ライフサイエンスコーパス: endoscopy

1 dian 4 endoscopies (interquartile range, 3-6 endoscopies).

2 esophageal cancer within 5 years after index endoscopy.

3 ed blood lipid concentrations at the time of endoscopy.

4 are diagnosed within 1 year after the index endoscopy.

5 nsecutive patients undergoing upper GI tract endoscopy.

6 by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

7 zed qualitative information such as flexible endoscopy.

8 ryology, European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy.

9 used to triage patients requiring screening endoscopy.

10 ted Thai version of GerdQ and then underwent endoscopy.

11 to acute duodenitis following diagnostic UGI endoscopy.

12 a high miss-rate during standard white-light endoscopy.

13 and Depression scale were fulfilled prior to endoscopy.

14 llowing an uneventful upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

15 % for (99m)Tc-CXCL8 scan and 71% and 70% for endoscopy.

16 nteers as a control group were recruited for endoscopy.

17 elopment and inflammation were determined by endoscopy.

18 n and is easily detected by nasal fiberoptic endoscopy.

19 icosteroid resistance was evaluated by nasal endoscopy.

20 gating the risk of infection associated with endoscopy.

21 ontrols) were evaluated with the FLIP during endoscopy.

22 647 BE cases swallowed a Cytosponge prior to endoscopy.

23 d high Rutgeerts score (>2) in postoperative endoscopy.

24 ient's likelihood of completing surveillance endoscopy.

25 leading to gastric eosinophilia assessed by endoscopy.

26 illation underwent postprocedural esophageal endoscopy.

27 roid resistance was evaluated by using nasal endoscopy.

28 nd The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

29 and histologic findings at the time of index endoscopy.

30 ulcer that had healed by the time of 3-month endoscopy.

31 he Cytosponge test before their surveillance endoscopy.

32 women with endoscopy occurred <2 weeks after endoscopy.

33 ugh, abdominal computed tomography (CT), and endoscopy.

34 nt advances in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy.

35 were reintroduced individually, followed by endoscopy.

36 the use of small-bowel CE and colon capsule endoscopy.

37 le failed attempts at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

38 28 participants were randomly assigned after endoscopy.

39 pregnancies exposed to endoscopy (2025 upper endoscopies, 1109 lower endoscopies, and 58 endoscopic r

40 We identified 3052 pregnancies exposed to endoscopy (2025 upper endoscopies, 1109 lower endoscopie

41 I criteria would potentially spare 367 (40%) endoscopies (21% with Baveno VI criteria) with a risk of

42 Mortality (TIPS 32% vs. endoscopy 26%; P = 0.418) and treatment failure (TIPS 38

43 = 0.418) and treatment failure (TIPS 38% vs. endoscopy 34%; P = 0.685) did not differ between groups.

44 enocarcinoma] underwent nCRT with CT-PET and endoscopy 4 to 6 weeks later, and surgery subsequently.

45 frequency of angiodysplasia confirmed during endoscopy (58% versus 23%; P=0.03).

46 During endoscopy, 6 allergens were injected in the esophagus of

47 ee clinical remission, a Mayo Score </= 1 on endoscopy, a FC </= 200 mug/g and no significant active

48 king relying on CT alone or on a combined CT-endoscopy algorithm was similar and would have spared 19

49 During ex vivo molecular fluorescence endoscopy, all tumors could clearly be delineated for bo

50 16 explorative laparotomies compared with an endoscopy-alone algorithm.

51 copic therapy, it is appropriate to consider endoscopy among efforts to develop health system capacit

52 ent EACs (of all EACs detected after initial endoscopy) among BE cohorts, using a random effects mode

53 ity spent two or more days a week performing endoscopies and had practices comprising less than 25% o

54 ut an increase in complications or number of endoscopies and without a reduction in rebleeding or oth

55 %) among those who had not undergone a lower endoscopy and 18 colorectal cancers per 100000 person-ye

56 found to have non-dysplastic BE at the index endoscopy and after 1 year or more of follow-up.

57 BE with low-grade dysplasia) at their index endoscopy and at least a 3-year follow-up period, 25% of

58 e development of diagnostic tools that avoid endoscopy and biopsy analyses to more easily monitor dis

59 cy of the Cytosponge-TFF3 test compared with endoscopy and biopsy.

60 ing at centers equipped with high-definition endoscopy and capable of performing endoscopic resection

61 ubjective variables, such as bleeding during endoscopy and Child-Pugh score, which are evaluated inco

62 The duodenum was assessed by side-viewing endoscopy and classified as stage 1 to 5 disease.

63 eterogeneous with significant differences in endoscopy and clinicopathology between PGC and DGC.

64 The upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy were normal.

65 Endoscopy and colonoscopy were performed; however, they

66 o endoscopy, we found no association between endoscopy and gestational age or birth weight.

67 our country, where there are restrictions to endoscopy and high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H.

68 Endoscopy and histology confirmed a gastric adenocarcino

69 features of colonic inflammation observed by endoscopy and histology.

70 Individuals with normal upper GI endoscopy and histopathology findings from analyses of b

71 or fecal calprotectin for IBD, confirmed by endoscopy and histopathology or clinical follow-up, in p

72 We used high-resolution mini-endoscopy and in vivo imaging methods to assess colitis

73 Results of endoscopy and laparotomy in our patient with malignant a

74 y (CT), ultrasound, and light-based methods [endoscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT)].

75 Secondary endpoints comprised pH testing and endoscopy and other symptoms measured by the GSRS, dysph

76 t study using routine lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and pathology data from patients who, after ba

77 osite indices, response definitions based on endoscopy and patient-reported outcomes can be readily a

78 s were adjudicated free of active disease on endoscopy and radiology at final assessment (difference,

79 al esophagus was examined by high definition endoscopy and SE sequentially.

80 the foundation for development of molecular endoscopy and summarise key results from preclinical and

81 ith continued symptoms can be evaluated with endoscopy and tests of esophageal physiology, to better

82 g course providing false negative results of endoscopy and ultrasound if performed between episodes o

83 After negative results of endoscopy and ultrasound, the diagnosis was established

84 of the vocal folds with fiber-optic or rigid endoscopy and using stroboscopic or high-speed video to

85 ndoscopy (2025 upper endoscopies, 1109 lower endoscopies, and 58 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancr

86 ing unnecessary dietary restrictions, saving endoscopies, and shortening the diagnostic process.

87 unction with techniques such as laparoscopy, endoscopy, and angiographic intervention.

88 omplete symptom, upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, and histology data from 1452 consecutive adul

89 everity of liver failure, active bleeding at endoscopy, and initial therapy.

90 Methods such as diffraction, endoscopy, and optical coherence tomography have been ap

91 sy cohorts, the screening period included an endoscopy, and participants with duodenal histology who

92 ices that are placed or removed via flexible endoscopy, and procedures that utilize instruments that

93 Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Endoscopy, Archives of Surgery, and Liver transplantatio

94 astomotic leakage are present, a CT-scan and endoscopy are currently the methods of choice.

95 ion of colorectal adenomas and cancers using endoscopy as the reference standard.

96 of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) risk stratification guidelines versus m

97 rrence assessed by barium meal radiology and endoscopy at 6 months.

98 (mean age, 50.3 y; 62% female) who underwent endoscopy at a tertiary medical center in the United Kin

99 Subjects were assessed by videocapsule endoscopy at baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment.

100 derdone esophago-gastro-duodenal (EGD) video endoscopy at two general hospitals in Erzurum.

101 promising target for molecular fluorescence endoscopy because it showed a high protein expression, e

102 of 23 months, 10 (29%) of 35 patients in the endoscopy + beta-blocker group, as compared to 0 of 37 (

103 3.5 years and the oesophagus was assessed by endoscopy, biopsy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and high-

104 including examination and a nasal fiberoptic endoscopy by an otorhinolaryngologist in the acute phase

105 Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopies can be safely performed after lung and heart

106 BACKGROUND & AIMS: Video capsule endoscopy (CE) provides a noninvasive option to assess t

107 ients attending the outpatient clinic, nasal endoscopy changed classification in only four patients (

108 sensitivities and cost effectiveness of pre-endoscopy coeliac screening with Simtomax in anaemia; 3)

109 first, and 97 (52%) to receive full-spectrum endoscopy colonoscopy first.

110 Upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, and pelvic magnetic resonance im

111 strategies such as laparotomy, laparoscopy, endoscopy, computed tomographic angiography, angiographi

112 ate sex-matched control groups: 606 elective endoscopy controls and 303 primary care controls without

113 atients at low risk of progression, for whom endoscopy could be avoided.

114 atients at low risk of progression, for whom endoscopy could be avoided.

115 pothesise that using a point of care test at endoscopy could fill this gap, by providing rapid result

116 partially replace currently used techniques (endoscopy, CT enterography and MR enterography) in the d

117 In a prospective study, we used a combined endoscopy-CT decision-making algorithm.

118 Endoscopy demonstrated a complete mucosal lining at 15 m

119 rveillance for microbiology laboratories and endoscopy departments.

120 I pathology review that persists on a second endoscopy, despite intensification of acid-suppressive t

121 Endoscopy did never rectify a wrong CT decision.

122 ll-night polysomnography, drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE), and relocation pharyngoplasty.

123 to precede AEF development, and postablation endoscopy documenting esophageal ulcer may identify pati

124 ain, and refractory reflux symptoms after an endoscopy does not reveal a mechanical obstruction or an

125 udy design, subjects who presented for upper endoscopy due to various non-emergent causes had gastric

126 review concludes that lower gastrointestinal endoscopy during pregnancy is of low risk for mother and

127 ting the study population to women having an endoscopy during pregnancy or before/after, and only ana

128 wide population-based cohort study, we found endoscopy during pregnancy to be associated with increas

129 Exposure to any endoscopy during pregnancy was associated with an increa

130 endoscopy <1 year before or after pregnancy, endoscopy during pregnancy was associated with preterm b

131 l disease, celiac disease, or liver disease, endoscopy during pregnancy was not linked to preterm bir

132 comes of pregnancies for women who underwent endoscopy during their pregnancy.

133 ause the esophagus is easily accessible with endoscopy, early diagnosis and curative treatment of eso

134 Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitorin

135 luation with GERD-HRQoL questionnaire, upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour impedance p

136 Flexible airway endoscopy (FAE) is an accepted and frequently performed

137 se previous upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy findings were normal, underwent CT and MR ente

138 The repeat capsule endoscopy findings, one year following institution of a

139 analysis of EAC usually commences with upper endoscopy followed by cross-sectional imaging.

140 Biopsies were collected at both endoscopies for PGE2 quantification and histopathologica

141 nant biopsy tissues from patients undergoing endoscopy for Barrett's esophagus.

142 ast 1 symptom could avoid risks and costs of endoscopy for more than half the children with celiac di

143 ients with EoE and 21 individuals undergoing endoscopy for other reasons (controls).

144 at utilize instruments that require flexible endoscopy for the indications of weight loss or treatmen

145 by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: for diminutive colorectal polyps characterize

146 n-CF gastric juice data was obtained through endoscopy from 14 patients without lung disease.

147 nd B in intestinal biopsies collected during endoscopy from patients with IBS (n = 183) and without I

148 Biopsy specimens were collected via endoscopy from the upper, middle, and lower thirds of th

149 Full-spectrum endoscopy (FUSE) incorporates 2 additional lateral camer

150 Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy-guided mucosal biopsy was negative for maligna

151 The European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines recently recommended prophylactic r

152 Diagnostic upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy has been regarded as a safe procedure.

153 d anesthesia care (MAC) for gastrointestinal endoscopy has increased in the Veterans Health Administr

154 Endoscopy helped in identifying poor prognosis in 30 of

155 ] score and platelet-spleen ratio [PSR]) and endoscopy/hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement.

156 lines for diagnostic evaluation recommending endoscopy (high risk), MR cholangiopancreatography (inte

157 ), 181 (10%) were not confirmed with initial endoscopy (ie, discordant), of which 37 were excluded (a

158 liquids and no solids and identified through endoscopy immediately after intubation.

159 Esophagitis was found at endoscopy in 34% and confirmed at histology in 67%.

160 BE was suspected after endoscopy in 37% and was confirmed by histology for 43%

161 High-definition endoscopy in combination with digital chromoendoscopy al

162 However, the inaccuracy of endoscopy in determining the depth of intramural necrosi

163 nosing gastric cancer in subjects undergoing endoscopy in northeastern Turkey.

164 veloped into a powerful adjunct to screening endoscopy in the clinic.

165 The respective utility of CT and endoscopy in the decision-making process were compared.

166 feasible, whereas performance of esophageal endoscopy in the presence of AEF may result in significa

167 Initial endoscopy in the remaining 151 patients showed no varice

168 = 169) collected from patients who underwent endoscopy in the United Kingdom or the Netherlands and a

169 copies to achieve eradication or to the last endoscopy in those not achieving eradication was compara

170 diagnosed more than 1 year after the initial endoscopy in which BE was diagnosed, respectively).

171 The findings that were noted during endoscopy included the optic disc characteristics, anato

172 nd panoramic views obtained by full-spectrum endoscopy increased the number of dysplastic lesions det

173 The prediction of pCR through CT-PET and endoscopy independently or combined is limited by low se

174 onths); patients were examined by a median 4 endoscopies (interquartile range, 3-6 endoscopies).

175 Endoscopy is a standard method for the assessment of gas

176 Endoscopy is an integral part of the investigation and m

177 BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopy is an integral part of the investigation and m

178 When endoscopy is indicated during pregnancy, concerns about

179 The contrast mechanism of medical endoscopy is mainly based on metrics of optical intensit

180 atients with advanced liver disease in which endoscopy is mandatory as well as rule out the presence

181 Population screening by endoscopy is not cost-effective, but a number of alterna

182 Endoscopy is the standard of care for emergency patient

183 enital malformations) in women who underwent endoscopy just before or after pregnancy.

184 malignant atrophic papulosis, Degos disease, endoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy.

185 was to assess whether lower gastrointestinal endoscopies (LGEs) across all three trimesters of pregna

186 Numerous dietary restrictions and endoscopies limit the implementation of empiric eliminat

187 Endoscopy limited to the rectosigmoid colon is the stand

188 Compared to women with endoscopy <1 year before or after pregnancy, endoscopy d

189 re likely to rate the Cytosponge higher than endoscopy (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.001).

190 , cough, aspiration, laryngitis, GERD, GORD, endoscopy, manometry, pH monitoring, proton pump inhibit

191 , cough, aspiration, laryngitis, GERD, GORD, endoscopy, manometry, pH monitoring, proton pump inhibit

192 R before surgery, with metabolic imaging and endoscopy, may spare patients' operative intervention.

193 oscopic cholecystectomy (n = 10 studies) and endoscopy (n = 10 studies), participants who reached sim

194 ither underwent RFA (n = 45) or surveillance endoscopy (n = 125) for LGD, confirmed by at least 1 exp

195 rence standard; the results of video-capsule endoscopy (n = 36) and clinical follow-up (n = 59) were

196 All eligible subjects who underwent endoscopy (n = 887) were invited to participate in a fol

197 s, 564 were identified as cases and 1,202 as endoscopy-negative controls.

198 None of the 15 stillbirths to women with endoscopy occurred <2 weeks after endoscopy.

199 Endoscopy of the gastrointestinal tract has shown gastri

200 lammation were monitored by in vivo imaging (endoscopy) of mice.

201 n pump inhibitor therapy and/or surveillance endoscopy) of this before undergoing the procedure.

202 questionnaires prior to elective, outpatient endoscopy; of these individuals, 564 were identified as

203 and objective evaluation of inflammation by endoscopy, offers a clinically meaningful and scientific

204 cipants had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy on the day of breath sampling.

205 Lesions were scored by endoscopy on the last day of PPE exposure.

206 mong physicians, where the majority performs endoscopy on two or more days per week, most prefer prev

207 difficult to distinguish by means of regular endoscopy only.

208 Endoscopy or urgent surgery should not be delayed during

209 rticipants who did not have a previous lower endoscopy (OR 0.73 (0.64, 0.83)).

210 32% of round 1 participants crossed over to endoscopy over 4 screening rounds-7.0% due to a positive

211 geal dilation (P = 0.04), suspicion of BE at endoscopy (P < 0.001), and histological esophagitis (P =

212 using a visual analogue scale, compared with endoscopy (p < 0.001), and patients who were not sedated

213 ile range, 322-2355 days) after surveillance endoscopy (P = .32).

214 The 15-20 million endoscopies performed every year in the United States al

215 FS, 30.3-43.5), upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy (PFS, 26.5-34.3), mastectomy (PFS, 16.5-35.0),

216 By endoscopy, PGCs showed protruding and elevated patterns

217 during colonoscopy using a NIR fluorescence endoscopy platform, providing the endoscopist a wide-fie

218 acers during ex vivo colonoscopy with an NIR endoscopy platform.

219 Gastrointestinal endoscopy plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and mana

220 hospital admissions, surgical interventions, endoscopies, PN, and immunosuppressive medication.

221 cation who underwent a diagnostic ophthalmic endoscopy procedure from March 2014 to May 2016.

222 The endoscopy procedure in itself did not lead to any compli

223 Diagnostic endoscopy provided invaluable supplemental information a

224 They had a median of 9 endoscopies (range: 2-25) over a median of 11 years (ran

225 Written endoscopy records from 29th September 1977 to 16th Decem

226 Results were compared with endoscopy reports and with histology of any polyps ident

227 served in 37% of participants with evaluable endoscopy results at week 12.

228 Urgent upper endoscopy revealed multiple 'downhill' esophageal varice

229 three additional unpublished cases in which endoscopy revealed only minimal changes while laparoscop

230 mucosal inflammation as assessed by the Mayo endoscopy score (P = 0.01), disease activity as indicate

231 In contrast, endoscopy score and clinical grades were strongly associ

232 atients achieving endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopy score of 0) had significantly higher IBDQ scor

233 Responders had lower endoscopy scores during their disease duration (P = .013

234 coefficient (0.20) between histological and endoscopy scores was poor.

235 olfactory testing, computed tomography, and endoscopy scoring.

236 i-Scan endoscopy (SE) provides high resolution and modulation o

237 Postablation endoscopy seems to identify patients at high risk of eso

238 Group 1: pre-endoscopy serology availability was retrospectively anal

239 this hypothesis: 1) the availability of pre-endoscopy serology in anaemia; 2) the sensitivities and

240 However, pre-endoscopy serology is often unavailable, thus committing

241 tool to screen individuals in the office or endoscopy setting; Figure 2 illustrates a strategy for u

242 high-definition/high-resolution white-light endoscopy should be performed under maximal acid suppres

243 Colon capsule endoscopy should not be substituted routinely for colono

244 Video capsule endoscopy showed delayed appearance of villi until the p

245 The upper endoscopy showed gastritis and gastric stenosis in the g

246 on with acute abdomen he had upper and lower endoscopy showing areas of nonspecific patchy erythema.

247 r adverse outcomes of pregnancy according to endoscopy status using 1,589,173 unexposed pregnancies a

248 erology clinic, hospital emergency room, and endoscopy suite.

249 e new Expanded-Baveno VI criteria spare more endoscopies than the original criteria with a minimal ri

250 ), however when stratified by previous lower endoscopy, the association was only observed in the part

251 Although this would not replace endoscopy, the ICG-r15 appears able to identify patients

252 ed at baseline and confirmed by a subsequent endoscopy, the odds for progression to neoplasia also in

253 Based on CT-scans and upper endoscopy, the true number of anastomotic leakage was 15

254 nce every 6 months for 1 year after the last endoscopy, then annually for 2 years, then every 3 years

255 The mean number of endoscopies to achieve eradication or to the last endosc

256 also passed the way for small bowel capsule endoscopy to become a therapeutic instrument.

257 uld be used to identify patients who warrant endoscopy to diagnose BE.

258 fy patients with reflux symptoms who warrant endoscopy to diagnose BE.

259 After a preliminary endoscopy to rule out previous gastric macroscopic damag

260 quently diagnosed with IBD (after diagnostic endoscopy) to those of 20 comparison patients with funct

261 can impact probe-based applications such as, endoscopy, tomography, and industrial imaging and sensin

262 ic tissues from patients who underwent upper endoscopy (UE).

263 The endoscopy unit of the University Teaching Hospital in Lu

264 lyps >20 mm from 2003 to 2014 in an academic endoscopy unit were retrospectively analyzed for size, l

265 ow-band imaging is an image-enhanced form of endoscopy used to observed microstructures and capillari

266 Endoscopy uses optical imaging methods to investigate ti

267 However, the total number of avoided endoscopies using this rule is relatively low.

268 rointestinal pathology review), repeat upper endoscopy using high-definition/high-resolution white-li

269 on with MR enterography (MRE), video capsule endoscopy (VCE), CRP, fecal calprotectin and CDAI.

270 Fiberoptic endoscopy was developed at the University of Michigan in

271 judication panel that reviewed radiology and endoscopy was masked to allocation and visits.

272 of UGIB among the 86 patients who underwent endoscopy was oesophageal varices (57%), followed by pep

273 A second endoscopy was performed after 24 hours to evaluate delay

274 An upper endoscopy was performed in 54 patients at a median of 6

275 Endoscopy was performed to monitor adenoma regression in

276 Gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed to rule out inflammatory bowel d

277 At the end of treatment, a new endoscopy was performed.

278 rticles we identified only 11 cases in which endoscopy was performed.

279 Due to persistent abdominal pain, an upper endoscopy was performed.

280 In addition, small bowel capsule endoscopy was proven as a valid tool to diagnose polyps

281 , for which only 1 birth had been exposed to endoscopy, we found no association between endoscopy and

282 ontrol group, 10 complications (1.2%) of 805 endoscopies were documented.

283 A total of 404 upper endoscopies were performed under propofol sedation.

284 irs, overall sensitivity and specificity for endoscopy were 74% and 85%, positive predictive value wa

285 253 798 patients who underwent colonic endoscopy were identified, of whom 11 944 with intermedi

286 n ablation and postinterventional esophageal endoscopy were included in the study.

287 , raised serum total bilirubin and a lack of endoscopy were independent predictors of mortality.

288 .001), and patients who were not sedated for endoscopy were more likely to rate the Cytosponge higher

289 t, a computed tomography (CT) scan and upper endoscopy were performed.

290 tom-line belief in the value of surveillance endoscopy when evaluating a patient's likelihood of comp

291 ed with patients without GERD by GerdQ or by endoscopy with 24-h pH monitoring (PHM) and in normal vo

292 r disease (cACLD) can safely avoid screening endoscopy with a platelet count >150 x 10(9) cells/L and

293 t study of patients scheduled for outpatient endoscopy with anesthesia at a county hospital serving t

294 In total, 511 patients underwent endoscopy with anesthesia during the study period.

295 unemployment are associated with no-shows to endoscopy with anesthesia.

296 l polyps was evaluated using high-definition endoscopy with digital chromoendoscopy and the accuracy

297 days and underwent an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with duodenal biopsy of the distal duodenum at

298 An upper endoscopy with endoscopic ultrasound was performed and f

299 All eligible patients were proposed an upper endoscopy with multistaged esophageal biopsies under gen

300 te may be achieved by molecular fluorescence endoscopy with targeted near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent

301 hibitor; and 4) patients receiving follow-up endoscopy within the 3(rd) and the 4(th) months after tr