ライフサイエンスコーパス: epidural analgesia

1 agents, early ambulation, and fixed regimen epidural analgesia.

2 eturn of bowel motility, and weaning regimen epidural analgesia.

3 in terms of the risks and benefits of labor epidural analgesia.

4 sources for studies related to postoperative epidural analgesia.

5 incidence of dystocia than continuous lumbar epidural analgesia.

6 ral analgesia or a combination of spinal and epidural analgesia.

7 dpoint, the risk of death was decreased with epidural analgesia (3.1% vs 4.9%; odds ratio, 0.60; 95%

8 RCT), epidural anesthesia (2 meta-analyses), epidural analgesia (6 RCTs, 1 meta-analysis), and laparo

9 time were the increased postoperative use of epidural analgesia and bronchoscopy (for clearance of pu

10 This study compares the effect of epidural analgesia and PCA on pain relief, pulmonary fun

11 While epidural analgesia appears to be safe, it comes with hig

12 maximal inspiratory force were improved with epidural analgesia by day 3.

13 multimodal approach and the use of thoracic epidural analgesia can contribute to facilitate the fast

14 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Maternal fever following epidural analgesia complicates up to one-third of nullip

15 Epidural analgesia did not affect the incidence of respi

16 ears to be an association between the use of epidural analgesia during labor and an increased risk of

17 Importance: Epidural analgesia (EA) is used as an adjunct procedure

18 ration, followed by aggressive postoperative epidural analgesia for all patients.

19 c colorectal cases performed with or without epidural analgesia for cancer, diverticular disease, and

20 The incorporation of thoracic epidural analgesia, goal-directed fluid management thera

21 icantly more women receiving combined spinal-epidural analgesia had pruritus (P<0.001) and requested

22 Epidural anesthesia and epidural analgesia improve the overall outcome and short

23 Nonrandomized studies suggest that thoracic epidural analgesia improves outcome.

24 The use of epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery ha

25 The perioperative use of epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is

26 ced catheters in neonates, study the role of epidural analgesia in outcome improvement for neonates,

27 ts have been obtained regarding the value of epidural analgesia in preventing postoperative pulmonary

28 Epidural analgesia initiated early in labor (when the ce

29 Whether epidural analgesia is a better method than parenteral op

30 Recent studies report that epidural analgesia is associated with a lower catecholam

31 ral analgesia, the combination of spinal and epidural analgesia is not associated with an overall dec

32 Although thoracic epidural analgesia is still considered a 'gold standard'

33 These results demonstrate that epidural analgesia is superior to PCA in providing analg

34 ent-controlled analgesia group compared with epidural analgesia (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.10-3.53;

35 significantly reduced in patients receiving epidural analgesia on days 2 and 3.

36 preoperative malnutrition and postoperative epidural analgesia on outcomes has also been explored fu

37 nalgesia to receive either continuous lumbar epidural analgesia or a combination of spinal and epidur

38 ury were prospectively randomized to receive epidural analgesia or PCA during an 18-month period.

39 nger stay was associated with intraoperative epidural analgesia (OR = 1.07, P = 0.019).

40 f surgery and pain assessments, all forms of epidural analgesia provided significantly better postope

41 Overall, epidural analgesia provides better postoperative pain re

42 urgery under general anesthesia, concomitant epidural analgesia reduces postoperative mortality and i

43 Epidural analgesia, regardless of analgesic agent, locat

44 Epidural analgesia significantly decreased the risk of a

45 ve postoperative pain management, preemptive epidural analgesia significantly decreases postoperative

46 Epidural analgesia significantly reduced pain with chest

47 The authors have previously shown that epidural analgesia significantly reduces the pain associ

48 Among the women who received combined spinal-epidural analgesia, some were discouraged from walking a

49 his randomized trial was to compare thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) to intravenous patient-controll

50 As compared with continuous lumbar epidural analgesia, the combination of spinal and epidur

51 It remains controversial whether adding epidural analgesia to general anesthesia decreases posto

52 n in spontaneous labor at term who requested epidural analgesia to receive either continuous lumbar e

53 he majority of evidence favors an ability of epidural analgesia to reduce postoperative cardiovascula

54 Similar results were found when epidural analgesia using levobupivacaine with clonidine

55 001 for all), with the exception of thoracic epidural analgesia vs opioids for rest pain after thorac

56 On case-matched analysis, epidural analgesia was associated with a longer hospital

57 Following qualitative assessment, epidural analgesia was associated with faster return of

58 Epidural analgesia was associated with significantly red

59 When analyzed by postoperative day, epidural analgesia was better than parenteral opioids on

60 Epidural analgesia was initiated in the intrathecal grou

61 Epidural analgesia was used in 4102 cases (2.14%).

62 of 125 trials (9044 patients, 4525 received epidural analgesia) were eligible.

63 To describe the recent advances in labor epidural analgesia, which may have an impact on maternal

64 e tested the hypothesis that combined spinal-epidural analgesia, which permits ambulation during labo

65 s and there is also consistent evidence that epidural analgesia with local anesthetics is associated

66 luded randomized controlled trials comparing epidural analgesia (with local anesthetics, lasting for

67 cause they allow the neonate to benefit from epidural analgesia without the concerns of spinal cord i