ライフサイエンスコーパス: end-of-life care

1 ly when hospital admissions occur as part of end of life care.

2 tive intervention to palliation and finally, end of life care.

3 t discussing their wishes or preferences for end of life care.

4 ness has not been elaborated with respect to end of life care.

5 the complex communication necessary for good end of life care.

6 ospital services, and an increasing need for end-of-life care.

7 ory determination of death and its impact on end-of-life care.

8 ulatory determination of death could improve end-of-life care.

9 ractitioners is vital to ensure high quality end-of-life care.

10 to hospice services, key measures of quality end-of-life care.

11 s frequently misconstrued as synonymous with end-of-life care.

12 ative practitioners to provide comprehensive end-of-life care.

13 s of healthcare and improving the quality of end-of-life care.

14 ny are uncertain of the practice's impact on end-of-life care.

15 r declines in the patient's health and their end-of-life care.

16 hosocial issues (including carer issues) and end-of-life care.

17 receipt of life-sustaining interventions and end-of-life care.

18 ere has been extensive political debate over end-of-life care.

19 since immigration, and region of birth, with end-of-life care.

20 e associated with markers of poor quality in end-of-life care.

21 ning Treatment) forms are a major advance in end-of-life care.

22 dy outcome was participants' preferences for end-of-life care.

23 MCS, achieving optimal device settings, and end-of-life care.

24 d similar physician and hospital patterns of end-of-life care.

25 nterventions to improve important aspects of end-of-life care.

26 e similar physician and hospital patterns of end-of-life care.

27 well: Organ donation is an important part of end-of-life care.

28 may not fit with a family's preferences for end-of-life care.

29 re has sometimes come at the expense of good end-of-life care.

30 -beating donors, unless specialty trained in end-of-life care.

31 nating OR staff concerns about their role in end-of-life care.

32 of administrative models of care delivery on end-of-life care.

33 rders, advance directives, or are in need of end-of-life care.

34 uality improvement methods in the context of end-of-life care.

35 environment for understanding and improving end-of-life care.

36 we have yet to identify clear indicators for end-of-life care.

37 ed care planning, and timely patient-centred end-of-life care.

38 ir physicians unprepared for decisions about end-of-life care.

39 minants have created widening disparities in end-of-life care.

40 and fellows, and particular attitudes about end-of-life care.

41 that constitutes a significant challenge for end-of-life care.

42 had focused on patients during treatment and end-of-life care.

43 analyzed for the number of pages relevant to end-of-life care.

44 in Oregon appear to misunderstand options in end-of-life care.

45 icians understand and manage conflicts about end-of-life care.

46 may have diverse preferences that influence end-of-life care.

47 life support utilization and the quality of end-of-life care.

48 r to assist them in discussing prognosis and end-of-life care.

49 sider spirituality an important dimension of end-of-life care.

50 d whether these potential disparities modify end-of-life care.

51 r-reported quality rating of "excellent" for end-of-life care.

52 and documentation of key decisions linked to end-of-life care.

53 l were associated with perceptions of better end-of-life care.

54 lth professional attitudes to palliative and end-of-life care.

55 patients with DT-LVAD are receiving optimal end-of-life care.

56 cancer pain and no evidence of palliative or end-of-life care.

57 nto survivorship, and metastatic disease and end-of-life care.

58 ared follow-up and survivorship care, and in end-of-life care.

59 s importance for patient comfort and optimal end-of-life care.

60 t differences in the use of life support and end-of-life care.

61 sing use of hospice did not offset intensive end-of-life care.

62 rences in disease trajectories and access to end-of-life care.

63 We asked participants about barriers to end-of-life care (1 = huge to 5 = not at all a barrier),

64 e a number of external challenges to optimal end-of-life care: (1) geographic distance as well as pol

65 paying it forward." Scores on the Quality of End-of-Life Care-10 instrument were high.

66 cesses of care, and scores on the Quality of End-of-Life Care-10 instrument.

67 Building on ASCO's prior statements on end-of-life care (1998) and palliative care (2009), this

68 ng and promote attitudinal change concerning end-of-life care, 3) academic detailing of nurse and phy

69 the standard care group received aggressive end-of-life care (33% vs. 54%, P=0.05), median survival

70 of recovery; transition from intervention to end of life care; a controlled death.

71 r diagnosis on patient-reported outcomes and end-of-life care among ambulatory patients with newly di

72 Differences in utilization and costs of end-of-life care among developed countries are of consid

73 portive care may improve quality of life and end-of-life care among patients with cancer.

74 Purpose To assess disparities in end-of-life care among patients with ovarian cancer.

75 ciated with receiving intensive and invasive end-of-life care among patients with ovarian cancer.

76 Discussions about the patient's wishes for end-of-life care and a greater number of spiritual care

77 cologists, especially regarding the shift to end-of-life care and adequate pain control.

78 can be performed successfully; its impact on end-of-life care and bereavement needs further investiga

79 or decisions made by a family with regard to end-of-life care and by assuring families continuity of

80 s can respond to an intervention to plan for end-of-life care and can express specific preferences fo

81 tant within this subset of patients improved end-of-life care and decreased use of superfluous resour

82 ck of educational opportunities, and gaps in end-of-life care and interprofessional teamwork.

83 Issues around end-of-life care and limitations of medical therapy aros

84 uncomfortable at the clinical juncture where end-of-life care and organ donation interface.

85 mmunication skills to improve the quality of end-of-life care and provide palliative care in the ICU.

86 gesting a mismatch between patient needs for end-of-life care and resources at participating hospital

87 The instrument included the Quality of End-of-Life Care and Satisfaction with Treatment quality

88 The convergence of end-of-life care and surgical practice often occurs in t

89 ompting national attention on the quality of end-of-life care and the development of a palliative car

90 adolescents with advanced cancer about their end-of-life care and the factors that influenced their d

91 ality evaluation by reviewing palliative and end-of-life care and the known domains for quality palli

92 the quality of ICU nurse handover related to end-of-life care and to compare the practices of differe

93 ICU directors regarding barriers to optimal end-of-life care and to identify the type, availability,

94 , perceived benefit of strategies to improve end-of-life care, and availability of these strategies.

95 Staff reported increased knowledge of end-of-life care, and enhanced confidence, which in turn

96 on-making and existing options for directing end-of-life care, and highlight important differences be

97 of homes' characteristics, the approaches to end-of-life care, and liaison with other services, was c

98 cic surgery, use of experimental treatments, end-of-life care, and limitation of care or withdrawal o

99 s, the determination of death, provisions of end-of-life care, and pediatric DCDD.

100 , neoplasm, palliative care, terminally ill, end-of-life care, and survival.

101 ved with complications, palliative care, and end-of-life care, and thus have an important role in tea

102 al process, identifying core competencies in end-of-life care, and training clinicians in these skill

103 gining and acting on moral possibilities for end of life care; and (E) facilitating saying goodbye -

104 setting in which death and discussion about end-of-life care are common, yet these conversations are

105 Core competencies for end-of-life care are enumerated including the approaches

106 fe support, high-quality decision making and end-of-life care are essential in all regions, and can i

107 n, polypharmacy, and factors associated with end-of-life care are reviewed.

108 Physicians providing end-of-life care are subject to a variety of stresses th

109 The 7 major legal myths regarding end-of-life care are: (1) forgoing life-sustaining treat

110 It is unusual for physicians to identify end-of-life-care as an area of competency that can be im

111 d misconceptions that palliative care meant "end-of-life care" as a major barrier, whereas transplant

112 thanasia have been increasingly discussed in end-of-life care, as PAS and euthanasia have now been le

113 impart a practical framework for quality of end-of-life care assessment with the goal of guiding the

114 will always remain an important setting for end-of-life care because of the severity of illness of p

115 erstanding and improving communication about end-of-life care between clinicians and families in the

116 ences in the utilization of life support and end-of-life care between patients dying in the medical I

117 ctors perceive important barriers to optimal end-of-life care but also universally endorse many pract

118 ication about end-of-life care or quality of end-of-life care but was associated with a small increas

119 included in national guidelines for quality end-of-life care, but little data exist to guide spiritu

120 Care Homes programme can contribute towards end-of-life care by helping to improve the quality and q

121 omes included patients' goal attainment (ie, end-of-life care congruent with patients' wishes and loc

122 End-of-life care continues even after the death of the p

123 Participating in end-of-life care conversations can be emotionally challe

124 Overcoming political divides to support end-of-life care conversations is needed to promote care

125 Less well understood is how this can inform end-of-life care decision making and complement informat

126 Although they did not clearly attenuate end-of-life care disparities, medication use disparities

127 Supportive medication use did not attenuate end-of-life care disparities.

128 characteristic associated with attitudes on end-of-life care dissimilar to the consensus positions r

129 review the importance of communication about end-of-life care during the family conference and make s

130 ues and concerns and the value of discussing end-of-life care early, with oncologists cued to endorse

131 For good end-of-life care, early communication, exploration of re

132 as to address the documented deficiencies in end-of-life care (EOLC) in intensive care unit settings

133 Eighty end-of-life care episodes were observed.

134 e are enumerated including the approaches to end-of-life care, ethical and legal constraints, symptom

135 ue to use illicit substances while receiving end-of-life care, experts recommend scheduling frequent

136 of care and prognosis, treatment selection, end-of-life care, facilitating family involvement in car

137 nd end-of-life care (n = 3; decision making, end-of-life care, family follow-up).

138 nterhospital variability in the intensity of end-of-life care, few data are available assessing varia

139 ife care policy emphasises the importance of end of life care for all patients regardless of setting.

140 , bereaved family members reported excellent end-of-life care for 51.3%.

141 Five themes were identified in the data: end-of-life care for dying cancer patients, end-of-life

142 end-of-life care for dying cancer patients, end-of-life care for family members, cultural sensitivit

143 evidence-based HF care should be included in end-of-life care for HF patients.

144 , and evidence indicates the need to improve end-of-life care for ICU patients.

145 Conclusion End-of-life care for older patients with AML is suboptim

146 gists and hospice professionals both provide end-of-life care for oncology patients, and little has b

147 context (LCP-I) in improving the quality of end-of-life care for patients with cancer in hospitals a

148 Recommendations to improve end-of-life care for patients with cardiovascular diseas

149 End-of-life care for patients with dementia was extremel

150 reviews the critical necessity for reform in end-of-life care for the field of oncology and the major

151 created positive memories and individualized end-of-life care for their loved ones.

152 f hospice services and strategies to enhance end-of-life care for these patients.

153 Few interventions have focused on improving end-of-life care for underserved populations, such as ho

154 of Life (FATE), in evaluating the quality of end-of-life care for veterans dying with cancer.

155 he commissioners modified the act to prevent end-of-life care from precluding organ donation.

156 antly more cues for discussion of prognosis, end-of-life care, future care options and general issues

157 ut their expectations and fears, options for end-of-life care, goals, family concerns and burdens, su

158 d for transplantation received lower-quality end-of-life care, had longer hospital stays before death

159 The research in palliative and end-of-life care has elucidated important domains for qu

160 relatively high family satisfaction with ICU end-of-life care has prompted speculation that ICU palli

161 Quality ICU end-of-life-care has been found to be related to good co

162 Perhaps this is why end-of-life-care has been so difficult to teach to clini

163 Calls for improvement in end-of-life care have focused attention on the managemen

164 serve many homeless people could improve the end-of-life care homeless people receive.

165 etween race and supportive treatment use and end-of-life care (hospice, intensive care unit, more tha

166 Claims-based quality measures of aggressive end-of-life care (ie, intensive care unit [ICU] admissio

167 , widowed, or divorced should be a focus for end-of-life care improvement, along with known at risk g

168 associated factors, which are essential for end-of-life care improvement.

169 uicide are likely to decrease as training in end-of-life care improves and the ability of physicians

170 expertise and develop projects that promote end-of-life care in a medical intensive care unit (ICU)

171 hose by the Institute of Medicine addressing end-of-life care in cancer and cancer survivorship.

172 End-of-life care in China reflects and has been influenc

173 tify and address local barriers to improving end-of-life care in each ICU, 4) feedback of local quali

174 sicians and surrogate decision makers around end-of-life care in ICU.

175 ies have examined the adequacy or quality of end-of-life care in institutional settings compared with

176 Initiatives to improve end-of-life care in intensive care units face several im

177 care physicians and nurses express views on end-of-life care in strong agreement with consensus posi

178 -family and nurse-family communication about end-of-life care in the ICU and a research agenda to imp

179 or patients, families, and clinicians during end-of-life care in the ICU are supported by eliciting a

180 that may facilitate good communication about end-of-life care in the ICU before, during, and after th

181 It is unclear whether efforts to improve end-of-life care in the ICU could significantly reduce h

182 inally, a comprehensive agenda for improving end-of-life care in the ICU has been developed to guide

183 Outlining unanswered questions on end-of-life care in the ICU is a first step to providing

184 Therefore, improving the quality of end-of-life care in the ICU is an important endeavor.

185 are data to suggest that current quality of end-of-life care in the ICU is often poor and that this

186 h to examine and improve communication about end-of-life care in the ICU must proceed in conjunction

187 onsequently, there has been speculation that end-of-life care in the ICU represents an important targ

188 tions are designed to improve the quality of end-of-life care in the ICU, researchers, clinicians, an

189 consensus statements and review articles on end-of-life care in the ICU, there is limited evidence o

190 s for measuring and improving the quality of end-of-life care in the ICU.

191 merged as a comprehensive ideal for managing end-of-life care in the ICU.

192 nts and families, may improve the quality of end-of-life care in the ICU.

193 success of interventions designed to improve end-of-life care in the ICU.

194 n an attempt to create a global standard for end-of-life care in the ICU.

195 vidence suggests that change is occurring in end-of-life care in the intensive care unit (ICU).

196 ate indicators for evaluating palliative and end-of-life care in the intensive care unit, future work

197 ion is important for delivering high quality end-of-life care in the intensive care unit, yet little

198 es consistent with proficient palliative and end-of-life care in the intensive care unit.

199 fe support order form" to improve quality of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit.

200 ver, no research on interventions to improve end-of-life care in the pediatric intensive care unit (P

201 summarizing existing descriptive data about end-of-life care in this setting.

202 of best practices for providing high-quality end-of-life care in this setting.

203 terature reporting circumstances surrounding end-of-life care in vascular surgery patients.

204 Important barriers to better end-of-life care included patient/family factors, includ

205 Other knowledge unique to end-of-life care includes principles for notifying famil

206 and c) support for family's decisions about end- of-life care, including support for family's decisi

207 istic regressions were conducted to evaluate end-of-life care, including chemotherapy in the final 14

208 concepts play a foundational role in guiding end-of-life care, including the distinctions between wit

209 ted 14 of 14 strategies as likely to improve end-of-life care, including trainee role modeling by exp

210 Providing quality end of life care is a challenging area in intensive care

211 shift the patient's trajectory from cure to end of life care is required.

212 End-of life care is in need of improvement, yet little i

213 Communication about end-of-life care is a core clinical skill.

214 Improving end-of-life care is a government health priority and hom

215 Because excellent end-of-life care is an important part of high-quality in

216 End-of-life care is associated with increased burnout an

217 End-of-life care is emerging as a comprehensive area of

218 End-of-life care is frequently provided in the ICU becau

219 The provision of good quality and equitable end-of-life care is high on the public and political age

220 uld be updated to ensure that palliative and end-of-life care is in place alongside treatment should

221 esolved pain has been cited as evidence that end-of-life care is of poor quality.

222 End-of-life care is particularly relevant for older adul

223 ficient time to talk to dying patients about end-of-life care issues (OR, 0.79 [CI, 0.71 to 0.87]) we

224 tool for measuring and improving quality of end-of-life care, it is important to understand the fact

225 ntervention to end of life care, rather than end of life care itself so that effective and timely dec

226 who died in the hospital reported excellent end-of-life care less often (42.2% [194/460]) than those

227 U within 30 days of death reported excellent end-of-life care less often (45.0% [68/151]) than those

228 Practitioners discussed end-of-life care less with blacks (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.3

229 rch of articles from 1970-1998 and review of end-of-life care literature and organizational bibliogra

230 Good end-of-life care may be complicated by disagreements bet

231 the suggestion that the skills required for end-of-life care might be viewed in the same manner, as

232 Family members reported excellent end-of-life care more often for patients who received ho

233 o patient, social and spiritual support) and end-of-life care (n = 3; decision making, end-of-life ca

234 was instrumental in drawing attention to the end-of-life care needs of patients with advanced maligna

235 l provide opportunity for improvement in the end-of-life care of cancer patients.

236 End-of-life care of critically ill patients generally co

237 s, practices, and challenges associated with end-of-life care of patients with cancer.

238 pulmonology) who may also participate in the end-of-life care of potential donors in various clinical

239 he rehabilitation, complex medical care, and end-of-life care of this frail and vulnerable population

240 Supportive, palliative, and end-of-life care offer the potential to enhance quality

241 tle attention has been paid to the impact of end-of-life care on caregivers who are family members of

242 ill, evidence shows that conversations about end-of-life care options between physicians and patients

243 d not improve quality of communication about end-of-life care or quality of end-of-life care but was

244 o another acute care facility, discharged to end-of-life care, or had missing LVEF assessment status.

245 increase in the attention given to improving end-of-life care, our understanding of what constitutes

246 and ensures organ donation is posed at every end-of-life care pathway.

247 icle, we discuss three key drivers of costs: end-of-life care patterns, medical imaging, and drugs.

248 death and donation after circulatory death, end-of-life care, performance metrics, resources and rem

249 parental adjustment, and preparation for the end-of-life care period.

250 End-of-life care planning and decision making by health

251 d provider expectations," and "timeliness of end-of-life care planning").

252 nctional and cognitive decline, and need for end-of-life care planning.

253 ggressive therapies, and when to make formal end-of-life care plans.

254 End of life care policy emphasises the importance of end

255 death donors could increase with changes in end-of-life care practices to allow the evolution of bra

256 Rates of documentation of end-of-life care preferences in the medical record remai

257 ationship, distress, advance directives, and end-of-life care preferences.

258 actors obtained clinical variables including end-of-life care processes and family conference data.

259 To examine end-of-life care provided to immigrants to Canada in the

260 ive and practice is truly collaborative, the end-of-life care provided to intensive care unit patient

261 Despite national efforts to improve end-of-life care, proxy reports of pain and other alarmi

262 ry outcomes were patient-reported quality of end-of-life care (QEOLC; mean rating of 26 items rated f

263 ans with families, bereavement programs, and end-of-life care quality monitoring.

264 on transition from curative intervention to end of life care, rather than end of life care itself so

265 consideration of transplantation affects the end-of-life care received by patients, care was evaluate

266 End-of-life care remains a challenging and complex activ

267 Patients admitted to ICU to manage end-of-life care represent a small proportion of overall

268 Optimal end-of-life care requires a willingness to engage with t

269 cine, and family practice that competency in end-of-life care requires specialty training.

270 thics of death and dying, formal training in end-of-life care skills is not routinely given in most p

271 consensus provide standards of practice for end-of-life care; statements without consensus identify

272 o protect dying patients' wishes about their end-of-life care, states that have legislated or are con

273 use less life support and may receive better end-of-life care than similar patients without cancer.

274 failure, little is known about the eventual end-of-life care that patients with DT-LVAD receive.

275 of the new wording creates the potential for end-of-life care that prioritizes care of the potential

276 ons associated with family disagreement over end-of-life care, the ramifications for healthcare provi

277 Ranging from primary prevention to end-of-life care, the scope for new models of care is ex

278 found among conditions, ranging from 9% for end-of-life care to 82% for stroke care.

279 rses had strong willingness to offer quality end-of-life care to patients and families, however, they

280 Palliative medicine provides end-of-life care to terminally ill patients with a focus

281 End-of-life care varies according to the administrative

282 The transition from intervention to end of life care was reported as being the most problema

283 ith cancer in 7 developed countries in 2010, end-of-life care was more hospital-centric in Belgium, C

284 Information about end-of-life care was obtained from documentation in the

285 ficial impact from education initiatives for end-of-life care, we have yet to identify clear indicato

286 Advance directives specifying limitations in end-of-life care were associated with significantly lowe

287 Data on end-of-life care were collected from electronic medical

288 rvice provision of specialist palliative and end-of-life care, which have hitherto been neglected.

289 e in the United States, the need for quality end-of-life care will be far better served if Congress e

290 More research on how to improve end-of-life care will enable health care providers to op

291 conducting a cost-effectiveness analyses for end-of-life care will need to evolve or alternative stra

292 ce of clarifying prognostic expectations and end-of-life care wishes in the advanced cancer context,

293 ing the quality of their communication about end-of-life care with family members.

294 initiating contact and discussing residents' end-of-life care with general practitioners and those wo

295 may be useful to clinicians when discussing end-of-life care with patients and families of patients

296 st study to find a reduction in intensity of end-of-life care with similar or improved family distres

297 1432 patients (50%) discussed some aspect of end-of-life care with their practitioner and 1088 (38%)

298 tion that palliative care is synonymous with end-of-life care, with no role earlier in the course of

299 We evaluated the predictors of quality of end-of-life care, with the main independent variable bei

300 term "palliative care," "supportive care," "end-of-life care," "withdrawal of life-sustaining therap