricitabine) in a large cohort encompassing heterosexu
220 onotherapy or a combination of tenofovir and emtricitabine) in HIV serodiscordant couples aged 18 yea
221 osure prophylaxis (PrEP) with oral tenofovir/emtricitabine is an effective means of decreasing human
222 in the form of tenofovir-disoproxil-fumarate/emtricitabine is being implemented in selected sites in
224 mbination tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine, is an effective human immunodeficiency vi
225 tions, combined with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine, maintained HIV-1 RNA suppression in semen
227 os(t)ides (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine or abacavir and lamivudine) and with no re
228 HIV-infected patients on EFV plus tenofovir/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine with NAFLD were ran
229 troviral therapy (ART) with either tenofovir-emtricitabine or lamivudine (tenofovir group) or zidovud
230 ed darunavir plus raltegravir plus tenofovir-emtricitabine or tenofovir plus lamivudine), and D (best
231 avir, raltegravir, and either tenofovir plus emtricitabine or tenofovir plus lamivudine), C (ritonavi
232 Despite sparse efficacy data, tenofovir-emtricitabine or tenofovir-lamivudine plus nevirapine is
233 each with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine orally once daily, for up to 96 weeks.
234 randomized to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine plus atazanavir/ritonavir, darunavir/riton
235 were randomly assigned to receive tenofovir-emtricitabine plus either atazanavir/ritonavir, darunavi
236 cal trial (HPTN 067/ADAPT) of oral PrEP with emtricitabine plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate at a re
237 ommendations for daily use of PrEP with oral emtricitabine plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in wome
238 ovir plus a cytosine analogue (lamivudine or emtricitabine) plus a non-nucleoside reverse transcripta
239 y (BMD) during tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) showed BMD
240 Reactive nitrogen species also reacted with emtricitabine, propranolol, and other trace organic cont
243 nofovir and 183.0 ng/mL (113.0 to 250.0) for emtricitabine, reflecting trough-to-peak breast milk con
244 cy of oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine relies on optimal adherence, which poses a
245 breast milk concentrations of tenofovir and emtricitabine (respective median trough-to-peak concentr
247 antivirals, including tenofovir alafenamide, emtricitabine, sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and velpatasvir w
249 ablets and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine tablets were over-encapsulated to visually
251 f doses of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine taken per week, as estimated by hair conce
252 ral use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (TDF-FTC) for preexposure prophylaxis (PrE
253 a approved tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) co-formulate for use in pre-expo
254 worldwide, yet tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) for PrEP is only licensed for ad
255 -based regimens with a backbone of tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) or abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC)
256 The patients were randomized to tenofovir-emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) plus atazanavir-ritonavir (ATV/r
259 nd no history of resistance to elvitegravir, emtricitabine, tenofovir alafenamide, or tenofovir.
260 was non-inferior to continuing rilpivirine, emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in maintain
262 ; screening genotypes showing sensitivity to emtricitabine, tenofovir, lamivudine, and abacavir; and
263 We evaluated an elvitegravir-cobicistat-emtricitabine-tenofovir alafenamide single-tablet regime
264 e short-term, open-label study of daily oral emtricitabine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate PrEP among 5
266 CT03227861) study using darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/
267 CT03227861) study using darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/
268 nd pibrentasvir with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide, abacavir/dolutegrav
269 2%-99.3%) and similar to that seen with oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (94.0%; 55.1
271 e ADVANCE study randomized to the efavirenz /emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and do
272 prospective, open-label study of rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in ART-naive
273 -equivalent doses of CAB LA, 6 received oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and 10 were
277 mucosal tissue concentrations of tenofovir, emtricitabine, their active metabolites (tenofovir dipho
278 ng ART with atazanavir/ritonavir + tenofovir/emtricitabine to a single zoledronic acid (ZOL) infusion
279 fovir and 31.9 mug/kg (IQR 21.0 to 60.8) for emtricitabine, translating into a <0.01% and 0.5% relati
280 sition of tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) and emtricitabine triphosphate (FTC-TP) in the FGT have been
281 tabolites (tenofovir diphosphate [TFVdp] and emtricitabine triphosphate [FTCtp], respectively), and c
283 veness of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine varies across populations; thus, similar H
284 PrEP) with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine was adopted by WHO as a strategy to reduce
285 monotherapy or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine was associated with decreased risk of acqu
286 s unquantifiable in 46/49 samples (94%), but emtricitabine was detectable in 47/49 (96%) (median [IQR
288 rt taking daily oral co-formulated tenofovir/emtricitabine, we examined the prevalence and duration o
289 fant plasma concentrations for tenofovir and emtricitabine were 12,500 and >200-fold lower than the r
290 ssigned (1:1) to switch to fixed-dose 200 mg emtricitabine with 10 mg or 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide
291 tenofovir alafenamide or to continue 200 mg emtricitabine with 200 mg or 300 mg tenofovir disoproxil
293 afety and efficacy of fixed-dose combination emtricitabine with tenofovir alafenamide in patients swi
294 tabine with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to emtricitabine with tenofovir alafenamide, high rates of
298 g regimens containing fixed-dose combination emtricitabine with tenofovir disoproxil fumartate from 7
299 oval mechanism for abacavir, zidovudine, and emtricitabine, with half-lives (t1/2,photo) in wetland w
300 to-2-week postpartum "tail" of tenofovir and emtricitabine (zidovudine alone); zidovudine, lamivudine