戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              Epidural abcessess can involve the intercranial or spina
2  vertebral osteomyelitis (n = 1) and primary epidural abscess (n = 1).
3 rom last injection to diagnosis, 39 days for epidural abscess and 21 days for stroke; P<0.001), and s
4                 We report an unusual case of epidural abscess and vertebral osteomyelitis in a patien
5                      The incidence of spinal epidural abscess is increasing, and the understanding of
6                          Paralysis in spinal epidural abscess may be the result of spinal cord compre
7                          Diagnosis of spinal epidural abscess requires a high index of suspicion and
8 circulation stroke, spinal osteomyelitis, or epidural abscess that developed after epidural or parasp
9 n patients had arachnoiditis, another had an epidural abscess, and 9 had urine retention.
10 and management can improve outcome in spinal epidural abscess: minimally invasive surgery early versu
11 ysfunction, the presentation of intracranial epidural abscesses (ICEAs) is less well defined.
12           Although rare, incidence of spinal epidural abscesses (SEAs) is increasing as predisposing
13 vention is an integral part of treatment for epidural abscesses in patients with neurological symptom
14 bnormal contrast enhancement, paraspinal and epidural abscesses, meningeal enhancement at the affecte
15                       With the advent of new epidural adjuvant drugs and new epidural delivery system
16 hibition of exercise pressor reflex input by epidural anaesthesia attenuated the bi-directional reset
17                   In contrast, the effect of epidural anaesthesia on the resetting of the carotid bar
18 l blockade of skeletal muscle afferents with epidural anaesthesia.
19 dpoint, the risk of death was decreased with epidural analgesia (3.1% vs 4.9%; odds ratio, 0.60; 95%
20 RCT), epidural anesthesia (2 meta-analyses), epidural analgesia (6 RCTs, 1 meta-analysis), and laparo
21                                  Importance: Epidural analgesia (EA) is used as an adjunct procedure
22 ent-controlled analgesia group compared with epidural analgesia (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.10-3.53;
23 nger stay was associated with intraoperative epidural analgesia (OR = 1.07, P = 0.019).
24 his randomized trial was to compare thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) to intravenous patient-controll
25 luded randomized controlled trials comparing epidural analgesia (with local anesthetics, lasting for
26 time were the increased postoperative use of epidural analgesia and bronchoscopy (for clearance of pu
27                                        While epidural analgesia appears to be safe, it comes with hig
28  multimodal approach and the use of thoracic epidural analgesia can contribute to facilitate the fast
29  PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Maternal fever following epidural analgesia complicates up to one-third of nullip
30                                              Epidural analgesia did not affect the incidence of respi
31 c colorectal cases performed with or without epidural analgesia for cancer, diverticular disease, and
32                      Epidural anesthesia and epidural analgesia improve the overall outcome and short
33  Nonrandomized studies suggest that thoracic epidural analgesia improves outcome.
34                                   The use of epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery ha
35                     The perioperative use of epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is
36 ced catheters in neonates, study the role of epidural analgesia in outcome improvement for neonates,
37 ts have been obtained regarding the value of epidural analgesia in preventing postoperative pulmonary
38                                              Epidural analgesia initiated early in labor (when the ce
39                                      Whether epidural analgesia is a better method than parenteral op
40                            Although thoracic epidural analgesia is still considered a 'gold standard'
41  preoperative malnutrition and postoperative epidural analgesia on outcomes has also been explored fu
42 ury were prospectively randomized to receive epidural analgesia or PCA during an 18-month period.
43 f surgery and pain assessments, all forms of epidural analgesia provided significantly better postope
44                                     Overall, epidural analgesia provides better postoperative pain re
45 urgery under general anesthesia, concomitant epidural analgesia reduces postoperative mortality and i
46                                              Epidural analgesia significantly decreased the risk of a
47       The authors have previously shown that epidural analgesia significantly reduces the pain associ
48      It remains controversial whether adding epidural analgesia to general anesthesia decreases posto
49 he majority of evidence favors an ability of epidural analgesia to reduce postoperative cardiovascula
50              Similar results were found when epidural analgesia using levobupivacaine with clonidine
51 001 for all), with the exception of thoracic epidural analgesia vs opioids for rest pain after thorac
52                    On case-matched analysis, epidural analgesia was associated with a longer hospital
53            Following qualitative assessment, epidural analgesia was associated with faster return of
54          When analyzed by postoperative day, epidural analgesia was better than parenteral opioids on
55                                              Epidural analgesia was initiated in the intrathecal grou
56                                              Epidural analgesia was used in 4102 cases (2.14%).
57 s and there is also consistent evidence that epidural analgesia with local anesthetics is associated
58 cause they allow the neonate to benefit from epidural analgesia without the concerns of spinal cord i
59  of 125 trials (9044 patients, 4525 received epidural analgesia) were eligible.
60                The incorporation of thoracic epidural analgesia, goal-directed fluid management thera
61                                              Epidural analgesia, regardless of analgesic agent, locat
62     To describe the recent advances in labor epidural analgesia, which may have an impact on maternal
63  agents, early ambulation, and fixed regimen epidural analgesia.
64 eturn of bowel motility, and weaning regimen epidural analgesia.
65  in terms of the risks and benefits of labor epidural analgesia.
66 sources for studies related to postoperative epidural analgesia.
67                                        Total epidural analgesic consumption and in-hospital opioid co
68 tal settings were listed for patients in the epidural and conventional analgesia groups.
69                               In vivo paired epidural and depth-electrode recordings indicated that t
70 orted outbreak of infections associated with epidural and intra-articular injections.
71 hich different opioids redistribute from the epidural and intrathecal spaces to reach target opioid r
72 eak suggest that fungal infections caused by epidural and paraspinal injection of a contaminated gluc
73 ingeal spaces may shorten detection time for epidural and subdural hematomas, increase sensitivity (e
74 ce in complication rate was detected between epidurals and alternative analgesic methods (odds ratio,
75    Allopathic medicine, regional techniques (epidural), and complementary interventions are routinely
76 is the indicated local anesthetic in caudal, epidural, and spinal anesthesia and is widely used clini
77  for preoperative smoking cessation (1 RCT), epidural anesthesia (2 meta-analyses), epidural analgesi
78 is study was to assess the value of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) and left cardiac sympathetic d
79                                              Epidural anesthesia and analgesia for neonates should be
80 f available data have examined the effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on patient outcomes, a
81                                              Epidural anesthesia and epidural analgesia improve the o
82 hesia have been reported, clinical trials of epidural anesthesia for outcome of surgical patients hav
83       Even though many beneficial aspects of epidural anesthesia have been reported, clinical trials
84                                     Thoracic epidural anesthesia impairs right ventricular contractil
85 de of cardiac sympathetic fibers by thoracic epidural anesthesia may affect right ventricular functio
86 ctives were to study the effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia on right ventricular function and ve
87                                     Thoracic epidural anesthesia resulted in a significant decrease i
88 ested before and after induction of thoracic epidural anesthesia using combined pressure-conductance
89 g caudal epidural block, lumbar and thoracic epidural anesthesia, and peripheral nerve blockade.
90 , ganglion stellatum ablation, high thoracic epidural anesthesia, low-level vagal nerve stimulation,
91           Ultrasound can assist in spinal or epidural anesthesia.
92 ressing potential complication of spinal and epidural anesthesia.
93  as well as unintended dural puncture during epidural anesthesia.
94 load were the same before and after thoracic epidural anesthesia.
95 -specific variables, particularly spinal and epidural anesthesia.
96 ut not affected by the induction of thoracic epidural anesthesia.
97                                              Epidural anesthesia/analgesia has been demonstrated to i
98                                              Epidural anesthesia/analgesia is one of these advances t
99           Potential complications related to epidural anesthesia/analgesia range from transient pares
100  was conducted for all pertinent articles on epidural anesthesia/analgesia.
101                                    Spinal or epidural anesthesia; general anesthesia.
102                                              Epidural application of picrotoxin to the rat's M1 motor
103                                        Using epidural application of the GABA(A) antagonist picrotoxi
104 sider EDA as useful, whereas others perceive epidurals as unnecessary or even deleterious.
105  of intracranial pressure by inflation of an epidural balloon catheter with saline (1 mL/20 min) unti
106                                Opposition to epidural block in labor, based on a widely acclaimed 199
107                                              Epidural block remains the most effective, safe approach
108  has emerged showing that the association of epidural block with dystocia and cesarean section is cas
109 tic techniques in children, including caudal epidural block, lumbar and thoracic epidural anesthesia,
110 avertebral blocks the same respect as spinal epidural blocks because the potential of devastating com
111                                              Epidural blood patch remains the treatment of choice.
112                                           An epidural blood patch should not be performed until 24 h
113 s intracranial hypotension, surgically or by epidural blood patch, a rebound and self-limiting intrac
114                           When performing an epidural blood patch, the optimal amount of blood is 20
115                 Treatments include bed rest, epidural blood patching, percutaneous placement of fibri
116  this problem was associated with the use of epidurals, but recent data in the literature deny such a
117 njection, coupled with the flexibility of an epidural catheter that can provide a long duration of la
118                    Infection associated with epidural catheterization is an uncommon but devastating
119 efits, and risks and complications of caudal epidural catheters in neonates.
120                                 In neonates, epidural catheters inserted at the sacral hiatus can eas
121                                              Epidural catheters may directly prevent deep venous thro
122 edures and the use of electrical guidance of epidural catheters, the 'Tsui' technique, are reviewed.
123 loped to accurately identify the position of epidural catheters.
124                                              Epidural cervical haemorrhage and focal axonal damage to
125 rent methods for blood vessel cannulation or epidural, chest tube, and initial trocar placement often
126 ther brain stimulation techniques, including epidural cortical stimulation and noninvasive brain stim
127 wed a significant, although small, effect of epidural corticosteroid injections compared with placebo
128                                              Epidural corticosteroid injections for radiculopathy wer
129       30 placebo-controlled trials evaluated epidural corticosteroid injections for radiculopathy, an
130 iews provide inconsistent recommendations on epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica.
131               There were no clear effects of epidural corticosteroid injections for spinal stenosis (
132                                       Use of epidural corticosteroid injections is increasing.
133         The available evidence suggests that epidural corticosteroid injections offer only short-term
134                           For radiculopathy, epidural corticosteroids were associated with greater im
135 nges into the cortical tissue underlying the epidural cup in all rats.
136 s were chronically implanted with a modified epidural cup over the right frontal cortex, with microel
137 zed to the neocortical region underlying the epidural cup.
138 e implanted with bilateral parietal cortical epidural cups filled with 50 mM NMDA on the right side a
139                Four rats were implanted with epidural cups over the parietal cortices.
140 ocalized to the cortical area underneath the epidural delivery site and were absent in the cerebral c
141 dvent of new epidural adjuvant drugs and new epidural delivery systems, we are now able to use very l
142             Seventeen patients had malignant epidural disease.
143           Fifteen patients had nonneoplastic epidural disease: Six patients had hematomas, and nine h
144 bsequently, all subjects were implanted with epidural EEG electrodes over frontal (FC) and parietal c
145                                              Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) of lumbosacral seg
146                                We found that epidural electrical stimulation of the dorsal columns in
147          Recently, it was shown in rats that epidural electrical stimulation of the lumbar spinal cor
148  we interface leg motor cortex activity with epidural electrical stimulation protocols to establish a
149 proaches, including vagus nerve stimulation, epidural electrical stimulation, and deep brain stimulat
150                                 Simultaneous epidural-electrocorticography and scalp-electroencephalo
151                                    We placed epidural electrodes over motor cortex and the dorsal cer
152 rance and expectoration of secretions, three epidural electrodes were applied in the T9, T11, and L1
153 cess, pyothorax, paravertebral abscesses and epidural empyemas, abscess between adjacent vertebral bo
154  We developed a new method for multi-channel epidural ERP characterization in behaving mice with high
155 re the stepping-like movements generated via epidural (ES) and/or intraspinal (IS) stimulation.
156 , an overall increase in the total number of epidurals (especially extended use) being performed, or
157                                  We recorded epidural evoked potentials from awake rats in response t
158                                  We recorded epidural field potentials with chronically implanted ele
159  attempts to map the journey of the 'walking epidural' from its earliest form to its more recognizabl
160                The median time from the last epidural glucocorticoid injection to symptom onset was 1
161                                           An epidural glucocorticoid injection was identified as a po
162 ple procedures, and translaminar approach to epidural glucocorticoid injection.
163                                              Epidural glucocorticoid injections are widely used to tr
164 estrogen and progesterone receptor and human epidural growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status; and axi
165 ught to have been associated with ambulatory epidurals, have however been more difficult to prove.
166 ll fracture (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 3.7-11.4), and epidural hematoma (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.8-6.2).
167 midline shift, depressed skull fracture, and epidural hematoma are key risk factors for needing inten
168 ed are those of recent interest, and include epidural hematoma in association with anticoagulant ther
169                                              Epidural hematoma occurred in 10% of HI (3% of all TP),
170 ired a second surgery (screw malposition and epidural hematoma).
171 ntracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, sub/epidural hematoma, or cerebral thrombophlebitis was iden
172 decreased complications, including spinal or epidural hematoma, urinary retention, or hemodynamic alt
173 he risk of hemorrhagic complications such as epidural hematoma.
174  epidural without the risk of hypotension or epidural hematoma.
175 resthesias (<10%) to potentially devastating epidural hematomas (0.0006%).
176 ion system composed of a spatially selective epidural implant and a pulse generator with real-time tr
177                  Recent studies suggest that epidural infection is no longer as rare a complication a
178 nsitivity included presence of paraspinal or epidural inflammation (n = 43, 97.7% sensitivity), disk
179 ted MR images, and presence of paraspinal or epidural inflammation were evaluated.
180                                              Epidural injectate flow is highly variable, both among p
181  In the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis, epidural injection of glucocorticoids plus lidocaine off
182 al or no short-term benefit as compared with epidural injection of lidocaine alone.
183 rative and labor patients) consisting of the epidural injection of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor
184 ted with nerve root block; two, with central epidural injection; and one, with overnight intravenous
185 rformed foraminal nerve blocks and foraminal epidural injections in the thoracic spine from June 27,
186 diagnosis of fungal meningitis attributed to epidural injections of contaminated methylprednisolone.
187 to-severe leg pain and disability to receive epidural injections of glucocorticoids plus lidocaine or
188                                            2 epidural injections of steroids, etanercept, or saline,
189 needles in which no dural puncture was done (epidural injections) or without a conventional needle co
190               Early preoperative assessment, epidural insertion, and replacement for failed regional
191  images of the study group patients involved epidural intra-canal spinal pathological masses causing
192  no epidural involvement; second group, mild epidural involvement without contact with spinal cord or
193 al level involvement, paraspinal solid mass, epidural involvement, lateral border cortical destructio
194 nts with malignant compression fractures and epidural involvement.
195                           First group had no epidural involvement; second group, mild epidural involv
196                                     Thoracic epidural is often recommended; however, its role is incr
197                 It is likely that the use of epidural ketamine or clonidine as adjuncts to local anae
198  added to a fentanyl-bupivacaine mixture for epidural labor analgesia, it seems to provide satisfacto
199 r selected patients with a single high-grade epidural lesion caused by a radioresistant tumor who als
200                                              Epidural lipomas causing cord compression is documented
201                                              Epidurals may be associated with superior pain control b
202                       In this study, chronic epidural micro-electrocorticographic recordings were per
203 s light general anesthesia and postoperative epidural morphine (group 2).
204 the ACh involved in the analgesic effects of epidural neostigmine and could be more specifically targ
205                                              Epidural neurophysiological responses to frequency and d
206                                          The epidural NMDA exposure caused neuronal loss that in most
207 esia, including intravenous, intrathecal and epidural ones, as well as the addition of clonidine for
208 eri-spinal tissues following intrathecal and epidural opioid administration.
209 eened, MRI was abnormal in 36 (21%), showing epidural or paraspinal abscess or phlegmon, arachnoiditi
210 cribe an outbreak of fungal meningitis after epidural or paraspinal glucocorticoid injection with met
211 em that occurred among patients who received epidural or paraspinal glucocorticoid injections of pres
212 is, or epidural abscess that developed after epidural or paraspinal glucocorticoid injections.
213 including regional analgesia with continuous epidural or peripheral nerve block infusions, judicious
214                   The safety and efficacy of epidural or spinal anesthesia for spinal surgery continu
215               Fatal meningitis and localized epidural, paraspinal, and peripheral joint infections oc
216 omyelitis or diskitis, or moderate to severe epidural, paraspinal, or intradural enhancement.
217 nd other infections in patients who received epidural, paraspinal, or joint injections with contamina
218 algesia with parenteral opioids (group 1) or epidural plus light general anesthesia and postoperative
219  and vertebral osteomyelitis with associated epidural/psoas/iliacus abscesses) were characterized, us
220  signatures of selective visual attention in epidural recordings as a fast, reliable, and high-perfor
221 e most direct evidence available from spinal epidural recordings of the descending corticospinal voll
222  increased our understanding of the cause of epidural-related fever and brought additional supportive
223 de in the last 18 months around the topic of epidural-related fever, but major gaps in knowledge pers
224  examine the latest research on the topic of epidural-related maternal fever, with special focus on t
225 scopic colorectal resections, the benefit of epidurals remains debated.
226 hood for initial failed epidural, subsequent epidural replacement, inadvertent dural puncture, and ce
227  with the regional selectivity of the lumbar epidural route, the front paws showed no more effect tha
228                                              Epidurals seem to slow down recovery after laparoscopic
229 ent age, intracranial hemorrhage (other than epidural), skull fracture, and higher head/neck injury s
230      The spread of radiopaque dye within the epidural space (which may mimic that of local anaestheti
231 urs when cancer metastasises to the spine or epidural space and causes secondary compression of the s
232 natomical information, especially concerning epidural space and spinal cord.
233 n different anatomic locations including the epidural space in the spinal cord causing cord compressi
234  on the neural tissues after ablation in the epidural space of the porcine spine.
235 but showed no evidence of extension into the epidural space or spinal cord compromise.
236               Flow within only the posterior epidural space was associated with unilateral flow (P=.0
237       Sixteen CT-guided IRE ablations in the epidural space were performed by using 667 V in four ani
238 ed in the right lateral recess of the spinal epidural space, 20 IRE ablations were performed with com
239  measurements of opioid concentration in the epidural space, intrathecal space, spinal cord and peri-
240 ng factor for the use of IRE ablation in the epidural space.
241 odes implanted chronically into the cervical epidural space.
242 nsert into the narrow confines of the spinal epidural space.
243  by inflating a 4.0F Fogarty catheter in the epidural space.
244                                   Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) occurs when can
245 and chemotherapy in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), the impact of
246        A significantly less invasive method--epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS)--has been suggest
247                   We hypothesised that tonic epidural spinal cord stimulation can modulate spinal cir
248  acute ischemic strokes and had a history of epidural spinal injections of methylprednisolone for low
249 ved from 19 case patients with meningitis or epidural/spinal abscesses, 6 isolates from contaminated
250                                              Epidural steroid and facet joint injections had the high
251 they are potential candidates for surgery or epidural steroid injection (for suspected radiculopathy)
252 th interventional pain treatments, including epidural steroid injection, facet blocks and radiofreque
253  facet and/or perifacet joint injection, and epidural steroid injection.
254                                              Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are the most commonly
255 se translation BACKGROUND: Administration of epidural steroid injections (ESIs) with contaminated met
256                               Transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) are associated with
257 valuate flow patterns of interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injections and compare these patterns t
258 erated intense interest as an alternative to epidural steroid injections for lumbosacral radiculopath
259 oroscopic images from 701 consecutive lumbar epidural steroid injections in 485 patients were reviewe
260                                              Epidural steroid injections may provide modest short-ter
261                       Images from 406 lumbar epidural steroid injections, one per patient (214 women,
262                   More patients treated with epidural steroids (75%) reported 50% or greater leg pain
263                      The group that received epidural steroids had greater reductions in the primary
264  for lumbar radicular pain has long included epidural steroids to inhibit the inflammatory component
265 a complete spinal cord transection (T9), and epidural stimulation (ES) electrodes were secured to the
266 as demonstrated that lumbosacral spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) and activity-based training
267 egained voluntary movement after 7 months of epidural stimulation and stand training.
268                The long-latency responses to epidural stimulation are correlated with the recovery of
269  hindlimb EMG activity evoked in response to epidural stimulation at the S1 spinal cord segment in co
270 s tested under the facilitating influence of epidural stimulation at the S1 spinal segment, or epidur
271      These data demonstrate that spinal cord epidural stimulation can facilitate locomotion in a time
272 r cortex were robustly augmented with spinal epidural stimulation delivered at an intensity below the
273                                              Epidural stimulation enabled the man to achieve full wei
274 individuals voluntary movement occurred with epidural stimulation immediately after implant even in t
275 a suggest that facilitation of stepping with epidural stimulation is mediated primarily through ipsil
276                  Task-specific training with epidural stimulation might reactivate previously silent
277 Recent studies in animals showed that direct epidural stimulation of the primary motor cortex surroun
278 motor region, MLR) with locomotion evoked by epidural stimulation of the spinal cord (SC).
279 ral stimulation at the S1 spinal segment, or epidural stimulation plus quipazine, a 5-HT agonist.
280 ing motor cortex stimulation and spinal cord epidural stimulation produced large augmentation in moto
281 ted side predominantly mediate the effect of epidural stimulation to facilitate stepping?
282 at neuromodulating the spinal circuitry with epidural stimulation, enables completely paralysed indiv
283 ntrol of some leg movements, but only during epidural stimulation.
284 to 7 weeks after surgery when facilitated by epidural stimulation.
285  EMG bursts during locomotion facilitated by epidural stimulation.
286 nscranial magnetic stimulation and implanted epidural stimulation.
287 s an increased likelihood for initial failed epidural, subsequent epidural replacement, inadvertent d
288  were comparable to those of recordings from epidural surface arrays.
289 ince the introduction of the combined spinal-epidural technique in the early 1980s it has gained incr
290 of local anesthetics using a combined spinal-epidural technique.
291  epidurals than with other more conventional epidural techniques, the other positive effects, such as
292 tisfaction scores are higher with ambulatory epidurals than with other more conventional epidural tec
293 ivery is necessary, has made combined spinal-epidural the labor analgesic of choice in many obstetric
294      Inclusion criteria were a comparison of epidural therapy vs parenteral opioids for postoperative
295  and cerebral venous blood flow, that is, in epidural veins at cervical level 3, uniquely demonstrate
296                                              Epidural volume extension enhances the spread of local a
297                  Since the earliest 'walking epidural' was described in the early 1990s, there has be
298                                              Epidurals were more likely to be used in large teaching
299     All randomized clinical trials comparing epidurals with an alternative analgesic technique follow
300 roots provides similar analgesia to thoracic epidural without the risk of hypotension or epidural hem

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top