コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 tive, and emotionally negative) and nonvocal environmental sounds.
2 communication and/or facilitate awareness of environmental sounds.
3 h-processing programs, and cats responded to environmental sounds.
4 can effortlessly categorize a wide range of environmental sounds.
5 of unfamiliar voices and the recognition of environmental sounds.
6 f deficits in processing for both speech and environmental sounds.
7 sformation when optimized for non-biological environmental sounds.
8 gain biologically important information from environmental sounds.
9 c sounds, above artificial control sounds or environmental sounds.
10 of spoken words to equivalent processing of environmental sounds, after controlling for low-level pe
11 hemisphere-damaged aphasic patients to match environmental sounds and linguistic phrases to correspon
12 g is essential for the perception of speech, environmental sounds and music, and may be deranged in t
14 onses evoked during the processing of words, environmental sounds, and non-meaningful sounds in seman
17 blished by 7 years of age, the processing of environmental sounds continues to improve throughout dev
18 imental conditions were words, syllables and environmental sounds, each controlled by a noise baselin
19 d posterior superior temporal regions, while environmental sounds enhanced activation in a right post
21 tal changes in neural responses to words and environmental sounds from pre-adolescence (7-9 years) th
22 ded environmental sounds results in improved environmental sound identification, with benefits shown
23 bat's auditory midbrain, we hypothesize that environmental sounds (including vocalizations produced b
24 ssors, the temporal information in speech or environmental sounds is delivered through modulated elec
25 Hyperacusis, a marked intolerance to normal environmental sound, is a common symptom in patients wit
27 ferent types of sound-broadly categorized as environmental sound, music, and speech-resulting in nine
28 anning the domains of color, visual texture, environmental sound, music, tactile quality, and odor, w
29 ifferences were driven by stimulus type: the Environmental Sound N400 effect decreased in latency fro
30 The mismatch word-N400 peaked later than the environmental sound-N400 and was only slightly more post
31 ), overall liking (P =.001), aversiveness of environmental sounds (P =.02), and distortion (P =.02).
33 d cognitive abilities showed that speech and environmental sound performance were differentially corr
34 compared during the processing of words and environmental sounds presented in semantically matching
35 Perceptual training with spectrally degraded environmental sounds results in improved environmental s
36 d significant improvements in all speech and environmental sound scores between the initial pretest a
38 our-channel vocoder, consisted of a 160-item environmental sound test, word and sentence tests, and a
40 These findings indicate generalizability of environmental sound training and provide a basis for imp
41 raining and provide a basis for implementing environmental sound training programs for cochlear impla
42 pretests (1 week apart) prior to a week-long environmental sound training regimen, which was followed
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。