ライフサイエンスコーパス: endoscopic ultrasonography

1 tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and endoscopic ultrasonography.

2 ncer staging," "endoscopic ultrasound," and "endoscopic ultrasonography."

3 80 patients with cancer, the sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasonography (98% [95% CI, 91% to 100%]) f

4 tumors in patients recommended for surgery, endoscopic ultrasonography and CT correctly identified 6

5 tumors in patients recommended for surgery, endoscopic ultrasonography and CT correctly identified 8

6 f 120 patients enrolled, 104 (87%) underwent endoscopic ultrasonography and CT.

7 Quality measures for use in endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cho

8 Endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic ultrasonograph

9 sis of clinical history and abnormalities on endoscopic ultrasonography and ERCP and were referred fo

10 Clinical data combined with imaging studies (endoscopic ultrasonography and ERCP) can be used to iden

11 Modern imaging modalities of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholan

12 omography-pancreas angiography, laparoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and fine-needle aspiration c

13 esophagus was assessed by endoscopy, biopsy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and high-resolution impedanc

14 es of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography, endoscopic ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imagi

15 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic ultrasonography, and pancreatoscopy.

16 etic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasonography-are enabling more accurate di

17 to the initial staging of esophageal cancer, endoscopic ultrasonography-based measurement of reductio

18 Endoscopic ultrasonography can play an adjunctive role i

19 Endoscopic ultrasonography complements the role of ERCP

20 The new Rosemont consensus classification of endoscopic ultrasonography criteria for chronic pancreat

21 tion endoscopy with random gastric biopsies, endoscopic ultrasonography, CT, and PET scans to evaluat

22 fficult, although newer techniques utilizing endoscopic ultrasonography-elastography and MRI hold pro

23 Endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde cholan

24 Staging included endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and laparoscopy.

25 ical staging with the use of laparoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and to improve R0 resec

26 Two studies show that endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) correlates well with en

27 tection of malignancy in patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) fine-needle aspiration

28 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has taken on more of a

29 Analysis of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) images with an artifici

30 Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) may offer a diagnostic

31 Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) may replace endoscopic

32 r study is needed to improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) to diagnose chronic pan

33 trograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) under procedural sedati

34 is propria layer of the stomach, as shown by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS).

35 (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS).

36 Staging also included a laparoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS).

37 igh risk for recurrence before therapy using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS).

38 Endoscopic ultrasonography followed by multidetector CT

39 , published since April 2002, on the role of endoscopic ultrasonography for staging of esophageal can

40 Overall, endoscopic ultrasonography for staging of patients with

41 Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided celiac plexus block ca

42 ancreatitis is, indeed, chronic, the role of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided celiac plexus block sh

43 Endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration

44 Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided FNA biopsy may play a

45 Cytologic results on endoscopic ultrasonography-guided FNA biopsy were positi

46 ytologic evidence of chronic pancreatitis on endoscopic ultrasonography-guided FNA biopsy.

47 were prospectively identified and underwent endoscopic ultrasonography-guided FNA biopsy.

48 The operating characteristics of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided FNA for diagnosing pan

49 Endoscopic ultrasonography has also been improved in res

50 improved by newer techniques associated with endoscopic ultrasonography imaging.

51 The true value of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing small duct chro

52 cause long-term follow-up data on the use of endoscopic ultrasonography in this respect are not avail

53 Endoscopic ultrasonography is becoming the test of choic

54 Compared with multidetector CT, endoscopic ultrasonography is superior for tumor detecti

55 al staging accuracy for esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography is superior to other currentl

56 Thus, STIR-MRI followed by endoscopic ultrasonography is the most appropriate cours

57 Endoscopic ultrasonography is useful to assess the local

58 oma cannot be identified by SRS or STIR-MRI, endoscopic ultrasonography should be undertaken because

59 ecently published studies on the outcomes of endoscopic ultrasonography support its utility in the st

60 confirmed at surgical resection (n = 12) or endoscopic ultrasonography (US) with cystic fluid analys

61 langiopancreatography (MRCP), four patients; endoscopic ultrasonography (US), 21 patients; endoscopic

62 ysts that were 3 cm or smaller at surgery or endoscopic ultrasonography (US)-guided cyst fluid aspira

63 For the 53 surgical patients, endoscopic ultrasonography was superior to CT for tumor

64 Findings on endoscopic ultrasonography were subtle, nonspecific, and

65 f PDAC requires invasive procedures, such as endoscopic ultrasonography, which has inherent risks and