ライフサイエンスコーパス: enteritidis

1 ogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enteritidis.

2 ribute to successful egg contamination by S. Enteritidis.

3 87/91 is a recently evolved descendent of S. Enteritidis.

4 VA) method for subtyping Salmonella serotype Enteritidis.

5 reaks caused by Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis.

6 n of outbreaks caused by Salmonella serotype Enteritidis.

7 with progeny response to S. enterica serovar Enteritidis.

8 t in the transmission of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis.

9 st OMPs isolated from S. Choleraesuis and S. Enteritidis.

10 -transferase-LpfA fusion protein of serotype Enteritidis.

11 ge type (PT) reference strains of Salmonella enteritidis.

12 methods for the epidemiological typing of S. enteritidis.

13 ous than the flagella observed on Salmonella enteritidis.

14 he chicken ovaries by invasive strains of S. enteritidis.

15 ied nonpasteurized liquid eggs containing S. enteritidis.

16 rapid, and powerful subtyping method for S. enteritidis.

17 detection and characterization method for S. Enteritidis.

18 of the isolates, 3 of which were Salmonella Enteritidis.

19 Typhimurium and 1608 (15.8%) were Salmonella Enteritidis.

20 d ecological origins of S. enterica serotype Enteritidis.

21 e development of a SNP typing scheme with S. Enteritidis.

22 aradox surrounds Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis.

23 ia monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica sv. Enteritidis.

24 did bacterial lipopolysaccharides Salmonella enteritidis (0.24 nmol/L, 5-fold) greater than Helicobac

25 Twelve serotypes, including Enteritidis (21%) and Javiana (21%), were less likely to

26 inst challenge with S. typhimurium F98 or S. enteritidis 27A PT 8 in birds from vaccinated hens and i

27 f cross-immunizing infection with Salmonella Enteritidis; (3) an increase in the duration of infectio

28 mologous (Typhimurium F98) and heterologous (Enteritidis 4973 and S. enterica O6,14,24: e,h-monophasi

29 h a 14-kDa fimbrial protein isolated from S. enteritidis (68% reduction in attachment).

30 proportion than Typhimurium (6%), including Enteritidis (7%), Heidelberg (13%), Choleraesuis (57%),

31 Enteritidis (80 to 100% vaccine efficacy).

32 m, followed by S. Heidelberg (10.86%) and S. Enteritidis (9.90%).

33 himurium SpvD having an arginine and serovar Enteritidis a glycine at this position.

34 ubsequent challenge with virulent Salmonella enteritidis a selection against lpf phase-on variants wa

35 l showing the highest binding affinity to S. enteritidis, a DNA sequence of high affinity to the bact

36 e phenotypic response to S. enterica serovar Enteritidis, an F1 population of chickens was created by

37 lates serotyped, 160 (45.6%) were Salmonella Enteritidis and 152 (43.3%) were Salmonella Typhimurium.

38 ng NTS isolates, >/=80% (79.7% of Salmonella Enteritidis and 90.2% of Salmonella Typhimurium isolates

39 is of a patient with disseminated Salmonella enteritidis and a homozygous splice acceptor mutation in

40 mprises a positive selection step against S. enteritidis and a negative selection step against a mixt

41 reus) and Gram-negative microbes (Salmonella enteritidis and Escherichia coli O157:H7).

42 s aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enteritidis and Escherichia coli.

43 c areas that distinguished them from serovar Enteritidis and from each other.

44 Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Kentucky differ greatly in epidemiology.

45 54, fliH, fljB, csgB, spvR, and rfbMN) in S. Enteritidis and other Salmonella serovars.

46 from other Salmonella species, including S. enteritidis and S. choleraesuis.

47 er Salmonella enterica serovars including S. enteritidis and S. dublin can also kill C. elegans.

48 ng Dice similarities for S. enterica serovar Enteritidis and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strains

49 enzyme combined PFGE for S. enterica serovar Enteritidis and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strains,

50 ) for 74 strains each of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium.

51 rs have the capacity to inhibit growth of S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium in bacterial cultures; th

52 amers, twelve rounds of selection to live S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium were performed, alternati

53 ection of highly specific DNA aptamers to S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium.

54 rain M5a1, Salmonella eastbourne, Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella gelsenkirchen, respectively.

55 serovars of the Salmonella genus: Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium.

56 ing methods for Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis and survey the population structure of commo

57 H8 infected S. enterica serotypes Enteritidis and Typhimurium and Escherichia coli by init

58 Nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium are a common cause of gastro

59 sm to evade cross-immunity between serotypes Enteritidis and Typhimurium.

60 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. enteritidis) and closely related serovars, suggesting th

61 Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis (S. enteritidis) and Escherichia coli O157:H7, has generated

62 m, 10% (10) were Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis, and 3% (3) were Salmonella enterica serovar

63 tions indicated that clinical isolates of S. enteritidis are highly heterogeneous in their ability to

64 Since S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis are the most common NTS serovars associated

65 a patient with Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis bacteremia.

66 s after inoculation with S. enterica serovar Enteritidis bacterin vaccine.

67 a collection of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis bacteriophage.

68 dual strains of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis beyond the phenotypic level; however, a cons

69 mbinant His-tagged flagellin from Salmonella enteritidis bound to TLR5 in detergent lysates from COS-

70 ears and case fatality was 20.3%; Salmonella Enteritidis case fatality (27.8%) was higher than for ot

71 Since 2010, Salmonella Enteritidis cases have risen and Salmonella Typhimurium

72 ella (NTS), mainly serotypes Typhimurium and Enteritidis, cause invasive infections with high mortali

73 Salmonella Enteritidis cells in a VBNC physiological state were eva

74 Enteritidis cells into mouse macrophages.

75 against heterologous S. Choleraesuis and S. Enteritidis challenge.

76 Enteritidis compared to IgY from vaccinates, for both an

77 t IgY from multiple animals infected with S. Enteritidis compared to those infected with S. Hadar.

78 Stanleyville (91% vaccine efficacy), and S. Enteritidis CVD 1944 protected mice against the group D

79 The vaccines S. Typhimurium CVD 1931 and S. Enteritidis CVD 1944 were immunogenic and protected BALB

80 t international travel by linking Salmonella Enteritidis data from the National Antimicrobial Resista

81 Typhimurium and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis DeltaguaBA DeltaclpX live oral vaccines to p

82 xtensive analysis of clinical isolates of S. enteritidis, demonstrate the complex nature of Salmonell

83 hly selective and can successfully detect S. enteritidis down to 600 CFU mL(-1) (equivalent to 18 CFU

84 Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis, drugs that are not appropriate for therapy

85 ction against lpf phase ON cells of serotype Enteritidis during a subsequent challenge, suggesting th

86 Viable counts for serovar Enteritidis either matched the level of serovar Typhi (J

87 after an intravenous injection of Salmonella enteritidis endotoxin (10 mg/kg) or saline.

88 after an intravenous injection of Salmonella enteritidis endotoxin (10 mg/kg).

89 Administration of 0.5 mg/kg Salmonella enteritidis endotoxin to male Fischer rats induced a dra

90 ofiles of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enteritidis, Escherichia coli, during growth in the pres

91 gainst some food-borne pathogens (Salmonella enteritidis, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes an

92 e of related pathogens, including Salmonella enteritidis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Ps

93 Clinical isolates of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis exhibit a wide spectrum of virulence in mice

94 ith native LT or with recombinant Salmonella enteritidis expressing LT-B.

95 A Tn10 insertion from a Salmonella enteritidis fimU mutant was transduced into S. typhimuri

96 ave analyzed the pathway by which Salmonella enteritidis flagellin (FliC) activates murine and human

97 surveillance of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis for over 2 decades.

98 cs of Salmonella BSI in Blantyre; Salmonella Enteritidis from 1999 to 2002, Salmonella Typhimurium fr

99 nome sequence analysis of 675 isolates of S. Enteritidis from 45 countries, we show the existence of

100 types of Salmonella may mitigate recovery of Enteritidis from chickens exposed by contact.

101 ntucky impacted the recovery of the pathogen Enteritidis from chickens.

102 of diversity within 104 isolates of serotype Enteritidis from eight unaffiliated poultry farms in Eng

103 on the molecular fingerprinting of serotype Enteritidis from poultry environments in the United King

104 tal of 192 NTS isolates (114 Typhimurium, 78 Enteritidis) from blood and stools from pediatric admiss

105 We estimate that S. enteritidis gastroenteritis developed in 224,000 persons

106 To investigate whether changes in serovar Enteritidis gene content contributed to this increased p

107 dentified in the Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis genome that is predicted to encode a protein

108 phism (SNP)-based cluster analysis of the S. Enteritidis genomes revealed well supported clades, with

109 Overall, almost all the serovar Enteritidis genomes were very similar to each other.

110 Overall, MLVA typing of Salmonella serotype Enteritidis had enhanced resolution, good reproducibilit

111 The infecting S. Enteritidis harbored a mutation in the mismatch repair g

112 Enteritidis-harboring mutations in functional homologs o

113 The infecting S. Enteritidis harboured a mutation in the mismatch repair

114 The incidence of Salmonella Enteritidis has been falling since 1997, and levels of S

115 The lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Salmonella enteritidis has been implicated as a virulence factor of

116 symptomatic colonizers of chickens, serovars Enteritidis, Heidelberg, and Kentucky.

117 injected intramuscularly 2 weeks later with Enteritidis, (ii) hens were contact infected with Kentuc

118 contact infected with Kentucky and then with Enteritidis, (iii) hens were injected with Enteritidis o

119 3985 induced excellent protection against S. enteritidis in chickens.

120 Enteritidis in complex food matrix.

121 Furthermore, the growth rate of S. Enteritidis in culture was significantly inhibited by H-

122 sociated food poisoning caused by Salmonella enteritidis in eggs because the avirulent S. typhimurium

123 a survival advantage to S. enterica serovar Enteritidis in eggs by repairing DNA damage caused by eg

124 ntial for efficient uptake or survival of S. enteritidis in macrophages.

125 environments, which may ultimately assist S. Enteritidis in persistent and silent colonization of chi

126 report on a technology to reduce Salmonella enteritidis in poultry.

127 uding two rare strains classified as serovar Enteritidis in the Salmonella reference collection B, on

128 ence that SEF14 fimbriae are expressed by S. enteritidis in vivo, previous studies showed that SEF14

129 The isolation rate of Salmonella serotype Enteritidis increased until 1996, whereas declines were

130 cted to evaluate whether NO production in S. Enteritidis-infected HD11 cells can be used as a biomark

131 Production of NO in S. Enteritidis-infected HD11 cells increased significantly

132 demonstrate that NO-based screening using S. Enteritidis-infected HD11 cells is a viable tool to iden

133 verse the suppression of NO production in S. Enteritidis-infected HD11 cells.

134 e highly discriminatory for IgY following S. Enteritidis infection (p < 0.05) compared to infections

135 implications for Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infection and transmission to eggs, along wi

136 We defined an outbreak-associated case of S. enteritidis infection as one in which S. enteritidis was

137 ure of ice cream associated with cases of S. enteritidis infection were compared with those of produc

138 Enteritidis) infection covering 15 years in an interleuk

139 Enteritidis) infection covering 15 years in an interleuk

140 The incidence of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis infections has increased substantially in re

141 acid-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis infections in the United States and recent i

142 rease in the number of reports of Salmonella enteritidis infections.

143 ization after pathogenic S. enterica serovar Enteritidis inoculation and for circulating antibody lev

144 Results of this study demonstrated that S. enteritidis interacts with granulosa cells in a specific

145 and transmission electron micrographs of S. enteritidis invasion of granulosa cells showed organisms

146 Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis is a common food-borne pathogen, often assoc

147 S. Enteritidis is a further example of a Salmonella serotyp

148 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis is a gram-negative bacterium that negatively

149 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis is a major cause of food-borne diseases asso

150 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis is a major cause of food-borne diseases in i

151 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis is a significant cause of gastrointestinal i

152 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis is an important food-borne pathogen, and chi

153 ogical characteristic of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis is its association with chicken shell eggs,

154 Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis is known to have pathobiology specific to ch

155 S. Enteritidis is known to suppress nitric oxide (NO) produ

156 The structure of S. Enteritidis is more complex than previously known, as a

157 le each year and among pathogens, Salmonella Enteritidis is most widely found bacteria causing food b

158 y in recent decades, and S. enterica serovar Enteritidis is now one of the leading serovars of Salmon

159 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis is often transmitted into the human food sup

160 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis is one of the most prevalent Salmonella sero

161 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) is a major etiologic agent of nontyphoid sa

162 Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis (S. enteritidis) is a major food-borne pathogen, and its inc

163 Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis, is responsible for a major global burden of

164 type element with homology to the Salmonella enteritidis IS1351 element and Yersinia enterocolitica I

165 we conducted a retrospective analysis of S. Enteritidis isolates from seven epidemiologically confir

166 The resultant phylogeny allocated most S. Enteritidis isolates into two distinct clades (clades I

167 in the examined genomes grouped the serovar Enteritidis isolates into two major lineages.

168 al and animal origins of Salmonella serotype Enteritidis isolates may have a considerable influence o

169 f 65 arbitrary primers were screened with S. enteritidis isolates of different phage types.

170 With >89,400 bp surveyed across 98 S. Enteritidis isolates representing 14 distinct phage type

171 A total of 52 S. enterica serotype Enteritidis isolates representing 16 major outbreaks and

172 la Typhimurium and 30% (24/79) of Salmonella Enteritidis isolates tested were found to be multidrug r

173 characterized clinical and environmental S. Enteritidis isolates were sequenced.

174 s been developed to differentiate Salmonella enteritidis isolates.

175 able of detecting DNA polymorphisms among S. enteritidis isolates.

176 to be resistant to >/=1 agent for serotypes Enteritidis, Javiana, Panama, and Typhimurium.

177 d the effects of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and recombinant Sal

178 core polysaccharide-OPS (COPS) of Salmonella Enteritidis lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to flagellin protei

179 the published level of glucosylation for S. enteritidis LPS as well as for S. enteritidis LPS purcha

180 ion for S. enteritidis LPS as well as for S. enteritidis LPS purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., the 1

181 N-gamma +/+ mice following injection with S. enteritidis LPS, despite sustaining 11-fold reductions i

182 ection with a hypotensive dose of Salmonella enteritidis LPS.

183 lowing injection of 300 microg of Salmonella enteritidis LPS.

184 kers for the response to S. enterica serovar Enteritidis may result in the enhancement of the immune

185 fferent hosts, including S. enterica serovar Enteritidis (multiple hosts), S. Gallinarum (birds), and

186 During a challenge with a serotype Enteritidis mutant carrying the lac promoter in front of

187 riae on colonization of mice with a serotype Enteritidis mutant in which the lpf promoter region was

188 f the 687 NTS isolates, including Salmonella Enteritidis (n = 244 [35.5%]), Salmonella Typhimurium (n

189 comprised serotypes Typhimurium (n = 43) and Enteritidis (n = 4).

190 0), Typhimurium (n = 163), Newport (n = 93), Enteritidis (n = 45), Dublin (n = 25), Pullorum (n = 9),

191 (two outbreaks caused by Salmonella serotype Enteritidis, one by Norwalk-like virus), and food items

192 h Enteritidis, (iii) hens were injected with Enteritidis only, and (iv) hens were contact infected wi

193 ly, and (iv) hens were contact infected with Enteritidis only.

194 ontaminated with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis or Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium a

195 ety of strains, which suggests that serotype Enteritidis organisms representing different genomic gro

196 a single culture-proven foodborne Salmonella enteritidis outbreak in 1994, Salmonella-induced gastroe

197 of commonly encountered S. enterica serotype Enteritidis outbreak isolates in the United States.

198 a single culture-proven foodborne Salmonella enteritidis outbreak that involved 1811 patients (mostly

199 erefore, more information is needed about S. Enteritidis pathobiology in comparison to that of S. Typ

200 S. Enteritidis persistently and silently colonizes the inte

201 monella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Enteritidis phage type (PT) 4, which peaked in 1993.

202 arge outbreak of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis phage type 14b affecting more than 30 patien

203 ection B, only eleven regions of the serovar Enteritidis phage type 4 (PT4) chromosome (sequenced at

204 Eight isolates of S. enteritidis phage type 8 that failed to be discriminated

205 determine the relationships between some S. Enteritidis phage types (PTs) commonly associated with f

206 confer protection against challenge with S. enteritidis, presumably because lpf phase-off variants w

207 falling since 1997, and levels of Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 have fallen to preepidemic levels and ha

208 host-promiscuous Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis PT4 isolate P125109 and a chicken-restricted

209 roarray comparisons of the sequenced serovar Enteritidis PT4 to isolates of the closely related serov

210 Whereas CVD 1931 did not protect against S. Enteritidis R11, CVD 1944 did mediate protection against

211 wild-type strains S. Typhimurium I77 and S. Enteritidis R11, respectively, were constructed by delet

212 tected mice against lethal infection with S. Enteritidis R11.

213 10 exp9 CFU, and hens injected with serotype Enteritidis received 10 exp7 CFU intramuscularly.

214 sruption of this gene in S. enterica serovar Enteritidis rendered the organism more susceptible to eg

215 Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis represented 386 (49.2%) and 391 (49.9%), res

216 lethal doses (LD50) of S. Typhimurium or S. Enteritidis, respectively.

217 ent blood-borne Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis (S.

218 re only found in Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. enteritidis) and closely related serovar

219 hogens, such as Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis (S. enteritidis) and Escherichia coli O157:H

220 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) is a major etiologic agent

221 Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis (S. enteritidis) is a major food-borne patho

222 ent protein from Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis, S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, and Pseudo

223 genes of Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella arizonae, Shigella sonnei, and S

224 O157:H7, Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella arizonae, Shigella sonnei, Shige

225 uginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Typhimurium, Escherichia coli).

226 onsin, reported Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis (SE) infections during 1997 more than double

227 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE) is one of the most common food-borne pa

228 ess in humans annually in the United States; Enteritidis (SE) is the most common serotype.

229 N-susceptible isolate of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE8743).

230 mbria genes were replaced both in Salmonella enteritidis (sefA, agfA and fimC) and Escherichia coli (

231 ctivity against Escherichia coli, Salmonella enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Mycobacterium bo

232 chicken macrophage HD11 cells, while dead S. Enteritidis stimulates a high level of NO production, su

233 osomal tlpA gene rendered a virulent serovar Enteritidis strain defective in intracellular survival a

234 for strain differentiation of more clonal S. Enteritidis strains and provides core genotypic markers

235 Enteritidis strains associated with or related to the U.

236 -old and nineteen 10- to 20-year-old serovar Enteritidis strains from various hosts, using a Salmonel

237 ent or divergent in any of the other serovar Enteritidis strains tested.

238 ells compared to the serovar Typhimurium and Enteritidis strains tested.

239 Typhimurium and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis strains that can serve as live oral vaccines

240 the subtyping of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis strains to an epidemiologically relevant lev

241 Three divergent atypical Enteritidis strains were not virulent in BALB/c, but two

242 This RAPD approach to S. enteritidis subtyping provided more discriminatory power

243 obal epidemic clade and two new clades of S. Enteritidis that are geographically restricted to distin

244 sed subtyping scheme for S. enterica serovar Enteritidis that relies on a single combined cluster ana

245 n a whole-gene scale were needed for serovar Enteritidis to become more prevalent in domestic fowl.

246 is able to reduce the ability of Salmonella Enteritidis to kill A459 respiratory cells.

247 ential for resistance of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis to nitrosative and oxidative stress.

248 e NTS serotypes also shifted from Salmonella Enteritidis to Salmonella Typhimurium.

249 To understand the mechanisms S. Enteritidis utilizes to colonize and persist in laying h

250 ntibody production after S. enterica serovar Enteritidis vaccination.

251 ggest that a bivalent (S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis) vaccine would provide broad protection agai

252 Enteritidis via Cell Systematic Evolution of Ligands by

253 e used transposon mutagenesis to identify S. Enteritidis virulence genes by assay of invasiveness in

254 -1beta secretion that contributes to serovar Enteritidis virulence.

255 S. enteritidis infection as one in which S. enteritidis was cultured from a person who became ill in

256 hicken ovarian granulosa cells by Salmonella enteritidis was examined in vitro.

257 S. enteritidis was found to attach specifically to fibronec

258 S. enteritidis was isolated from 8 of 226 ice cream product

259 an previously known, as a second clade of S. Enteritidis was revealed that is distinct from those com

260 Salmonella Enteritidis was the most frequent isolate, with 1944 of

261 e characteristics of clinical isolates of S. enteritidis, we determined the 50% lethal doses (LD(50))

262 he RNI/ROI resistance of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis, we transformed a genomic DNA library of SE2

263 Highly specific DNA aptamers to Salmonella enteritidis were selected via Cell-SELEX technique.

264 used to examine a panel of 29 isolates of S. enteritidis which had been previously characterized by o

265 serovar Typhimurium and S. enterica serovar Enteritidis, which are usually linked to localized gastr

266 I as most concordant for S. enterica serovar Enteritidis, while XbaI, BlnI, and SpeI were most concor

267 tified a gene, yafD from S. enterica serovar Enteritidis, whose overexpression conferred upon S. ente

268 iological association of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis with egg products.

269 y significant roles in the interaction of S. enteritidis with granulosa cells.